International Journal of Inflammation, Cancer and Integrative Therapy
Open Access

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most formidable challenges in oncology due to its late-stage diagnosis and poor prognosis. With a five-year survival rate of less than 10%, early detection and effective treatment are critical but often elusive goals. Biomarkers, which are biological molecules indicative of the presence or progression of a disease, are at the forefront of research efforts aimed at improving outcomes for pancreatic cancer patients. This article delves deeper into the current biomarkers used in pancreatic cancer, emerging technologies, and future directions in biomarker discovery and application [1].

Current biomarkers in pancreatic cancer

CA 19-9 (Carbohydrate antigen 19-9): CA 19-9 is the most established biomarker for pancreatic cancer. It is a sialylated Lewis(a) antigen that is elevated in 70-80% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Despite its widespread use, CA 19-9 has limitations. It is not specific to pancreatic cancer, as elevated levels can also be observed in benign conditions like pancreatitis and cholestasis, as well as in other malignancies such as colorectal and gastric cancers. Nevertheless, CA 19-9 remains a valuable tool for monitoring disease progression and response to therapy rather than for early diagnosis [2].

CEA (Carcinoembryonic antigen): CEA is another biomarker utilized in pancreatic cancer, albeit with less frequency and specificity than CA 19-9. Elevated CEA levels can be indicative of a variety of malignancies, including colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and others, as well as non-malignant conditions such as smoking and inflammatory diseases. In pancreatic cancer, CEA may be used in conjunction with CA 19-9 to enhance diagnostic accuracy, particularly in cases where CA 19-9 is not elevated.

KRAS mutations: Mutations in the KRAS gene occur in over 90% of PDAC cases. These mutations can be detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) extracted from blood samples. The presence of KRAS mutations in ctDNA is a promising approach for non-invasive early detection, as well as for monitoring treatment response and disease recurrence [3]. However, the sensitivity of ctDNA assays needs to be improved to detect low levels of mutant DNA, especially in early-stage disease.

MicroRNAs: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNAs that play critical roles in gene regulation. Several miRNAs, such as miR-21, miR-155, and miR-196a, have been found to be upregulated in pancreatic cancer. These miRNAs can be detected in blood, making them potential non-invasive biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis. For example, elevated levels of miR-21 are associated with poor prognosis and resistance to chemotherapy.

Emerging biomarkers and future directions

Liquid biopsies: Liquid biopsies, which analyze ctDNA, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and exosomes from blood samples, represent a significant advancement in non-invasive cancer diagnostics. In pancreatic cancer, liquid biopsies can provide real-time insights into tumor dynamics, genetic mutations, and resistance mechanisms. This technology holds promise for early detection, monitoring of minimal residual disease, and guiding personalized treatment strategies. Current research is focused on improving the sensitivity and specificity of liquid biopsy assays to enhance their clinical utility [4].

Proteomics and metabolomics: Proteomics and metabolomics involve the large-scale study of proteins and metabolites, respectively. Advances in these fields are uncovering new biomarkers by analyzing the protein and metabolite profiles in patient samples. Techniques such as mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy are being used to identify unique patterns associated with pancreatic cancer. These biomarkers can potentially aid in early detection, predict treatment response, and identify novel therapeutic targets.

Tumor microenvironment markers: The tumor microenvironment (TME) comprises a complex network of cells, including immune cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells, as well as extracellular matrix components. The TME plays a critical role in cancer progression and resistance to therapy. Biomarkers derived from the TME, such as immune cell infiltration profiles, stromal markers, and secreted factors, are being studied to better understand their role in pancreatic cancer and to identify novel therapeutic targets. For instance, the presence of certain immune cell populations, like tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), has been associated with poor prognosis and resistance to immunotherapy [5].

Genetic and epigenetic markers: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the identification of genetic and epigenetic alterations in pancreatic cancer. These alterations include gene mutations, copy number variations, and DNA methylation changes [6]. For example, mutations in genes such as TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4, in addition to KRAS, are common in pancreatic cancer and have prognostic and therapeutic implications. Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation patterns, are also being explored as biomarkers for early detection and treatment stratification.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are transforming biomarker discovery and validation. By analyzing large datasets from genomic, proteomic, and clinical sources, AI and ML can identify complex biomarker signatures with high accuracy. These technologies can integrate various types of data to develop predictive models for early detection, prognosis, and treatment response. For example, AI algorithms can analyze imaging data along with molecular and clinical data to improve diagnostic accuracy and predict patient outcomes [7].

Conclusion

The quest for effective biomarkers in pancreatic cancer is a dynamic and ongoing effort driven by the urgent need for early detection, better prognostication, and improved treatment outcomes. While current biomarkers like CA 19-9 and KRAS mutations have provided valuable insights, the future lies in integrating emerging technologies such as liquid biopsies, proteomics, and AI-driven analyses. These advancements hold the promise of ushering in a new era of precision medicine, where early detection and tailored therapies can significantly improve survival rates and quality of life for pancreatic cancer patients. Continued research and collaboration across disciplines will be essential to realize the full potential of these innovations and to overcome the formidable challenges posed by pancreatic cancer.

Acknowledgment

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Waluga M, Kukla M, Zorniak M, Bacik A, Kotulski R. et al. (2015) From the stomach to other organs Helicobacter pylori and the liver. World J Hepatol 7: 2136-2146.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Avenaud  P, Marais A, Monteiro L, Le Bail B, Bioulac Sage P, et al.(2000) Detection of Helicobacter species in the liver of patients with and without primary liver carcinoma. Cancer 89: 1431-1439.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Nilsson I, Lindgren S, Eriksson S, Wadstrom T (2000) Serum antibodies to Helicobacter hepaticus and Helicobacter pylori in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut 46: 410-414.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Lee JW, Lee DH, Lee JI, Jeong S, Kwon KS, et al. (2010) Identification of Helicobacter pylori in Gallstone Bile and Other Hepatobiliary Tissues of Patients with Cholecystitis. Gut Liver 4: 60-67.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Chen DF, Hu L, Yi P, Liu WW, Fang DC, et al. (2007) H pylori exist in the gallbladder mucosa of patients with chronic cholecystitis. World J Gastroenterol 13: 1608-1611.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Jahantab MB, Safaripour AA, Hassanzadeh S, Yavari Barhaghtalab MJ (2021) Demographic Chemical and Helicobacter pylori Positivity Assessment in Different Types of Gallstones and the Bile in a Random Sample of Cholecystectomied Iranian Patients with Cholelithiasis. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 9: 3351-3352.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Izadi M, Fazel M, Sharubandi SH, Saadat SH, Farahani MM, et al. (2012) Helicobacter species in the atherosclerotic plaques of patients with coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Pathol 21: 307-311.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref