Cellular and Molecular Biology
Open Access

Organoids; Cell replacement therapies; Physiological significance; Biomedical potential

Introduction

During the development of vertebrates, the kidney and pancreas are solid tissues that emerge from the endoderm. The pancreas and kidney both control metabolism throughout the body. The pancreas is primarily in charge of maintaining glucose homeostasis, while the kidney is in charge of detoxification and the production of urea. The two organs additionally discharge compounds or solubilising factors into the digestive tract to support assimilation, through the normal hepatopancreatic conduit, framed by the joining of the normal bile pipe and the pancreatic channel [1]. Notwithstanding similitudes in capability and morphology in adulthood, the kidney and the pancreas share a typical formative history, set of early morphological designing occasions and early record factors. The adult pancreas is generally considered to have a much lower regenerative capacity than the liver, which is one of the most significant differences between these organs despite the many shared characteristics. Damage to either tissue can lead to extremely debilitating diseases, which is not surprising given their crucial role in organism physiology [2]. Although the kidney is well-known for its remarkable capacity for regeneration, cirrhosis and impairment of kidney function can result from repeated tissue damage. Diabetes mellitus and the inability to regulate blood glucose levels occur when insulin-secreting cells in the pancreas are destroyed or lose function. Inflammation-related illnesses like hepatitis or pancreatitis raise the risk of cancer in both organs, and the global incidence of both hepatic and pancreatic cancer is rapidly rising [3]. As a result, the basic and biomedical communities are both interested in the topic of stem cell biology and regeneration in the adult kidney and pancreas. However, because primary cultures of both tissues lack in vitro expansion potential, it has been challenging to investigate these using in vitro methods.

To study the kidney and pancreas' stem cell biology, we and others have recently turned to 3D cell culture systems. The designs produced in such culture frameworks have been named "organoids". As previously stated, an organoids is a three-dimensional structure formed by cells spontaneously self-organizing into structures that resemble in vivo tissue in terms of cellular composition and function and is derived from pluripotent stem cells, neonatal tissue stem cells, or adult-derived stem/progenitor cells [4, 5]. The origins and characteristics of AdSCderived kidney and pancreas organoids cultures as currently described will be the subject of this review. Each organ's in vivo biology and the role that 3D in vitro culture has played in revealing AdSC biology's mechanisms will be examined separately. In addition, we will discuss the physiological significance of AdSC culture systems and the role that developmental biology has played in AdSC biology research. In conclusion, we will discuss the biomedical applications of adult kidney and pancreas organoids cultures in disease modelling and regenerative medicine.

The primary genealogy isolation occasions happen from the getgo in pancreas advancement when the pancreatic bud goes through partition into tip and trunk cells, with tip cells being distinguished through articulation of Cpa1. Tip cells will develop into acinar cells as the epithelium grows, while trunk cells will develop into the duct and endocrine lineages [6]. During pancreatic development, trunk cells that express the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor Neurogenin3 will delaminate from the forming ductal tree and migrate to form islets. This suggests that Neurog3 expression is a crucial determinant of endocrine fate. It would appear that the islets themselves mature and expand primarily after birth, when the pancreas' lineages are highly segregated [7]. In point of fact, the adult pancreas' homeostatic maintenance appears to be highly compartmentalized, with the majority of reports demonstrating self-duplication of the acinar and ductal compartments and self-duplication of cells within the islets. Under homeostatic circumstances, interconversion between cell types in the sound grown-up pancreas would seem, by all accounts, to be exceptionally low, while possibly not totally missing, and such isolated homeostatic turnover is profoundly practically identical to homeostasis in the grown-up liver. It has also been reported that this compartmentalization is maintained during regeneration and damage, with the specific ablation of cells leading to an increase in the rate of replication in the remaining cells [8]. It's tempting to think that the pancreas has less capacity for regeneration than the kidney because of its strict compartmentalization. The skin, on the other hand, has been well documented to compartmentalize proliferative niches. Despite this, the skin has full regenerative capacity thanks to transient cellular plasticity, which enables stem cells from one compartment to assist in the repair of other compartments during damage. The organ is capable of full functional recovery following certain types of damage, such as partial duct ligation, and estimates suggest that as much as 90% of cell mass must be lost before clinical signs of diabetes become apparent [9]. It is also worth placing the regenerative capacity of the pancreas into context. It is surely evident however that the pancreas isn't equipped for the quick recovery displayed by the kidney to many physical and poisonous abuses.

A search for alternative regenerative mechanisms or cell sources that could produce new, functional cells has been prompted by the pancreas' relatively low regenerative capacity and the rise in the incidence of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The existence of a facultative, multipotent AdSC population in the pancreas has become an even more contentious issue than in the kidney due to the absence of a morphologically distinct cell population during pancreatic regeneration. Interco version between cell types appears to be possible under certain types of damage, but it is extremely inefficient [10]. Studies into pliancy in the harmed pancreas have been to a great extent informed by occasions during pancreatic turn of events, especially the nearby relationship between the ductal and endocrine heredities that has driven many gatherings to examine whether the developed ductal tree has any limit with respect to endocrine cell creation upon harm in the grown-up. In damaged ducts, reactivation of Neurog3 expression and the development of novel islets in close proximity to the ducts have been reported by several groups. The declaration of Neurog3 in conduits would propose a dedifferentiation occasion or the reacquisition of formative potential [11]. Despite the acquisition of Neurog3 expression in some ductal cells, the cell of origin for these new endocrine clusters, it is currently unknown how mature the newly formed endocrine cells are. Centroacinar cells, ductal cells at the acinar termini with elongated cytoplasmic projections, have been shown to be a cell of origin for the production of new endocrine cells in zebra fish. However, it is unclear whether mammalian Centroacinar cells have the same capacity to form endocrine cells during damage, and the zebrafish pancreas' vastly increased capacity to regenerate suggests that zebrafish mechanisms may not be present in mammals [12]. Other researchers have attempted to direct the trans differentiation of other types of cells into cells rather than relying on endogenous mechanisms for the generation of new islets. It is abundantly clear that cells, duct cells, and even acinar cells can interconvert to cells in vivo when certain transcription factors are overexpressed. However, despite being instructive regarding the underlying molecular circuitry of pancreatic plasticity and tissue compartmentalization, it is uncertain whether these methods will ultimately be of biomedical use.

Organoids cultures make it possible to grow adult pancreatic and kidney tissue, something that was not possible with more conventional 2D culture techniques. In vitro studies of these tissues' self-renewal and differentiation properties have been made possible by the establishment of these systems. We can think of adult-derived organoids as in vitro platforms for modelling kidney and pancreas regeneration in terms of progenitor activation, proliferation, and differentiation, similar to the use of in vitro hepatoblast and embryonic pancreas explant cultures for investigating the characteristics of these stem cells [13]. The fact that stem cell-like behavior in vitro can result from removing cells from their natural environment and placing them in conditions that promote and maintain non-physiological cell states is one limitation to this application. However, we would like to point out that, first of all, not all cells can form organoids in vitro, indicating lineagespecific competence in reverting to an uncommitted progenitor state. Second, when looking for markers of the AdSC state, the promotion or maintenance of rare states in vivo might be very useful [14, 15]. This is especially true when looking at primary pancreatic tissue, where the function of an in vivo AdSC state is highly contentious. In addition, organoids cultures are ideal for studying stem cell-niche interactions in a three-dimensional environment, which is still a relatively unexplored area for diseases like type 2 diabetes and hepatic and pancreatic cancer.

Conclusion

3D organoids cultures have the potential to be of significant biomedical use in addition to their function in the study of stem cell biology. Adult-derived kidney and pancreas organoids could be used as a source of cells for assays that require primary cells due to their capacity for differentiation, genomic stability, and rapid expansion potential. Organoids culture's expansion potential will soon be used to produce high-throughput assays for both normal and patientderived organoids that are physiologically relevant. As with colorectal cancer, these assays could be used in individualized medicine. In the long run, we anticipate that the advantages of adult-derived organoids technology as a genetically stable, non-tumourigenic source material capable of producing differentiated cell types will be combined with those of a physiologically relevant 3D culture system in defining factors controlling cell fate decisions, resulting in significant advancements in the fields of cell therapy and regenerative medicine. Overall, we anticipate that adult kidney and pancreas organoids will serve as a useful, accessible, and physiologically relevant 3D in vitro model system for biomedical research.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest declared.

Acknowledgement

None

1. Wei J, Goldberg MB, Burland V, Venkatesan MM, Deng W, et al. (2003) Complete genome sequence and comparative genomics of Shigella flexneri serotype 2a strain 2457T. Infect Immun 71: 2775-2786.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Kuo CY, Su LH, Perera J, Carlos C, Tan BH, et al. (2008) Antimicrobial susceptibility of Shigella isolates in eight Asian countries, 2001-2004. J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 41: 107-11.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

3. Gupta A, Polyak CS, Bishop RD, Sobel J, Mintz ED (2004) Laboratory-confirmed shigellosis in the United States, 1989- 2002: Epidemiologic trends and patterns. Clin Infect Dis 38: 1372-1377.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Murugesan P, Revathi K, Elayaraja S, Vijayalakshmi S, Balasubramanian T (2012) Distribution of enteric bacteria in the sediments of Parangipettai and Cuddalore coast of India. J Environ Biol 33: 705-11.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

5. Torres AG (2004) Current aspects of Shigella pathogenesis. Rev Latinoam Microbiol 46: 89-97.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

6. Varghese S, Aggarwal A (2011) Extended spectrum beta-lactamase production in Shigella isolates-A matter of concern. Indian J Med Microbiol 29: 76.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

7. Peirano G, Agersø Y, Aarestrup FM, Dos Prazeres Rodrigues D (2005) Occurrence of integrons and resistance genes among sulphonamide-resistant Shigella spp. from Brazil. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 301–305.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

8. Kang HY, Jeong YS, Oh JY, Tae SH, Choi CH, et al. (2005) Characterization of antimicrobial resistance and class 1 integrons found in Escherichia coli isolates from humans and animals in Korea. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 639-644.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

9. Pan J-C, Ye R, Meng D-M, Zhang W, Wang H-Q, et al. (2006) Molecular characteristics of class 1 and class 2 integrons and their relationships to antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 288–296.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

10. The HC, Thanh DP, Holt KE, Thomson NR, Baker S (2016) The genomic signatures of Shigella evolution, adaptation and geographical spread. Nat Rev Microbiol 14: 235.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

11. Bhattacharya D, Bhattacharya H, Thamizhmani R, Sayi DS, Reesu R, et al. (2014) Shigellosis in Bay of Bengal Islands, India: Clinical and seasonal patterns, surveillance of antibiotic susceptibility patterns, and molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant Shigella strains isolated during a 6-year period from 2006 to 2011. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 33: 157-170.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

12. Bachand N, Ravel A, Onanga R, Arsenault J, Gonzalez JP (2012) Public health significance of zoonotic bacterial pathogens from bushmeat sold in urban markets of Gabon, Central Africa. J Wildl Dis 48: 785-789.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

13. Saeed A, Abd H, Edvinsson B, Sandström G (2009) Acanthamoeba castellanii an environmental host for Shigella dysenteriae and Shigella sonnei. Arch Microbiol 191: 83-88.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

14. Iwamoto M, Ayers T, Mahon BE, Swerdlow DL (2010) Epidemiology of seafood-associated infections in the United States. Clin Microbiol Rev 23: 399-411.

Google Scholar Crossref, Indexed at

15. Von-Seidlein L, Kim DR, Ali M, Lee HH, Wang X, et al. (2006) A multicentre study of Shigella diarrhoea in six Asian countries: Disease burden, clinical manifestations, and microbiology. PLoS Med 3: e353.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at