Psychology and Psychiatry: Open access
Open Access

Operational Psychology; Competency Development; High-Stakes Environments; Military Psychology; Law Enforcement; Intelligence Operations; Situational Awareness; Decision-Making

Introduction

Operational psychology, a specialized area within psychology, focuses on applying psychological principles to high-stakes environments such as military operations, law enforcement, and intelligence work. In these settings, psychologists are required to perform under extreme pressure, often making decisions that have immediate and far-reaching consequences [1]. Despite the importance of operational psychology, there is a notable lack of standardized definitions and frameworks for the competencies necessary to excel in this field. Competency in operational psychology encompasses a broad range of skills, including situational awareness, rapid decision-making, stress management, and ethical judgment [2, 3]. However, the absence of clear guidelines and training programs tailored to these competencies can lead to variability in practice and outcomes. This paper addresses the gap by proposing a comprehensive framework for defining and developing the competencies essential for operational psychology [4]. The framework is informed by both theoretical perspectives and real-world applications, with the goal of enhancing the effectiveness and consistency of psychological support in high-stakes environments.

Materials and Methods

This study employed a mixed-methods approach to develop and validate the proposed framework for operational psychology competency. The research involved the following components:

Expert Interviews: Semi-structured interviews with experienced operational psychologists working in military, law enforcement, and intelligence settings [5].

Case Studies: In-depth analysis of real-world scenarios where operational psychology played a critical role. A draft framework based on the literature review and expert insights, which was refined through iterative feedback. Content analysis of expert interviews to identify key competencies and themes relevant to operational psychology. Examination of selected case studies to illustrate the application of identified competencies in real-world situations. Synthesis of findings into a coherent competency framework, followed by validation through expert feedback and comparison with existing models in related fields [6- 8].

Results

The study identified several core competencies essential for effective practice in operational psychology, including situational awareness, rapid decision-making, stress tolerance, and ethical judgment [9]. The qualitative analysis of expert interviews revealed a consensus on the importance of these competencies, while case studies provided practical examples of their application in high-stakes environments [10]. The proposed framework was refined based on expert feedback, resulting in a model that outlines specific behaviors and skills associated with each competency. The findings underscore the need for tailored training programs that focus on these competencies, with recommendations for integrating them into existing educational and professional development structures.

Conclusion

The framework developed in this study provides a structured approach to defining and developing competencies in operational psychology, addressing a critical gap in the field. By offering clear guidelines for training and assessment, the framework has the potential to standardize practices and improve the effectiveness of operational psychologists in high-stakes environments. The study highlights the importance of situational awareness, decision-making, stress management, and ethical considerations as core competencies, advocating for their inclusion in specialized training programs. Future research should focus on refining the framework and exploring its application across different operational contexts, ultimately contributing to the professionalization of operational psychology.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Ohan JL, Visser TA, Moss RG, Allen NB (2013) Parents’ stigmatizing attitudes toward psychiatric labels for ADHD and depression. Psychiatric Services 64: 1270-1273.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Al-Yagon M, Lachmi M, Danino M (2020) Manual-based personalized intervention for mothers of children with sld/adhd: Effects on maternal and family resources and children’s internalizing/externalizing behaviors. Journal of Attention Disorders 24: 720-736.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Motahhari ZS, Ahmadi K, Behzadpoor S, Azmoodeh F (2014) Effectiveness of mindfulness in marital burnout among mothers of ADHD children. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy 3: 591-613.

Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Efron D, Furley K, Gulenc A, Sciberras E (2018) Maternal ADHD symptoms, child ADHD symptoms and broader child outcomes. Archives of disease in childhood 103: 841-846.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Zoghipaydar MR, Ghaseni M, Bayat A, Kamal SS (2015) Comparing the Mental Health in Mothers of Children with and without Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Journal of Exceptional Education (J Except Educ) 8: 5-14.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Slagt M, Deković M, de Haan AD, Van Den Akker AL, Prinzie P, et al. (2012) Longitudinal associations between mothers' and fathers' sense of competence and children's externalizing problems: the mediating role of parenting. Developmental psychology 48: 1554.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Roostaei M, Abedi S, Khazaeli K (2016) The relationship between behavioral problems in 7 to 13 year old children with cerebral palsy and maternal depression: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences 11: 401-406.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Sciberras E, Efron D, Patel P, Mulraney M, Lee KJ, et al. (2019) Does the treatment of anxiety in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) using cognitive behavioral therapy improve child and family outcomes? Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC psychiatry 19: 1-9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Lau W, Chan CK, Li JC, Au TK (2010) Effectiveness of group cognitive-behavioral treatment for childhood anxiety in community clinics. Behaviour Research and Therapy 48: 1067-1077.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Carpenter AL, Pincus DB, Furr JM, Comer JS (2018) Working from home: An initial pilot examination of videoconferencing-based cognitive behavioral therapy for anxious youth delivered to the home setting. Behavior Therapy 49: 917-930.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref