Insights in Gynecologic Oncology
Open Access

Oophorectomy, the surgical removal of one or both ovaries, is a treatment option that may be considered in certain cases of endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). These two conditions, though distinct, can significantly impact a woman’s reproductive health, hormonal balance, and overall quality of life. As such, understanding the indications, risks, and implications of oophorectomy is essential for women facing these challenges.

Understanding endometriosis and pcos

Endometriosis is a condition in which tissue similar to the lining of the uterus grows outside of the uterus, leading to pain, irregular bleeding, and potential fertility issues. It affects approximately 10% of reproductive-aged women and can significantly impact their daily lives and reproductive choices.

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a hormonal disorder characterized by irregular menstrual cycles, excess androgen levels, and polycystic ovaries. PCOS affects around 6-12% of women of reproductive age and is associated with various metabolic and reproductive complications, including infertility [1].

While these conditions differ in their pathology and symptoms, they both can result in chronic pain, hormonal imbalances, and fertility challenges, prompting women to explore various treatment options, including oophorectomy.

Oophorectomy: when is it considered?

Oophorectomy may be considered in specific circumstances related to endometriosis and PCOS:

Oophorectomy for endometriosis

1. Severe or refractory endometriosis: In cases of severe endometriosis that do not respond to conservative treatments, such as hormonal therapies or pain management strategies, oophorectomy may be recommended. Removing the ovaries can help eliminate the source of estrogen production, which can exacerbate endometriosis symptoms.
2. Management of pain: Oophorectomy may be indicated for women with debilitating pelvic pain related to endometriosis, particularly if other treatments have failed to provide relief. By removing the ovaries and decreasing estrogen levels, some women experience significant pain reduction.
3. When fertility is not a priority: For women who do not plan to have children in the future or have completed their families, oophorectomy can be a viable option to manage severe endometriosis symptoms effectively.

Oophorectomy for pcos

1. Uncontrolled symptoms: In women with PCOS, especially those who have not responded to lifestyle changes or medication, oophorectomy may be considered as a last resort. This may be relevant for those experiencing significant metabolic issues or complications from the condition.
2. Risk of ovarian cancer: Although rare, women with long-standing PCOS have an increased risk of certain types of ovarian cancer [2-5]. In these cases, oophorectomy may be suggested to mitigate this risk.
3. Persistent ovarian cysts: Women with PCOS often develop multiple cysts on their ovaries. If these cysts become painful or lead to complications, surgical intervention may be necessary.

Evaluating treatment options: oophorectomy vs other approaches

Before opting for oophorectomy, it is essential to consider all treatment options available for endometriosis and PCOS:

For endometriosis:

1. Medications: Hormonal therapies, such as birth control pills, GnRH agonists, or progestins, can help manage pain and reduce the growth of endometrial tissue.
2. Laparoscopy: A minimally invasive surgical approach can be used to remove endometriotic lesions and adhesions, often preserving ovarian function.
3. Lifestyle modifications: Dietary changes, exercise, and stress management techniques can help improve symptoms for some women.

For PCOS:

1. Lifestyle changes: Weight loss, a balanced diet, and regular exercise can significantly improve symptoms and restore hormonal balance in many women with PCOS.
2. Medications: Medications such as metformin can help improve insulin sensitivity, while hormonal contraceptives can regulate menstrual cycles and manage symptoms.
3. Ovulation induction: For women wishing to conceive, medications to stimulate ovulation may be considered before resorting to surgical options.

Risks and considerations of oophorectomy

While oophorectomy can provide relief from endometriosis or PCOS symptoms, it is not without risks and potential complications:

1. Hormonal changes: Oophorectomy leads to a decrease in estrogen production, which can result in surgical menopause. Symptoms may include hot flashes, mood swings, and increased risk of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease [6-8].
2. Impact on fertility: For women who undergo a bilateral oophorectomy (removal of both ovaries), fertility is permanently eliminated. Women who still wish to conceive should explore other options, such as egg freezing, before surgery.
3. Surgical risks: As with any surgical procedure, there are inherent risks, including infection, bleeding, and complications related to anesthesia.

Making an informed decision

Deciding to undergo oophorectomy is a significant decision that requires careful consideration of the benefits and risks. Women should discuss their symptoms, treatment goals, and future fertility plans with a healthcare provider specializing in gynecologic oncology or reproductive health.

Additionally, obtaining a second opinion may provide further clarity and assurance about the best course of action. Support from mental health professionals and support groups can also help women navigate the emotional challenges associated with endometriosis, PCOS, and surgical decisions.

Conclusion

Oophorectomy can be a valuable option for managing severe endometriosis and PCOS in select cases. While it offers the potential for symptom relief, it is essential to weigh this against the risks and long-term implications, especially concerning hormonal changes and fertility. With a thorough understanding of treatment options and personalized care, women can make informed decisions that align with their health goals and life circumstances.

References

1. Emily Z, Brenda HYL, Georg MS (2020)Does parental presence affect workload during neonatal resuscitation  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 105: 559-561.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Nicolas JP, Daniele T, Clare L, Susanna MH, Francesco C, et al. (2018)Neonatal resuscitation using a laryngeal mask airway: a randomised trial in Uganda. Arch Dis Child 103: 255-260.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. McCormick MC (1985)The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. N Engl J Med 312: 82-90.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. RE Behrman, AS Butler (2007) Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes, Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

5. Harrison W, Goodman D (2015)Epidemiologic trends in neonatal intensive care, 2007-2012. JAMA Pediatr 169: 855-862.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Ramachandrappa A, L Jain L (2009)Health issues of the late preterm infant. Pediatr Clin North Am 56: 565-577.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Cristescu T, Behrman S, Jones SV, Chouliaras L, Ebmeier KP (2015)Be vigilant for perinatal mental health problems. Practitioner 259: 19-23.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

8. Weber M, Ayoubi JM, Picone O (2015)Nutrition of pregnant women: consequences for fetal growth and adult diseasesArchives de Pediatrie 22: 116-118.

Google Scholar, Crossref