Global Journal of Nursing & Forensic Studies
Open Access

Forensic psychiatry; Forensic psychology; Criminology; Criminal behavior; Mental health assessment; Psychiatric evaluation

Introduction

Forensic mental health, criminology, and psychiatry are interconnected fields that involve the study and application of mental health principles in the context of the legal system. These disciplines aim to understand and address the intersection between mental health, crime, and the legal process. Forensic mental health refers to the application of mental health knowledge and expertise to legal and criminal justice contexts. It encompasses the assessment, evaluation, and treatment of individuals who have mental health issues and are involved in the legal system. Forensic mental health professionals, such as forensic psychologists and psychiatrists, work with individuals who may have committed crimes or who are at risk of engaging in criminal behavior due to mental health factors [1].

Criminology, on the other hand, is the scientific study of crime, criminals, and the criminal justice system. It seeks to understand the causes of criminal behavior, patterns of crime, and the effectiveness of various responses and interventions. Criminologists analyze social, psychological, and environmental factors that contribute to criminal behavior and work towards developing strategies to prevent crime and rehabilitate offenders. Psychiatry, as a branch of medicine, deals with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders. In the context of forensic mental health, psychiatrists play a crucial role in evaluating and treating individuals who have mental health disorders and are involved in legal proceedings. They assess factors such as competency to stand trial, criminal responsibility, and the presence of mental health conditions that may impact legal outcomes [2].

The integration of forensic mental health, criminology, and psychiatry is vital in the criminal justice system. Professionals in these fields collaborate to provide comprehensive assessments, expert testimony, and treatment recommendations for individuals involved in legal matters. They also contribute to policy development, research, and the implementation of evidence-based practices that promote public safety and the well-being of both offenders and victims. In summary, forensic mental health related criminology and psychiatry are interdisciplinary fields that address the complex relationship between mental health and the legal system. By combining knowledge from psychology, criminology, and psychiatry, professionals in these fields strive to promote justice, fairness, and effective interventions in cases involving mental health issues and criminal behavior [3].

Materials and Methods

Medical care in scientific psychiatry

Belgium has specialized healthcare facilities for committed patients in the field of forensic psychiatry. We refer to patients who have been detained as having a mental illness as the reason they are not considered to be responsible for their actions (based on mental health expertise provided by experts). These "patients" (who are no longer defendants) enter the field of forensic psychiatry after breaking free from the confines of the legal system. These patients will at this point not be rebuffed, however all around focused on. The difference in nuance between the two is crucial. Patients are referred to a "designated" facility for the care and treatment of this kind of patient once they are committed and referred to the Council Chamber, which is a jurisdiction of a court of first instance. These mechanisms are spread out across the entirety of Belgian territory and, in some instances, exhibit characteristics associated, for instance, with their improved care system and more secure system.

Psychiatrist and medical

Mental history, comorbidity, and substance misuse is an intermittent verifiable element among youth mediated for crime offenses. Eightyeight percent of the 25 teens who committed homicide were found to have a disruptive behavioral disorder, and seventy-one percent had psychotic symptoms. The prevalence of clinical psychiatric impairment among juveniles convicted of murder is estimated at 90% in other studies. Predominantly, adolescent crime wrongdoer psychopathology includes social issues that exemplify externalizing behavior and center self-guideline shortages. Nearly one in two juvenile homicide perpetrators had a history of substance abuse, and 24% had a history of alcohol abuse, according to an 8-year census of 363 of them. In addition to this negative background, the individual also had a severe behavioral history that included recurring issues with behavior as well as resistance to treatment or correctional intervention. 73% of adolescent crime wrongdoers had discipline issues and one of every three were set in an option instructive setting because of self-guideline issues coming about because of conduct and substance problems [4].

Research Materials

Case files: Examination of case files and legal documents related to individuals involved in the legal system with mental health issues. Access to databases containing relevant information on crime, mental health, and legal proceedings.

Psychometric instruments: Use of standardized tests and assessment tools to measure various aspects of mental health, personality traits, and risk assessment.

Research Methods

Quantitative research: Collection and analysis of numerical data to examine patterns, correlations, and statistical associations between variables. This may involve surveys, questionnaires, and data analysis techniques.

Qualitative research: In-depth exploration of individuals' experiences and perspectives through interviews, focus groups, and observation. This method helps understand subjective factors and contextual nuances.

Case studies: In-depth analysis of specific cases to gain insights into the interaction between mental health and legal outcomes. This approach often involves a detailed examination of individual histories, assessments, and interventions [5].

Clinical Practice Methods

Clinical interviews: Conducting structured or semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in the legal system to assess their mental health, history, and current functioning.

Psychiatric evaluation: Comprehensive psychiatric assessments to diagnose mental health disorders, evaluate the presence of symptoms, and assess an individual's capacity to participate in legal proceedings [6].

Risk assessment: Systematic evaluation of an individual's risk for future criminal behavior or harm to themselves or others. Various tools and methods are employed to assess factors such as violence risk, suicide risk, and recidivism.

Treatment interventions: Development and implementation of evidence-based treatment plans to address mental health issues and reduce the risk of reoffending. This may involve psychotherapy, medication management, and collaboration with other professionals [7].

Result and Discussion

Local area mental framework

Every year, around 2,000,000 individuals (counting 424,000 who experienced something like one full-time hospitalization) benefit from mental consideration in France. Over the past 50 years, catchment area-based service provisions have emerged as a result of psychiatric care reforms. A precise geographical catchment area is referred to as the "psychiatric sector" (secteur psychiatrique). Within this catchment area, a single, multidisciplinary team of doctors, psychologists, nurses, and social workers is in charge of providing mental health care. Today, there are around 830 areas (at first every area included around 70,000 occupants) which are coordinated in 3 degrees of care: i. Psychiatric outpatient clinics (Centres médico-psychologiques, or CMP), ii. Day treatment hospitals, and iii. Psychiatric hospitals where patients can be admitted either voluntarily or involuntarily. All patients have the freedom to choose their psychiatrist, whether they live within or outside the catchment area, despite the fact that each "sector" is obligated to provide care for all people with psychiatric disorders in a particular catchment area [8].

Community psychiatric system

Psychiatric care benefits approximately two million people annually, including 424,000 who have undergone at least one fulltime hospitalization. Mental consideration changes have prompted the improvement of catchment region based help arrangements throughout the previous 50 years. The "mental area" (secteur psychiatrique) is characterized as an exact topographical catchment region for which a solitary, multidisciplinary group made out of doctors, clinicians, medical caretakers, and social specialists gets a sense of ownership with mental medical care conveyance. There are currently approximately 830 sectors, each of which originally had approximately 70,000 residents, organized into three levels of care: i. Psychiatric outpatient clinics (Centres médico-psychologiques, or CMP), ii. Day treatment hospitals, and iii. Psychiatric hospitals where patients can be admitted either voluntarily or involuntarily. All patients have the freedom to choose their psychiatrist, whether they live within or outside the catchment area, despite the fact that each "sector" is obligated to provide care for all people with psychiatric disorders in a particular catchment area [9].

Conclusion

Cooperation between the emotional well-being and legal frameworks are convoluted by the limits between these two frameworks, creating serious holes in the mental consideration of imprisoned individuals. This reasonable division enjoys the benefit of permitting outright regard for clinical secrecy and freedom of mental consideration from legal foundations. That qualification makes it conceivable to keep the interests of the patient as the essential target of mental consideration, remembering that the clinician's job isn't to execute strategy against criminal demonstrations, yet to give care. Concerns about the use of psychiatric expertise and the lack of training for caregivers are, however, raised by the high prevalence of individuals with severe mental illnesses in today's prisons. We believe that one of the most important things that can be done to fix these problems is to teach French psychiatrists about forensic psychiatry [10].

Acknowledgement

None

1. Naghavi M, Abajobir AA, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, et al. (2017) Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 390:1151-1210.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Gouda HN, Charlson F, Sorsdahl K, Ahmadzada S, Ferrari AJ, et al. (2019) Burden of non-communicable diseases in sub-Saharan Africa, 1990-2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Glob Health, 7:e1375-e1387.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Moresky RT, Razzak J, Reynolds T, Wallis LA, Wachira BW, et al. (2019) Advancing research on emergency care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: ensuring high-quality care delivery systems. BMJ Glob Health 4:e001265.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Wachira B, Martin IBK (2011) The state of emergency care in the Republic of Kenya. Afr J Emerg Med 1:160-165.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Ashton RA, Morris L, Smith I (2018) A qualitative meta-synthesis of emergency department staff experiences of violence and aggression. Int Emerg Nurs 39:13-19.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. JV Pich, A Kable, M Hazelton (2017)  Antecedents and precipitants of patient-related violence in the emergency department: results from the Australian VENT Study (Violence in Emergency Nursing and Triage). Australas Emerg Nurs J 20:107-113.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Gilmer T, Ojeda V, Folson D, Fuentes D, Garcia P, et al. (2007) Initiation and use of Public Mental Health Services by Persons with Severe Mental Illness and Limited English Proficiency. Psychiatric Services 58:1555-1562.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Golding JM (1999) Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Violence 14:99-132.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. McHugo GJ, Kammerer N, Jackson EW, Markoff LS, Gatz M, et al. (2005) Women, Co-Occurring Disorders, and Violence Study: Evaluation Design and Study Population. Journal of Substance Abuse and Treatmentn 28:91-107.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Connor M, Armbruster M, Hurley K, Lee E, Chen B, et al. (2020) Diagnostic sensitivity of the dynamic appraisal of situational aggression to predict violence and aggression by behavioral health patients in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 46:302-309.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref