Journal of Powder Metallurgy & Mining
Open Access

Cyclic polarization; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; Glassy alloy; Fe-Co metal-metal glassy alloys

Introduction

The glassy blends are considered to be particuarly intriguing metallic accoutrements because of exceptional parcels, or combinations of physical and chemical parcels,that distinguish metallic glassy blends from conventional crystalline accoutrements. The conformation of these metallic spectacles by rapid-fire melt quenching from the liquid state at a high cooling rate( 106 Ks −1) was first discovered in an Au- Si amalgamation system by Duwez etal. in 1960 [4, 5]. Still, Inoue set up that for metallic blends to have good glass- forming capability( GFA) the blends should be composed of further than three rudiments. In addition, the element rudiments should have different infinitesimal sizes and negative heats of mixing [6]. The first Fe- grounded bulk glassy blends were prepared in 1995 and, since also, a variety of Fegrounded bulk glassy blends have been prepared. Fe- grounded bulk metallic spectacles( BMGs) are useful for artificial operations as glamorous , engineering, structural and face coating accoutrements due to the fairly low cost of the main alloying element( Fe) [7]. Iron confers outstanding parcels, including high strength, a large elastic strain limit, and excellent wear and tear and erosion resistance, together with other remarkable engineering parcels similar as good rigidity, high durability and the essential fineness of the BMGs. Fe- grounded BMGs are unformed structures with unique physical and chemical parcels. These seductive rates arise from a combination of certain parcels that isn't attainable with conventional crystalline blends. The most important thing that limits the use of these blends is their vulnerability to erosion. As is well known, alloying rudiments may inhibit erosion [8]. The presence of rudiments similar as chromium and molybdenum in the amalgamation composition leads to lesser erosion resistance of Fegrounded bulk metallic spectacles. Xu etal. studied the effect of addition of chromium in Cr- Fe metallic spectacles and concluded that the Cr bettered the mechanical parcels and enhanced erosion resistance. The stability of the chromium oxide increased with adding chromium content. Addition of Cr enhanced resistivity to a certain extent, after which any farther increase was ineffective( the erosion resistance was stable above29.4 at. Cr). Gong et al. delved the erosion geste of Fe65.5 Cr4Mo4Ga4P12C5B5.5( at.) bulk metallic glass in3.0 M NaOH result [9]. They set up that the erosion resistance of this amalgamation was better than its structural relaxation/ crystallization counterparts. The( Fe44.3 Cr5Co5Mo12.8 Mn11.2C15.8B5.9)98.5Y1.5 bulk glassy amalgamation was studied in veritably introductory result(1.0 M NaOH) by Gostin etal.( 13). This amalgamation displayed a lower erosion rate at advanced pH. In this study we explored the effect of NaOH attention on passivation geste of two blends( VX9 and VX50). Alloy resistivity can be explained according to the composition of the defensive film formed in alkaline media, and the parcels of these blends make them veritably seductive for artificial operation [10].

Description

Sheets of metal-metal glassy alloys Fe78Co9Cr10Mo2Al1 (VX9) and Fe49Co49V2 (VX50) (at.%) were supplied by Vacuumschmelze GmbH & Co. KG, Hanau, Germany. A surface area of 1 cm2 was used as the working area and each experiment was carried out with fresh sample. The test solution was an aerated solution of sodium hydroxide at different concentrations (0.1M, 0.25M and 0.5M) at ambient temperature (27°C). The electrochemical measurements were performed on an Interface 1000™ potentiostat/galvanostat (Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA, USA). For accurate results, each experiment was repeated at least three times. The experimental data were analyzed using EFM140, EIS300 and DC105 software (Gamry Instruments). The electrochemical cell was comprised of three electrodes: the working electrode (sample), a saturated Ag/AgCl electrode and a platinum counter electrode.

The electrochemical frequency modulation (EFM) data were obtained using two frequencies, 2 and 5 Hz, with an amplitude of 10 mV, and the base frequency was 0.1 Hz at the open circuit potential (OCP). The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was conducted with an applied 10 mV sine wave and measurements were recorded over a frequency range of 800 kHz to 0.1 Hz [11]. The cyclic polarization experiments were carried out after the impedance run in different concentrations of NaOH solution (0.1M, 0.25M and 0.5M) at a scan rate of 1.5 mVs−1. The potential forward sweep was from the cathodic to the anodic direction (−700 to 1200 mV) and the potential reverse sweep was from the anodic to cathodic direction over the same range.

Results and Discussion

Cartridge and pod components

Typical Cover and cartridge factors revealed during disassembly are epitomized. In utmost types, a 4 mm periphery, indirect battery contact with 5 mm periphery, polymer gasket was located at the bottom of each cartridge or cover [12]. Above it, each heating element comported of a hair, either wrapped around a fiberglass wick or bedded in a ceramic, conterminous to holes that admit liquid from the girding tank. Some designs also added a polymeric or fiberglass wicking/ sequestration serape or entrapments, utmost fibers were joined to two long line leads, which occasionally held a defensive polymer jacket around one of the brazed connection points. These designs allow for vape liquid to be drawn in and wracked by the heating element, also gobbled up through the air tube [13]. The hot fibers, wicks, and sequestration are in direct contact with both the liquid and gobbled airstream. It's unclear to what extent the line leads or battery contact are also exposed, numerous of these design features are harmonious with latterly- generatione-cigarette designs reported by Williams and Talbot Some design differences between device types were apparent. All of the newer THC charges held ceramic heating rudiments. The fibers in the TKO and both CCell charges were bedded in 6 x 4 mm, tube- shaped pottery. The stringy wicking/ sequestration serape in this type appeared to fully fill the spherical volume of each heating element. The CCell and TKO charges belonging to EVALI cases displayed expansive charred, blackened material on the inside and outside of the oil painting- soaked pottery and sequestration, suggesting burned THC liquid and veritably high temperatures at the fibers [14]. Careful analysis of the TKO ceramic revealed that only the areas of the ceramic soaked with oil painting were blackened. The unused CCell cartridge also showed minor burn marks, maybe as the result of manufacturer testing. Note that the new CCell was manufactured with slightly different accoutrements than the used CCell, including a clear battery contact gasket rather of white, different heating element end draw, and different prophet/ drip tube design [15].

Conclusion

The heavy essence linked in these bias are implicit sources of habitual vaping exposures, though their ubiquitous presence in all tested products suggests that the essence factors don't explain the fairly recent appearance of acute respiratory cases. It's possible that newer charges containing VEA may interact else with these essence, especially if heated to advanced temperatures. specially, the newer charges associated with EVALI cases held the utmost separating ceramic and polymer accoutrements , and also displayed further substantiation of heat and thermal declination than a used nicotine cover. These element compositions and high temperatures are harmonious with conditions hypothecated to be sufficient for the conformation of dangerous chemicals( ethenone) from VEA. The fluorinated polymer factors observed in some bias have the eventuality to thermally degrade and volatilize when hotted. The apparent negotiation of accoutrements to achieve the same design pretensions, both between and within bias from the same merchandisers, suggests that the exact compositions of these factors will continue to change over time. This work is limited by the fact that numerous of the tested bias were samples from real examinations with unknown origins and operation parameters. The observed burn marks inside THC charges, implicit for catalysis, and essence and polymer compositions don’t indicate that exposures would do under all operation conditions, and are most applicable to harm reduction sweats grounded on avoiding advanced internal temperatures. Because this work represents a limited sample size, these data should be verified by unborn testing of other THC cartridge compositions, both literal and contemporary. Further internal temperature testing of colorful THC product types is demanded as a function of operation conditions, configurations, and liquid situations.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Blount BC, Karwowski MP, Shields PG, Morel-Espinosa M, Valentin-Blasini L, et al. (2020) Vitamin E Acetate in Bronchoalveolar-Lavage Fluid Associated with EVALI. N Engl J Med 382: 697-705.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Heinzerling A, Armatas C, Karmarkar E, Attfield K, Guo W, et al. (2020) Severe lung injury associated with use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products-California, 2019. JAMA Intern Med.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Butt YM, Smith ML, Tazelaar HD, Vaszar LT, Swanson KL, et al. (2019) Pathology of vaping associated lung injury. N Engl J Med 371:1780-1781.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Wu D, O'Shea D (2020) Potential for formation of pulmonary toxic ketene from vaping pyrolysis of vitamin E acetate. PNAS 117:6349-6355.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Braga A, Sodré E, Santos J, Marques C, Bueno J (2016) Steam reforming of acetone over Ni- and Co-based catalysts: Effect of the composition of reactants and catalysts on reaction pathways, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 195:16-28.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Williams M, Talbot P (2019) Design Features in Multiple Generations of Electronic Cigarette Atomizers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16:2904.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Hess C, Olmedo P, Navas-Acien A, Goessler W, Cohen J(2017) E-cigarettes as a source of toxic and potentially carcinogenic metals. Environmental Research 152:221-225.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Na C J, Jo SH, Kim KH, Sohn JR, Son YS (2019) The transfer characteristics of heavy metals in electronic cigarette liquid. Environmental Research 174:152-159.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Williams M, Li J, Talbot P(2019) Effects of Model, Method of Collection, and Topography on Chemical Elements and Metals in the Aerosol of Tank-Style Electronic Cigarettes. Sci Rep 9:13969.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Mikheev VB, Brinkman MC, Granville CA, Gordon SM, Clark PI (2016) Real-Time Measurement of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Size Distribution and Metals Content Analysis. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 1895-1902.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

11. Giroud C, de Cesare M, Berthet A, Varlet V, Concha-Lozano N (2015) Favrat B. E-Cigarettes: A Review of New Trends in Cannabis Use. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:9988-10008.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

12. Webster T, Harrad S, Millette J, Holbrook R, Davis J, et al. (2009) Identifying transfer mechanisms and sources of decabromodiphenyl ether BDE 209) in indoor environments using environmental forensic microscopy. Environ Sci Technol 43:3067-3072.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

13. Wagner J, Ghosal S, Whitehead T, Metayer C (2013) Morphology, spatial distribution, and concentration of flame retardants in consumer products and environmental dusts using scanning electron microscopy and Raman micro-spectroscopy. Environment International 59:16-26.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

14. Farsalinos KE, Rodu B (2018) Metal emissions from e-cigarettes: a risk assessment analysis of a recently-published study. Inhal Toxicol 30:321-6.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

15. Fowles J, Barreau T, Wu N (2020) Cancer and Non-Cancer Risk Concerns from Metals in Electronic Cigarette Liquids and Aerosols. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17: 2146.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref