ISSN: 1522-4821

International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Research Article   
  • Int J Emerg Ment Health, Vol 24(9)
  • DOI: 10.4172/1522-4821.1000554

Narcissism is Not Self-love

Sam Vaknin*
Professor of Psychology, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia
*Corresponding Author: Sam Vaknin, Professor of Psychology, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia, Email: samvaknin@gmail.com

Received: 01-Sep-2022 / Manuscript No. ijemhhr-22- 76189 / Editor assigned: 03-Sep-2022 / PreQC No. ijemhhr-22- 76189 (PQ) / Reviewed: 19-Sep-2022 / QC No. ijemhhr-22- 76189 / Revised: 24-Sep-2022 / Manuscript No. ijemhhr-22- 76189 (R) / Accepted Date: 28-Sep-2022 / Published Date: 30-Sep-2022 DOI: 10.4172/1522-4821.1000554

Abstract

To a narcissist, love is interchangeable with other emotions, such as awe, respect, admiration, attention, or even being feared (collectively known as Narcissistic Supply). Thus, to him, a projected image, which provokes these reactions in others, is both “loveable and loved”. It also feels like self-love.

Keywords: Narcissim, Self-love, Psychological and physical abuse, Love

Keywords

Narcissim, Self-love, Psychological and physical abuse, Love

Introduction

“He/she is a narcissist”. How often have you heard this diatribe? More and more frequently recently. But, ask most people what “narcissism” means and they will equate it with unbridled self-love (Vaknin, et al. 2020).

Nothing can be further from the truth.

According to the legend of Narcissus, this Greek boy fell in love with his own reflection in a pond. In a way, this amply sums up the nature of his namesakes: narcissists (Ronningstam, et al.1996). Narcissus is not in love with himself. He is in love with his reflection.

There is a major difference between one’s True Self and reflected-self.

Loving your True Self is healthy, adaptive, and functional.

Loving your reflection (the impressions you leave on other people) has two major drawbacks:

• One depends on the existence and availability of the reflection to produce the emotion of self-love; and

• The absence of a “compass”, an “objective and realistic yardstick”, by which to judge the authenticity of the reflection. In other words, it is impossible to tell whether the reflection is true to reality – and, if so, to what extent.

He who loves only impressions and reflections is incapable of loving people, himself included.

But the narcissist does possess the in-bred desire to love and to be loved. If he cannot love himself – he must love his reflection (Vaknin, et al. 2007). But to love his reflection – it must be loveable (Alford, et al.1988; Fairbairn, et al.1954). Thus, driven by the insatiable urge to love (which we all possess), the narcissist is preoccupied with projecting a loveable image, albeit compatible with his self-image (the way he “sees” himself) (Schwartz, et al. 1974).

To a narcissist, love is interchangeable with other emotions, such as awe, respect, admiration, attention, or even being feared (collectively known as Narcissistic Supply). Thus, to him, a projected image, which provokes these reactions in others, is both “loveable and loved”. It also feels like selflove (Ronningstam, et al. 1996).

The more successful this projected image (or series of successive images) is in generating Narcissistic Supply (NS) the more the narcissist becomes divorced from his True Self and married to the image (Marcus, et al.1975; Alexander, et al. 1997).

I am not saying that the narcissist does not have a central nucleus of a “self”. All I am saying is that he prefers his image – with which he identifies unreservedly – to his True Self. The True Self becomes serf to the Image, paralysed and subordinates (Golomb, et al. 1995).

There are two differences between healthy self-love and pathological narcissism: (a) in the ability to tell reality from fantasy, and (b) in the ability to empathise and, indeed, to fully and maturely love others (David, et al.1998). As we said, the narcissist does not love himself. It is because he has very little True Self to love. Instead, a monstrous, malignant construct – the False Self – encroaches upon his True Self and devours it.

The narcissist loves an image which he projects onto others who reflect it to the narcissist (the False Self). This process reassures the narcissist of both the objective existence of his False Self and of the boundaries of his Ego. It blurs all distinctions between reality and fantasy (Guntrip, et al. 1962).

The False Self leads to false assumptions and to a contorted personal narrative, to a false worldview, and to a grandiose, inflated sense of being. The latter is rarely grounded in real achievements or merit. The narcissist’s feeling of entitlement is all-pervasive, demanding and aggressive. It easily deteriorates into open verbal, psychological and physical abuse of others (Greenberg, et al. 1983).

Maintaining a distinction between what we really are and what we dream of becoming, knowing our limits, our advantages and faults and having a sense of true, realistic accomplishments in our life are of paramount importance in the establishment and maintenance of our self-esteem, sense of self-worth and self-confidence (Grunberger, B., et al. 1979).

Reliant as he is on outside judgement, the narcissist feels miserably inferior and dependent. He rebels against this degrading state of things by escaping into a world of makebelief, daydreaming, pretensions and delusions of grandeur. The narcissist knows little about him and finds what he knows to be unacceptable (Horowitz, et al.1975; Kernberg, et al. 1975; Kohut, et al. 1971).

Our experience of what it is like to be human our very humanness – depends largely on our self-knowledge and on our experience of our selves. In other words: only through being himself and through experiencing his self can a human being fully appreciate the humanness of others (Ogas, et al. 2011).

The narcissist has precious little experience of his self. Instead, he lives in an invented world, of his own design, where he is a fictitious figure in a grandiose script. He, therefore, possesses no tools to enable him to cope with other human beings, share their emotions, put himself in their place (empathise) and, of course, love them – the most demanding task of inter-relating (Millon, et al. 2012).

The narcissist just does not know what it means to be human. He is a predator, rapaciously preying on others for the satisfaction of his narcissistic cravings and appetites for admiration, adoration, applause, affirmation and attention. Humans are Narcissistic Supply Sources and are (overor de-) valued according to their contributions to this end (Lasch, et al. 1980).

Self-love is a precondition for the experience and expression of mature love (Zweig, et al.1968). One cannot truly love someone else if one does not first love one’s True Self. If we had never loved ourselves – we had never experienced unconditional love and, therefore, we do not know how to love (Helm, et al. 2015).

If we keep living in a world of fantasy – how could we notice the very real people around us who ask for our love and who deserve it? The narcissist wants to love. In his rare moments of self-awareness, he feels ego-dystonic (unhappy with his situation and with his relationships with others). This is his predicament: he is sentenced to isolation precisely because his need of other people is so great.

References

Alexander, L. (1997). Narcissism: Denial of the True Self. Touchstone Book, New York.

Google Scholar

Alford, C. F. (1988). Narcissism: Socrates, the Frankfurt School, and psychoanalytic theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Google Scholar

David S, Roningstam E, Gunderson J, Tohen M. (1998). Pathological Narcissism in Bipolar Disorder Patients. J Pers Disord,12(2):179-185.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1954). An object-relations theory of the personality.

Google Scholar

Golomb E. (1995). Trapped in the Mirror: Adult Children of Narcissists in Their Struggle for Self – Quill

Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Harvard University Press.

Google Scholar

Grunberger B. (1979).  Narcissism: Psychoanalytic Essays. New York, International Universities Press.

Guntrip, H. (1962). Personality Structure and Human Interaction.

Google Scholar

Helm, K. M. (2015). Hooking Up: The Psychology of Sex and Dating: ABC-CLIO.

Google Scholar

Horowitz, M. J. (1975). Sliding meanings: A defense against threat in narcissistic personalities. Int J Psychoanal Psychother.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Kernberg, O. F. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological Narcism, New York (Jason Aronson) 1975.

Google Scholar

Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self, New York (International Universities Press) 1971.

Lasch, C. (1980). The culture of narcissism. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 44(5), 426.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Marcus, S. (1975). Freud's three essays on the theory of sexuality. Partisan review (New York, NY: 1936), 42(4), 517-534.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Millon, T., Millon, C. M., Meagher, S. E., Grossman, S. D., & Ramnath, R. (2012). Personality disorders in modern life. John Wiley & Sons.

Google Scholar

Ogas, O., & Gaddam, S. (2011). A billion wicked thoughts: What the world's largest experiment reveals about human desire. Dutton/Penguin Books.

Google Scholar

Ronningstam, E. (1996). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder in Axis I disorders. Harv Rev Psychiatry, 3(6), 326-340.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Schwartz, L. (1974). Narcissistic personality disorders-a clinical discussion. J Am Psychoanal Assoc, 22(2), 292-306.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Vaknin, S. (2020). Habit-Forming in a Time of Pandemic. Arch Psychiatry Behav Sci, V3. I2, 4.

Google Scholar

Vaknin, S. (2007). Malignant Self-love: Narcissism Revisited (10th Revised Impression).

Google Scholar

Zweig, P. (1968). The heresy of self-love: A study of subversive individualism. Basic books.

Google Scholar

Top