Toxicology: Open Access
Open Access

Nanotoxicology; Nanomaterials; Chemical properties

Introduction

Nanomaterials exhibit unique physical and chemical properties compared to their bulk counterparts due to their small size and large surface area relative to their volume. These properties include increased reactivity, altered mechanical strength, and enhanced electrical and optical characteristics. The small size of nanomaterials allows them to interact with biological systems at the cellular and molecular levels, potentially leading to new and unforeseen toxicological effects [1-3].

Methodology

Nanomaterials can enter the human body through various routes, including inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact. Inhalation of airborne nanoparticles can lead to respiratory issues, as these particles can penetrate deep into the lungs and even enter the bloodstream. Ingestion of nanomaterials may occur through contaminated food or water, posing potential risks to the gastrointestinal tract. Dermal contact with nanoparticles can result in skin irritation or systemic effects if the particles penetrate the skin barrier. Assessing the risks associated with each route of exposure is essential for determining appropriate safety measures and regulatory guidelines.

The toxicokinetics of nanomaterials—the study of their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion—differs from that of bulk materials due to their unique properties. Nanoparticles can be rapidly absorbed into the bloodstream through the lungs or gastrointestinal tract. Once in the bloodstream, they may accumulate in various organs, such as the liver, kidneys, and spleen. The distribution of nanoparticles within the body can be influenced by their size, shape, surface charge, and chemical composition. Understanding how nanomaterials are processed and eliminated by the body is crucial for assessing their potential for long-term accumulation and toxicity [4-7].

Mechanisms of nanotoxicity

Nanomaterials can induce toxicity through several mechanisms. Oxidative stress is a common mechanism, where nanoparticles generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) that damage cellular components, including lipids, proteins, and DNA. This damage can lead to inflammation, cellular apoptosis, and tissue injury. Additionally, nanoparticles may cause physical damage to cells and tissues due to their size and mechanical properties. For instance, certain nanoparticles can penetrate cell membranes and disrupt cellular function. Genotoxicity is another concern, as some nanoparticles may cause genetic mutations or chromosomal damage, potentially leading to cancer.

The toxicity of nanomaterials can manifest in both acute and chronic forms. Acute toxicity refers to adverse effects that occur shortly after exposure to high doses of nanoparticles. Symptoms may include respiratory distress, skin irritation, or gastrointestinal disturbances. Chronic toxicity, on the other hand, results from prolonged or repeated exposure to lower doses of nanomaterials. Long-term exposure can lead to more serious health issues, such as chronic inflammation, organ damage, or cancer. Research into both acute and chronic toxicity is essential for understanding the full range of potential health risks associated with nanomaterials [8- 10].

Risk assessment and management

Risk assessment in nanotoxicology involves evaluating the potential health hazards of nanomaterials based on their physical and chemical properties, exposure levels, and toxicity data. This process includes hazard identification, dose-response assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. Hazard identification involves determining the adverse effects of a nanomaterial, while dose-response assessment evaluates the relationship between exposure levels and health outcomes. Exposure assessment estimates the extent and duration of exposure to nanomaterials, and risk characterization combines these factors to estimate the overall risk to human health.

Effective risk management strategies are crucial for minimizing the risks associated with nanomaterials. These strategies include establishing safety guidelines and regulations, conducting thorough toxicity testing, and developing safer nanomaterial designs. Regulatory agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), play a key role in setting standards for nanomaterial safety and ensuring compliance with established guidelines.

Emerging challenges and future directions

Nanotoxicology faces several emerging challenges as nanotechnology continues to evolve. One challenge is the need for standardized testing methods to assess the toxicity of various nanomaterials consistently. Additionally, the potential for interactions between nanomaterials and other environmental or biological factors requires further investigation. Research into the long-term effects of nanomaterial exposure, as well as the development of strategies for mitigating potential risks, is essential for advancing the field.

Future research in Nano toxicology will likely focus on understanding the interactions between nanomaterials and biological systems at a more detailed level. Advances in imaging and analytical techniques will provide new insights into the behavior and effects of nanoparticles within living organisms. Moreover, interdisciplinary approaches that integrate toxicology, nanotechnology, and regulatory science will be crucial for addressing the complex challenges associated with nanomaterials.

Conclusion

Nanotoxicology is a critical field dedicated to understanding the potential risks associated with nanomaterials. By studying the unique properties of nanoparticles, their routes of exposure, mechanisms of toxicity, and long-term effects, researchers can develop effective risk assessment and management strategies. As nanotechnology continues to advance, ongoing research and collaboration will be essential for ensuring the safe use of nanomaterials and protecting human health and the environment.

References

1. Sun L, Wallace LA, Dobbin NA, You H, Kulka R, et al. (2018) Effect of venting range hood flow rate on size-resolved ultrafine particle concentrations from gas stove cooking. Aerosol Sci Tech 52 (12):1370-1381. 

Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Abdulwahab S, Rabee AM (2015) Ecological factors affecting the distribution of the zooplankton community in the Tigris River at Baghdad region, Iraq. Egypt J Aquat Res 41: 187-196.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Abed IJ, Al-Hussieny AA, Kamel RF, Jawad A (2014) Environmental and identification study of algae present in three drinking water plants located on tigris river in Baghdad. Int j adv Res 2: 895-900.

Google Scholar

4. Pope CA, Verrier RL, Lovett EG, Larson AC, Raizenne ME, et al. (1999) Heart rate variability associated with particulate air pollution. Am Heart J 138: 890-899.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Samet J, Dominici F, Curriero F, Coursac I, Zeger S (2000) Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 US cities, 1987-1994. N Engl J Med 343: 1742-17493.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Goldberg M, Burnett R, Bailar J, Brook J, Bonvalot Y, et al. (2001) The association between daily mortality and ambient air particle pollution in Montreal, Quebec 1. Nonaccidental mortality. Environ Res 86: 12–25. 

Indexed at, Crossref

7. Brook RD, Franklin B, Cascio W, Hong YL, Howard G, et al. (2004) Air pollution and cardiovascular disease – a statement for healthcare professionals from the expert panel on population and prevention science of the American Heart Association. Circulation 109: 2655-26715.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. He C, Morawska L, Hitchins J, Gilbert D (2004) Contribution from indoor sources to particle number and massconcentrations in residential houses. Atmos Environ 38(21): 3405-3415. 

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Dobbin NA, Sun L, Wallace L, Kulka R, You H, et al. (2018) The benefit of kitchen exhaust fan use after cooking - An experimental assessment. Build Environ 135: 286-296. 

Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Kang K, Kim H, Kim DD, Lee YG, Kim T (2019) Characteristics of cooking-generated PM10 and PM2.5 in residential buildings with different cooking and ventilation types. Sci Total Environ 668: 56-66. 

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref