ISSN: 2329-8863
Advances in Crop Science and Technology
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Special Issue Article Open Access

Multivariate Analysis of Phenotypic Diversity in the South Ethiopian Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) for Quantitative Traits

Mesfin Kebede Gessese1,4*, Bayetta Bellachew2and Musa Jarso3
1Awada Agricultural Research Center, Yirgalem, Ethiopia
2Inter African Coffee Organization, Abidjan, Ivory Coast
3Holetta Agricultural Research Center, Holetta, Ethiopia
4Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita, Ethiopia, P.O.Box 110099 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Corresponding Author : Mesfin Kebede Gessese
4Wolaita Sodo University Wolaita Ethiopia
P.O.Box 110099 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Tel: +251465514417
E-mail: mesfin.kebede10@gmail.com
Received February 26, 2015; Accepted April 30, 2015; Published May 04, 2015
Citation: Gessese MK, Bellachew B, Jarso M (2015) Multivariate Analysis of Phenotypic Diversity in the South Ethiopian Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) for Quantitative Traits. Adv Crop Sci Tech S1:003.doi: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000S1-003
Copyright: © 2015 Gessese MK, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Related article at
DownloadPubmed DownloadScholar Google

Visit for more related articles at Advances in Crop Science and Technology

View PDF Download PDF Tables & Figures

Abstract

Coffee is the most important export crop of the south Ethiopian region with more than 46 percent share of the national market. It covers more than 185 000 ha of land in 50 Woredas (districts) with 11 are high, 7 medium and 32 are low coffee producers. Garden coffee comprises 130000 ha, semi forest 45 000 ha and forest coffee 10000 ha where the semi forest and forest coffee production systems are pertinent to the western part of the region. A field experiment on evaluation of 41 south Ethiopian coffee accessions with 2 standard checks of the southwest Ethiopian origin was conducted using Randomized Complete Block Design at Wonago Research Sub-Station during 1999- 2000 cropping seasons. Data on 7 morphological agronomic characters, average of three years data on severity of CBD and CLR infestations and yield was obtained for the 43 genotypes. The germplasm accessions differed
significantly for all the 7 morphological agronomic characters and coffee bean yield in the univariate analyses of variances indicating the prevalence of variability among south Ethiopian coffee germplasm accessions. Further, the first four principal components explained 82.63 percent of the total variation prevalent within the germplasm accessions out of which 32.52 percent was explained by the first principal component. Average linkage cluster analysis using Mahalanobis (D2) distance for the 10 characters grouped the 43 accessions in to 9 clusters. The number of accessions per cluster ranged from 1 in cluster IX to 13 in cluster II. The clustering pattern of the accessions revealed the prevalence of genetic diversity in the south Ethiopian coffee for the characters considered. The maximum inter-cluster distance was observed between clusters V and VII while the minimum was observed between clusters VI and VII. The study highlighted the possibility of using accessions of the distant clusters as potential candidates for the genetic improvement of south Ethiopian coffee through crossing and selection.

Keywords
Cluster analysis; Coffea arabica; Genetic diversity; South Ethiopia; Germplasm
Introduction
Coffee is the most important export crop of the south Ethiopian region with more than 46 percent share of the national market. It covers more than 185000 ha of land in 50 Woredas (districts) with 11 are high, 7 medium and 32 are low coffee producers. Garden coffee comprises 130 000ha, semi forest 45 000ha and forest coffee 10 000ha where the semi forest and forest coffee production systems are pertinent to the western part of the region. In 2005 cropping season, the annual coffee production of the region was 131 000 tons out of which 100 302 tons was exported as 60 percent washed and 40 percent dry processed [1]. The average yield of coffee in the region is 500 kg/ha (for local or landrace cultivars) while 800 kg/ha for the released coffee berry disease resistant cultivars. Though the region is highly endowed with suitable environments and immense genetic diversity for coffee production, the productivity of coffee per unit area remains very low as compared to world average. This is attributed mainly due to the lack of improved cultivars for central and eastern coffee growing areas of the region, shortage of improved agronomic technologies and prevalence of diseases mainly Coffee berry disease and coffee wilt disease. Moreover, physiological problems such as die back due to absence of shade trees coupled with minimum use or absence of agricultural inputs in the smallholder coffee orchards of Central and Eastern Zones of the Region is very common [1].
The exploitation of genetic diversity for crop improvement should be the ultimate objective of genetic resources exploration and conservation. The vital stages of evaluation and incorporation of valuable characters such as disease resistance and/or tolerance to environmental stress factors into new varieties appeared to be justifications of genetic resources conservation, characterization, and evaluation [2-4]. In cognizant of this fact, renewed efforts of coffee germplasm collection were undertaken consecutively for 3 years (1995- 1997) from different coffee growing areas of Central and Southeastern part of the South Ethiopian Region by Jima Agricultural Research Center (JARC) and as a result more than 350 accessions were collected and maintained at the center.
Several workers have estimated the extent of genetic diversity present from the different sources of arabica coffee germplasm collections. For instance, a study by Catter on second progeny arabica coffee collections of Ethiopian origin indicated the prevalence of high level of variability in morphological, agronomic and biochemical characteristics [5]. The genetic diversity analysis conducted by Lashermes, et al. using RAPD markers on cultivated and subspontaneous accessions of arabica coffee confirmed the narrow genetic base of commercial cultivars (3 typica and 3 bourbon types) [6]. On the other hand, they reported the existence of large genetic diversity within the sub-spontaneous material, which consisted of 11 samples representing the different coffee growing areas in Ethiopia. Further, they have suggested the prevalence of an east-west differentiation in the Ethiopian coffee germplasm. Similarly, Montagnon and Bouharmont characterized 148 arabica coffee accessions for phenotype diversity under field condition [7]. They have evaluated the accessions using eighteen different morphological and agronomic traits by employing multivariate analysis and identified two main groups in the coffee accessions. According to them, accessions of group I have a more erect branching habit, narrower leaves, and were more resistant to coffee leaf rust and coffee berry disease than accessions of group II. They further opined that group I mostly contained Ethiopian arabica coffee accessions collected from west of Great Rift Valley, whereas group II contained commonly cultivated varieties throughout the world and Ethiopian accessions collected from east of Great Rift Valley in Ethiopia. Kebede and Bellachew studied the genetic diversity of Hararghe coffee (Coffea arabica L) landraces (using quantitative morphological characters), which is characterized as garden coffee located in the eastern Ethiopia and reported the prevalence of enormous genetic diversity among the landrace collections [8]. On the same basis, the present study was conducted in order to estimate the genetic diversity among South Ethiopian coffee germplasm collections and to facilitate for use in the ongoing breeding program.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was carried out at Wonago Agricultural Research Sub-Station (WARSS) located near Wonago town, 99 km south of Awassa at an altitude of 1850 meters above sea level. The sources of test materials were 41 South Ethiopian coffee accessions that were collected from 6 Woredas of Gedeo, Sidama and Wolayta zones and maintained in the field at WARSS (Table 1). The 41 accessions and 2 released coffee berry disease (CBD) resistant cultivars were planted in July 1999 using Randomized Complete Block Design in 4 replications. Each plot had 10 plants with a spacing of 2m by 2m between plants and rows. All field management practices were applied to all plots uniformly as recommended (JARC, 1996). Four plants were taken at random from each accession and labeled for data collection on different growth characters listed in Table 2. Jima Agricultural Research Center’s coffee breeding and genetics conventional methods were employed for data collection [9]. Data on 7 morphological agronomic characters vis-àvis stem girth, plant height, number of primary branches, number of stem nodes, length of longest primary branches, canopy diameter and internode length of the main stem; percent disease infestation levels on CBD and coffee leaf rust (CLF) and average of 3 years clean coffee yield was obtained on the 43 genotypes (Tables 3 and 4).
Data analysis
A two-way analysis of variance (using MSTATC statistical software package) was computed for each quantitative character in order to identify the variability among accessions. Further, the data were standardized to a mean of zero and a variance of unity, to avoid differences in scales used for analyses before undertaking principal component and divergence analyses. Clustering was performed by average linkage method and the number of clusters was determined by examining the pseudo F statistic and the pseudo t2 statistic using SAS software package [10]. Genetic diversity between clusters, as standardized Mahalanobis D2 values between clusters and principal components based on correlation matrix, were calculated using the same software employed in cluster analysis. The D2 values obtained for pairs of clusters were considered as the calculated values of Chisquared (X2) and were tested for significance both at 1% and 5% probability levels against the tabulated values of X2 for ’P’ degree of freedom, where P is the number of characters considered (P=10 in the present case) [11]. The important traits in each principal component that significantly contributed to the variation observed were identified as suggested by Jonson and Wichern [12].
Results and Discussions
Analyses of variances
Univariate analyses of variance were computed using MSTATC version 2.10 statistical software program for the seven quantitative morphological characters and the three years combined yield data. The ANOVA showed a highly significant difference among the genotypes for all the characters considered. Southeast Ethiopian coffee population was stated to be of narrow genetic base [6-13], however, the findings of this study indicates the presence of wide variations among Southeast Ethiopian (Sidama, Gedeo and Wolayta) landrace coffee populations located east of the Great Rift Valley. This might be attributed to the differences in the type of collections used i.e. forest coffee versus landraces. Since landraces are traditional varieties that have evolved over generations of selections by farmers they are characterized by high genetic heterogeneity, good adaptation to local environmental conditions and low productivity. In view of this it may be reasonable to state that there is a good chance to improve Sidama, Gedeo (Yirgachefe) and Wolayta coffees through selection and breeding. Such a view was endorsed by the work of earlier researchers [5,8,14].
Principal component analysis (PCA)
The first four principal components with eigen values greater than unity explained 82.63 percent of the total variation among the 43 genotypes for the 10 quantitative characters measured. Principal component one accounted nearly one third (32.52%) of the total variation. Accordingly, canopy diameter, number of nodes on the main stem, number of primary branches and plant height in that order are the most important characters that contributed for the variation in the first PC. On the same basis, internode length, number of nodes on the main stem, number of primary branches and plant height had significant contributions for the variation in the second PC. In the 3rd PC yield, severity of coffee berry disease, plant height and internode length are the most important characters that contributed for the variation obtained.
In light of the results obtained from the PCA, it may be possible to deduce that more than half (53 %) of the variation obtained was primarily due to number of nodes, primary branches, and plant height. This perhaps emphasized the significance of these characters to the appraisal of genetic diversity in the south Ethiopian landrace coffee populations. Moreover, these characters could be used as a selection criterion for improving the productivity of the crop since they represent the lion’s share in the variability of the coffee population in the specified area. Similar results have been reported for Limu coffee and Hararge coffee types (Coffea arabica L.) in Ethiopia [8,15].
Cluster analysis
The 41 southeast Ethiopian coffee selections including 2 southwest Ethiopian CBD resistant cultivars were grouped in to 9 clusters suggesting the prevalence of wide phenotypic variations in the coffee populations. The number of genotypes per cluster varied from 1 in cluster IX to 13 in cluster II. Cluster III contained selections only from Gedeo Zone (Yirgachefe and Wonago Woredas). On the same manner, in cluster V except 1 from Wonago, was composed of selections from Sidama Zone (Dale and Aleta Wondo Woredas). The 2 CBD resistant cultivars (75227 and 744) used as checks were grouped in clusters VI and VII where each cluster had 3 selections.
The selections from Wonago Woreda distributed in to 6 clusters where 7 out of 16 were grouped in cluster II. Similarly the selections from Yirgachefe distributed in to 5 clusters where 4 out of 11 were grouped in cluster III. Relatively low mean yield and higher scores of both CBD and CLR infestations characterized cluster IX that contains only 1 selection from Yirgachefe.
The cluster analysis failed to clearly show relatedness of the selections due to geographical origin. Rather it is evident that there is overlapping of clustering patterns in respect of all Woredas, which could be explained as lack of differentiation among Woredas arising partly due to gene flow [8,16].
Inter and Intra-cluster distance (D2) analysis
Almost all clusters showed a highly significant (P<0.01) difference among each other. The smallest inter-cluster distance (18.6) was observed between clusters VI and VII while the highest (134.7) was between clusters V and VIII. In most of the cases, the genotypes among the clusters are significantly (P<0.001) divergent from each other. Considering the intra-cluster (within cluster) distance, no significant genetic dissimilarity was detected.
Since the magnitude of heterosis largely depends upon the degree of genetic divergence in the parental lines, the germplasm selections belonging to the pairs of distant clusters such as V and VIII, VII and VIII and I and VIII could be very useful in hybridization program to obtain a wide variation among the segregates and to maximize heterosis in the F1. Similar view was held by earlier researchers.
Conclusion
Overlapping of the clustering patterns of the accessions from different districts indicated lack of differentiation among districts to a certain extent. Moreover, germplasm accessions from Gedeo Zone were more divergent than selections of Sidama Zone though relatively greater number of selections was considered from Gedeo Zone. Further, it is also possible to state that quantitative characters studied significantly contributed to the elucidation of genetic diversity prevalent in the region.
The significant inter-cluster distances between clusters indicated that there is a high opportunity for obtaining transgressive segregates and maximize heterosis by crossing germplasm accessions belonging to these clusters. Therefore, the grouping of accessions by multivariate methods could be of considerable practical value to the coffee breeders so that representative accessions could be chosen from such clusters for hybridization programs. Further, the quantitative characters visà- vis number of stem nodes, primary branches, plant height, length of the longest primary branch and stem diameter could be used as a selection criterion for improving the productivity of the crop since they represent the lion’s share in the variability of the coffee population in the specified area.
The number of germplasm accessions, the locations (number of districts) and the number of characters considered for the South Ethiopian coffee were small. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further study by including more number of germplasm from diverse locations to find best estimate of the genetic diversity within the region. Furthermore, additional traits of interest and molecular techniques may be very useful in order to further confirm the present encouraging result that indicated the presence of considerable variations within South Ethiopia coffee populations that provides immense potential for the development of improved varieties from the local landraces for the area.
References
style="padding-left:35px;">

References

  1. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="1">Southern Nations Nationalities People's Region Biro of Agriculture and Natural Resources department (SNNPR BoA and NRD) (2012) Agricultural Development Efforts, Extension Service, and Technology Transfer. In: Proceedings of the workshop on national planning of Ethiopia.Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  2. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="2">Balami S (2007) Genetic Diversity Analysis of the Wild Coffeaarabica L. Populations From Harenna Forest, Bale Mountains of Ethiopia, Using Inter Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSR) Marker. Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

  3. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="3">Geleta M, Herrera I, Monzón A, Bryngelsson T (2012) Genetic diversity of arabica coffee (Coffeaarabica L.) in Nicaragua as estimated by simple sequence repeat markers. ScientificWorldJournal 2012: 939820.

  4. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="4">Kathurima CW (2012) Genetic diversity among commercial coffee varieties, advanced selections and museum collections in Kenya using molecular markers. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 4: 39-46.

  5. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="5">Catter  R (1992) Study and structure of the phenotypic variation of Coffeaarabicafrom Ethiopia. TROPAG Data Base. pp.51.

  6. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="6">Lashermes P, Trouslot P, Anthony F, Combs MC, CA(1996) Genetic diversity for RAPD markers between cultivated wild accessions of Coffeaarabica. Euphytica.87: 59-64.

  7. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="7">Montagnon C, Bouharmont P(1996) Multivariate analysis of phenotypic diversity of Coffeaarabica. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43: 221-227.

  8. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="8">Kebede M, Bellachew B(2008) Phenotypic Diversity in the Hararge Coffee (Coffeaarabica L) Germplasm for Quantitative Traits. East African Journal of Sciences 2: 13-18.

  9. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="9">Bayetta B (1987) Coffee (Coffeaarabica L.) Genetic erosion and germplasm collection in Hararge region. . Plant Germplasm Resources Center/Ethiopia. Institute of Livestock Center for Africa (PGRC/E.ILCA). Germplasm Newsletter 15: 8-13.

  10. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="10">SASInstitute (2001) SAS user’s guide: Statistics (5thedn) SAS Inst, Cary, NC.

  11. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="11">Singh RK,Chaudhary BD(1987) Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. KalyaniPublishers, New Delhi, pp.318.

  12. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="12">Jonson RA, Wichern DW(1998) Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis.Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

  13. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="13">Anthony F, Combes MC, Herrena JC, Prakash NC, Bertrand B,et al.(2001) Genetic Diversity and Introgression Analysis in Coffee (Coffeaarabica L.) using Molecular Markers. Euphytica 118: 53-65.

  14. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="14">Leroy TC, Montango, Charrier A, Eskes AB (1993) Reciprocal recurrent selection applied to Coffeacanephora Pierre. I. Characterization and evaluation of breeding populations and value of inter-group hybrids. . Euphytica. 67:113-125.

  15. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="15">Kitila O, Alamerew S, Kufa T,Garedew W(2011) Genetic Diversity Analysis of Limmu Coffee (Coffeaarabica L.) Collection using Quantitative Traits in Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 470-481.

  16. id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="16">Teressa A, Crouzillat D, Petiard V,Brouhan P(2010) Genetic Diversity of arabica coffee (Coffeaarabica L.) collections. EJAST 1: 63-79.

--

Tables and Figures at a glance

image   image   image   image
Table 1   Table 2   Table 3   Table 4
Multivariate Analysis of Phenotypic Diversity in the South Ethiopian Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) for Quantitative Traits
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Journals

View More

Article Tools

Article Usage

  • Total views: 14792
  • [From(publication date):
    specialissue-2015 - Nov 27, 2024]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 10245
  • PDF downloads : 4547

Review summary

  1. Lemi
    Posted on Apr 20 2016 at 11:25 pm
    I'm doing my M.Sc Thesis on Arabica Coffee and very interested in this paper to read. Since it can be of great help to me and for my thesis. so,how can I get it?

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh
Peer Reviewed Journals

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals

Journals by Subject

Agri and Aquaculture Biochemistry Bioinformatics & Systems Biology Biomedical Sciences Business & Management Chemical Engineering Chemistry Clinical Sciences Computer Science Economics & Accounting Engineering Environmental Sciences Food & Nutrition General Science Genetics & Molecular Biology
Geology & Earth Science Immunology & Microbiology Informatics Materials Science Mathematics Medical Sciences Nanotechnology Neuroscience & Psychology Nursing & Health Care Pharmaceutical Sciences Physics Plant Sciences Social & Political Sciences Veterinary Sciences

Clinical & Medical Journals

Anesthesiology Cardiology Clinical Research Dentistry Dermatology Diabetes & Endocrinology Gasteroenterology Genetics Haematology Healthcare Immunology Infectious Diseases Medicine Microbiology
Molecular Biology Nephrology Neurology Nursing Nutrition Oncology Ophthalmology Orthopaedics Pathology Pediatrics Physicaltherapy & Rehabilitation
Psychiatry Pulmonology Radiology Reproductive Medicine Surgery Toxicology
International Conferences 2024-25
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Conferences by Country

USA Australia Italy Germany UK Japan Brazil South Korea Netherlands
Spain Canada China France India Singapore South Africa New Zealand Philippines
Poland Austria Finland Denmark Mexico Norway Romania

Medical & Clinical Conferences

Microbiology Diabetes & Endocrinology Nursing Healthcare Management Neuroscience Immunology Gastroenterology Genetics & MolecularBiology Pathology Alternative Healthcare Pediatrics Ophthalmology
Oncology & Cancer Cardiology Dentistry Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Psychiatry Infectious Diseases Medical Ethics & Health Policies Palliativecare Reproductive Medicine & Women Healthcare Surgery Radiology

Conferences By Subject

Pharmaceutical Sciences Pharma Marketing & Industry Agri, Food & Aqua Nutrition Physics & Materials Science Environmental Science EEE & Engineering Veterinary Chemical Engineering Business Management Massmedia Geology & Earth science
Top