Journal of Dental Science and Medicine
Open Access

Access opening; Molar anatomy; Orifice location; Pulp chamber; Root canal treatment

Introduction

A micro-neurologic surgical technique is precisely what endodontic therapy is. Because an intimate relationship is the primary basis on which all surgical procedures are performed, any attempt to undertake endodontic therapy, understanding of anatomy must be preceded by extensive knowledge of the structure of both the root-canal system and the pulp chamber. In an effort to without providing a thorough anatomic description, address the root-canal system would be comparable to a doctor hunting for an appendix not having ever read Gray’s Anatomy [1]. Previous works of literature addressing the anatomy of the pulp chamber been extremely broad for determining orifice location and number. The anatomy of pulp chamber floor has been greatly described by Dr. Paul Krasner and HJ Rankow in endodontic literature [2]. It has been suggested to make an access in a suitable location in the search for the orifices in the clinical crown in the hopes that they are seen. There is minimal information for safely approaching them if they cannot be seen. Finding them without running the risk of causing significant tooth loss is a challenge. Any seasoned operator is aware that searching for substantially repaired teeth’s root-canal orifices, carefully broken down or gouged by prior accessing is quite challenging. The purpose of this study was to examine the anatomy of the pulp chamber and the pulp chamber floor and determine the approximate distance between the proximal margin to the orifices [3].

Method and Materials

There were 3000 permanent human molar teeth extracted for periodontal and orthodontic reasons in consideration. The teeth were examined using cbct to determine the relationship in distance between proximal margin and the orifice location.

The inclusion criteria for the:

(i) Permanent molars without caries, fillings or fractures.

(ii) CBCT images of good quality.

Acquisition of images or radiographic methods

Utilizing CS 3D Imaging Software (Carestream Dental), which operates at a voltage of 80 kV and a current of 5.0 mA, with a 17-second exposure. The field of vision ranged from 40 to 60 millimetres. All of the CBCT scans were conducted by a certified oral radiologist in compliance with the product’s suggested procedure [3-6].

Results

CBCT images of the scanned samples confirms the average distance between mesial marginal ridge to the mesial canals of molars is 3.5mm.

Discussion

Clear trends and connections between the pulp chamber and the external morphology were seen. These observations lead to the investigation on the estimate distance between the proximal walls and the pulp chamber. To assist the clinician more systematically locate pulp chambers and the quantity and position of pulp vessels, special laws have been developed [7].

On the pulp chamber floor, there are root-canal orifices. Most professionals start root canal therapy with preconceived notions and thoughts on the position and anatomy of the pulp chambers and roots canals. These concepts are derived on idealised images of pristine teeth displayed in textbooks. The laws of centrality, CEJ, and the orifice location described by Dr. Krasner and Rankow stand forth as pillers for orifice location.2 the pulp chamber is often accessible based on this ideal anatomy and the work of the clinician. However, after a tooth has been restored, the occlusal structure may not be important to the location of the underside pulp chamber, such as that of a gold-porcelain alloy crown). Using this fictitious anatomy as a starting point accessing the tooth could result in lateral perforation. In this investigation in addition to the already available laws of orifice location, an additional investigation is being introduced. The concept of the average distance between the mesial marginal ridge to the mesial canal orifices. The newly stated concept is being termed as Eldho’s principle for location of mesial canals in molars. Eldho’s principle may not be applicable in full coverage restored molars but can be an accessory tool for intact and carious molars. Understanding the law of centrality will aid in avoiding crown laterally oriented perforations. The pulp chamber being what it is the operator may always be found in the middle, at the level of the CEJ. The newly stated Eldho’s principle states that the average distance between the mesial marginal ridge to the mesial canals in molars is approximately 3.5mm. No matter how anatomically distorted the CEJ is, treat it as a circular target. The CEJ can still serve as a trustworthy landmark even at an acute angle to the root [2]. There is an anatomy of the pulp-chamber floor as well as the chamber. The practise of endodontics can now be founded on fundamental surgical anatomic concepts, including the location of the chamber and root-canal orifice. The author sincerely convey gratitude towards Krasner and Rankow for their incredible work. Because of this, laws are more significant than measuring devices. With this anatomical foundation, additional equipment, now that microscopes may be utilized logically and not just for show, but as useful instruments for carrying out therapy [8].

1. Alfawaz H, Alqedairi A, Alkhayyal AK, Almobarak AA, Alhusain MF, et al. (2018) Prevalence of C-shaped canal system in mandibular first and second molars in a Saudi population assessed ia cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig 1-6.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Al-Dahman Y, Alnassar F, Al-Jebaly A, et al. (2018) Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary premolars in a Saudi population. BioMed

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Al-Shehri S, Al-Shehri S, Al-Nazhan S, Shoukry S, Al-Shwaimi E, et al. (2017) Root and canal configuration of the maxillary first molar in a Saudi subpopulation: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Saudi Endod J 7: 69-76.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Barbizam JV, Ribeiro RG, TanomaruFilho M (2004) Unusual anatomy of permanent maxillary molars. J Endod 30: 668-671.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV (2010) Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium–enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod 36: 1547-1551.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Sert S, Aslanalp V, Tanalp J (2004) Investigation of the root canal configurations of mandibular permanent teeth in the Turkish population. Int Endod J 37: 494-499.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Vertucci FJ (1984) Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 58: 589-599.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Vertucci FJ (1984) Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 58: 589-599.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref