ISSN: 2332-0702

Journal of Oral Hygiene & Health
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Review Article   
  • J Oral Hyg Health 2022, Vol 10(9): 334

Miswak through the Ages: A Review of Traditional and Modern Usages of the Chewing Stick

Tahira Hyder*
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ziauddin University, Pakistan
*Corresponding Author: Tahira Hyder, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ziauddin University, Pakistan, Tel: 00923008239831, Email: tahira.hyder@zu.edu.pk

Received: 18-Aug-2022 / Manuscript No. JOHH-22-72199 / Editor assigned: 20-Aug-2022 / PreQC No. JOHH-22-72199(PQ) / Reviewed: 03-Sep-2022 / QC No. JOHH-22-72199 / Revised: 08-Sep-2022 / Manuscript No. JOHH-22-72199(R) / Accepted Date: 10-Sep-2022 / Published Date: 15-Sep-2022

Abstract

Oral health has a major influence on not just individual’s general health but also their quality of life. The traditional toothbrush or “miswak” have been used since thousands of years as an oral hygiene aid. Miswak continues to remain popular in modern times, owing to its ease of availability, low costs and simplicity, particularly amongst Muslim population where it holds a religious and cultural impact. Much research has been performed on the phytochemical profile of miswak, revealing anti-plaque, anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory properties, which augment the mechanical cleaning aspects of the twig. A strong inhibitory action against Gram negative bacteria implicated in the initiation and progression of chronic periodontitis has also been reported. Recent investigations have demonstrated an anti-osteoporotic and pro-repair effect on femur bone. The current article presents a review of the pharmacological components, medicinal benefits and modern scientific usages of miswak in various aspects of oral health care.

Keywords

Chewing stick; Miswak; Oral health; Plaque; Salvadora persica

Introduction

The traditional toothbrush or “Miswak” refers to a 15 to 20 cm long pencil-sized stick of an evergreen tree called Salvadora Persica, otherwise known as Arak (in Arabic) and Peelu (in Urdu) [1]. It is the precursor to modern toothbrushes, with usage being traced back to Babylonians some 7000 years ago [2]. In modern times it continues to be used as an oral hygiene aid in developing nations like India, Pakistan, most of the Arabian countries, and several African countries [3]. Owing to its strong religious and cultural impact, it is popular amongst the Muslim population [4].

The efficiency of miswak as an oral hygiene aid has been attributed to the mechanical cleansing effects of its fibres, the release of beneficial phytochemicals, or both [5]. Based upon its easy availability, low cost, unique chemical composition and proven efficacy in plaque removal the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended using miswak as an oral hygiene tool [6, 7].

Discussion

Miswak as an oral hygiene tool

Despite serving a similar function to conventional toothbrushes, miswak differs from them in their design. The bristles are situated along the long axis of the miswak stick (Figure 1), hence adapting the lingual and interdental spaces is relatively difficult compared to the facial surfaces of teeth. Before usage, the miswak sticks have to be chewed at one end, exposing the bristles, which are then used to clean the teeth in a similar manner to a toothbrush [8]. Miswak is held with a pen-like grip with two-fingers or five-fingers [9], and the brush-end is moved along the tooth surface in an up and down or rolling motion [10]. After several usages, the brush-end becomes frayed, making the stick ineffective. This necessitates cutting off the edge and exposure of a fresh end, allowing the stick to be used this way for several weeks.

oral-hygiene-and-health-stick

Figure 1: The traditional chewing stick or miswak. Note how the bristles are situated along the long axis of the stick.

Studies comparing the efficacy of miswak and modern toothbrushes show that miswak has a superior or comparable oral hygiene effect over toothbrushes [11-14]. An assessment of periodontal status of over 200 adult Sudanese who habitually used either miswak or a toothbrush revealed that miswak users had significantly lesser gingival bleeding, lower dental calculus and signs of periodontal disease [13]. Gazi et al. also reported significantly lower gingival bleeding in miswak users and concluded that five times a day use of miswak is a suitable alternate for tooth brushing [15]. Al-Otaibi et al. concluded that if subjects are professionally instructed on the correct use of miswak [16], it is more effective at plaque removal and reducing the signs of gingivitis than tooth brushing, Malik et al. reported that the mechanical and chemical cleansing properties of toothbrushes were paralleled by miswak, which could potentially replace the former as an oral hygiene tool [17].

The use of miswak is associated with a potentially increased risk of the development of gingival recession and tooth wear. However, these findings have been linked with higher frequency of usage (5 times per day) and an uninstructed manner of application of miswak [18, 19], necessitating the provision of the right instructions.

Chemical composition

Chemical analysis of miswak revealed the presence of a number of biologically active phytochemicals, showing therapeutic benefits in the maintenance of oral hygiene. A list of chemical constituents of miswak and their pharmacological benefits have been recorded in Table 1.

Sl. No. Compound Action
1 Sulphur Antibacterial effects [20-23]
2 Benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) Anticariogenic and antibacterial effects [24-26]
Antiviral effects [26]
3 Butanediamide Antibacterial effects [27]
4 N-benzyl-2-phenylacetamide Antibacterial effects [27]
5 Trimethylamine and Salvadorine Antiphlogistic, antibacterial and gingiva-stimulating effects [21, 28]
6 Tannins Astringent actions [29]
Anti-plaque and calculus [30]
Reduction of clinical signs of gingivitis [31]
7 Fluorides Enamel repair and remineralization [24, 32, 33]
8 Chloride Anti-calculus [21, 34]
9 Vitamin C Assists in gingival tissue healing and repair [20, 35]
10 Silica An abrasive compound that removes plaque and stains [36]
11 Essential oils Increased salivary flow and buffering of pH [23]
12 Tocopherols (γ-tocopherol, and α-tocopherol) anti-oxidant properties [37]

Table 1: The various constituents of miswak and their pharmacological actions.

Pharmacological actions of miswak

Antibacterial properties: It has been demonstrated that miswak possesses an antibacterial activity, which led to the recommendation of the use of aqueous solutions of miswak extract in the form of a mouthwash [36]. The antibacterial activity is hypothesized to result from the presence of anionic ions, which exert an inhibitory effect on salivary peroxide thiocyanate and hydrogen peroxidase. In a study assessing the antibacterial action of miswak, Al Lafi and Ababneh reported that miswak was most effective against Staphylococcus aureus [37]. An in-vitro study by Sofrata et al. demonstrated that miswak exerted stronger antibacterial effects against Gram negative bacteria in comparison to Gram positive bacteria, highlighting a possible role in the prevention and treatment of periodontal diseases [38].

Studies comparing anti-plaque effects miswak and chlorhexidine mouthwash show conflicting results; some indicate that both exert similar effects [39-43], while others favor the use of chlorhexidine mouthwash [44-50]. Two studies reported that the mean plaque score was significantly lower in the miswak group compared to the chlorhexidine group [51, 52]. A meta-analysis indicated that while miswak extracts yielded lower mean plaque index scores compared to a placebo it is less effective compared to either 0.12% or 0.2% of chlorhexidine [53].

Anti-cariogenic activity: Numerous clinical and laboratory studies have highlighted the anti-cariogenic activity of miswak, which arises in part from its fluoride content, the inhibitory action against cariogenic bacteria and the salivary stimulatory effect, with improve buffering capacity [54].

A remineralizing effect was observed on white spot lesions when fresh miswak chewing sticks soaked with sodium fluoride was applied [55]. It has also been demonstrated that miswak-containing mouthwashes exert an antibacterial action against cariogenic bacteria, inhibiting their growth and lowering acid production. In a study comparing the antibacterial activity of miswak mouthwash, miswak toothpaste, and regular toothpastes, Al-Dabbagh et al. concluded that miswak containing products, particularly the mouthwash, are more effective in reducing the number of cariogenic bacteria than regular toothpaste [66].

Sofrata et al. reported that rinsing with miswak extract resulted in a prolonged elevation in plaque pH following an acidic challenge, compared to water rinsing (p<0.001) and was associated with a stimulation of parotid gland secretion (p<0.01) [57]. This increase in pH could be hypothesized to cause caries prevention.

Anti-mycotic activity: In an investigation conducted by Al- Bagieh et al. the authors concluded that aqueous extracts of miswak possessed an antimycotic activity against Candida albicans, which lasts for up to 36 hours at concentrations of 15 or greater [58]. This anti-mycotic activity is hypothesized to originate from one of the root components, including sulphur compounds, chlorine, trimethylamine and alkaloid resins.

Anti-oxidant effects: Anti-oxidants are vital substances that neutralize the effects of free-radical-induced oxidative stress and protect the tissues from the destruction caused by them. The anti-oxidant effects of SP have been ascribed to the presence of two tocopherols (γ-tocopherol and α-tocopherol) as well as the anti-oxidant enzymes catalase, peroxidase, and Polyphenol oxidase [59].Other studies have reported that the presence of hydroxyl-containing furan derivatives could exert anti-oxidant effects [60].

In another study Benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) was shown to significantly reduce the release of IL-6 and IL-8, suggesting an antiinflammatory role [61]. It has been documented that BITC is an anticancer agent, inhibiting chemically induced cancer, oncogenic-derived cancer formation, and human tumor xenografts in rodent cancer models [62].

Role in bone regeneration and repair: Investigations to assess the bone healing properties of SP revealed an anti-osteoporotic activity of SP [63, 64]. This anti-osteoporotic activity in femur bone maybe attributable to the presence of elevated quantities of phytochemicals, calcium, phosphorus, silica, fluorides, sulphur, sterols and heavy metals; which induce osteoblasts, accelerating bone regeneration and re-modelling [64].

Conclusion

In the current review, empirical shreds of evidence demonstrating the pharmacological properties of miswak and its role in the promotion of good oral health have been reported. Based upon the simplicity, low cost, and anti-bacterial, anti-cariogenic, and other protective functions,it can be concluded that miswak is an effective alternative for oral health maintenance particularly in developing countries like Pakistan where it is more convenient and easily obtained. The strong anti-bacterial effect on the periodontopathogenic Gram-negative bacteria paves the way for a potential role for Miswak in the prevention and treatment of chronic periodontal disease.

Author Contribution

The topic selection, literature search and manuscript preparation was carried out by the corresponding author, Dr. Tahira Hyder.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no Conflict of Interest.

Funding

This manuscript received no specific grant or sponsorship from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.

References

  1. Quattrocchi U (2012) CRC world dictionary of medicinal and poisonous plants: common names, scientific names, eponyms, synonyms, and etymology (5 Volume Set). CRC press.
  2. Google Scholar

  3. Winarni Y, Haslinda R, Aspalilah A (2019) Miswak: The underutilized device and future challenges. JDOH 11: 6-11.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Niazi F, Naseem M, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS, Almas K (2016) Role of Salvadora persica chewing stick (miswak): A natural toothbrush for holistic oral health. Eur J Dent 10: 301-308.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Owens J, Sami W (2016) The role of the Qur’an and Sunnah in oral health. J relig health 55: 1954-1967.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Al Bratty M, Makeen HA, Alhazmi HA, Syame SM, Abdalla AN, et al. (2020) Phytochemical, cytotoxic, and antimicrobial evaluation of the fruits of miswak plant, Salvadora persica L. J Chem.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. World Health Organization (1987) Prevention of oral diseases. WHO Offset Publ 1-83.
  12. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  13. Khatak M, Khatak S, Siddqui AA, Vasudeva N, Aggarwal A, et al. (2010) Salvadora persica. Pharmacogn rev 4: 209-214.
  14. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  15. Ahmad H, Ahamed N (2012) Therapeutic properties of meswak chewing sticks: A review. Afr J Biotechnol 11:14850–14857.
  16. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  17. Hollist NO (1981) The technique and use of chewing stick. Odontostomatol Trop 4: 171-174.
  18. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  19. Musa MF, Ali SM, Mohd FN, Ab Halim N (2020) Deconstructing orthographic knowledge and cultural awareness of miswak practice amongst dental educators: benefits and barriers: a qualitative study. J Int Oral Health 12: 525-531.
  20. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  21. Al-Otaibi M (2004) The miswak (chewing stick) and oral health. Studies on oral hygiene practices of urban Saudi Arabians. Swed Dent J 167: 2-75.
  22. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  23. Olsson B (1978) Efficiency of traditional chewing sticks in oral hygiene programs among Ethiopian schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 6: 105-109.
  24. Google Scholar, Crossref

  25. Darout IA, Albandar J, Skaug N (2000) Periodontal status of adult Sudanese habitual users of miswak chewing sticks or toothbrushes. Acta Odontol Scand 58: 25-30.
  26. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  27. Al-Hammadi AA, Al-Rabai NA, Togoo RA, Zakirulla M, Alshahrani I, et al. (2018) Knowledge, attitude, and behavior related to use of miswak (Chewing Stick): A cross-sectional study from aseer region, Saudi Arabia. Contemp clin dent 9: S64-S68.
  28. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  29. Ml Gazi, Davies TJ, Al-Bagieh N, Cox SW (1992) The immediate and medium-term effects of Meswak on the composition of mixed saliva. J Clin Periodontol 19:113–117.
  30. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  31. Al-Otaibi M, Al-Harthy M, Söder B, Gustafsson A, Angmar-Månsson B (2003) Comparative effect of chewing sticks and tooth brushing on plaque removal and gingival health. Oral Health Prev Dent 1: 301–307.
  32. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  33. Malik AS, Shaukat MS, Qureshi AA, Abdur R (2014) Comparative effectiveness of chewing stick and toothbrush: a randomized clinical trial. N Am J Med Sci 6: 333–337.
  34. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  35. Aumeeruddy MZ, Zengin G, Mahomoodally MF (2018) A review of the traditional and modern uses of Salvadora persica L (Miswak): Toothbrush tree of Prophet Muhammad. J ethnopharmacol 213: 409-444.
  36. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  37. Dizaye KF, Othman ZY (2020) Therapeutic effects of Salvadora persica (Miswak) on patients with mild to moderate gingivitis. Erbil Dental Journal (EDJ) 3:119-125.
  38. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  39. Akhtar J, Siddique K, Bi S, Mujeeb M (2011) A review on phytochemical and pharmacological investigations of Miswak (Salvadora persica Linn). J Pharm BioAllied Sci 3: 113–117.
  40. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  41. Tubaishat RS, Darby ML, Bauman DB, Box CE (2005) Use of miswak versus toothbrushes: oral health beliefs and behaviours among a sample of Jordanian adults. Int J Dent Hyg 3:126–136.
  42. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  43. Bismelah NA b, Kassim ZHM, Ahmad R, Ismail NH (2016) Herbs in dentistry. J Medicinal Plants Studies 4:18–23.
  44. Google Scholar

  45. Almas K (1993) Miswak (chewing stick) and its role in oral health: An update. Dent Middle East 3: 214–218.
  46. Google Scholar

  47. Sofrata A, Santangelo EM, Azeem M, Borg-Karlson AK, Gustafsson A, et al. (2011) Benzyl isothiocyanate, a major component from the roots of Salvadora persica is highly active against gram-negative bacteria. PLoS one 6: e23045.
  48. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  49. Almas K, Al-Zeid Z (2004) The immediate antimicrobial effect of a toothbrush and Miswak on cariogenic bacteria: a clinical study. J Contemp Dent Pract 5:105–114.
  50. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  51. Aljarbou F, Almobarak A, Binrayes A, Alamri HM (2022) Salvadora persica’s Biological Properties and Applications in Different Dental Specialties: A Narrative Review. Evid-Based Complementary Altern Med.
  52. Google Scholar, Crossref

  53. Khalil AT (2006) Benzylamidesfrom Salvadora Persica. Arch Pharm Res 29: 952–956.
  54. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  55. Mirakhmedov M, Laredo S, Nguyen AVT (2020) Miswak: An Alternative Approach to Traditional Oral Hygiene Care (Doctoral dissertation).
  56. Google Scholar

  57. Sawarkar SP, D'souza A, Fernandes T (2020) Salvadora persica L. (Miswak) An Effective Folklore Toothbrush. Natural Oral Care in Dental Therapy 30: 285-296.
  58. Google Scholar, Crossref

  59. Taha RR, Fawzi EM, Ibrahim SH (2020) Effect of Miswak versus standard preventive measures for caries control of young Egyptian adults: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Int Oral Health 14: 230-242.
  60. Google Scholar, Crossref

  61. Char D, Dogao A, Dogan M (1987) SEM, XRF and EMPA evaluation of Middle Eastern toothbrush “Salvadorapersica”. J Elect Micro Tech 5: 145.
  62. Google Scholar

  63. Nordin A, Saim AB, Ramli R, Hamid AA, Nasri NW, et al. Miswak and oral health: An evidence-based review. Saudi J Biol Sci 27: 1801-1810.
  64. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  65. Al Sadhan R, Almas K (1999) Miswak (chewing stick): A cultural and scientific heritage. Saudi Dent J 11: 80–87.
  66. Google Scholar

  67. Ramli H, Aripin KN, Said SM, Hanafiah RM, Dom TN (2022) The effectiveness of miswak (Salvadora persica L. and Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) practices in reducing plaque and gingivitis among adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ethnopharmacol 298: 115598.
  68. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  69. Ramadan MF, Morsel JT (2004) Oxidative stability of black cumin (Nigella sativa L), coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) and niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass.) crude seed oils upon stripping. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 106: 35–43.
  70. Google Scholar, Crossref

  71. Poureslami H, Makarem A, Mojab F (2007) Paraclinical effects of miswak extract on dental plaque. Dent Res J 4: 106-110.
  72. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  73. AI-Lafi T, Ababneh H (1995) The effect of the extract of the miswak (chewing sticks) used in Jordan and the Middle East on oral bacteria. Int Dent J 45: 218–222.
  74. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  75. Sofrata AH, Claesson RLK, Lingström PK, Gustafsson AK (2008) Strong antibacterial effect of miswak against oral microorganisms associated with periodontitis and caries. J Periodontol 79: 1474-1479.
  76. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  77. Narayan A, Mendon C (2012) Comparing the effect of different mouthrinses on de novo plaque formation. J Contemp Dent Pract 13: 460–463.
  78. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  79. Bassiouny G, Al-Barrak H (2014) The anti-plaque effect of Miswak and myrrh mouthwashes versus chlorhexidine in the treatment of chronic gingivitis; a comparative clinical trial. Med Sci 9: 32–37.
  80. Google Scholar

  81. Deshmukh MA, Dodamani AS, Karibasappa G, Khairnar MR, Naik RG, et al. (2017) Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of probiotic, herbal and chlorhexidine mouthwash on gingival health: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Diagn Res 11: ZC13–ZC16.
  82. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  83. Rahmani ME, Radvar M (2005) The anti-plaque effects of Salvadora persica and Padina essential oil solution in comparison to chlorhexidine in human gingival disease; a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Int J Pharmacol 1: 311–315.
  84. Google Scholar, Crossref

  85. Vandana S, Supreet K, Tej SS, Neelam S, Simrat K, et al. (2014) Evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety of commercially available herbal mouthwash (HiOra) R in comparison with chlorhexidine mouthwash (Aster-X)R in improving oral health in patients undergoing dental procedures: a double blind, randomized, active-controlled. Bfudj 5: 38–43.
  86. Google Scholar

  87. Al-Bayaty FH, Ai-Koubaisi AH, Abdul N, Ali W, Abdulla MA (2010) Effect of mouth wash extracted from Salvadora persica (Miswak) on dental plaque formation: a clinical trial. J Med Plants Res 4: 1446–1458.
  88. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  89. Gupta R, Yadav OP, Khan M, Kaushik S, Ahmed N (2017) Comparative evaluation of efficacy of Hiora, Terminalia chebula and chlorhexidine as mouth wash on dental plaque. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther 8: 00290.
  90. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  91. Prasad KA, John S, Deepika V, Dwijendra KS, Reddy BR, et al. (2015) Anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash: a comparative study. J Int Oral Health 7: 98–102.
  92. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  93. Ghasemi M, Rahbar M, Valaei N (2014) Comparison of the Substantivity of several Mouthwashesand their effect on microbial plaque using epifluorescence microscope. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 26:122–128.
  94. Google Scholar

  95. Bhat N, Mitra R, Oza S, Mantu VK, Bishnoi S, et al. (2014) The anti-plaque effect of herbal mouthwash in comparison to chlorhexidine in human gingival disease: a randomized placebo controlled clinical trial. J Complement Integr Med 11: 129–137.
  96. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  97. Bhate D, Jain S, Kale R, Muglikar S (2015) The comparative effects of 0.12% chlorhexidine and herbal oral rinse on dental plaque-induced gingivitis: a randomized clinical trial. J Indian Soc Periodontol 19: 393–395.
  98. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  99. Singh A, Daing A, Dixit J (2013) The effect of herbal, essential oil and chlorhexidine mouthrinse on de novo plaque formation. Int J Dent Hyg 11: 48–52.
  100. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  101. Abdulbaqi HR, Himratul-Aznita WH, Baharuddin NA (2016) Evaluation of Salvadora persica L. and green tea anti-plaque effect: a randomized controlled crossover clinical trial. BMC Complement Altern Med 16: 493.
  102. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  103. Jaidka S, Somani R, Bajaj N, Jaidka R, Sharma S, et al. (2015) Comparative evaluation of various mouthwashes for their effect on oral health: an in-vivo study. IJOCR 3: 56–62.
  104. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  105. Jassoma E, Baeesa L, Sabbagh H (2019) The anti-plaque/anticariogenic efficacy of Salvadora persica (Miswak) mouthrinse in comparison to that of chlorhexidine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 19: 64.
  106. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  107. Sabbagh HJ, AlGhamdi KS, Mujalled HT, Bagher SM (2020) The effect of brushing with Salvadora persica (miswak) sticks on salivary Streptococcus mutans and plaque levels in children: a clinical trial. BMC complement med ther 20: 53.
  108. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  109. Baeshen HA, Lingström P, Birkhed D (2011) Effect of fluoridated chewing sticks (miswak) on white spot lesions in post orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:291-297.
  110. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  111. Al-Dabbagh SA, Qasim HJ, Al-Derzi NA (2016) Efficacy of Miswak toothpaste and mouthwash on cariogenic bacteria. Saudi Med J 37: 1009–1014.
  112. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  113. Sofrata A, Lingström P, Baljoon M, Gustafsson A (2007) The effect of Miswak extract on plaque pH. An in vivo study. Caries Res 41: 451–454.
  114. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  115. Al-Bagieh NH, Idowu A, Salako NO (1994) Effect of aqueous extract of miswak on the in vitro growth of Candida albicans. Microbios 80: 107-113.
  116. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  117. Mariod AA, Matthäus B, Hussein IH (2009) Chemical characterization of the seed and anti-oxidant activity of various parts of Salvadora persica. JAOCS 86: 857-865.
  118. Google Scholar, Crossref

  119. Mohamed SA, Khan JA (2013) Anti-oxidant capacity of chewing stick miswak Salvadora persica. BMC Complement Altern Med 13: 1-6.
  120. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  121. Albabtain R, Ibrahim L, Bhangra S, Rosengren A, Gustafsson A (2018) Chemical effects of chewing sticks made of Salvadora persica. Int J Dent Hyg 16: 535-540.
  122. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  123. Rao CV (2013) Benzyl isothiocyanate: double trouble for breast cancer cells. Cancer Prev Res 6: 760-763.
  124. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  125. Dorri M, Shahrabi S, Navabazam A (2012) Comparing the effects of chlorhexidine and persica on alveolar bone healing following tooth extraction in rats, a randomised controlled trial. Clin Oral Investing 16: 25-31.
  126. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  127. Fouda AM, Youssef AR (2017) Anti-osteoporotic activity of Salvadora persica sticks extract in an estrogen deficient model of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 3:132-137.
  128. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Citation: Hyder T (2022) Miswak through the Ages: A Review of Traditional and Modern Usages of the Chewing Stick. J Oral Hyg Health 10: 334.

Copyright: 2022 Hyder T. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Recommended Conferences
Article Usage
  • Total views: 1611
  • [From(publication date): 0-2022 - Nov 21, 2024]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 1396
  • PDF downloads: 215
Top