Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuroimmunology
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Short Communication   
  • J Clin Exp Neuroimmunol 8 : 196, Vol 8(4)
  • DOI: 10.4172/jceni.1000196

Miller Fisher Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances

Azizul Haque*
Institute of Clinical Neurobiology, Innsbruck Medical University, United States
*Corresponding Author: Azizul Haque, Institute of Clinical Neurobiology, Innsbruck Medical University, United States, Tel: 1187421953230, Email: HaqueA@gmail.com

Received: 03-Jul-2023 / Manuscript No. jceni-23-109809 / Editor assigned: 05-Jul-2023 / PreQC No. jceni-23-109809 (PQ) / Reviewed: 19-Jul-2023 / QC No. jceni-23-109809 / Revised: 24-Jul-2023 / Manuscript No. jceni-23-109809 (R) / Published Date: 31-Jul-2023 DOI: 10.4172/jceni.1000196

Abstract

Mill operator Fisher Disorder (MFS) remains as a particular variation of Guillain-Barré Condition (GBS) portrayed by a group of three of side effects including ophthalmoplegia, ataxia, and areflexia. First recognized by nervous system specialist Charles Mill operator Fisher in 1956, this uncommon neurological problem offers a novel understanding into the perplexing transaction between the resistant framework and the sensory system. This refreshed account audit digs into the clinical indications, basic pathophysiology, demonstrative techniques, and current administration approaches for Mill operator Fisher Disorder. Mill operator Fisher condition (MFS) is viewed as an interesting variation of Guillain- Barré disorder (GBS), a gathering of intense beginning safe intervened neuropathies described by the exemplary ternion of ataxia, areflexia and ophthalmoparesis. The current survey means to give a nitty gritty and refreshed profile of all parts of the disorder through an assortment of distributed deals with the subject, going from beginning depiction to ongoing improvements connected with Coronavirus.

Clinical manifestations: The triad of mfs

The hallmark features of Miller Fisher Syndrome encompass ophthalmoplegia (paralysis of eye movement), ataxia (loss of coordination and balance), and areflexia (absence of reflexes) [1,2]. These symptoms often manifest acutely, with a rapid onset over a few days to weeks. Ophthalmoplegia, frequently the initial symptom, involves impaired eye movement control, resulting in double vision or difficulty moving the eyes in unison. Ataxia contributes to gait disturbances, slurred speech, and clumsiness. Areflexia, a cardinal sign of the disorder, reflects diminished or absent deep tendon reflexes such as the knee-jerk reflex [3].

Underlying pathophysiology: The immune response

MFS is commonly considered an autoimmune disorder triggered by preceding infections, most commonly viral or bacterial. Molecular mimicry-a phenomenon where the immune system's response to an infectious agent cross-reacts with components of nerve tissue-has been proposed as a mechanism. The immune system's attack on the peripheral nerves' myelin sheath and associated gangliosides disrupts nerve signal transmission, leading to the characteristic symptoms.

Diagnostic approaches: Unraveling the syndrome

Diagnosing MFS is a combination of clinical assessment, laboratory investigations, and electrophysiological studies. The triad of symptoms, coupled with the characteristic progression over days to weeks, often provides a crucial diagnostic clue [4]. Lumbar puncture, revealing elevated protein levels in cerebrospinal fluid without a significant increase in white blood cells, supports the diagnosis. Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) aid in confirming nerve damage and differentiating MFS from other neuromuscular disorders.

Management strategies: Addressing the immune response

Treatment strategies for MFS involve addressing the autoimmune response and managing the associated symptoms. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasmapheresis—where antibodies are removed from the plasma—aim to suppress the immune attack on peripheral nerves [5]. Supportive care includes physical therapy to manage ataxia and promote mobility. While the majority of individuals with MFS experience spontaneous recovery over a few weeks to months, some might require extended rehabilitation to regain full function.

Prognosis and future directions

The prognosis for MFS is generally favorable, with many patients experiencing near-complete recovery. However, the path to recovery can be challenging due to the debilitating nature of the symptoms during the acute phase. Long-term follow-up studies have shown that most individuals regain their previous level of function, although some might experience residual symptoms such as mild ataxia or diminished reflexes.

Research into the underlying mechanisms of MFS continues to deepen our understanding of the disorder. Advancements in neuroimaging, immunology, and neurophysiology are refining diagnostic accuracy and elucidating potential targeted therapeutic approaches. Furthermore, studying MFS sheds light on broader autoimmune processes and the intricate interactions between the immune and nervous systems.

Conclusion

Miller Fisher Syndrome serves as a distinctive clinical entity within the spectrum of Guillain-Barré Syndrome. Its characteristic triad of symptoms, autoimmune pathophysiology, diagnostic methods, and management approaches all contribute to a complex narrative of the disorder. As medical knowledge advances, a comprehensive grasp of MFS fosters improved diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes, underscoring the significance of ongoing research in this field.

References

  1. Steffen M, Philipp KJ, Paul HL, Stephanie M (2019) Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 21: 309-307.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Schwartz K, Boles BR (2013) Microbial amyloids—Functions and interactions within the host.Curr Opin Microbiol16:93–99 .
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Wang WY, Tan MS, Yu JT, Tan L (2015) Role of pro-inflammatory cytokines released from microglia in Alzheimer’s disease.Ann Transl Med3:136.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Schwab C, Klegeris A, McGeer PL (2010) Inflammation in transgenic mouse models of neurodegenerative disorders.Biochim Biophys Acta.1802:889-902.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Lin L, Zheng LJ, Zhang LJ (2018) Neuroinflammation, Gut Microbiome, and Alzheimer’s Disease.Mol Neurobiol 55:8243-8250.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Citation: Haque A (2023) Miller Fisher Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances. J Clin Exp Neuroimmunol, 8: 196. DOI: 10.4172/jceni.1000196

Copyright: © 2023 Haque A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top