Microbial Sources of Amyloid and Relevance to Amyloidogenesis andAlzheimer's Disease (AD)

Zhao Y^1,2, Dua P³ and Lukiw WJ^1,4,5

¹LSU Neuroscience Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 2020 Gravier Street, Suite 904, New Orleans LA 70112 USA

²Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 2020 Gravier Street, Suite 904, New Orleans LA 70112 USA

³Department of Health Information Management, Louisiana State University Ruston LA 71270 USA

⁴Departments of Ophthalmology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 2020 Gravier Street, Suite 904, New Orleans LA 70112 USA

⁵Departments of Neurology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 2020 Gravier Street, Suite 904, New Orleans LA 70112 USA

Corresponding Author:

Walter J Lukiw
Professor of Neuroscience
Neurology and Ophthalmology Bollinger Professor of Alzheimer’s disease
LSU Neuroscience Center of Excellence
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center2020 Gravier Street, Suite 904
Tel: 504-599-0842
E-mail: wlukiw@lsuhsc.edu

Received date: December 14, 2014; Accepted date: January 05, 2015; Published date: January 15, 2015

Citation: Lukiw WJ, Zhao Y and Dua P (2015) Microbial Sources of Amyloid and Relevance to Amyloidogenesis and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). J Alzheimers Dis Parkinsonism 5:177. doi:10.4172/2161-0460.1000177

Copyright: © 2015 Walter J. Lukiw et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Alzheimers Disease & Parkinsonism

Abstract

Since the inception of the human microbiome project (HMP) by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2007 there has been a keen resurgence in our recognition of the human microbiome and its contribution to development, immunity, neurophysiology, metabolic and nutritive support to central nervous system (CNS) health and disease. What is not generally appreciated is that (i) the ~1014 microbial cells that comprise the human microbiome outnumber human host cells by approximately one hundred-to-one; (ii) together the microbial genes of the microbiome outnumber human host genes by about one hundred-and-fifty to one; (iii) collectively these microbes constitute the largest ‘diffuse organ system’ in the body, more metabolically active than the liver; strongly influencing host nutritive-, innate-immune, neuroinflammatory-, neuromodulatory- and neurotransmission-functions; and (iv) that these microbes actively secrete highly complex, immunogenic mixtures of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and amyloid from their outer membranes into their immediate environment. While secreted LPS and amyloids are generally quite soluble as monomers over time they form into highly insoluble fibrous protein aggregates that are implicated in the progressive degenerative neuropathology of several common, age-related disorders of the human CNS including Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This general commentary-perspective paper will highlight some recent findings on microbial-derived secreted LPS and amyloids and the potential contribution of these neurotoxic and proinflammatory microbial exudates to age-related inflammatory amyloidogenesis and neurodegeneration, with specific reference to AD wherever possible.

Keywords

Alzheimer’s disease (AD); Beta amyloid precursor protein (βAPP); Congo Red (CR); Curli fibers; Hologenome; Inflammation; Innate-immunity; Toll receptor type 2 (TLR2); Senile (amyloid) plaques (SP)

Secretory Elements of the Human Microbiome

Humans contain a complex and dynamic community of microbes called ‘the microbiome’ that forms a ‘metaorganism’ with commensal or symbiotic benefit to the host [1-7]. Collectively these microbes constitute the largest ‘diffuse organ system’ in the body, more metabolically active than the liver, and through systemic effects impact the health and well-being of the human host [2-10]. The microbiome of the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract, containing the largest reservoir of microbes in the body, is composed of about 1014 microbes from at least 1000 distinct microbial species [2-6]. Interestingly, (i) microbial cells outnumber human host cells by about one hundred-toone and microbial genes collectively outnumber human genes by about one hundred-and-fifty-to-one [2-4,11,12]; (ii) the vast majority of GI tract microbiota are anaerobic or facultative anaerobic bacteria, with fungi, protozoa, archaebacteria and other microorganisms making up the remainder [2-5]; (iii) of all mammalian species human GI tract microbiota with bacterial densities of up to 1012 per ml are the highest recorded density of any known microbial ecosystem [3-5]; and (iv) only two bacterial divisions (of the 52 divisions currently identified by metagenomics analysis) are prominent in GI tract microbiota, and these include the Gram-positive Firmicutes (~51%) and anaerobic Gram-negative Bacteroidetes (~48%). The remaining 1% of phylotypes are distributed amongst the Cyanobacteria, Fusobacteria, Proteobacteria, Spirochaetes and Verrucomicrobia, along with various species of fungi, protozoa, viruses and other commensal microorganisms [4,11-14]. That the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were preferentially selected from the 52 bacterial divisions available in the biosphere is of evolutionary interest with implications for the ‘hologenome’ theory, which postulates that it is not the individual organism, but rather the organism together with its associated symbiotic microbial communities that should be considered as the basic unit of natural selection and evolution [15]. Interestingly, and from what is known, microorganisms that make up the smallest 1% of the microbiome have a disproportionately large impact on, and relevance to, human disease, and a major function of the healthy GI tract microbiome is to keep the proliferation of any potentially pathogenic microbes under homeostatic control [5,12,16]. Indeed, besides being of immense benefit to human health and welfare in the extraction of energy from food, absorption of nutrients and generation of vitamins (such as vitamin B12 and K), amino acids (such as lysine) and peptide sugars (such as peptidoglycans), the microbiome anchors a systemic immune-defense system against infective pathogens, while simultaneously being a prodigious producer of bacterial LPS and amyloid. Here we discuss relatively recent research at the intersection of LPS, microbial and AD amyloid highlighting 6 recent, specific and highly illustrative insights into the potential contribution of microbialderived LPS and amyloid to CNS amyloidosis and the degenerative disease process.

Microbiome-Derived Amyloid

A remarkable variety of microbial species including bacteria and fungi of the human microbiome generate significant quantities of functional amyloid, and even early scientific interpretations suggested that secreted amyloid and other shed molecules may serve some immune-evasive and survival strategy [3,4,17]. From the 1014 microbiota of the human microbiome it is also apparent that humans tolerate a substantial exposure to LPSs and microbial-generated amyloid, which potentially may contribute to the pathology of progressive CNS diseases with an amyloidogenic component [3,4,18-20]. For example, amyloids are associated with structures located on fungal surfaces and the recent observation of amyloidogenic fungal proteins and diffuse mycoses in the blood of AD patients suggest that chronic fungal infection contributes to AD risk via amyloid exposure [2-6,21,22]. To cite another recent example, in Escherichia coli (strain K12) extracellular bacterial amyloids known as ‘curli fibers’ and composed of the major structural curli subunit gA (CsgA) are a common secretory component used as structural materials facilitating surface attachment and adhesion, biofilm development and protection against host defenses [23,24]. Curli fibers typically engulf and surround bacteria forming a meshwork or ‘biofilm’ that biophysically connects large numbers of bacteria together [18,19]. Biofilms therefore represent a matrix of extracellular polymeric amyloids and other complex lipoproteins and LPS in various structural forms. Interestingly, the extracellular ~18 kDa CsgA amyloid precursor contains a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) that, like the Aβ42 peptide, is recognized by the human immune system toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2; see below) [25,26]. An expanding list of bacterial amyloid systems include those associated with gram-negative species of Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptomyces and others, suggesting that functional amyloids are a widespread phenomenon extensively generated by a wide range of microbiome bacteria and recognized by TLR2 [3,4,23,24,27]. Indeed the extremely large number and variety of microbiome bacteria and their capability to produce enormous quantities of LPS, amyloid and LPS/amyloid breakdown products indicates that human physiology may be chronically exposed to a tremendous systemic amyloid burden of a wide variety of amyloid, and this may be especially important during the course of aging when both the GI tract epithelium and blood-brain barriers become significantly more restructured and permeable [2,27-30].

The Amyloid Peptides of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)

‘Amyloid’ is a generic term for any aggregated, insoluble, lipoprotein-rich deposit exhibiting β-pleated sheet structures that are oriented perpendicular to the fibrillar axis [31-34]. About 55% of all eukaryotic proteins are predicted to contain unstructured regions of amino acids that are intrinsically amyloidogenic [34-36]. The amyloids that characterize AD consist largely of perivascular amyloid enriched in the 40 amino acid Aβ40 peptide, parenchymal amyloid, enriched in the 42 amino acid Aβ42 peptide, and nuclear amyloids that contain highly complex mixtures of lipoprotein fibrils and amyloid aggregates [34,37,38]. The Aβ peptides of AD are derived from a polytopic transmembrane β-amyloid precursor protein (βAPP) though tandem beta- and gamma-secretase cleavage events [39-41]. Cellular trafficking of the ~770 amino acid βAPP precursor is regulated by a large βAPP interactome that includes membrane integral and membrane peripheral adaptor proteins, and also by interactions with membrane-associated glycolipids and phospholipids [34,42]. Aβ40 peptides associate with endothelial cells that line the cerebral vasculature, and the more neurotoxic, albeit less abundant, hydrophobic Aβ42 peptides form the central core of the senile plaque (SP) of the parenchymal lesions that characterize AD [40,43]. The extra two hydrophobic amino acids in the Aβ42 peptide appear to convey many of the neurotoxic biophysical properties and selfaggregation of this slightly larger molecule [25,26,44,45]. The recognition of Aβ42 peptides and their misfolded aggregates by microglial surveillance systems, and the inability of microglial cells to deal with these toxic, pro-inflammatory inclusions, especially in their multimeric and aggregated form are thought to form the molecular basis for the aberrant immune activation, chronic inflammation and elevated oxidative stress that is characteristic of AD neuropathology [8,34,39,46-51]. Notably, (i) Aβ42 peptides as monomers, dimers and fibrils induce patterns of inflammatory gene expression typical of the classical innate-immune and inflammatory response induced by infectious agents such as bacterial LPS, a common endotoxin of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria [49,52; see below]; (ii) the presence of bacterial LPS or endotoxin-mediated inflammation strongly contributes to amyloid neurotoxicity [19,24-27,32,42,50-55]; and (iii) AD amyloids, like prion amyloids, once formed, may induce a self-perpetuating process leading to amplification, aggregation and spreading of pathological protein assemblies, and serial propagation of distinct strains of Aβ prion-like amyloids from AD patients have been recently observed [56,57]. Indeed, an increasing number of studies support the idea (i) that certain self-propagating protein conformations feature in the pathogenesis of several common neurodegenerative diseases including AD; (ii) that pro-inflammatory and immunogenic aggregates of Aβ peptides may become selfpropagating in AD brain; and (iii) that certain forms of Aβ peptides are serially transmissible and hence important in the propagation of neurological disease [57]. The contribution of LPS to the serial transmissibility of certain amyloidogenic Aβ peptides and their aggregates is currently not well understood, however it has recently been shown that Aβ peptide fibrillogenesis is strongly potentiated by soluble bacterial endotoxins, suggesting the contribution of infectious events and/or microbial-released factors to the pathogenesis of AD [24,54,57].

Bacterial LPS and PAMPS

LPS, sometimes referred to as bacterial lipoglycan or bacterial endotoxin, is the major amphiphilic glucosamine-based phospholipid of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, and in nonencapsulated bacteria are directly exposed to their environment [19,58-60]. LPS consists of a hydrophobic and lipophilic inner core, a hydrophilic outer core polysaccharide chain, and a repeating hydrophillic O-antigenic oligosaccharide chain (N~4-40) specific to the bacterial serotype [19,61]. LPSs are initially soluble but over time LPSs typically form large heterogeneous aggregates with molecular masses of 1-4 Mda or greater, and these structures are exceptionally immunogenic to the host [61-65]. Activation via LPS involves interactions with innate immunity-receptors such as Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4; see below) in complex with MD-2 protein (also known as lymphocyte antigen 96) and accessory proteins, such as the cluster of differentiation innate-immune protein 14 (CD14) and LPS-binding protein [19,63,64]. LPS and MD-2 specifically activate the human TLR4 leading to the production of a highly pleiotropic mixture of cytokines and chemokines which in turn promote inflammatory and innate-immune responses [61-64]. Bacterial LPS is considered to possess a prototypical pathogen-associated molecular pattern or PAMP, consisting of LPSs arranged in a highly specific molecular configuration efficiently recognized by host innate-immunity [60,65]. Recent literature has provided evidence that LPS is involved in the inflammatory and pathological processes associated with Aβ peptidemediated amyloidosis characteristic of AD. For example it has been demonstrated just this year: (i) that the chronic infusion of LPS into the fourth ventricle of rats reproduces many of the inflammatory and pathological features seen in the AD suggesting that bacterial LPS potentiates the fibrillogenesis of Aβ peptides [24]; (ii) that LPSinduced neuroinflammation is associated with AD-type amyloidogenic axonal pathology and dendritic degeneration in rodent models of AD [59]; and (iii) that the glycosylphosphatidyl-inositol-anchored LPS and ‘microbe-detecting receptor CD14, crucial in the neutralization of invading microbes, is also stimulated by Aβ fibrils thus further linking innate-immune signaling with AD amyloidogenesis [60,64]. This later observation of a CD14-dependent inflammatory response to Aβ fibrils indicates a structural molecular mimicry between the highly hydrophobic, aggregated Aβ fibrils and biophysically similar microbial PAMPS that contribute to chronic pro-inflammatory signaling and progressive neural degeneration [59,60,65,66]. Such findings again underscore the pathogenic importance of both microbial-released factors and the Aβ fibrils that characterize AD-type neuropathology [3,4,24,66].

Amyloidophilic Dyes: Congo Red Stains Microbial LPS and Amyloid

The water soluble secondary diazo dye Congo Red [CR; 3,3'-([1,1'- biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis(4-aminonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid-disodium salt)] has been classically used in microbiological epidemiology and investigative microbiology as a bacterial stain due to its important and unusual spectroscopic properties, and high affinity for both LPS and amyloid [67-69]. For example, CR rapidly identifies the presence of virulent forms of the gram-negative Proteobacteria Shigella where the dye binds unique surface LPS repeat structures of this facultative anaerobe [33,67,68]. CR’s apple-green birefringent fluorescence enhancement under polarized light is probably due to (i) a substratemediated hydrophobic pi-pi orbital stacking interaction between the aromatic rings of CR dye molecules and β-pleated sheet or related structures of both LPS and amyloids [69] and (ii) a restriction of the torsional rotation of the CR molecule upon binding [3,4,69]. The polymerization of amyloidogenic proteins, such as AD and prion amyloids into ordered β-pleated sheet, or similar structures, is cooperative, and can be accelerated by already aggregated amyloid in a highly selective ‘seeding’ process. Indeed the CR-based intercalation of β-pleated sheets, induction of a positive anisotropy that is directionally dependent and polarized, and generation of a measureable wavelength shift and apple-green birefringence is a hallmark of the majority of both microbial and AD amyloid [33,68]. The identification of the ‘amylome’, a classification of amino acid sequences within proteins with internal, self-complementary interfaces and high fiber-forming capability has improved our understanding of the tendency of different proteins to form amyloids that contribute to ‘dense-deposit’ disease [34,40,70]. Still widely used, CR staining is a highly sensitive diagnostic tool for amyloidosis and the ‘gold standard’ for the detection of amyloid fibrils including the Aβ42-enriched perivascular, parenchymal and nuclear amyloid deposits of AD [33,38,67,68]. Interestingly, it has very recently been demonstrated: (i) that the index of accumulation of CR-positive nuclear amyloids in spherical nucleoplasmic microenvironments may predict brain cell fitness and survival [38]; (ii) that LPS is capable of inducing a more pathogenic CR-sensitive β-pleated sheet conformation of prion amyloids [55]; and (iii) that the infectious microbial burden is significantly associated with both AD development and the propensity of AD amyloids to be stained by CR [66,70].

Molecular Mimicry

Molecular mimicry is defined (i) as the hypothetical possibility that structural similarities in amino acid sequence or PAMPS between microbial and host molecules, including amyloids, are sufficient enough to result in the cross-activation of the immune system leading to autoimmunity, and progressively pathological, pro-inflammatory signaling; and (ii) may exemplify one of the most powerful strategies that prokaryotic pathogens and eukaryotic parasites utilize to override homeostatic host cell functions to ensure their own replication and survival [3,4,58]. For example, mitochondria appear to have originated from archaeobacteria via endosymbiotic relationships that formed very early in eukaryotic evolutionary history, and cross-reactivity of mitochondria and immunological responses to bacterial LPS or amyloids may exert deleterious auto-immune effects and drive dysfunction to mitochondrial homeostasis. These potentially devastating auto-immune effects may be exacerbated over the course of aging when both GI-tract and blood brain barriers of the CNS become more permeable and critical CNS components become ‘decompartmentalized’[2,28-30,58]. This is partially exemplified by the extragastric diseases such as basal ganglia disorder Sydenham’s chorea, rheumatic fever, low grade systemic inflammatory states and the link to the Firmicute Streptococcus and/or the gram-negative microaerophilic Proteobacteria Helicobacter pylori [3,4,9,16,71,72]. Previous bacterial infection resulting in antibody formation to amyloids or bacterial endotoxins may predispose CNS mitochondria or amyloids to subsequent attack by antibodies and immune effects that result in an up-regulation of CNS inflammation [58,66].

Activation of TLR2 by Amyloids

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) constitute a family of 13 (TLR1 to TLR13) currently identified, non-catalytic type I membrane-spanning protein receptors expressed in macrophages and in dendritic and microglial cells. As pattern recognition receptors, TLRs play key roles in the innate-immune surveillance system by sensing structurally conserved PAMPs (see above) on microbial surfaces that are distinguishable from the host organism, and hence serve as immunesensors that are a first line dense against microbial invasion [73-75]. Microglial TLR2s are activated by amyloid, bacterial lipoproteins, LPS and other microbial triggers that subsequently induce cytokine production, inflammation, phagocytosis and innate-immune defense responses that directly impact CNS homoeostasis and drive neuropathology. More specifically the TLR2/TLR1 complex can recognize biofilm-associated amyloids produced by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria [2,24,76]. Interestingly, (i) Aβ42 peptides that associate with microglia-mediated pro-inflammatory host responses also co-activate TLR2 signaling [74,77]; (ii) microbial amyloids further induce pro-inflammatory interleukin IL-17A, a driver of NF-kB signaling and cyclooxygenase-2 activation; (iii) LPS and amyloids also induce other potent mediators of inflammatory responses such as IL-22 that direct TLR2 activation [76]; and (iv) pathologically up-regulated levels of IL-17A and IL-22 are associated with chronic inflammatory diseases including AD [41,45].

Concluding Remarks

Considerable advancement in DNA and RNA sequencing and bioinformatics technologies have created a new arena of human genetic research called ‘metagenomics’ that permits the comprehensive examination of complex microbial ecosystems without the need for labor-intensive microbial culture. This ‘metagenomic’ approach allows analysis of genetic material harvested directly from the GI tract microbiome using prokaryotic ribosomal RNA as an internalized reference without the need for microbial culture – indeed many microbial species of the human GI tract cannot be cultured ex vivo [6,13]. Currently the HMP is focused on the creation of the first integrated dataset of biological properties from both the microbiome and host from cohort studies of diseases with which the microbiome is associated [18,20,78]. The integration of complementary microbiome genus-and-species and abundance analysis using control microbial reference strains in cognitively normal aging humans is providing unprecedented information about the complexity of humanendogenous microbial communities and their potential contribution to CNS health and disease [6,13]. It is reasonable to speculate that the vast contribution and bioavailability of both microbial nutrients and neurotoxins are altered as humans age, leading to disequilibrium of the ‘hologenome’ that in part defines the difference between healthy aging from disease. Interestingly, at the precise time-point of death the human microbiome rapidly transforms into the ‘thanato-microbiome’ (thanatos-, Greek, death) and begins to play a primary role in the decomposition of host tissues; so keeping that potentially pathogenic fraction of the 1014 microbial species of the human GI tract in check, and the preservation of a healthy and homeostatic microbiome is an important part of the maintenance and preservation of human life itself [13,79]. Clearly, not only individual microbial abundance in the microbiome is important but also microbial speciation and stoichiometry, and what microbial complexities might contribute to, or detract from, optimum CNS health.

In summary a remarkable variety of microbes which constitute the human microbiome are capable in generating vast quantities of LPS and functional amyloid. The ability of both microbial- and CNSderived amyloids to bind CR has provided a practical tool for characterizing their abundance, subcellular location and biophysical properties and has suggested a potential overlap in their occurrence in CNS disease [25,26,50]. Indeed microbial and CNS amyloids are very similar in their biophysical and biological structure, immunogenicity and ability to be stained with diazo dyes such as CR and complex mechanistic interrelationships between these amyloids and with LPS are beginning to emerge. The large amount microbial-generated LPS and GI tract amyloid implicates high potential for human systemic exposure to these microbial-sourced amyloids, especially since the bioavailability of amyloid to the CNS may increase as humans age when GI-tract and blood brain barriers of the CNS become more permeable [2,28,29,30]. What is noteworthy is that (i) that human microbes that produce amyloids such as CsgA and curli, and the Aβ42 peptides that accumulate in AD, are recognized by the same TLR2/ TLR1 immune sensor-receptor system of the 13 different TLR-type receptors available; (ii) that all of these amyloids similarly direct increases in IL-17A- and IL-22-mediated pro-inflammatory signaling; and (iii) that Aβ42 peptides and CsgA do not share any common sequences of amino-acid, only considerable structural similarity in their PAMPs [80,81]. Microbes and their secretory exudates that include LPSs and amyloids are powerful pro-inflammatory and innateimmune activators and inducers of complement proteins and cytokines, that subsequently affect vascular permeability, immunogenicity and the generation of free radicals that further intensifies amyloid aggregation and inflammatory degeneration highly characteristic of age-related AD neuropathology, that includes defective Aβ peptide clearance mechanisms [14,82,83]. A more complete understanding of the human ‘hologenome’, of human microbial ecosystems and their secretory products should yield further insight into their contribution to age-related neurological diseases associated with amyloidogenesis, CNS inflammation and progressive neurodegeneration. It would be certainly informative to establish: (i) if LPSs, amyloids or other microbial-derived factors generated by the microbiome become more available systemically as humans age; (ii) if any microbial-generated amyloids or related signaling molecules colocalize with the amyloid-dense SP deposits or other insoluble lesions that characterize AD; (iii) what the evolution and nature of amyloidrelated communication between the microbiome and the CNS has on the development or propagation of amyloidogenesis throughout the CNS; (iv) how these highly interactive factors impact the onset, propagation and course of age-related inflammatory neurodegeneration; and (v) how increased understanding of microbiome-mediated mechanisms of amyloidogenesis may lead to the advancement of more effective anti-amyloid therapeutic strategies (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Potential contribution of gastrointestinal (GI) tract microbiome-derived lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and amyloids to systemic and central nervous system (CNS) amyloid burden

This highly schematicized drawing shows that as a major part of the microbiome, GI tract microbial sources of LPS and/or amyloid may contribute to both systemic amyloid and CNS amyloid burden and impact amyloidogenesis in both systemic and CNS compartments (question marks). This may be particularly relevant during the course of aging when the GI tract barrier and blood-brain barriers become considerably more permeable. Such mechanisms may operate both directly via LPS/amyloid leakage through compromised GI tract or blood-brain barriers and/or indirectly through LPS/amyloid-triggered cytokines or other small pro-inflammatory molecules which transit normally protective physiological barriers. Indeed, microbes and their secretory exudates are extremely powerful pro-inflammatory and innate-immune activators and inducers of complement proteins and cytokines, that subsequently affect vascular permeability, immunogenicity and the generation of free radicals. These further promote amyloid aggregation and inflammatory degeneration characteristic of an age-related AD neuropathological processes that also involve defective Aβ peptide clearance mechanisms [14,81-83]. See text for further details.

Acknowledgements

This work was presented in part at the Alzheimer Association International Congress (AAIC) 12-16 July 2014 in Copenhagen, Denmark and at the Society for Neuroscience (SFN) Annual Meeting 15-19 November 2014 in Washington DC. Sincere thanks are extended to Drs. S. Bhattacharjee, F Culicchia, C Eicken and C Hebel for short post-mortem interval (PMI) human brain tissues or extracts, DNA and miRNA array work and initial data interpretation, and to AI Pogue, D Guillot and J Lockwood for expert technical assistance. Additional thanks are extended to the many physicians and neuropathologists of Canada and the USA who have provided high quality, short post-mortem interval human brain and retinal tissues for study. Additional human control and AD brain tissues were provided by the Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders (MIND) Institute and the University of California, Irvine Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (UCI-ADRC; NIA P50 AG16573). Research on miRNA in the Lukiw laboratory involving the innate-immune response in AD, amyloidogenesis and neuro-inflammation was supported through a COBRE III Pilot Project NIH/NIGMS Grant P30- GM103340, an unrestricted grant to the LSU Eye Center from Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB); the Louisiana Biotechnology Research Network (LBRN) and NIH grants NEI EY006311, NIA AG18031 and NIA AG038834.

References

1. Cho I, Blaser MJ (2012) The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease. Nat Rev Genet 13: 260-270.
2. Bhattacharjee S, Lukiw WJ (2013) Alzheimer's disease and the microbiome. Front Cell Neurosci 7: 153.
3. Hill JM, Bhattacharjee S, Pogue AI, Lukiw WJ (2014) The gastrointestinal tract microbiome and potential link to Alzheimer's disease. Front Neurol 5: 43.
4. Hill JM, Clement C, Pogue AI, Bhattacharjee S, Zhao Y, et al. (2014) Pathogenic microbes, the microbiome, and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Front Aging Neurosci 6: 127.
5. Heintz C, Mair W (2014) You are what you host: microbiome modulation of the aging process. Cell 156: 408-411.
6. Halber D, The Microbiome http://now.tufts.edu/articles/microbiome Tufts Now, 80 George St., Medford, Massachusetts02155 USA - See more at: http://now.tufts.edu/articles/microbiome#sthash.4LtLDe.dpuf 19 September 2014
7. Bravo JA, Julio-Pieper M, Forsythe P, Kunze W, Dinan TG, et al. (2012) Communication between gastrointestinal bacteria and the nervous system. Curr Opin Pharmacol 12: 667-672.
8. Boutajangout A, Wisniewski T (2013) The innate immune system in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Cell Biol 2013: 576383.
9. Douglas-Escobar M, Elliott E, Neu J (2013) Effect of intestinal microbial ecology on the developing brain. JAMA Pediatr 167: 374-379.
10. Mancuso R, Baglio F, Cabinio M, Calabrese E, Hernis A, et al. (2014) Titers of herpes simplex virus type 1 antibodies positively correlate with grey matter volumes in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 38: 741-745.
11. Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ (1998) Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 6578-6583.
12. Kim BS, Jeon YS, Chun J (2013) Current status and future promise of the human microbiome. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr 16: 71-79.
13. Gordon JI, Ley RE, Wilson R, Mardis E, Xu J, Fraser CM, Relman DA (2014) Update on the Human Microbiome Project
14. Lin CS, Chang CJ, Lu CC, Martel J, Ojcius DM, et al. (2014) Impact of the gut microbiota, prebiotics, and probiotics on human health and disease. Biomed J 37: 259-268.
15. Stilling RM, Dinan TG, Cryan JF (2014) Microbial genes, brain & behaviour - epigenetic regulation of the gut-brain axis. Genes Brain Behav 13: 69-86.
16. Hornig M (2013) The role of microbes and autoimmunity in the pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric illness. Curr Opin Rheumatol 25: 488-795.
17. Syed AK, Boles BR (2014) Fold modulating function: bacterial toxins to functional amyloids. Front Microbiol 5: 401.
18. Lei YM, Nair L, Alegre ML (2014) The interplay between the intestinal microbiota and the immune system. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol .
19. Rhee SH (2014) Lipopolysaccharide: basic biochemistry, intracellular signaling, and physiological impacts in the gut. Intest Res 12: 90-95.
20. Shoemark DK, Allen SJ (2015) The Microbiome and Disease: Reviewing the Links between the Oral Microbiome, Aging, and Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 43: 725-738.
21. Alonso R, Pisa D, Rábano A, Carrasco L (2014) Alzheimer's disease and disseminated mycoses. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33: 1125-1132.
22. Alonso R, Pisa D, Marina AI, Morato E, Rábano A, et al. (2014) Fungal infection in patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 41: 301-311.
23. Schwartz K, Boles BR (2013) Microbial amyloids--functions and interactions within the host. Curr Opin Microbiol 16: 93-99.
24. Asti A, Gioglio L (2014) Can a bacterial endotoxin be a key factor in the kinetics of amyloid fibril formation? J Alzheimers Dis 39: 169-179.
25. Zhou Y, Blanco LP, Smith DR, Chapman MR (2012) Bacterial amyloids. Methods Mol Biol 849: 303-320.
26. Zhou ZD, Chan CH, Ma QH, Xu XH, Xiao ZC, et al. (2011) The roles of amyloid precursor protein (APP) in neurogenesis: Implications to pathogenesis and therapy of Alzheimer disease. Cell Adh Migr 5: 280-292.
27. Hattori M, Taylor TD (2009) The human intestinal microbiome: a new frontier of human biology. DNA Res 16: 1-12.
28. Tran L, Greenwood-Van Meerveld B (2013) Age-associated remodeling of the intestinal epithelial barrier. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68: 1045-1056.
29. Marques F, Sousa JC, Sousa N, Palha JA (2013) Blood-brain-barriers in aging and in Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurodegener 8: 38.
30. Oakley R, Tharakan B (2014) Vascular hyperpermeability and aging. Aging Dis 5: 114-125.
31. Badtke MP, Hammer ND, Chapman MR (2009) Functional amyloids signal their arrival. Sci Signal 2: pE3.
32. Blanco LP, Evans ML, Smith DR, Badtke MP, Chapman MR (2012) Diversity, biogenesis and function of microbial amyloids. Trends Microbiol 20: 66-73.
33. Buxbaum JN, Linke RP (2012) A molecular history of the amyloidoses. J Mol Biol 421: 142-159.
34. Lukiw WJ (2012) Amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide modulators and other current treatment strategies for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Expert Opin Emerg Drugs .
35. Uversky VN. (2010) Targeting intrinsically disordered proteins in neurodegenerative and protein dysfunction diseases: another illustration of the D(2) concept.Expert Rev Proteomics.7: 543-64.
36. Breydo L, Reddy KD, Piai A, Felli IC, Pierattelli R, et al. (2014) The crowd you're in with: effects of different types of crowding agents on protein aggregation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1844: 346-357.
37. Hawkes CA, Jayakody N, Johnston DA, Bechmann I, Carare RO (2014) Failure of perivascular drainage of β-amyloid in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Brain Pathol 24: 396-403.
38. von Mikecz A (2014) Pathology and function of nuclear amyloid. Nucleus 5: 311-317.
39. Van Broeck B, Van Broeckhoven C, Kumar-Singh S (2007) Current insights into molecular mechanisms of Alzheimer disease and their implications for therapeutic approaches. Neurodegener Dis 4: 349-365.
40. O'Brien RJ, Wong PC (2011) Amyloid precursor protein processing and Alzheimer's disease. Annu Rev Neurosci 34: 185-204.
41. Zhang H, Ma Q, Zhang YW, Xu H (2012) Proteolytic processing of Alzheimer's β-amyloid precursor protein. J Neurochem 120 Suppl 1: 9-21.
42. Merezhko M, Muggalla P, Nykänen NP, Yan X, Sakha P, et al. (2014) Multiplex assay for live-cell monitoring of cellular fates of amyloid-β precursor protein (APP). PLoS One 9: e98619.
43. Alexandrov PN, Pogue A, Bhattacharjee S, Lukiw WJ (2011) Retinal amyloid peptides and complement factor H in transgenic models of Alzheimer's disease. Neuroreport 22: 623-627.
44. Teng PK, Anderson NJ, Goldschmidt L, Sawaya MR, Sambashivan S, et al. (2012) Ribonuclease A suggests how proteins self-chaperone against amyloid fiber formation. Protein Sci 21: 26-37.
45. Zhang J, Ke KF, Liu Z, Qiu YH, Peng YP (2013) TH7 cell-mediated neuroinflammation is involved in neurodegeneration of aβ1-42-induced Alzheimer's disease model rats. PLoS One 8: e75786.
46. Armstrong RA (2006) Plaques and tangles and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Folia Neuropathol 44: 1-11.
47. Cui JG, Hill JM, Zhao Y, Lukiw WJ (2007) Expression of inflammatory genes in the primary visual cortex of late-stage Alzheimer's disease. Neuroreport 18: 115-119.
48. Furukawa Y, Nukina N (2013) Functional diversity of protein fibrillar aggregates from physiology to RNA granules to neurodegenerative diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1832: 1271-1278.
49. Ferrera D, Mazzaro N, Canale C, Gasparini L (2014) Resting microglia react to Aβ42 fibrils but do not detect oligomers or oligomer-induced neuronal damage. Neurobiol Aging 35: 2444-2457.
50. Serpente M, Bonsi R, Scarpini E, Galimberti D (2014) Innate immune system and inflammation in Alzheimer's disease: from pathogenesis to treatment. Neuroimmunomodulation 21: 79-87.
51. Takeda S, Sato N, Morishita R. (2014) Systemic inflammation, blood-brain barrier vulnerability and cognitive/non-cognitive symptoms in Alzheimer disease: relevance to pathogenesis and therapy. Front Aging Neurosci.6:171
52. Colangelo V, Schurr J, Ball MJ, Pelaez RP, Bazan NG, et al. (2002) Gene expression profiling of 12633 genes in Alzheimer hippocampal CA: transcription and neurotrophic factor down-regulation and up-regulation of apoptotic and pro-inflammatory signaling. J Neurosci Res 70: 462-473.
53. Hammer ND, Wang X, McGuffie BA, Chapman MR (2008) Amyloids: friend or foe? J Alzheimers Dis 13: 407-419.
54. Dasari M, Espargaro A, Sabate R, Lopez del Amo JM, Fink U, Grelle G.(2011) Bacterial inclusion bodies of Alzheimer's disease ß-amyloid peptides can be employed to study native-like aggregation intermediate states. Chembiochem.12: 407-423
55. Saleem F, Bjorndahl TC, Ladner CL, Perez-Pineiro R, Ametaj BN, et al. (2014) Lipopolysaccharide induced conversion of recombinant prion protein. Prion 8.
56. Le NT, Narkiewicz J, Aulić S, Salzano G, Tran HT, et al. (2014) Synthetic prions and other human neurodegenerative proteinopathies. Virus Res.
57. Watts JC, Condello C, Stöhr J, Oehler A, Lee J, et al. (2014) Serial propagation of distinct strains of Aβ prions from Alzheimer's disease patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: 10323-10328.
58. Via A, Uyar B, Brun C, Zanzoni A (2015) How pathogens use linear motifs to perturb host cell networks. Trends Biochem Sci 40: 36-48.
59. Deng X, Li M, Ai W, He L, Lu D, Patrylo PR, et al.(2014) Lipolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation is associated with Alzheimer-like amyloidogenic axonal pathology and dendritic degeneration in rats. Adv Alzheimer Dis. 3:78-93.
60. Fassbender K, Walter S, Kühl S, Landmann R, Ishii K, et al. (2004) The LPS receptor (CD) links innate immunity with Alzheimer's disease. FASEB J 18: 203-205.
61. Rivest S (2009) Regulation of innate immune responses in the brain. Nat Rev Immunol 9: 429-439.
62. Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. St. Louis MO USA; (2014) LPS solubility – product insert - https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/content/dam/sigma-aldrich/docs/Sigma/ProductInfor-mation_ Sheet/2/l5886pis.pdf
63. Sasaki H, White SH (2008) Aggregation behavior of an ultra-pure lipopolysaccharide that stimulates TLR-4 receptors. Biophys J 95: 986-993.
64. Dowhan W (2014) Lipids and extracellular materials. Annu Rev Biochem 83: 45-49.
65. Ifuku M, Katafuchi T, Mawatari S, Noda M, Miake K, et al. (2012) Anti-inflammatory/anti-amyloidogenic effects of plasmalogens in lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation in adult mice. J Neuroinflammation 9: 197.
66. Bu XL, Yao XQ, Jiao SS, Zeng F, Liu YH, et al. (2014) A study on the association between infectious burden and Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Neurol .
67. Steensma DP (2001) "Congo" red: out of Africa? Arch Pathol Lab Med 125: 250-252.
68. Linke RP. Congo red staining of amyloid; improvements and practical guide for a more precise diagnosis of amyloid and the different amyloidoses. Chapter 11.1 in Protein Misfolding, Aggregation, and Conformational Diseases Part A: Protein Aggregation and Conformational Diseases, 2006;4:239-276 (2006) Editors: Uversky V,N,, Fink A.L., Springer NY
69. Wu C, Scott J, Shea JE (2012) Binding of Congo red to amyloid protofibrils of the Alzheimer Aβ(9-40) peptide probed by molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J 103: 550-557.
70. Goldschmidt L, Teng PK, Riek R, Eisenberg D (2010) Identifying the amylome, proteins capable of forming amyloid-like fibrils. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 3487-3492.
71. Hayashi M (2013) [Anti-basal ganglia antibody]. Brain Nerve 65: 377-384.
72. Roubaud Baudron C, Franceschi F, Salles N, Gasbarrini A (2013) Extragastric diseases and Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter 18 Suppl 1: 44-51.
73. Tükel C, Wilson RP, Nishimori JH, Pezeshki M, Chromy BA, et al. (2009) Responses to amyloids of microbial and host origin are mediated through toll-like receptor 2. Cell Host Microbe 6: 45-53.
74. Yu Y, Ye RD (2014). Microglial Aß receptors in Alzheimer's disease. Cell Mol Neurobiol. Aug 23.
75. Harry GJ.(2013) Microglia during development and aging. Pharmacol Ther. 139:313-326
76. Nishimori JH, Newman TN, Oppong GO, Rapsinski GJ, Yen JH, et al. (2012) Microbial amyloids induce interleukin 17A (IL-17A) and IL-22 responses via Toll-like receptor 2 activation in the intestinal mucosa. Infect Immun 80: 4398-4408.
77. Gustot A, Raussens V, Dehousse M, Dumoulin M, Bryant CE, Ruysschaert JM, Lonez C (2013) Activation of innate immunity by lysozyme fibrils is critically dependent on cross-ß sheet structure. Cell Mol Life Sci. 70:2999-3012.
78. Catanzaro R, Anzalone MG, Calabrese F, Milazzo M, Capuana ML, et al. (2014) The gut microbiota and its correlations with the central nervous system disorders. Panminerva Med .
79. Can I, Javan GT, Pozhitkov AE, Noble PA. (2014) Distinctive thanatomicrobiome signatures found in the blood and internal organs of humans. J Microbiol Methods. 106:1-7.
80. Rapsinski GJ, Newman TN, Oppong GO, van Putten JP, Tükel Ç (2013) CD protein acts as an adaptor molecule for the immune recognition of Salmonella curli fibers. J Biol Chem 288: 14178-14188.
81. Kanther M, Tomkovich S, Xiaolun S, Grosser MR, Koo J, Flynn EJ 3rd, Jobin C, Rawls JF. (2014) Commensal microbiota stimulate systemic neutrophil migration through induction of serum amyloid A. Cell Microbiol. 16:1053-67.
82. Zhao Y, Bhattacharjee S, Jones BM, Dua P, Alexandrov PN, et al. (2013) Regulation of TREM expression by an NF-кB-sensitive miRNA-34a. Neuroreport 24: 318-323.
83. Jones BM, Bhattacharjee S, Dua P, Hill JM, Zhao Y, et al. (2014) Regulating amyloidogenesis through the natural triggering receptor expressed in myeloid/microglial cells 2 (TREM). Front Cell Neurosci 8: 94.