Oil & Gas Research
Open Access

Glycobiotechnology involves the transfer of the introductory knowledge structure and functional relationship of glycoconjugates to exercise- related synthetic and applied directors. The term “glycoconjugate” indicates the combination of glycoproteins and glycolipids. Microbial strains are suitable to produce glycoconjugates and grease their metabolism in colorful ways, similar as via the directors of these motes, uptake of the desirable adulterants, and other substrates. Glycoconjugates are an integral part of the bacterial cell membrane, which consists of special types, viz., face motes (lipopolysaccharides, capsular polysaccharides, lipo-oligosaccharides, and glycoproteins), cell- wall polymers, and buried exopolysaccharides. In addition to this, microbial strains produce extracellular glycoconjugates similar as rhamnolipids, sophorolipids and exopolysaccharides, glycoproteins, and glycol-lipopeptides. These glycoconjugates play a pivotal part in the bioremediation of the OPs [1-3].

Microorganisms produce glycoconjugates with bio surfactant parcels during the stationary phase of the microbial growth cycle. Glycoconjugates are amphiphilic composites synthesized onto the cell face of the microorganism. These motes contain hydrophilic and hydrophobic halves that reduce the face and interfacial pressure. Glycoconjugates can have different structures, similar as glycoproteins, glycopeptides, peptidoglycans, glycolipids, lipopolysaccharides, and glycosides. The product of the glycoconjugates depends on the patron microorganism, nutritive sources similar as carbon and nitrogen, trace rudiments, and the physicochemical conditions for product. Lately, glycoconjugate rhamnolipids have been the most generally used in artificial and environmental operations. The glycolipid rhamnolipid is well studied in the Pseudomonas and Burkholderia species. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is considered as the top rhamnolipid patron at over 100 g • L − 1. In a liquid culture, Pseudomonas aeruginosa produces two types of rhamnolipids appertained to as mono and dirhamnolipid. These motes are synthesized by two enzyme-specific rhamnosyl transfer responses. The enzyme that catalyzes these responses is called rhamnosyltransferase. The hydrophobic and hydrophilic corridor of the rhamnolipid are synthesized by different biosynthetic responses in the microbial strains. After their conflation, both of the portions are linked to each other, forming monorhamnolipids and dirhamnolipids. Provocations are also reported to produce glycoconjugates similar as sophorolipids, mannosylerythritol, cellobiose, and trehalose lipids. These have been explored for their lesser eventuality in the bioremediation of weakened spots. The enhanced bioremediation of pyrene and tetracycline in soil was delved with the addition of sophorolipid [4-7] .

Hydrophobic adulterants bear desorption from the soil and water terrain before microbial metabolism. Mineralization of OPs is governed by desorption from the soil. The operation of glycoconjugates as bio surfactants for the bioremediation of environmental OPs is also well established; they play a direct part in the desorption of adulterants. In the first step, these glycoconjugates interact with lower answerable OPs and ameliorate their transfer into the soil matrix and their posterior junking. In the alternate step, glycoconjugates act as a ground between the microbial strains and soil, due to which the bioavailability of the adulterants increases. The increased attention of these face-active glycoconjugate composites help in the attachment of microbial cells to adulterants. Bio surfactants increase the face areas of hydrophobic adulterants through which their solubility increases in the soil and water terrain. The use of bio surfactants for the biodegradation of fungicides has gained attention in recent times. Former reports supported the part of bio surfactants in the bioremediation of hydrocarbon and fungicide- defiled soil. These reports favor fungicide declination using glycoconjugated biosurfactant generally synthesized from bacterial speciesviz.,B. pumilus,B. mojavensis,B. licheniformis andB. amyloliquifaciens. Biosurfactants of Lactobacillus pentosus degrade octane efficiently. In a study, Burkholderia species insulated from an canvas- defiled area was suitable to produce biosurfactant, that plays a critical part in fungicide declination. Biosurfactants that degrade naturally are immaculately suitable for the junking of organic adulterants from the terrain and considered ecofriendly to nature. Former studies indicated that the effectiveness of OP declination was bettered in the presence of microbial glycoconjugates. Stimulation in the declination of OPs was substantially due to the action of the biosurfactants. Improvement in the declination of octane was due to the biosurfactants product using Lactobacillus pentosus. In addition to rallying, glycoconjugated biosurfactants increase the declination rate via other mechanisms. An axenic culture of Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E produced a rhamnolipid that eased the bioremediation of chlorinated phenols. The sense behind this medium involves ruse of the chlorophenol in the biosurfactant micelles and the hydrophobic relationship between these two types of composites. Also, Actinobacteria produced biosurfactants that enhanced the rate of xenobiotics bioremediation. Rhamnolipids were plant to be acceptable in the bioremediation of carbendazim with Rhodococcus sp. D-1. The rhamnolipid affected carbendazim declination in a attentiondependent manner with maximum bioremediation effectiveness. It eased carbendazim emulsification and favorable changes on the cell face, allowing it to enter Rhodococcus sp [7-10] . D1 cells, and declination latterly passed. The glycolipid produced from the Rhodococcussp. strain IITRO3 also makes the lesser impact on declination oftrichloro (4-chlorophenyl) ethane. The distribution of glycoconjugateproducing bacteria was reported in polluted thirsty southwestern soil. Rhizospheric microbes play an important part in the declination of soil impurity, enhancing the declination plant with product of the glycoconjugates.

1. Magdalena A.K, Anna T.S, Monika J, Agnieszka S.C (2019) Glycoconjugates of Gram-negative bacteria and parasitic protozoa - are they similar in orchestrating the innate immune response?. Innate Immun 25: 73-96.

Indexed at , Google Scholar , Crossref

2. Anne I, Annabelle V (2008) Microbial recognition of human cell surface glycoconjugates. Curr Opin Struct Biol 18: 567-576.

Indexed at , Google Scholar , Crossref

3. Kenji Y (2013)Recent advances in glycotechnology for glycoconjugate synthesis using microbial endoglycosidases. Biotechnol Lett 35: 1733-1743.

Indexed at , Google Scholar , Crossref

4. Ewelina K, Gabriela P.G, Binay C, Gabriela B, Karol E, et al. (2018) Novel Uridine Glycoconjugates, Derivatives of 4-Aminophenyl 1-Thioglycosides, as Potential Antiviral Compounds. Molecules 23:1435.

Indexed at , Google Scholar , Crossref

5. Pankaj B, Amit V, Saurabh G, Geeta B, Shaohua C (2021) Microbial glycoconjugates in organic pollutant bioremediation: recent advances and applications. Microb Cell Fact 20: 72.

Indexed at , Google Scholar , Crossref

6. Karlsson K.A (1995) Microbial recognition of target-cell glycoconjugates. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5: 622-635.

Indexed at , Google Scholar , Crossref

7. Jolanta L.K, Magdalena O.P (2015) [The significance of fucosylated glycoconjugates of human milk in nutrition of newborns and infants]. Postepy Hig Med Dosw 69: 811-829.

Indexed at , Google Scholar , Crossref

8. Hanne L.P.T, Sarah L (2014) The sweet tooth of bacteria: common themes in bacterial glycoconjugates. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78: 372-417.

Indexed at , Google Scholar , Crossref

9. Hanne L.P.T, Willem M.D.V (2016) Sugar Coating the Envelope: Glycoconjugates for Microbe-Host Crosstalk. Trends Microbiol 24: 853-861.

Indexed at , Google Scholar , Crossref

10. Karlijn G, Cambi A, Torensma R, Carl G.F (2006) C-type lectins on dendritic cells and their interaction with pathogen-derived and endogenous glycoconjugates. Curr Protein Pept Sci 7: 283-294.

Indexed at , Google Scholar , Crossref