Journal of Mucosal Immunology Research
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Commentary   
  • J Mucosal Immunol Res, Vol 5(1)
  • DOI: 10.4172/jmir.1000129

MDSC Inhibitor Therapy in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm

Jen Chin Wang1* and Zayar O2
1Department of Hematology/Oncology, Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center, NewYork, US
2Department of Medicine, Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, NewYork, USA
*Corresponding Author: Jen Chin Wang, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11212, NewYork, USA, Email: jcwang0005@Gmail.com

Received: 07-Jan-2021 / Accepted Date: 21-Jan-2021 / Published Date: 28-Jan-2021 DOI: 10.4172/jmir.1000129

Description

We had published an article “Myeloid suppressor cells in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm“in Leukemia Research [1]. Hereby, we would like to write a commentary note as an extension for that article. In that article, we had described that Myeloid Suppressor Cells (MDSC) were increased in classical Philadelphia chromosome negative (ph(-)) Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) including Polycythemia Vera (PV), Essential Thrombocythemia (ET), and Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF).

MDSC Cells

MDSC-like cells were first described in the early 1900, with progression of tumor, increase in Extramedullary Haematopoiesis (EMH) and neutrophilia that was later shown to result in immune evasion and tumor vascularization [2]. The nomenclature and phenotypic heterogeneity of these cells which included immature Myeloid Cells (iMCs), Myeloid Suppressor Cells (MSCs), and Gr1+ myeloid cells [3-6] was confusing and a consensus was reached, identifying MDSC as the terminology to be used for this cellular phenotype and function in 2007 [7]. In summary, in mice, Mouse MDSC co-expressed CD11b and Gr1, is classified in two major groups: monocytic MDSC (M-MDSC), with a CD11b+Ly6Glow/ −Ly6Chigh phenotype, and granulocytic or polymorphonuclear MDSC (PMN-MDSC), with a CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow/− phenotype [8]. Since no human equivalent of Gr1+ exists, there is no unequivocal manner to phenotype human MDSC. M-MDSC are mostly described as CD14+HLA-DRlow/−, or as CD11b+CD33+CD14+HLA-DRlow/ −, whereas PMN- MDSC are mostly described as CD11b +CD33+CD15+HLA-DR [9,10].

Immunity Studies in MPN

Barosi had reviewed immune dysregulation in MPN [11], summarized as 1) auto-immune diseases were predisposed to and associated with MPN, 2) increased immune cells with monocytes and macrophages resulting in inflammatory cytokines, 3) controversyabout the increase or decrease of Treg cells, 4) dysfunction of CD4+/NK cells. We also reported that PD-1 and PD-L1 were increased in MPN [12]. Increased MDSC in MPN published by us [1], further added to the dimension of immune dysregulation in MPN. Lately, we also found TLR 2 levels were elevated in patients with MPN [13]. We speculated that increased MDSC cells in MPN were likely related to the chronic inflammatory process in MPN [14] with derangements of TLR pathway leading to the formation of MDSC through increased production of inflammatory cytokines leading to the defective maturation of MDSC [15,16].

Prospect of MDSC in the Advance of Therapy in MPN

Dr.Tefferi’s [17] opinion that in treating MF patients, the only treatment modality that is currently capable of prolonging survival or potential cure in MF is allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Current drug therapy for PMF is mostly palliative in scope and has not been shown to favorably modify disease’s natural history or prolong survival; specifically, JAK2 inhibitor treatment in PMF has not been shown to reverse bone marrow fibrosis or induce complete or partial remissions; instead, its value is limited to symptomatic relief and reduction in spleen size. Exploration of other therapeutic options will be necessary to further advance therapy in MPN. An option for advancing therapy in MPN may be to decrease MDSC levels in MPN diseases by which to restore the immune function of suppressed immune cells. MDSC can be decreased by 1)All- Trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA): ATRA binds to the retinoic acid receptor and blocks the retinoic acid signal transduction, which then causes MDSC to differentiate into DC and macrophages [18]. 2) Chemotherapy: using gemcitabine was shown to reduce the frequency of MDSC and Treg as well as TGF-β1 level but not T cells in the peripheral blood of pancreatic cancer patients [19]. 3) Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor. Notably MDSC were found to express Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK), and Ibrutinib covalently binds to cysteine residues immediately outside the ATP-binding pocket of BTK [20]. Targeting BTK in malignant B cells with ibrutinib has been shown to have great effects on the response rate and survival in B cell lymphoid neoplasms [21]. Reports have also shown a role for BTK in Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling in myeloid cells [22,23].We have reported that TLR signaling is enhanced in MPN [13], therefore by employing Ibrutinib which suppresses MDSC and TLR signaling in myeloid cells may have effects on MPN. PD- 1 inhibitor therapy in treating myelofibrosis was reported lately as a negative study, failed to achieve clinical activities, [24] Targeting MDSC in murine tumor models enhances the efficacy of immune-based therapies such as PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade [24-27]. Therefore, clinical trial with adding MDSC inhibitor to the immune check-check point inhibitor may be worthwhile in the treatment of MPN and need to be explored in the future studies.

References

  1. Wang JC, Kundra A, Andrei M, Baptiste S, Chen C, et al. (2016) Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasm. Leuk Res 43:4339-4343.
  2. Sonnenfeld A. (1929) Leukamische reaktiones bei carcinoma. Zeitschrift f Klin Med 111.
  3. Boutte AM, McDonald WH, Shyr Y, Yang L, Lin PC. (2011) Characterization of the MDSC proteome associated with metastatic murine mammary tumors using label-free mass spectrometry and shotgun proteomics. PLoS One 6:e22446.
  4. Chornoguz O, Grmai L, Sinha P, Artemenko KA, Zubarev RA, et al. (2011) Proteomic pathway analysis reveals inflammation increases myeloid-derived suppressor cell resistance to apoptosis. Mol Cell Proteomics 10(3):M110.
  5. Bronte V, Serafini P, Apolloni E, Zanovello P. (2008) Tumor-induced immune dysfunctions caused by myeloid suppressor cells. J Immunother 24(6):431-446.
  6. Gabrilovich DI, Velders MP, Sotomayor EM, Kast WM. (2001) Mechanism of immune dysfunction in cancer mediated by immature Gr-1+ myeloid cells. J Immunol 166(9):5398-5406.
  7. Gabrilovich DI, Bronte V, Chen S, Colombo MP, Ochoa, et al. (2007) The Terminology Issue for Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. Cancer Res 67(1):425-425.
  8. Bronte V, Apolloni E, Cabrelle A, Ronca R, Serafini P, et al. (2000) Identification of a CD11b(+)/Gr-1(+)/CD31(+) myeloid progenitor capable of activating or suppressing CD8(+) T cells. Blood 96(12):3838-3846.
  9. Bronte V, Brandau S, Chen S-H, Colombo MP, Frey AB, et al. (2016) Recommendations for myeloid-derived suppressor cell nomenclature and char- acterization standards. Nat Commun 7:12150.
  10. Damuzzo V, Pinton L, Desantis G, Solito S, Marigo I, et al. (2015) Complexity and challenges in defining myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cytom Part B Clin Cytom 88(2):77-91.
  11. Barosi G. An immune dysregulation in MPN. .Curr Hematol Malig Rep 9(4):331-339.
  12. Wang JC, Chen C, Kundra K, Sreenath K, Pandey A, et al. (2019) Programmed Cell Death Receptor (PD-1) Ligand (PD-L1) expression in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leuk Res 79:52-59.
  13. Shi G, Chen H, Abdelmalek S, Bandarchuk A, Mahmood AK, et al. (2016) Derangements of Toll-like Receptors, Inflammatory Cytokines, and Reactive Oxygen Species in Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasm: Implicate Roles of Inflammation in the Pathogenesis. Ame Soc Hematol 128(22):1945.
  14. Hasselbalch HC. (2013) Chronic inflammation as a promotor of mutagenesis in essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera and myelofibrosis. A human inflammation model for cancer development? Leuk Res 37(2):214-220.
  15. Diaz-Montero CM, Salem ML, Nishimura MI, Garrett-Mayer E, Cole DJ, et al. (2009) Increased circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells correlate with clinical cancer stage, metastatic tumor burden, and doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother 58(1):49-59.
  16. Bunt SK, Yang L, Sinha p, Clements VK, Leips J, Ostrand-rosenberg S. (2007)Reduced inflammation in the tumor microenvironment delays the accumulation of myeloid‐derived suppressor cells and limits tumor progression. Cancer res 67: 10019-10026.
  17. Tefferi A. (2018) Primary myelofibrosis: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol 93(12):1551-1560.
  18. Nefedova Y, Fishman M, Sherman S, Wang X, Beg AA, et al. (2007) Mechanism of all-trans retinoic acid effect on tumor-associated myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res 67:11021-11028.
  19. Eriksson E, Wenthe J, Irenaeus S, Loskog A, Ullenhag G. (2016) Gemcitabine reduces MDSCs, tregs and TGFβ-1 while restoring the teff/treg ratio in patients with pancreatic cancer. J Transl Med 14:282.
  20. Stiff A, Trikha P, Wesolowski R, Kendra K, Hsu V, et al. (2016) Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Express Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase and Can Be Depleted in Tumor-Bearing Hosts by Ibrutinib Treatment. Cancer Res ;76(8):2125-2136.
  21. Byrd JC, Hillmen P, O'Brien S, Barrientos JC, Reddy NM, et al. (2019) Long-term follow-up of the RESONATE phase 3 trial of ibrutinib vs ofatumumab. Blood 133(19):20310-2042.
  22. Lee KG, Xu S, Kang ZH, Huo J, Huang M, et al. (2012) Bruton's tyrosine kinase phosphorylates Toll-like receptor 3 to initiate antiviral response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:5791-5796.
  23. Bunt SK, Clements VK, Hanson EM, Sinha P, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. (2009) Inflammation enhances myeloid-derived suppressor cell cross-talk by signaling through Toll-like receptor 4. J Leukoc Biol 85(6):996-1004.
  24. Gabriela S. Hobbs, MD, Cansu Cimen Bozkus, Martha Wadleigh, MD, et al. (2020) Results of a Phase II Study of PD-1 Inhibition in Advanced Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Blood 136:14-15.
  25. Bridle BW, Chen L, Lemay CG, Diallo JS, Pol J, et al. (2013) HDAC inhibition suppresses primary immune responses, enhances secondary immune responses, and abrogates autoimmunity during tumor immuno- therapy. Mol Ther 21:887-894.
  26. Highfill SL, Cui Y, Giles AJ, Smith JP, Zhang H, et al. (2014) Disruption of CXCR2-mediated MDSC tumor trafficking enhances anti-PD1 efficacy. Sci Translat Med 6(237):237ra67.
  27. Weide B, Martens A, Zelba H, Stutz C, Derhovanessian E,et al. (2014) Myeloid-derived suppressor cells predict survival of patients with advanced melanoma: comparison with regulatory T cells and NY-ESO-1- or melan-A-specific T cells. Clin Cancer Res 20(6):1601-1609.

Citation: Wang JC, Oo Z. (2021) MDSC Inhibitor Therapy in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm. J Mucosal Immunol Res 5: 129. DOI: 10.4172/jmir.1000129

Copyright: © 2021 Wang JC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top