Mass Spectrometry and COVID-19: Characterization and Diagnostics
DOI: 10.4172/2155-9872.1000425
Abstract
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 (disease:COVID-19) has created a severe public health crisis with an ongoing pandemic and according to the World Health Organization, over 2.5 million confirmed cases of infection to date. Analytical science and techniques are at the forefront of onging research and development and ranges from understanding the fundamental biology of the virus to diagnostic testing. This editorial examines mass spectrometry based analytical strategies used in virus characterization and diagnostics; a summary of what has been done and what is emerging and evolving is presented.
Keywords: COVID-19, Mass spectrometry, diagnostics, characterization, Spike Protein.
Short communication
Established methods in mass spectrometry (MS) used in the characteri- zation of virus structure and, protein-based vaccines and therapeutics which target viral infections include peptide mapping [1], glycan profil- ing (site localization, composition and heterogeneity) [2] and quantifi- cation of viral proteins with liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) [3]. These methods usually involve digestion of proteins (free or incorporated into virus, vaccine or thera- peutic assembly/structure) into peptides prior to MS analysis; glycan analysis can be done at the glycopeptide level or glycans can be released and oftentimes labeled for ease of ionization prior to MS analysis or al- low for detection with complementary methods[4,5].
In biopharmaceutical research and development peptide mapping is a first step in the assessment of the critical quality attributes (CQAs) [6] of a protein-based product. LC-MS/MS peptide mapping assay serve to confirm the primary sequence of a protein as proof of identity. Glycans can affect safety, stability, efficacy and clearance of a biotherapeutic and so its glycan profile is also a CQA [7]. In the ongoing pandemic, virions of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus which causes COVID-19) comprise single- stranded RNA with nucleoproteins enclosed within a capsid containing matrix proteins; four structural proteins are present-S (spike), E (en- velope), M (membrane), and N (nucleocapsid) proteins [8,9]. The N protein encapsulates the RNA genome while the S, E, and M proteins make up the viral envelope. The S protein, which protrudes from the vi- rus surface giving it a crown-like appearance, is the subject of extensive characterization as it is a key target for vaccine and drug development because it initiates and mediates entry into the host cell and subsequent infection [10]. It is a ~540 kDa homotrimer complex heterogeneously glycosylated with 22 N-glycan sites on each monomer. Peptide mapping has been used to obtain the primary sequence of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein at about 90% sequence coverage [11]. The glycans on the S-Protein surface can play several roles including that of immune evasion by forming a glycan shield, host cell receptor binding and im- mune recognition [12,13]. Thus, for effective drug design and to aid in understanding virus action and infection a glycan profile is vital. The N-glycan site localization and composition has been determined with LC-MS/MS for all 22 potential glycosylation sites on the native S pro- tein allowing for a signature N-glycan profile [14]. In addition, LC-MS/ MS was used to experimentally deduce for the first time O-glycans on the S-Protein surface [15].
Most mass spectrometry based diagnostic assays for COVID-19 (to date) use a targeted LC-MS/MS proteomics approach with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) [16]. Currently the main diagnostic test for COVID-19 is based upon the real time polymerase chain reaction (rT-PCR) and detects specific viral signatures of the SARS-CoV-2 ge- nome in people who are infected. It is the gold standard for testing, but it has limitations and includes false positives, low detection sensitivity and reduced specificity particularly in a mutated virus [17]. Antibody based serology COVID-19 tests can be used to detect viral antigens, but the limitation arises with a negative (inconclusive) result since the de- tection sensitivity and specificity can be suboptimal [18,19]. Proteom- ics based testing would serve as a complementary, fast, sensitive and specific method in COVID-19 diagnostics. Targeted LC-MS/MS with MRM have been used for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 via detec- tion of signature peptides of the S and N-proteins. This approach has been successfully applied for the detection of the S Protein from naso- oropharyngeal swabs in symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 patients [20] and in Gargle solution samples from COVID-19 patients [21].
Although they have been applied to virus structure characterization with instrument modification, intact mass analysis, native mass spec- trometry and hydrogen deuterium exchange (HDX) methods present more of a challenge because these megadalton sized assemblies are simply too large for conventional and commercial mass spectrometers currently available [22-25]. Characterization usually relies on full or partial digestion for MS analysis; however, information on intact as- sembly, antigenic protein incorporation into assembly and aggregation state can be lost. However, with the advent of the new charge detection mass spectrometry (CDMS) the upper mass limitation is overcome. CDMS allows the direct measurement of mass (allowing for confirma- tion of size, identity and confirmation of antigen incorporation into vi- ral capsids or a drug product), mass distribution and aggregation state of megadalton sized structure [26-29]. Thus, in the biopharmaceutical world, it holds potential as an emerging and promising technique for the characterization of megadalton sized structures such as gene ther- apy vectors, viruses and vaccine candidates such as virus-like particles (VLPs) where confirmation of assembly structure, identity and assem- bly/disassembly may become routine with MS.
Overall, established MS workflows have risen to the need for methods to be used in SARS-CoV-2 characterization. MS based diagnostic as- says look promising, are still emerging and being developed. CDMS currently presents at the forefront of MS technologies for the charac- terization of megadalton sized structures at the fully assembled level; however, there is a need for the development of more techniques in this area.
References
- Benevento M , Palma SD, Snijder J, Moyer CL, Reddy VS, et al. (2014) Adenovirus composition, proteolysis, and disassembly studied by in-depth qualitative and quantitative proteomics. J Biol Chem 289(16):11421-11430.
- Cruz E, Cain J, Crossett B, Kayser V (2018) Kayser Site-specific glycosylation profile of influenza A (H1N1) hemagglutinin through tandem mass spectrometry. Hum Vaccin Immunother 14(3):508-517.
- Santana WI, Williams TL, Winne EK, Pirkle JL, Barr JR (2014) Quantification of viral proteins of the avian H7 subtype of influenza virus: an isotope dilution mass spectrometry method applicable for producing more rapid vaccines in the case of an influenza pandemic. Anal Chem 86(9):4088-4095.
- Pabst M, Altmann F (2011) Glycan analysis by modern instrumental methods. Proteomics 11(4):631-643.
- Leymarie N, Zaia J (2012) Effective use of mass spectrometry for glycan and glycopeptide structural analysis. Anal Chem 84(7):3040-3048.
- US Food and Drug Administration (2009) Guidance for Industry Q8(R2) Pharmaceutical Development.
- Solá RJ, Griebenow K (2010) Glycosylation of therapeutic proteins: An effective strategy to optimize efficacy. BioDrugs 24(1):09-21.
- Astuti I, Ysrafil (2020) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): An overview of viral structure and host response. Diabetes Metab Syndr 14(4):407-412.
- Huang Y, Yang C, Xu X, Xu W, Liu SW (2020) Structural and functional properties of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: Potential antivirus drug development for COVID-19. Acta Pharmacol Sin 41(9):1141-1149.
- Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, Goldsmith JA, Hsieh CL, et al. (2020) Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367(6483):1260-1263.
- Li W, Lauber MA (2020) Comprehending COVID-19: Preliminary Examination of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein by Peptide Mapping.
- Grant OC, Montgomery D, Ito K, Woods RJ (2020) Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein glycan shield reveals implications for immune recognition. Sci Rep 10(1):14991.
- Shang J, Ye G, Shi K, Wan Y, Luo C, Aihara H, et al. (2020) Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. Nature 581(7807): 221-224.
- Watanabe Y, Allen DJ, Wrapp D, McLellan JS, Crispin M (2020) Site-specific glycan analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike. Science 369(6501):330-333.
- Shajahan A, Supekar NT, Gleinich AS, Azadi P (2020) Deducing the N- and O- glycosylation profile of the spike protein of novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Glycobiol 30(12):981-988.
- Vidova V, Spacil Z (2017) A review on mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics: Targeted and data independent acquisition. Anal Chim Acta 964:7-23.
- Yang S, Rothman RE (2004) PCR-based diagnostics for infectious diseases: Uses, limitations, and future applications in acute-care settings. Lancet Infect Dis 4(6):337-348.
- Bastos ML, Tavaziva G, Abidi SK, Campbell JR, Haraoui LP, et al. (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for covid-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 370:m2516.
- Hourneaux de Moura DT (2020) Diagnostic Characteristics of Serological-Based COVID-19 Testing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2020;75:e2212.
- Singh P, Chakraborty R, Marwal R, Radhakrishan VS, Bhaskar AK, et al. (2020) A rapid and sensitive method to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus using targeted-mass spectrometry. J Proteins Proteom 11:159–165
- Ihling C, Tänzler D, Hagemann S, Kehlen A, Hüttelmaier S, et al. (2020) Mass Spectrometric Identification of SARS-CoV-2 Proteins from Gargle Solution Samples of COVID-19 Patients. J Proteome Res 19(11):4389-4392.
- Berkel WJV, Heuvel RHVD, Versluis C, Heck AJ (2000) Detection of intact megaDalton protein assemblies of vanillyl-alcohol oxidase by mass spectrometry. Protein Sci 9(3):435-439.
- Uetrecht C, Versluis C, Watts NR, Roos WH, Wuite GJL, et al. (2008) High-resolution mass spectrometry of viral assemblies: Molecular composition and stability of dimorphic hepatitis B virus capsids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(27): 9216-9220.
- Snijder J, Rose RJ, Veesler D, Johnson JE, Heck AJR (2013) Studying 18 MDa virus assemblies with native mass spectrometry. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 52(14):4020-4023.
- Monroe EB, Kang S, Kyere SK, Li R and Prevelige PE (2010) Hydrogen/deuterium exchange analysis of HIV-1 capsid assembly and maturation. Structure 18(11):1483-1491.
- Keifer DZ, Pierson EE, Hogan JA, Bedwell GJ, Prevelige PE, et al. (2014) Charge detection mass spectrometry of bacteriophage P22 procapsid distributions above 20 MDa. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 28(5):483-488.
- Keifer DZ, Motwani T, Teschke CM, Jarrold MF (2016) Acquiring structural information on virus particles with charge detection mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 27(6):1028-1036.
- Pierson EE, Keifer DZ, Asokan A, Jarrold MF (2016) Resolving adeno-associated viral particle diversity with charge detection mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 88(13):6718-6725.
- Bond KM, Lyktey NA, Tsvetkova IB, Dragnea B, Jarrold MF (2020) Disassembly intermediates of the brome mosaic virus identified by charge detection mass spectrometry. J Phys Chem B 124(11):2124-2131.
Share This Article
Open Access Journals
Article Tools
Article Usage
- Total views: 2391
- [From(publication date): 0-2021 - Nov 23, 2024]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 1278
- PDF downloads: 1113
