Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production
Open Access

Low-impact fishing gear; Sustainable fisheries; Habitat preservation; Selective fishing methods

Introduction

The sustainability of global fisheries has become a critical issue in the face of increasing demand for seafood, environmental degradation, and overfishing. Traditional fishing methods often result in significant bycatch, habitat destruction, and resource depletion, threatening marine biodiversity and the long-term viability of fisheries. In response, there has been a growing emphasis on the development and implementation of low-impact gear technologies that reduce these negative effects while maintaining the economic productivity of fisheries [1]. These innovations aim to enhance selectivity, minimize ecological harm, and improve the overall sustainability of fishing practices. Low-impact fishing gear technologies include a range of modifications and alternative designs, such as bycatch reduction devices (BRDs), more efficient trawling systems, and selective fishing techniques that target specific species without harming non-target organisms or sensitive habitats. These technologies have shown promise in reducing the unintended capture of marine life and minimizing the physical damage caused to underwater ecosystems, such as coral reefs and seafloor habitats. Additionally, low-impact gear can improve operational efficiency by reducing waste and increasing the profitability of sustainable fisheries [2].

This paper explores the role of low-impact gear technologies in transforming global fishing practices. It examines how these innovations contribute to the balance between ecological conservation and the economic needs of the fishing industry. By analyzing advancements in fishing gear design, their practical applications, and case studies from various fisheries, this study highlights the potential of low-impact technologies as a pathway toward achieving more sustainable, responsible, and environmentally friendly fisheries [3].

Discussion

The development and adoption of low-impact gear technologies represent a pivotal shift towards more sustainable fishing practices, addressing some of the most pressing environmental challenges facing global fisheries today. Traditional fishing methods often have significant unintended consequences, including high bycatch rates, habitat destruction, and overfishing [4]. Low-impact gear technologies offer a promising solution by minimizing these adverse effects while maintaining or even enhancing the profitability of fisheries. One of the primary benefits of low-impact gear is its ability to reduce bycatch, the unintentional capture of non-target species, including endangered or vulnerable marine organisms. Innovations such as bycatch reduction devices (BRDs), modified net designs, and selective fishing methods allow fishers to target specific species with greater precision, reducing the mortality of marine life that is not the intended catch. These technologies not only contribute to the conservation of biodiversity but also support the long-term sustainability of fisheries by helping to maintain healthy populations of marine species [5].

In addition to bycatch reduction, low-impact gear plays a critical role in minimizing habitat destruction. Many traditional fishing methods, particularly bottom trawling, can cause severe damage to the seafloor, harming coral reefs and other sensitive marine habitats. Low-impact gear, such as advanced trawling systems that avoid contact with the seafloor or gear modifications that reduce physical disturbance, can help protect these vital ecosystems. Preserving marine habitats is crucial not only for biodiversity but also for maintaining the productivity of fisheries, as healthy ecosystems support abundant fish populations [6]. Furthermore, the adoption of low-impact gear can improve the efficiency and profitability of fisheries. By reducing waste and the unintended capture of non-target species, fishers can streamline their operations, reduce the need for discarding unwanted catch, and improve the quality of the seafood they harvest. This can lead to better market prices, increased consumer demand for sustainably sourced products, and stronger brand reputation for fishers and seafood companies committed to environmentally friendly practices [7].

Despite the clear advantages, the widespread adoption of low-impact gear technologies faces several challenges. The initial cost of adopting new gear can be prohibitive, especially for small-scale fisheries that may lack the financial resources to invest in advanced technologies. Additionally, there are technical challenges in adapting these systems to different fishing environments and species, as what works in one context may not be applicable in another. Moreover, the lack of standardized regulations and enforcement mechanisms across regions complicates the global implementation of low-impact fishing practices, as fishers may face inconsistent requirements depending on their location [8]. To overcome these challenges, collaboration among governments, industry stakeholders, and research institutions is essential. Policies that incentivize the adoption of low-impact technologies, such as subsidies, tax breaks, or access to low-interest loans, could help alleviate the financial burden for small-scale fishers [9]. Furthermore, regional and international efforts to standardize and enforce sustainable fishing practices would create a more consistent and predictable regulatory environment, promoting the widespread use of low-impact gear. Research and development into more affordable and adaptable gear designs will also be crucial in driving further adoption. In conclusion, low-impact gear technologies are a critical component of the transition toward more sustainable fisheries. By reducing bycatch, minimizing habitat destruction, and improving operational efficiency, these technologies offer a pathway to more responsible and eco-friendly fishing practices. However, achieving widespread adoption will require overcoming financial, technical, and regulatory barriers. Continued innovation, policy support, and collaboration among stakeholders will be essential to ensuring that low-impact gear technologies fulfill their potential in promoting long-term sustainability in global fisheries [10].

Conclusion

Low-impact gear technologies represent a promising and essential step towards sustainable fisheries management. By addressing key environmental challenges such as bycatch, habitat degradation, and resource depletion, these innovations offer a pathway to balancing ecological conservation with the economic viability of the fishing industry. The development of selective fishing methods, bycatch reduction devices, and habitat-friendly gear modifications not only reduce the unintended capture of marine life but also help preserve vital ecosystems, ensuring the long-term health and productivity of marine resources. However, despite the clear environmental and economic benefits, the widespread adoption of low-impact gear faces significant challenges. The financial barriers for small-scale fisheries, the technical complexities of adapting gear to different environments, and the lack of consistent global regulations all hinder the broader implementation of these technologies. Overcoming these obstacles will require coordinated efforts from governments, industry leaders, and the scientific community to provide financial incentives, improve technological accessibility, and establish standardized, enforceable regulations that promote sustainability.

1. Tadelle DS (2003) Phenotypic and genetic characterization of local chicken ecotypes in Ethiopia. PhD Dessertation, HumboldtUniversity, Berlin, Germany.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

2. Njenga SK (2005) Productivity and socio-cultural aspects of local poultry phenotypes in coastal Kenya. The Royal and Agricultural University (KVL), Denmark.

Google Scholar

3. FAO (2019) Poultry Sector Ethiopia. FAO Animal Production and Health Livestock Country Reviews.

Google Scholar

4. Alam GMM, Khatun Most N, Kamruzzaman M (2012) Factors affecting poultry production: Empirical insights from areas of Bangladesh. Annals of Bangladesh Agriculture 16.

Google Scholar

5. CSA (2017) The federal democratic republic of Ethiopia. Agricultural Sample Survey. Vol. II. Report on Livestock and Livestock Characteristics (Private Peasant Holdings), CSA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
6. Alemu Y, Tadele D (1997) The Status of Poultry Research and Development in Ethiopia, Research Bulletin No.4. Poultry Commodity Research Program Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center. Alemaya University of Agriculture, Ethiopia 6.

Google Scholar

7. DAGRIS (2008) International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi.
8. Nebiyu Y, Brhan T, Kelay B (2013) Characterization of Village Chicken Production Performance under Scavenging System in Halaba District of Southern Ethiopia. Ethiop Vet J 17: 69-80.

Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Dessie T, Taye (2011) Current state of knowledge on phenotypic characteristics of indigenous chickens in the tropics. World’s Poult Sci J 67: 507–516.

Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Wondmeneh E, Van der Waaij EH, Dessie T, (2014) A running breeding program for indigenous chickens in Ethiopia: evaluation of success. American Society of Animal Science.

Google Scholar, Indexed at