Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production
Open Access

Ecological; Coexistence; Competition; Plant diversity; Herbivores

Introduction

Achieving a balance between human needs and ecological integrity is a multifaceted endeavor that requires science-based management, sustainable practices, and collaborative efforts among stakeholders, ultimately ensuring the vitality and resilience of these critical ecosystems. Understanding and effectively managing livestock and wildlife interactions in rangeland ecosystems are vital for preserving the ecological health and biodiversity of these landscapes [1]. Rangeland ecosystems are among the most extensive and diverse landscapes on our planet, encompassing vast expanses of grasslands, savannas, and arid regions. These environments are home to a multitude of plant and animal species, and they serve as critical habitats for both livestock and wildlife. The interactions between these two groups are complex and multifaceted, often defining the health and balance of rangeland ecosystems. In this article, we will explore the intricate relationship between livestock and wildlife in rangelands, highlighting the challenges and opportunities this interaction presents. Challenges in managing these interactions include overgrazing, habitat degradation, disease transmission, and conflicts between stakeholders. Conservation efforts are essential to address these challenges, focusing on sustainable rangeland management practices, habitat conservation, and stakeholder collaboration [2].

Understanding and effectively managing livestock and wildlife interactions in rangeland ecosystems are vital for preserving the ecological health and biodiversity of these landscapes. Achieving a balance between human needs and ecological integrity is a multifaceted endeavor that requires science-based management, sustainable practices, and collaborative efforts among stakeholders, ultimately ensuring the vitality and resilience of these critical ecosystems [3].

Coexistence and competition

One of the fundamental aspects of livestock and wildlife interactions in rangelands is competition for resources. Both groups rely on the same basic resources, including forage, water, and space. This competition can have both positive and negative effects on the ecosystem. On the one hand, competition can stimulate adaptive behaviors and drive the evolution of species in these environments. Livestock and wildlife may evolve strategies to coexist by partitioning resources, altering grazing patterns, or adapting to seasonal changes in availability. This competition can, in some cases, promote biodiversity and species resilience [4].

On the other hand, excessive competition can strain resources and negatively impact the health of rangeland ecosystems. Overgrazing and over browsing can lead to habitat degradation, loss of plant diversity, and soil erosion. It can also disrupt wildlife habitats, particularly for species that are more sensitive to habitat changes.

Positive interactions

Livestock and wildlife interactions are not limited to competition; they also encompass positive synergies. Some rangeland ecosystems have evolved to rely on the presence of large herbivores, whether they are native wildlife or domestic livestock, to maintain their ecological health.

Ecosystem engineering: Large herbivores, such as cattle or bison, play the role of ecosystem engineers. They influence the structure and composition of plant communities by grazing and trampling, which can promote the growth of certain plant species and create a mosaic of habitat types [5].

Mutual benefits: Livestock can benefit from the presence of native wildlife, as certain bird species help to control pest insects. Additionally, wildlife can benefit from livestock presence, as livestock may disturb the soil and vegetation in ways that create opportunities for wildlife foraging and nesting.

Traditional land management: Indigenous and traditional land management practices often integrate the coexistence of livestock and wildlife in a harmonious way. Indigenous communities have longstanding knowledge of how to manage rangelands sustainably, ensuring that both domestic and wild animals can thrive.

Challenges and Conservation Efforts

Despite the potential for positive interactions, there are also challenges to managing livestock and wildlife in rangelands. Overgrazing, habitat degradation, disease transmission, and conflicts between stakeholders are significant concerns. Conservation efforts seek to address these challenges by implementing sustainable rangeland management practices, such as rotational grazing, maintaining buffer zones between livestock and wildlife habitats, and creating wildlife corridors. These strategies aim to strike a balance between meeting the needs of human livelihoods and conserving the ecological integrity of rangeland ecosystems [6 ].

Discussion

The dynamic interactions between livestock and wildlife in rangeland ecosystems are a critical aspect of these landscapes’ ecological balance and human livelihoods. Understanding and effectively managing these interactions are central to the sustainability and conservation of these complex environments. Livestock and wildlife interactions in rangeland ecosystems are a complex and dynamic interplay. While competition for resources is an inherent part of this relationship, the coexistence of livestock and wildlife offers opportunities for mutual benefits and conservation. Managing this coexistence effectively is essential for ensuring the ecological health of rangeland ecosystems and maintaining the biodiversity and resilience of these remarkable landscapes. Balancing the interests of humans, livestock, and wildlife in rangelands requires a combination of sustainable practices, sciencebased management, and collaboration among stakeholders, ultimately contributing to the vitality of these vital ecosystems [7].

Resource competition and its implications

One of the primary aspects of livestock and wildlife interactions in rangelands is competition for limited resources such as forage, water, and space. The competition between these groups can have far-reaching ecological implications. Competition can, on one hand, drive adaptation and evolution. Species may develop strategies to partition resources, altering grazing patterns or adapting to seasonal variations in resource availability. Such adaptation can enhance the resilience and biodiversity of rangeland ecosystems. On the other hand, intense resource competition can strain rangeland resources, leading to habitat degradation and the loss of plant diversity. Overgrazing and over browsing can be detrimental to the environment, resulting in soil erosion and disruption of wildlife habitats, especially for species that are sensitive to habitat alterations [8].

Positive synergies: While competition is an essential aspect, livestock and wildlife interactions in rangeland ecosystems are not limited to resource rivalry. Positive synergies can also emerge from their coexistence, benefiting both the environment and human interests.

Ecosystem engineering: Large herbivores, whether livestock or native wildlife, play the role of ecosystem engineers in rangelands. They significantly influence the structure and composition of plant communities through their grazing and trampling activities. This can promote the growth of certain plant species and create a mosaic of habitat types, benefiting various wildlife species.

Mutual benefits: Both livestock and wildlife can experience mutual benefits from their interactions. For instance, certain bird species help control pest insects, offering a natural form of pest management. Livestock can disturb the soil and vegetation in ways that create opportunities for wildlife foraging and nesting, promoting habitat diversity.

Traditional land management: Indigenous and traditional land management practices often integrate the coexistence of livestock and wildlife harmoniously. These practices, rooted in deep ecological knowledge, prioritize a balanced relationship between the needs of human livelihoods and the conservation of the environment [9].

Challenges and conservation efforts

The successful management of livestock and wildlife interactions in rangelands requires addressing several challenges. Overgrazing, habitat degradation, disease transmission between species, and conflicts between stakeholders are significant concerns. Conservation efforts aim to mitigate these challenges by implementing sustainable rangeland management practices. Strategies include rotational grazing, the creation of buffer zones between livestock and wildlife habitats, and the establishment of wildlife corridors to allow safe passage for various species [10].

Conclusion

The interactions between livestock and wildlife in rangeland ecosystems are a fascinating and intricate aspect of these environments. While resource competition is an inherent part of their relationship, the coexistence of these two groups offers potential for both mutual benefits and ecological conservation. Managing this coexistence effectively is essential for the ecological health of rangeland ecosystems, the preservation of biodiversity, and the resilience of these landscapes. Balancing the interests of humans, livestock, and wildlife in rangelands is a complex undertaking, necessitating a combination of sustainable rangeland management practices, science-based conservation, and collaboration among stakeholders. Ultimately, this balanced approach ensures the vitality and long-term sustainability of these critical ecosystems, where human activities and wildlife conservation can coexist harmoniously.

1. Besbes B (2009) Genotype evaluation and breeding of poultry for performance under sub-optimal village conditions. World's Poult Sci J 65: 260-271.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Aman G, Bangu B, Bereket Z (2017) Production performance of Sasso (distributed by ethio-chicken private poultry farms) and Bovans brown chickens breed under village production system in three agro-ecologies of Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples Regional State (SNNPR), Ethiopia. Int J Livest Prod 8: 145–157.
3. Nebiyu YA (2016) Assessment of urban poultry production practices in Addis Ababa with emphasis on egg production, product marketing, feed quality and waste management. Department of Animal Production Studies, College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University.

Google Scholar

4. FAOSTAT (2018) FAO online statistical database.
5. Delgado C, Rosegrant M, Steinfeld H, Ehui S, Courbois C (1999) Livestock to 2020 the next revolution. Food, Agriculture and Environment Discussion Paper 28.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Mack S, Hoffmann D, Otte J (2005) The contribution of poultry to rural development. World’s Poult Sci J 61: 7-14.

Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Alemu D, Degefe T, Ferede S, Nzietcheung S, Roy D (2008) Overview and background paper on Ethiopia’s poultry sector: Relevance for HPAI research in Ethiopia.

Google Scholar

8. Abdelqader A, Wolnny CBA, Gauly M (2007) Characterization of Local Chicken Production Systems and their Potential under Different Levels of Management Practice in Jordan. Trop Anim Health Prod 39: 155-164.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

9. Solomon Z, Binyam K, Bilatu A, Ferede A (2013) Village chicken production systems in Metekel zone, Northwest Ethiopia. WJAR 2: 256-262.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

10. Halima H (2007) Phenotypic and Genetic Characterization of Indigenous Chicken Populations in Northwest Ethiopia. University of the Free State.

Google Scholar