Journal of Orthopedic Oncology
Open Access

Ewing sarcoma; late effects; survivorship; secondary malignancies; cardiopulmonary toxicity; endocrine dysfunction

Introduction

Ewing sarcoma is a highly aggressive malignancy that originates in the bones or soft tissues, most commonly affecting children, adolescents, and young adults. Advances in multimodal treatment strategies, including intensive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical interventions, have significantly improved survival rates, with five-year survival reaching 70–80% in localized disease cases. However, for survivors of Ewing sarcoma, the benefits of extended survival are often accompanied by long-term and potentially debilitating late effects of treatment. These late effects can significantly impact survivors' quality of life, posing challenges that extend well beyond the initial cancer diagnosis and treatment phase. The nature and severity of late effects are influenced by a combination of factors, including the type and intensity of treatments received, the age at diagnosis, and individual predispositions such as genetic vulnerabilities. Common late effects include cardiopulmonary toxicity from anthracycline-based chemotherapy, radiation-induced secondary malignancies, endocrine and growth dysfunction, musculoskeletal impairments due to surgery or radiation, neurocognitive deficits, and a range of psychosocial challenges. These complications may emerge months or even years after treatment completion, underscoring the need for long-term surveillance and management. Despite growing awareness, the identification and management of late effects in Ewing sarcoma survivors remain a complex and under-researched area. Addressing these challenges requires a multidisciplinary approach involving oncologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, physical therapists, and mental health professionals. Additionally, survivorship care plans tailored to individual risks are critical to minimizing the long-term impact of treatment and improving overall well-being. This review examines the spectrum of late effects associated with Ewing sarcoma treatment, highlighting the importance of early detection, personalized interventions, and novel therapeutic strategies. By understanding these long-term consequences, healthcare providers can better support survivors in navigating the physical, emotional, and social challenges they may face throughout their lives [1].

Discussion

Survivors of Ewing sarcoma face a wide spectrum of late effects resulting from the intensive multimodal therapies required to achieve remission. These late effects can significantly impact their quality of life and functional capabilities, making comprehensive, long-term management critical. This section explores the key categories of late effects, their underlying causes, and strategies for mitigation [2].

Cardiopulmonary Toxicity

The use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, a cornerstone in Ewing sarcoma treatment, is associated with a significant risk of cardiotoxicity. Survivors may develop conditions such as cardiomyopathy, heart failure, or arrhythmias years after treatment. Radiotherapy to the chest can exacerbate these risks by causing damage to cardiac and pulmonary tissues. Regular cardiovascular monitoring, early lifestyle interventions, and the use of cardioprotective agents during treatment are essential for minimizing these risks. Emerging approaches, such as the use of liposomal anthracyclines, may also reduce the cardiotoxic burden [3].

Secondary Malignancies

The use of radiation therapy, combined with certain chemotherapeutic agents, increases the risk of secondary malignancies in Ewing sarcoma survivors. Common secondary cancers include sarcomas, breast cancer, and hematologic malignancies such as leukemia. These risks necessitate lifelong cancer surveillance programs and patient education about early detection strategies. Advances in radiation techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy, may help to reduce exposure to surrounding healthy tissues, thereby lowering the risk of secondary malignancies [4].

Endocrine Dysfunction

Endocrine dysfunction is another common late effect, particularly in survivors who undergo pelvic or spinal radiation. Conditions such as growth hormone deficiency, hypothyroidism, gonadal dysfunction, and metabolic syndrome can emerge years after treatment. These complications can profoundly affect growth, development, fertility, and overall metabolic health. Routine endocrine evaluations and early intervention with hormone replacement therapies or fertility preservation techniques are key to managing these effects [5].

Musculoskeletal Complications

Treatment of Ewing sarcoma, particularly surgeries involving limb salvage or radiation to bones, often results in musculoskeletal impairments. These may include limb-length discrepancies, reduced range of motion, chronic pain, or fractures in irradiated bones. Early and continuous engagement in physical therapy and rehabilitation programs can help mitigate functional impairments. Advances in surgical techniques and prosthetic design have also improved functional outcomes in limb-salvage procedures [6].

Neurocognitive and Psychosocial Challenges

Neurocognitive impairments, including memory deficits, reduced attention, and learning difficulties, are increasingly recognized in Ewing sarcoma survivors. These deficits may stem from the neurotoxic effects of chemotherapy or psychosocial stressors associated with the cancer experience. Survivors often face psychological challenges such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Multidisciplinary support, including mental health services and educational support programs, is crucial for addressing these needs [7].

Psychosocial and Quality-of-Life Considerations

Ewing sarcoma survivors often experience long-term challenges in reintegrating into society, pursuing education, and maintaining employment due to the physical and emotional impacts of their treatment. Persistent fatigue, physical disabilities, and body image concerns can further exacerbate these challenges. Peer support groups, vocational training, and individualized counseling can play an important role in enhancing their quality of life [8].

Multidisciplinary Care and Survivorship Plans

The complexity and diversity of late effects in Ewing sarcoma survivors underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to care. Survivorship plans tailored to each individual should include regular screenings, personalized rehabilitation programs, and access to mental health resources. Close collaboration among oncologists, primary care providers, cardiologists, endocrinologists, physical therapists, and psychologists is essential to ensure that survivors receive comprehensive, holistic care [9].

Future Directions

Advances in treatment protocols, such as targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and refined radiation techniques, hold promise for reducing the late effects of treatment. Additionally, research into genetic and molecular markers may help identify patients at higher risk for specific complications, enabling proactive interventions. Finally, the development of digital health tools and telemedicine can enhance long-term follow-up care and support for survivors, especially those in underserved areas. By addressing the late effects of Ewing sarcoma treatment through proactive and personalized care, healthcare providers can help survivors lead healthier, more fulfilling lives while minimizing the long-term burden of their cancer journey [10].

Conclusion

The treatment of Ewing sarcoma has evolved significantly over the past decades, with multimodal approaches leading to improved survival rates. However, these advances come at the cost of substantial late effects that can profoundly impact the quality of life of survivors. Cardiopulmonary toxicity, secondary malignancies, endocrine dysfunction, musculoskeletal impairments, neurocognitive deficits, and psychosocial challenges are among the most common and impactful long-term complications. Addressing these late effects requires a proactive, multidisciplinary approach that includes regular monitoring, early interventions, and personalized survivorship care plans. The integration of advanced therapies, such as targeted and immunotherapies, along with innovations in radiation and surgical techniques, offers promise in reducing treatment-related morbidity. Moreover, fostering awareness among survivors and healthcare providers about the importance of long-term follow-up care is critical to improving outcomes and mitigating risks. Future research should focus on refining therapeutic strategies to balance oncological control with toxicity reduction, developing predictive models for late effects, and enhancing the delivery of survivorship care through digital and telemedicine platforms. By prioritizing holistic and patient-centered approaches, healthcare providers can ensure that Ewing sarcoma survivors achieve not only long-term survival but also improved functionality and well-being.

1. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves:  a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44: 837-845.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Hogan D, Lan LTT, Diep DTN, Gallegos D, Collins PF, et al. (2017) Nutritional status of Vietnamese outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Hum Nutr Diet 30: 83-89.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Collins PF, Elia M, Kurukulaaratchy RJ, Stratton RJ  (2018) The influence of deprivation on malnutrition risk in outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Clin Nutr 37: 144-148.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Pinzón-Espitia O, Pardo-Oviedo J, Ibáñez-Pinilla M (2021) Detection of nutritional risk and hospital stay in the hospitalized elderly adult. Nutr Hosp 38: 464-469.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Chen R, Xing L, You C, Ou X (20180 Prediction of prognosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with respiratory failure:  A comparison of three nutritional assessment methods. Eur J Intern Med 57: 70-75.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Grönberg AM, Slinde F, Engström CP, Hulthén L, Larsson S, et al. (2005) Dietary problems in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Hum Nutr Diet 18: 445-452.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

7. Remels AHV, Gosker HR, Langen RCJ, Schols AMWJ (2013) The mechanisms of cachexia underlying muscle dysfunction in COPD. J Appl Physiol 114: 1253-1262.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

8. Rabito EI, Marcadenti A, Da-Silva-Fink J, Figueira L, Silva FM, et al. (2017) Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire, Malnutrition Screening Tool, and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool Are Good Predictors of Nutrition Risk in an Emergency Service. Nutr Clin Pract 32: 526-532.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

9. Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M, et al. (2003) ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr 22: 415-421.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

10. Skipper A, Coltman A, Tomesko J, Charney P, Porcari J, et al. (2020) Adult Malnutrition (Undernutrition) Screening:  An Evidence Analysis Center Systematic Review. J Acad Nutr Diet 120: 669-708.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at