ISSN:2167-7964

Journal of Radiology
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Case Report   
  • OMICS J Radiol 2023, Vol 12(11): 505

Intrahepatic Portosystemic Venous Shunt: A Case Report

Jaddour M*, Imrani K, Moatassimbillah N and Nasser I
Central Radiology Department, IBN SINA Hospital, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
*Corresponding Author: Jaddour M, Central Radiology Department, IBN SINA Hospital, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco, Email: dr.jaddourmohammed@gmail.com

Received: 02-Nov-2023 / Manuscript No. roa-23-118744 / Editor assigned: 06-Nov-2023 / PreQC No. roa-23-118744 / Reviewed: 20-Nov-2023 / QC No. roa-23-118744 / Revised: 24-Nov-2023 / Manuscript No. roa-23-118744 / Published Date: 30-Nov-2023

Abstract

The intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt is defined as communication between an intrahepatic portal vein and a systemic vein, including the hepatic and perihepatic veins, via an anomalous intrahepatic venous channel. Intrahepatic shunts between portal and systemic veins can be acquired (cirrhosis, trauma, rupture of a portal vein aneurysm) or congenital. Intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunts (IPSVSs) are rare vascular malformations. They can be asymptomatic or present with various symptoms including encephalopathy. We present one case of IPSVS discovered incidentally.

Keywords

IPVS; MRI; Ultrasound; Asymptomatic

Introduction

The term IPSVS is used specifically to describe a lesion with abnormal communication(s) between the portal and hepatic veins, and four morphological types has been described [1]. The type 1 is the most common IPSVS involves a single large vessel of constant diameter connecting the right portal vein to the inferior vena cava (IVC). In type 2 IPSVS, one or multiple connections are present between peripheral branches of portal and hepatic veins in a single hepatic segment. If there is an aneurysmal connection between portal and hepatic veins is defined as a shunt and it is classified as type 3.Multiple communications between portal and hepatic veins involving both lobes of the liver is found in type 4 IPSVS.

These lesions are usually asymptomatic and are discovered incidentally when ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) scan, or magnetic resonance are performed for other reasons. Patients may be misdiagnosed with psychiatric or neurologic disorders if the IPSVS is not identified as a cause for encephalopathy [2].

In this manuscript, we describe one case of IPSVS involved a patient who was asymptomatic and in whom IPSVS was an incidental finding on an abdominal Ultrasound performed for other indications.

Observation

A 42-year-old patient, who presented for evaluation of bladder pain, she was referred by a general practitioner for suspicion of a hydatid cyst of the right liver. On ultrasound: Structure of a vascular nature of the right liver, probably at the expense of the right hepatic vein (Figure 1).

radiology-Ultrasound

Figure 1: Ultrasound coupled with color Doppler demonstrated anechoic tubular structures dependent on the right hepatic vein. Color Doppler imaging revealed a continuous high-velocity waveform across the shunt, which are suitable for IPSVS.

A follow-up CT scan showed no significant change in the IPSVS and hepatic mass (Figure 2a and 2b).

radiology-Axial

Figure 2: (a) Axial CT images without contrast injection, (b) and with contrast injection

The patient underwent liver MRI to better characterize the abovementioned lesion, which showed an enlarged liver with a hepatic arrow measured at 17 cm with a homogeneous signal, with no sign of dysmorphism. It is the site of a thin-walled serpiginous formation straddling segments VI and VII in un signal T1 and T2 (Figure 3), without septum or endoluminal material or calcifications parietal. It communicates the right hepatic vein with the retro-hepatic part of the inferior vena cava (Figure 4).

radiology-sequence

Figure 3: Axial sequence at T2 penetration, showing the presence of a serpiginous formation connecting segment VI to segment VII.

radiology-parallel

Figure 4: Enhancement parallel to the inferior vena cava and hepatic veins after Gadolinium injection.

Discussion

IPSVS are rare hepatic vascular malformations which are usually congenital, but they may also be acquired due to portal hypertension or iatrogenic causes. When diagnosed, periodic laboratory evaluations are important because of the ongoing potential risk of hepatic encephalopathy [3]. While most asymptomatic IPSVS are discovered incidentally as in our case, if suspected, color Doppler sonography, is highly sensitive and specific.

Our case is defined as a type 1 of IPSVS involves a single large vessel of constant diameter connecting the right portal vein to the inferior vena cava (IVC).

Multiple imaging modalities are useful for diagnosis of an intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt including color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced CT, MRI or conventional catheterdirected angiography. The imaging finding most consistent with diagnosis of a portosystemic venous shunt is visualization of a direct communication between portal and hepatic veins. Secondary findings on imaging suggestive of a shunt include abnormal blood pooling from a dilated portal branch with early visualization of the hepatic venous system [4].

The more difficult situation is that of the asymptomatic patient. Although transfemoral transcatheter embolization with coils or other mechanical occluders is a relatively safe procedure, complications do occur including infection, hemorrhage, portal vein occlusion, and portal hypertension, among others [5].

The analysis Risk/benefit is difficult, due to the unknown natural history of an IPSVS that has remained asymptomatic into adulthood. Several reports have shown that IPSVS can be a cause of hepatic encephalopathy and the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy has been found to increase with age [2,6].

The entity of IPSVS and their endovascular treatment have been described previously. The approach to the asymptomatic patient and the question of whether a prophylactic procedure should be offered has never been discussed in the literature.

Conclusion

IPSVS are rare hepatic vascular malformations. Although usually asymptomatic and discovered incidentally on imaging, we described one case an asymptomatic 42-year-old, whose shunt was incidentally discovered. There is no consensus on how to approach asymptomatic patients with IPSVS. We believe that treatment of asymptomatic IPSVS, if straightforward, should be offered to otherwise healthy patients, regardless of age, as an alternative to clinical and Doppler ultrasound surveillance.

References

Citation: Jaddour M, Imrani K, Moatassimbillah N, Nasser I (2023) IntrahepaticPortosystemic Venous Shunt: A Case Report. OMICS J Radiol 12: 505.

Copyright: © 2023 Jaddour M, et al. This is an open-access article distributedunder the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permitsunrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided theoriginal author and source are credited.

Top