Advances in Crop Science and Technology
Open Access

Internet of Everything; Smart farming; Precision agriculture; IoT devices; AI in agriculture; Real-time data; Agricultural sensors; Machine-to-machine Communication; Connectivity; Big data analytics; Cloud computing; Automated farming; Remote monitoring; Smart irrigation; GPS technology.

Description

The Internet of Everything (IoE) in smart farming represents a groundbreaking evolution in agriculture, where people, processes, data, and things are interconnected to create an intelligent, responsive farming environment [1]. This framework enhances precision agriculture by utilizing interconnected devices, sensors, cloud platforms, and AI-driven analytics to optimize every stage of crop production [2]. By integrating physical and digital systems, IoE enables farmers to make real-time decisions based on rich data insights, improving productivity, resource efficiency, and sustainability. As global food demands rise and environmental pressures grow, IoE in agriculture offers a future-ready solution for smart, resilient farming systems [3].

Discussion

IoE builds upon the concept of the Internet of Things (IoT) by not only connecting devices but also enabling seamless communication among people, machines, and data platforms [4]. In smart farming, this means that everything from soil sensors to irrigation systems, weather stations to drones is linked through a network that constantly collects, analyzes, and shares data. This real-time data flow allows farmers to monitor crop health, soil conditions, weather patterns, and pest activity with unprecedented accuracy [5]. Using GPS-enabled equipment and drone surveillance, farmers can assess large fields quickly, identify problem zones, and apply interventions precisely where needed, reducing waste and improving crop outcomes [6].

Key components of IoE in agriculture include sensor networks, which measure soil moisture, pH, temperature, and nutrient levels; smart irrigation systems, which automatically adjust water supply based on plant needs; and agricultural drones and robotics, which help with planting, spraying, and harvesting [7]. These components are integrated via cloud-based platforms that use AI and machine learning to analyze the vast amount of data collected. For example, predictive models can forecast disease outbreaks or suggest optimal planting times based on historical trends and current conditions. Through remote access and mobile applications, farmers can control farm operations from anywhere, enhancing operational flexibility and efficiency [8].

Another critical aspect is the role of 5G and edge computing, which support faster, low-latency communication between devices, enabling real-time decision-making in the field. Machine-to-machine (M2M) communication allows equipment to operate autonomously, such as tractors adjusting speed and direction automatically or greenhouses regulating temperature and humidity without human input. These innovations reduce the need for manual labor, cut operational costs, and make farming more scalable [9].

The benefits of IoE in smart farming extend beyond efficiency. It supports sustainability by minimizing the overuse of water, fertilizers, and pesticides. It also plays a vital role in climate-smart agriculture, helping farmers adapt to unpredictable weather conditions through timely alerts and adaptive management tools. In livestock farming, wearable devices track animal health and behavior, improving herd management and biosecurity. Moreover, data generated through IoE platforms can be shared with agricultural stakeholders, including researchers, policymakers, and supply chain partners, to improve transparency and traceability in food production. Despite its transformative potential, IoE in agriculture faces several challenges. High implementation costs, limited connectivity in rural areas, and data privacy concerns can hinder adoption. Additionally, many farmers lack the technical skills required to operate and interpret digital tools. Addressing these barriers requires a collaborative effort involving technology providers, governments, and agricultural institutions. Investments in rural broadband infrastructure, farmer education, and supportive policy frameworks are essential to accelerate the adoption of IoE systems in agriculture [10].

Conclusion

The Internet of Everything is redefining the future of agriculture by creating interconnected, intelligent systems that elevate precision farming to a new level. By integrating devices, data, people, and processes, IoE enhances productivity, sustainability, and resilience in farming operations. It empowers farmers with real-time insights and automation tools that enable smarter decision-making and more efficient resource use. As the world faces mounting food and environmental challenges, embracing IoE in smart farming is not just an innovation—it is a necessity. Moving forward, widespread adoption will depend on closing the digital divide, investing in infrastructure, and fostering digital literacy among farmers to ensure that the benefits of this next-generation framework reach all corners of the agricultural world.

References

1. Harlan JR (1992) Origins and processes of.Grass evolution and domestication 159:12-15.

Google Scholar

2. Joshi A, Witcombe JR (1996) Farmer participatory crop improvement, II. Participatory varietal selection, a case study in India.Experimen Agric 32:461-477.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

3. Kamara AY, Ellis-Jones J, Amaza P, Omoigui LO, Helsen J, et al. (2008) A participatory approach to increasing productivity of maize through Striga hermonthica control in northeast Nigeria.Experimen Agric44:349-364.

Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Kornegay J, Beltran J, Ashby J (1995) Farmer selections within segregating populations of common bean in Colombia.Participatory plant breeding26:151.

Google Scholar

5. Lowenberg-DeBoer J, Nielsen R, Hawkins S (1994) Management of intra-field variability in large-scale agriculture: a farming systems perspective 551-555.

Google Scholar

6. Malandrin V, Dvortsin L (2013) Participatory processes of agro ecological innovation in organic cereal breeding: a case study from Italy. In Book of Proceedings, Fourth International Scientifi c Symposium Agrosym 719-725.

Google Scholar

7. McGuire S, Manicad G, Sperling L (1999) Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding-done from a perspective of farmer plant breeding.

Google Scholar

8. Meijer SS, Catacutan D, Ajayi OC, Sileshi GW, Nieuwenhuis M (2015) The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agro-forestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa.Int J Agric Sustain 13:40-54.

Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Mkumbira J, Chiwona-Karltun L, Lagercrantz U, Mahungu NM, Saka J, et a. (2003) Classification of cassava into ‘bitter’and ‘cool’in Malawi: From farmers' perception to characterization by molecular markers.Euphytica 132:7-22.

Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Morris ML, Bellon MR (2004) Participatory plant breeding research: opportunities and challenges for the international crop improvement system.Euphytica136:21-35.

Google Scholar, Crossref