Journal of Neuroinfectious Diseases
Open Access

Millions of individuals globally might be affected by infectious disorders on the neurological system. For instance, 300,000 people died from meningitis and around 3 million individuals acquired condition in 2016. The subject of neuroinfectious disorders is quickly developing as a result of the identification of novel infections, an increase in the use of immunosuppressive medication, better diagnostics, and current developments in infectious and autoimmune neurology.

The Institute of Medicine addressed the serious threat that newly developing infectious diseases represent to civilization in a major study published in 1992. In this study, infectious epidemics and pandemics were emphasised, and the infectious disease community was urged to take action to lessen this hazard. The Emerging Infections Network (EIN), a cooperative initiative between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Infectious Illnesses Society of America (IDSA) to detect and monitor novel infectious diseases and syndromes, was established in 1997 as a response. It presently includes more than 2570 infectious disease doctors and members of the international and domestic public health community. Physicians who specialize in infectious diseases and members of the public health community are the two member types on the EIN listserv. All IDSA or Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society members who regularly visit patients are considered infectious diseases physicians [1]. These physician members work in a range of facilities, such as the Veterans’ Affairs and Department of Defense hospital systems, city/county public hospitals, no-university teaching hospitals, community hospitals, and university hospitals. With a tiny number of foreign members, the majority of members practise in the United States. Members of the public health community include veterinarians, microbiologists, epidemiologists, and pharmacists who work for the federal, state, or local public health departments, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

An important component of this network is a private, moderated listserv where doctors and public health professionals, such as researchers from the CDC, FDA, NIH, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), can post queries about difficult clinical problems, from diagnostic conundrums to management queries. A moderator checks each message sent to the listserv for appropriateness, edits, and the removal of patient identities. Once a day (only Monday through Friday) via the listserv platform, posts are then compiled into a thread with the proper title and thread category (e.g., clinical, epi, infection prevention, CDC update, FDA recall, etc.) and disclaimer appended [2].

Other EIN members provide solutions to the situation when the investigation is made public. In order to notify its members and monitor antimicrobial medications, the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research/Drug Shortage group joined the listserv recently. Over the past ten years, the average number of different listserv conversations has remained consistent at around 200 every year, with a total number of answers for all subjects ranging from 760 to 976 per year. The frequency and nature of questions pertaining to instances of neuroinfectious illness discussed by infectious disease doctors on the EIN listserv are described in this paper. Our objectives were to characterise recurring themes and unresolved questions in order to outline future opportunities for research and education in this complex field, including the range of inquiries, the pathogens most frequently discussed, the populations most frequently affected, and finally the populations most frequently affected. The EIN listserv is a discussion platform for novel or atypical clinical occurrences as well as clinical aspects of emerging infectious diseases. However, no information on neuroinfectious illnesses has been provided. The enormous number of clinical inquiries devoted to infections affecting the central and peripheral nervous systems is evidence of the significance and difficulty of neuroinfectious disorders in the practise of infectious disease specialists, according to our results. It is noteworthy that this data’s analysis allows for the identification of research and educational goals that might help doctors in the diagnosis and treatment of these difficult illnesses [3]. First, the investigations show how difficult it is to diagnose CNS illnesses when there is immunosuppression. Immunosuppression-related neurological problems are more prevalent than ever. Up to 50% of patients with rheumatologic disorders have neurologic symptoms, and around one-third of patients with solid organ transplants experience neurologic problems. Many of these manifestations have been linked to immunosuppression rather than the underlying disease. Because they may simultaneously be at risk for CNS infections caused by immunosuppressive medications, central nervous system (CNS) involvement of their malignancy, and, more recently, neurologic immune-related adverse events caused by novel immunotherapies, patients with malignancies are even more difficult to diagnose. This difficulty is anticipated to increase as the arsenal of immunomodulatory drugs expands. The difficulty of expanded pathogen testing with diagnostic panels targeted at neuroinfectious diseases is further highlighted by the EIN listserv. Before the Bio fire Film Array Meningitis Encephalitis PCR panel was approved, there were two HHV6-related queries; both patients had HHV6 testing done since they had immunosuppressed states and a strong clinical suspicion of having it. However, two enquiries that were submitted following the panel’s approval concerned immunocompetent individuals in whom there was only a very slight clinical indication of HHV6 infection.

Both of these cases were treated with antiviral medications after the panel’s positive findings in these 2 cases were made public. Numerous follow-ups indicated that these two outcomes were probably clinically inconsequential and may have been connected to the incorporation of the HHV6 genome into the chromosome. A multiplex PCR panel’s accessibility has enhanced pathogen detection, but there is also worry about overuse in individuals with low clinical suspicion for CNS infections. With the availability of more sophisticated diagnostics, such as next-generation sequencing, specialized training may be necessary to correctly interpret test results in the suitable clinical context [4]. Investigations involving individuals who had neurologic symptoms but no obvious viral aetiology were also of interest. The differential diagnosis took a wide variety of noninfectious neurologic aetiologies into account. The prevalence of autoimmune encephalitis, which currently accounts for 20% to 30% of all instances of encephalitis, is rising. This awareness was reflected in the fact that several enquiries suggested that probable differential diagnoses for anti-NMDA, post infectious, and para neoplastic encephalitis. Specialists in viral diseases may benefit from specialized training to recognize these processes given the wide variety of neurologic illnesses encountered. Neurology and neuroinfectious illnesses are not currently covered in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AGCME) curriculum requirements for infectious disease fellowships. The curriculum requirements for internal medicine residencies do call for exposure to neurology as part of the training, but they do not define the kind or duration of contact [5,6]. Training in infectious illnesses would undoubtedly be advantageous for neurologists as well. Currently, the ACGME only demands “adequate exposure to faculty with special expertise in infectious illnesses” as part of the neurology residency programme; infectious disease-specific training is not necessary [7,8]. Only 10 non-ACGME recognized fellowships specifically focused on neuroinfectious illnesses existed as of July 2019. Although there may be extra advantage in creating collaborative training opportunities for neurologists and infectious disease doctors, efforts are being made to standardise fellowship curriculum for neurologists desiring training in neuroinfectious illnesses [9,10].

Conclusion

In conclusion, this retrospective study highlights the value of forums like the EIN in directing areas of priority and highlights the significant and growing challenges associated with the care of patients with neuroinfectious diseases in the practise of infectious disease physicians. It also identifies priorities for research and training in the field.

Acknowledgement

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

Author declares no conflict of interest.

1. John CC, Carabin H, Montano SM (2015) Global research priorities for infections that affect the nervous system. Nature 527: 178-186.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Nath A (2017) Grand challenges in neuroinfectious diseases. Front Neurol 8: 480.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Somand D, Meurer W (2009) Central nervous system infections. Emerg Med Clin North Am 27: 89-100.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Wilson MR, Sample HA, Zorn KC, Arevalo S, Yu G, et al. (2019) Clinical met genomic sequencing for diagnosis of meningitis and encephalitis. N Engl J Med 380: 327-340.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Johnson TP, Nath A (2018) Neurological syndromes driven by post infectious processes or unrecognized persistent infections. Curr Opin Neurol 31: 318-324.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Roos KL (2004) Principles of Neurologic Infectious Diseases: Principles and Practice. New York.

Google Scholar

7. Edge L (2008) Neuroinfections: celebrating the past, discussing the present. Lancet Neurol 7: 975.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Griffin JW (2006) Neurologists don't do windows. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2: 1.

Google Scholar

9. Epstein LG, Sharer LR, Cho ES, Myenhofer M, Navia B, et al. (1985) HTLV-III/LAV-like retrovirus particles in the brains of patients with AIDS encephalopathy. AIDS Res 1: 447-454.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Tan K, Patel S, Gandhi N, Chow F, Rumbaugh J, et al. (2008) Burden of neuroinfectious diseases on the neurology service in a tertiary care center. Neurology 71: 1160-1166.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref