Journal of Pulmonology and Respiratory Diseases
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Mini Review Article   
  • J Pulm Res Dis 2022, Vol 6(3): 113
  • DOI: 10.4172/jprd.1000113

In Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease, Transthoracic Ultrasound

Torres Antoni*
Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Universidad de Barcelona, CIBERes, Barcelona, Spain
*Corresponding Author: Torres Antoni, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Universidad de Barcelona, CIBERes, Barcelona, Spain, Email: torres.a@gmail.com

Received: 08-Jun-2022 / Manuscript No. jprd-22-68545 / Editor assigned: 10-Jun-2022 / PreQC No. jprd-22-68545 / Reviewed: 24-Jun-2022 / QC No. jprd-22-68545 / Revised: 29-Jun-2022 / Manuscript No. jprd-22-68545 / Published Date: 06-Jul-2022 DOI: 10.4172/jprd.1000113

Abstract

Background: Transthoracic ultrasound (TUS) is usually recommended as a noninvasive, radiation-free methodology for the assessment of opening respiratory organ sickness (ILD). This study was designed to check TUS options of ILD. Moreover, potential correlations of those options with parameters of spirometer, blood gas (ABG) analysis and 6-min walk check (6MWT) were assessed.

Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with ILD were diagnosed supported history, examination, chest X-ray/high-resolution X-radiation, and spirometer. Every patient underwent 6MWT, ABG analysis, and TUS. TUS was conjointly performed on twenty healthy volunteering controls.

Results: The TUS findings were B pattern in forty patients (80.0 percent; P zero.001), diminished respiratory organ slippery in twenty two patients (44.0 percent; P 0.001), thickness of the serous membrane line in 28 patients (56.0 percent; P 0.001), irregularity of the serous membrane line in 39 patients (78.0 percent; P 0.001), and sub pleural alterations in 22 patients (44.0 percent; P 0.01). However, these associations weren't statistically important (P > 0.05). Increasing distance between B lines conjointly joined reciprocally with FVC p.c expected (r = -0.278), pO2(r = -0.207), SpO2 at rest (r = -0.170), 6MWD (r = -0.209), and DSP (r = -0.214).

Conclusion: TUS seems to be a useful imaging technique for ILD identification. It is accustomed gauge however severe an ILD is. It’s easy, radiation-free, economical, and side. It be significantly useful within the follow-up of patients in low resource settings, pregnant girls, and patients World Health Organization are sick or unstable and cannot be emotional to the radiology suite.

Keywords

Transthoracic ultrasound; Interstitial lung disease; X-ray; patients; B-lines

Introduction

Interstitial respiratory organ illness (ILD) could be a cluster of heterogeneous respiratory organ disorders during which the alveoli, alveolar animal tissue, interstitium, capillary epithelial tissue, perivascular tissue, or animal tissue will be affected [1]. They’re classified along as they share common clinical options, imaging appearances, and pathological findings. ILD sometimes presents with progressive dyspnea, cough, diffuse bilateral infiltrates on chest X-ray, restriction on spirometer, and reduced diffusion capability to CO (DLCO). A high-resolution CT (HRCT) is commonly needed to spot the sort of ILD. Histopathological examination of respiratory organ tissue, however, remains the gold commonplace [2].

Transthoracic prenatal diagnosis (TUS) was at the start not thought of as a helpful respiratory organ imaging modality as ultrasound beams don't go through air. However, as a result of the presence of air within the lungs, there's a generation of bound artifacts [3]. In an exceedingly pathological state, the air at intervals the respiratory organ parenchyma is also replaced by fluids or solid tissue, which may either cause changes within the respiratory organ artifacts or cause actual visual image of the pathological respiratory organ [4].

Lung slippery is that the regular danceable movement of pleura against the pleura, which may unremarkably be seen as a shimmering line synchronous with metastasis movements. Loss of the conventional hyperechoic linear serosa contour resulting in a fragmented and irregular look is termed serosa line irregularity.

US has been found to be a decent tool in designation respiratory illness, and a meta-analysis rumored a sensitivity and specificity of 94 and 96, severally, for TUS against respiratory illness diagnosed by chest X-ray or CT (CT) scan, clinical criteria and microbiological laboratory results [5, 6]. Another meta-analysis has rumored TUS as a great tool for designation community-acquired respiratory illness within the emergency department with a sensitivity and specificity of 92 and 93, severally. However, there's restricted knowledge relating to the employment of TUS for the diagnosing of ILD [7, 8].

The current study was designed to review the TUS options of ILD. Doable correlations between TUS options (pleural line thickness and distance between B-lines) with parameters of spirometry (forced content [FVC] percent predicted), blood gas (ABG) analysis (pO2 at area air) and 6-min walk take a look at (6MWT) (SpO2 at rest, 6-min walk distance [6MWD] and distance-saturation product [DSP]) were assessed [9]. Since TUS could be a noninvasive, radiation-free, and side imaging modality, these correlations might facilitate in assessing whether or not TUS may well be used as associate imaging modality throughout follow-up to watch the progress of ILD [10].

Materials and Methods

This was a cross-sectional study involving fifty patients diagnosed with ILD supported history, examination, chest X-ray/HRCT, and spirometry, conducted within the out-patient Department of T.B. and Respiratory Diseases and also the Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging. The study amount extended from September 2017 to June 2019 [11]. This study was approved by the ethics panel of our Institute.

Consent was taken before ingress from all eligible participants.

The patient who has both of these:

1. Shortness of breath and/or coughing is respiratory symptoms.

2. X-ray/HRCT of the thorax: bilateral abnormalities suggestive of ILD

The following procedures were applied to all patients:

1. Clinical evaluation: This process covered symptoms and signs, comorbidities, exposure from present or previous jobs or hobbies, domestic environmental circumstances, pertinent drug history, and family history.

2. To evaluate the course and severity of the condition, spirometry was performed. Following the ATS/ERS suggested acceptability and reproducibility criteria, 3 or 2 acceptable readings (Grade A and B) were obtained with repeatability being within 100 ml or 10% of the highest value, whichever was higher.

3. Each patient underwent a posteroanterior chest X-ray.

The Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging at Sir Sunderlal Hospital used a Multi-detector row 128-slice CT scanner (Light speed, General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) to do HRCT scanning. Cuts of 1 mm were made. Two medical professionals from the departments of radiodiagnosis and imaging and tuberculosis and respiratory diseases worked together to interpret the CT results.

4. The radial artery was used to collect a 1 ml blood sample for ABG analysis in a heparinized syringe.

Transthoracic ultrasound scans were performed altogether the cases and therefore the controls mistreatment either Sonoline G20 (Seimens) or Philips IU22 (both equipped with 3.5 MHz curved probes and 7.5-10 MHz linear probe) [12]. Subjects were examined in an exceedingly sitting or supine position with arms raised on top of their head. Every hemithorax was divided into eight regions with the assistance of parasternal line, midclavicular line, anterior axillary line, posterior axillary line, and duct gland line (extending laterally and posteriorly) [13]. Hence, every hemithorax had higher anteromedial, lower anteromedial, higher anterolateral, lower anterolateral, higher lateral, lower lateral, higher posterior, and lower posterior regions. Electrical device was oriented either perpendicular or transversal to the chest wall [14].

Lung parenchyma was examined to seem for B-lines. The presence of three or additional B-lines between two ribs in two or additional regions bilaterally was referred to as B-pattern [15,16]. serous membrane was examined to seem for serosa line irregularity (defined as loss of the traditional linear serosa contour resulting in a fragmented and irregular appearance), serosa line thickenings (focal or diffuse echogenic lesions >3 millimeter in thickness that arise from either pleura or visceral pleura), sub pleural changes (small echo-poor areas to a lower place the serosa line within the respiratory organ parenchyma) and respiratory organ slippery (regular tripping movement of pleura against the pleura, which might usually be seen as a shimmering line synchronous with metastasis movements) [17-19].

Discussion

In ultrasonography examination, the presence of a marked distinction in acoustic reactance between Associate in Nursing object and its surroundings results in the looks of B-line artifacts [20]. Traditional respiratory organ contains abundant air and tiny water, thus no reflection of the ultrasonography beams happens and ordinarily no B-line artifacts seem [21, 22]. Once subpleural septae square measure thickened by water or pathology, a high resistance gradient happens between these structures and also the encompassing air inflicting reflection of the beams that produce a development of resonance [23, 24]. The beam looks to be treed in an exceedingly closed system, leading to endless to-and-fro ringing and yielded on the screen as a narrow-based laser-like ray extending from the respiratory organ surface to the sting of the screen [25].

The study has some limitations. First, ultrasound had been performed on patients already diagnosed as ILD supported chest HRCT, and this could be thought of a bias for the interpretation of the respiratory organ ultrasound patterns [26]. However, during this study, we have a tendency to don't assess the diagnostic accuracy of respiratory organ ultrasound in patients with ILD however study the utility of B-lines in analysis of these patients and if they will play a complementary role within the diagnosing and watching of ILD patients, particularly once HRCT cannot be done and avoiding redundant overload of radiation exposure is required. Second, respiratory organ pathology is also not uniformly distributed [27, 28]. This limitation is also unheeded as most of the studied patients had diffuse sickness and also the technique wont to examine the chest enclosed the higher and lower anterior and lateral elements of the chest so most of the affected elements were assessed [29].

Conclusion

TUS could be a helpful imaging methodology for the designation of ILD. The presence of B-pattern, serosa line irregularities, serosa line thickening, belittled respiratory organ slippery, associated subpleural changes are often wont to diagnose ILD in an applicable clinical setting. It will facilitate in choosing those patients UN agency would like associate HRCT, effectively ruling out ILD, and avoiding excess radiation exposure UN agency don't seem to be seemingly to possess the unwellness. TUS may avoid recurrent radiation exposure whereas observance the patient [30]. It’s particularly helpful once HRCT can't be drained a patient too sick to be shifted to the radiology suite or throughout gestation and once the patient is simply too breathless to perform PFT throughout follow up.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

  1. Hasan AA, Makhlouf HA (2014) B-lines: Transthoracic chest ultrasound signs useful in assessment of interstitial lung diseases. Ann Thorac Med 9: 99-103.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Bouhemad B, Zhang M, Lu Q, Rouby JJ (2007) Clinical review: Bedside lung ultrasound in critical care practice. Crit Care 11: 205.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Kirkpatrick AW, Sirois M, Laupland KB, Liu D, Rowan K, et al. (2004) Hand-held thoracic sonography for detecting post-traumatic pneumothoraces: the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST). J Trauma 57: 288-295.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Dulchavsky SA, Schwarz KL, Kirkpatrick AW, Billica RD, Williams DR, et al. (2001) Prospective evaluation of thoracic ultrasound in the detection of pneumothorax. J Trauma. 50: 201-205.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Targhetta R, Bourgeois JM, Chavagneux R, Coste E, Amy D, et al.(1993) Ultrasonic signs of pneumothorax: preliminary work. J Clin Ultrasound 21: 245-250.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Wernecke K, Galanski M, Peters PE, Hansen J (1987) Pneumothorax: evaluation by ultrasound - preliminary results. J Thorac Imaging 2: 76-78.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  13. Lichtenstein D, Meziere G, Biderman P, Gepner A (2000) The "lung point": an ultrasound sign specific to pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med 26: 1434-1440.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Balik M, Plasil P, Waldauf P, Pazout J, Fric M, et al.(2006) Ultrasound estimation of volume of pleural fluid in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 32: 318-321.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Fartoukh M, Azoulay E, Galliot R, Le Gall JR, Baud F, et al.(2002) Clinically documented pleural effusions in medical ICU patients. How useful is routine thoracentesis? Chest 121: 178-184.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Mayo PH, Goltz HR, Tafreshi M, Doelken P (2004) Safety of ultrasound-guided thoracentesis in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest 125: 1059-1062.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  21. Lichtenstein D, Menu Y (1995) A bedside ultrasound sign ruling out pneumothorax in the critically ill: lung sliding. Chest 108: 1345-1348.
  22. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  23. Talmor M, Hydo L, Gershenwald JG, Barie PS (1998) Beneficial effects of chest tube drainage of pleural effusion in acute respiratory failure refractory to PEEP ventilation. Surgery 123: 137-143.
  24. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  25. Vignon P, Chastagner C, Berkane V, Chardac E, Francois B, et al. (2005) Quantitative assessment of pleural effusion in critically ill patients by means of ultrasonography. Crit Care Med 33: 1757-1763.
  26. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  27. Yang PC, Luh KT, Chang DB, Yu CJ, Kuo SH, et al.(1992) Ultra-sonographic evaluation of pulmonary consolidation. Am Rev Respir Dis 146: 757-762.
  28. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  29. Yang PC, Chang DB, Yu CJ, Lee YC, Kuo SH, et al.(1992) Ultrasound guided percutaneous cutting biopsy for the diagnosis of pulmonary consolidations of unknown aetiology. Thorax 47: 457-460.
  30. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  31. Poe RH, Utell MJ, Israel RH, Hall WJ, Eshleman JD (1979) Sensitivity and specificity of the nonspecific transbronchial lung biopsy. Am Rev Respir Dis 119: 25-31.
  32. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  33. Stevens GM, Weigen JF, Lillington GA (1968) Needle aspiration biopsy of localized pulmonary lesions with amplified fluoroscopic guidance. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 103: 561-571.
  34. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  35. Yang PC, Luh KT, Wu HD, Chang DB, Lee LN, et al.(1990) Lung tumors associated with obstructive pneumonitis: US studies. Radiology 174: 717-720.
  36. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  37. Greenman RL, Goodall PT, King D (1975) Lung biopsy in immunocompromised hosts. Am J Med 59: 488-496.
  38. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  39. Cunningham JH, Zavala DC, Corry RJ, Keim LW (1977) Trephine air drill, bronchial brush, and fiberoptic transbronchial lung biopsies in immunosuppressed patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 115: 213-220.
  40. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  41. Schabrun S, Chipchase L, Rickard H (2006) Are therapeutic ultrasound units a potential vector for nosocomial infection? Physiother Res Int 11: 61-71.
  42. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  43. Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA (2008) Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest 134: 117-125.
  44. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  45. van der Werf TS, Zijlstra JG (2004) Ultrasound of the lung: just imagine. Intensive Care Med 30: 183-184.
  46. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  47. Lichtenstein D, Hulot JS, Rabiller A, Tostivint I, Meziere G (1999) Feasibility and safety of ultrasound-aided thoracentesis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 25: 955-958.
  48. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  49. Blaivas M, Lyon M, Duggal SA (2005) prospective comparison of supine chest radiography and bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. Acad Emerg Med 12: 844-849.
  50. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  51. Blackbourne LH, Soffer D, McKenney M, Amortegui J, Schulman CI, et al. (2004) Secondary ultrasound examination increases the sensitivity of the FAST exam in blunt trauma. J Trauma 57: 934-938.
  52. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  53. Rankine JJ, Thomas AN, Fluechter D (2000) Diagnosis of pneumothorax in critically ill adults. Postgrad Med J 76: 399-404.
  54. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  55. Wilson AJ, Krous HF (1974) Lung perforation during chest tube placement in the stiff lung syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 9: 213-216.
  56. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  57. Yu PY, Lee LW (1990) Pulmonary artery pressures with tension pneumothorax. Can J Anaesth 37: 584-586.
  58. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  59. Shorr RM, Crittenden M, Indeck M, Hartunian SL, Rodriguez A (1987) Blunt thoracic trauma. Analysis of 515 patients. Ann Surg 206: 200-205.
  60. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Citation: Antoni T (2022) In Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease, Transthoracic Ultrasound. J Pulm Res Dis 6: 113. DOI: 10.4172/jprd.1000113

Copyright: © 2022 Antoni T. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top