Implementing Touch Sensitive Microfiber Devices with Children's Feet
Received: 06-Dec-2022 / Manuscript No. crfa-22-83833 / Editor assigned: 08-Dec-2022 / PreQC No. crfa-22-83833 / Reviewed: 22-Dec-2022 / QC No. crfa-22-83833 / Revised: 24-Dec-2022 / Manuscript No. crfa-22-83833 / Published Date: 31-Dec-2022
Keywords
Foot; Polyester fabric
Editorial
Microfiber Devices for Children's Feet
Recognizing foot growth can help parents anticipate people's hormonal problems and determine when to purchase new shoes. To what extent footwear influences the structural growth of the feet and related locomotor behaviours is yet unknown to orthopedists. Given that children's shoes are considered disposable because of their quick foot growth, parents will only purchase a low-cost brand. Consumers' opinions on children's shoes are not addressed since they are not fully aware of barefoot literacy. This study intends to measure the development and growth of a child's feet, specifically the length of the foot, by integrating knitting smart textile sensors into children's shoes [1-3]. Two prototype arrangements were evaluated on 30 kids, each of whom placed their feet inside the instrumented shoes for ten seconds. Their toes' distance from the sensor was used to correlate capacitance data, which were then verified against shoe size and foot length. Foot length and capacitance readings were modelled using linear regression. (p-value = 0.01, standard error = 0.08; determined to be statistically significant) This regression model. The findings of this study suggest that knitted textile sensors can be used within shoes to provide a thorough understanding of kid foot growth [4].
According to research on foot morphology, throughout the first three years of life, the foot lengthens by about 2 mm each month. For children aged one to five years, various foot-growth rates have been found in more thorough research.
old. Growth rates for both sexes are comparable; Boys' feet, on the other hand, are more likely to become one size longer and one size wider. Additionally, it is suggested that the moment a child begins to stand and walk has a significant impact on the development of their foot. The majority of manufacturers produce miniature adult shoes. However, the foot anatomy and characteristics of children's and particularly toddlers' feet differ from those of adults' feet. During earliest stages, there is no requirement for a shoe as they won't walk. The sole function of the shoe is to provide protection from the weather and the environment from the time that they begin to walk, which is between the ages of one and two [5-7]. Because of this, shoes for children of this age need to be extremely pliable and supple in order to give them the freedom to move around like they were barefoot. Because they put extra stress on the joints in the feet and ankles, thick soles would hinder the development of the foot. The question of whether footwear influences the structural development of the feet and the associated locomotor behavior is still unanswered by podiatrists. The occurrence of a child's growth spurt and an indication of when to purchase new shoes can both benefit from information on foot growth. There is a lack of information regarding when parents purchase new shoes and how their children's feet grow inside these shoes, despite the fact that research on foot growth is known to be one of the best indicators of a growth spurt and possibly of various diseases. The development and validation of in-shoe monitoring tools for observing the growth and development of children's feet, including foot shape and structure (anthropometric parameters) and specifically foot length, are described in this study [8].
Foot lengths is typically measured without shoes on. The child's heel must line up with the curved portion of the standard foot measurement apparatus before a vertical bar is raised till it contacts the child's longest toe. The number at which this bar ends represents the child's foot size. The heel should ideally rest on the heel counter. This, in addition to the entire shoe upper, which firmly secures the foot inside the shoe, is created to hold the heel in position, giving the feet greater stability during variable movements.This establishes a foundation for the placement of the sensors. Since the heel will always be inside the heel counter, there won't be much alteration to the heel. Since the toe area would experience the greatest variation in length, it is the optimal location for the sensors. Additionally, this location is perfect because layers here are simple to conceal and fit. In the process of making shoes, polyester fabric is positioned as shown between the inside layer and the outside layer that serves as protection. The toe area is hardened by the polyester material (known as a toe puff) [9,10], which keeps the shoe in form and gives further protection from scuffing during child play.
References
- Park S, Lee W, Kim S (2003) The relative risks of the metabolic syndrome defined by adult treatment panel iii according to insulin resistance in Korean population. J Korean Med Sci 64: 552-560.
- Haffner SM, Valdez RA, Hazuda HP, Mitchell BD, Morales PA (1992) Prospective analysis of the insulin-resistance syndrome (syndrome x). Diabetes 41: 715-722.
- Hong E (2015) The mediating effect of self-efficacy in the relationship between diabetes knowledge and health promoting behaviors: Focus on gender differentiation. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ 21: 509-517.
- Koch M, Klügl M, Frankewycz B, Lang S, Worlicek M et al. (2021) Football-related injuries are the major reason for the career end of professional male football players. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29(11): 3560-3568.
- Schmidt-Olsen S, Jørgensen U, Kaalund S, Sørensen J (1991) Injuries among young soccer players. Am J Sports Med 19(3): 273-275.
- Krutsch W, Memmel C, Alt V, Krutsch V, Tröß T, et al. (2022) Timing return-to-competition: a prospective registration of 45 different types of severe injuries in Germany's highest football league. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142(3): 455-463.
- Munn J, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG (2010) Evidence of sensorimotor deficits in functional ankle instability: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport 13(1): 2-12.
- Fortuna M, Teixeira S, Machado S, Velasques B, Bittencourt J, et al. (2013) Cortical reorganization after hand immobilization: the beta qEEG spectral coherence evidences. PLoS One 8(11): 79-912.
- Fransz DP, Huurnink A, Kingma I, de Boode VA, Heyligers IC, et al. (2018) Performance on a Single-Legged Drop-Jump Landing Test Is Related to Increased Risk of Lateral Ankle Sprains among Male Elite Soccer Players: A 3-Year Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med 46(14): 3454-3462.
- Pearce CJ, Tourné Y, Zellers J, Terrier R, Toschi P, et al. (2016) Rehabilitation after anatomical ankle ligament repair or reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(4): 1130-1139.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Citation: Hannah S (2022) Implementing Touch Sensitive Microfiber Devices with Children's Feet. Clin Res Foot Ankle, 10: 383.
Copyright: © 2022 Hannah S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Share This Article
Recommended Journals
Open Access Journals
Article Usage
- Total views: 1180
- [From(publication date): 0-2022 - Dec 21, 2024]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 971
- PDF downloads: 209