Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation
Open Access

Hyper collectors; Phytoremediation; Movement factor; Bio-fixation factor; Bio-aggregation factor1

Introduction

Harmful weighty metal contamination is a widespread natural concern. It can prompt defilement of soil that can represent a serious danger to the entire biosphere. A polluted site can become disturbing for general wellbeing and climate. Contamination might be of normal or anthropogenic beginning [1]. Utilizing plants to manage this issue is a universally famous strategy that has an extreme lower cost. The plant based biotechnology to more readily deal with this worldwide concern is called phytoremediation. Soil is the highest layer of earth that helps plants develop and upholds life. Soil is named as tainted when the grouping of toxins surpasses the breaking point beneath the foundation level [2]. Defilement of soils has been on ascent because of extraordinary agronomic and modern exercises. Weighty metals collected in the dirt can't be biodegraded consequently soils should be remediated (Leung, 2013). The significant expenses and shortcoming renders the conventional techniques, similar to exhuming, for soil treatment insufficient [3]. Phytoremediation has an extraordinary likely as far as cleaning impurities that are covering an enormous region and are close to the surface and furthermore is exceptionally ecological well disposed (Bini, 2010).

Metalliferous soils have unconventionally high grouping of minor components (for example Mn 200-2000 mg/kg) or follow constituents (0.01-200 mg/kg, for example Zn, Cr, As, Co, Cu, Ni, Se, and Cd) [4]. Numerous types of plants are presently found that have the ability to amass metals at higher fixation than different plants in their parts that are over the ground [5]. They are named as hyper aggregators when the metal fixations are 50-100 times higher than in non-amassing plants. The standard meaning of hyper aggregation thinks of it as the catch of metals from the dirt at high rates, delivery and similar amassing in the shoots, tail and leaves. This definition isolates hyper collectors from different plants that gather abundance pollutants in their underlying foundations, accordingly barring or limiting development to shoots [6]. (Maestri, Marmiroli, Visioli, and Marmiroli, 2010). A solitary explicit component can be collected by numerous species or a solitary animal types can hyper gather various metals. It is vital that the metal retention in the elevated tissues is in overabundance so brief volume of polluted material is left in the dirt [7].

We can gauge about the hyper gathering limit of a plant in the event that its dry matter fixations are known consequently gauges can likewise be made of the yearly areal yield [8]. In this way by performing straightforward computations like movement factor, bioaccumulation factor and bio-focus factor, we can work out the yearly pace of expulsion of the toxin component from the dirt. Metals have different hyper collection limits that are moved by plants for example a plant that hyper gathers 1000mg/kg for nickel, Cu, Co and Pb however that probably won't be the situation of Manganese and Zinc as they might be named hyper aggregate on the off chance that their ability is 3000 mg/kg or more (RD Reeves, 2006) [9].

Methodology

A few exploration papers were checked on to assemble pertinent information [10]. Online information base "Google Scholar" demonstrated extremely accommodating in acquiring research papers and distributed examinations connected with hyper collecting plant species for the treatment of debased soil [11]. Every one of the investigated examinations depended on trial and error and field investigation. This article gives a data set of hyper gathering plants and their weighty metal phytoremediation likely in soil [12].

Results and Discussion

The following (Table) presents the findings of all the experiments performed by researchers around the globe to estimate the remediation potential of hyper accumulators [13]. The translocation factor explains capability of hyper accumulator to translocate the metal from underground to above ground parts of a plant (Nirola et al.,2015). The bioaccumulation coefficient (BAC) is used to evaluate the efficiency of a plant in phytoremediation and translocation [14]. The accumulation coefficient can also be defined as the plant to soil concentration quotient (Flora, 2014). Bio-concentration factor is the ratio of metal concentration in plant roots to the concentration of metal accumulated in soil (Nazir, Malik, Ajaib, Khan, & Siddiqui, 2011). These factors are the renowned parameters for determining hyper accumulating plant species [15]. It has also been observed that members of same family have similar phyto-remediating abilities [16]. Most commonly accumulated heavy metals are cadmium, zinc, nickel and copper [17].

Conclusion

Different plant species require different growing conditions to hyper accumulate heavy metals [18]. Moreover, not all the plant tissues store equal quantity of heavy metals. Some plant species are good at accumulating heavy metals more in their roots as compared to shoots or leaves [19]. This may also vary with the elements being accumulated. Mathematical calculations and soil profile analysis before and after treatment provides evidence of the hyper accumulation of heavy metals.

Recommendation

Pakistan is facing the problem of severe soil and water pollution. This data should be used for the field application of hyper accumulators in Pakistan [20]. This is a cheap, secure and eco-friendly way of bioremediation which has showed excellent results in contamination removal

1. Bert V, Bonnin I, Saumitou Laprade P, Laguérie De P, Petit D, et al. (2002) Do Arabidopsis halleri from nonmetallicolous populations accumulate zinc and cadmium more effectively than those from metallicolous populations. New Phytol 47-57.

Indexed at, Cross ref, Google Scholar

2. Bini C (2010) From soil contamination to land restoration Nova Science Publishers New York (NY).

Google Scholar

3. Chaney R L, Baklanov IA (2017) Phytoremediation and phytomining: status and promise. Adv Bot Res 189-221.

Crossref, Google Scholar

4. Flora SJS (2014) Handbook of arsenic toxicology: Academic Press. Potential of Arundo donax to treat chromium contamination. 42: 256-259.


Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

5. Leung DW (2013) Recent advances towards improved phytoremediation of heavy metal pollution. New Zealand: Bentham Science Publishers.

Crossref, Google Scholar

6. Maestri E, Marmiroli M, Visioli G, Marmiroli N (2010) Metal tolerance and hyperaccumulation: costs and trade-offs between traits and environment. Environ Exp Bot 68: 1-13.

Crossref, Google Scholar

7. Malaisse F, Gregoire J, Brooks R, Morrison (2015) Aeolanthus biformifolius De Wild.: a hyperaccumulator of copper from Zaire. Science 199: 887-888.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

8. Martos S, Gallego B , Sáez L , López Alvarado J, Cabot C, et al . (2016) Characterization of zinc and cadmium hyperaccumulation in three Noccaea (Brassicaceae) populations from non-metalliferous sites in the eastern Pyrenees. Front Plant Sci 7: 128.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

9. Mesjasz Przybyłowicz J, Nakonieczny M, Migula P, Augustyniak M, Tarnawska M, et al. (2004)Uptake of cadmium, lead nickel and zinc from soil and water solutions by the nickel hyperaccumulator Berkheya coddii. Acta Biol Crac Ser Bot 46: 75-85.

Google Scholar

10. Naeem HMI, Taskeen A (2010) Phytoremediation of Cu (II) by Calotropis Procera Roots. N Y Sci j 3.

Crossref, Google Scholar

11. Nazir A, Malik RN, Ajaib M, Khan N, Siddiqui MFJPJB, et al. (2011) Hyperaccumulators of heavy metals of industrial areas of Islamabad and Rawalpindi. 43: 1925-1933.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

12. Nirola R, Megharaj M, Palanisami T, Aryal R, Venkateswarlu K, et al. (2015) Evaluation of metal uptake factors of native trees colonizing an abandoned copper mine–a quest for phytostabilization.115-123.

Crossref, Google Scholar

13. Phaenark C, Pokethitiyook P, Kruatrachue M, Ngernsansaruay (2009) Cd and Zn accumulation in plants from the Padaeng zinc mine area. Int J Phytoremediation 11: 479-495.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

14. Rajakaruna N, Bohm BA (2002) Serpentine and its vegetation: a preliminary study from Sri Lanka. J Appl Bot 76: 20-28.

Google Scholar

15. Reeves R (2003. Tropical hyperaccumulators of metals and their potential for phytoextraction. Plant Soil 249: 57-65.

Crossref, Google Scholar

16. Reeves R (2006) Hyperaccumulation of trace elements by plants. Int J Phytoremediation 25-52.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

17. Reeves R, Baker A, Becquer T, Echevarria G, Miranda, et al. (2007) The flora and biogeochemistry of the ultramafic soils of Goiás state, Brazil. Plant Soil 293: 107-119.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

18. Sao V, Nakbanpote W, Thiravetyan P (2007) Cadmium accumulation by Axonopus compressus (Sw.) P. Beauv and Cyperus rotundas Linn growing in cadmium solution and cadmium-zinc contaminated soil. Sci Technol 29: 881-892.

Google Scholar

19. Saraswat S, Rai (2009) Phytoextraction potential of six plant species grown in multimetal contaminated soil. Chem Ecol 25: 1-11.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

20. Wei S, Zhou Q, Wang X, Zhang K, Guo G, et al. A newly-discovered Cd-hyperaccumulator Solatium nigrum L. Chin Sci Bull 50: 33-38.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar