Environment Pollution and Climate Change
Open Access

River contamination; Hazardous pollutants

Introduction

According to Kummu et al., about 50% of people worldwide live within 3 km of a river. 2011), and they are susceptible to low water quality and extremes in streamflow (flood/drought). These two issues are connected (and prone to deteriorate with environmental. However, the scientific literature has not yet adequately addressed the impact of extreme streamflow on water quality. Floods prepare toxins put away on the floodplain, and treatment and containment of overwhelm work. Floods reduce river re-oxygenation by lowering water levels and increasing pollutant concentrations. Droughts, when combined with warming waters, make harmful algal blooms (HABs) more likely and more severe.

According to Wuebbles et al., one of the many current effects of climate change on the United States is an increase in heavy precipitation events and a rise in mean temperature. Floods are getting worse all over the United States as a result of these changes, evolving flow regulation strategies, and the development of watersheds Europe and possibly other locations. Conversely, droughts increase water competition, desiccate crops, and concentrate contaminants. The timing and magnitude of peak stream flow outside of the design range of existing infrastructure and its operating rules will be altered by shifting seasonality and reductions in winter snowpack (IPCC, 2013), according to projections for the middle of the century. Therefore, careful investigation of the compounding effects of extreme stream flow on water quality is necessary for reducing risks to riparian communities. The majority of the work done on risk management and adaptive capacity has focused on issues of available water 2003; or the threat of flooding on its own, with promising early work on tradeoffs between anthropocentric water supply and ecological water requirements. Other aspects of water-resource systems are less advanced than climate change risk management. Water supply risk assessment (including climate change risk) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) have both made significant progress, but surprisingly little has been done to combine the tools of contaminant transport (advection, dispersion, and reaction of contaminants in flowing water) and bottom-up water-resource system risk assessment (such as weather generators, hydrologic models, demographic and land use models, economic trade-off analysis, Bayesian networks [1-5].

Discussion

The impact of climate change on riverine water quality has been the subject of numerous studies. These studies pay particular attention to the effects of temperature and primarily focused on questions of contaminant (or nutrient) loading rather than transport. These studies monitored water quality parameters over a specific time period to see how changes in climatic variables affected water quality. However, they were unable to simulate the fate of pollutants under changing climates. Non-point source pollution in agricultural watersheds has been the primary focus of other studies on the effects of climate change on water quality. Despite the fact that some studies have looked at how pollutant transport is affected by climate change, but they haven’t looked at how climate change and extreme events affect the fate of contamination at point sources and chemical spills in rivers. As a result, concerns about water quality have not been directly incorporated into bottom-up assessments of broader water system resilience because contaminant transport models have not been included in water system modeling chains.

Problems of surface water contaminant transport have almost always required one-dimensional (1D) approaches for risk or uncertainty analysis, and they have not been successful in reproducing the duration of the contaminant plume. The inability to accurately model contaminant plume exposure reduces the usefulness of 1D water quality risk assessment tools because contaminants plume exposure is typically the issue of greatest concern for riparian water utilities. To effectively simulate the advection and dispersion of pollutants in surface waters, higher-dimensional CFD models are useful. Numerous studies have used numerical models to simulate the transport of pollutants through rivers, but have done so without examining how the hydroclimatological inputs affect the water contamination model’s response. According to Van Griensven and Meixner, the most important two-dimensional (2D) CFD formulation and a well-parameterized coupled human-hydrologic model for the generation of CFD inputs are the form of the model (that is, how the processes are represented).

Additionally, prior approaches to climate change risk assessment in contaminant transport issues have tended to evaluate uncertainty in a single input for example, meteorological. However, systematic investigation of a multidimensional risk space is required [6-10].

Conclusion

Applications pertaining to the subsurface have dominated risk assessment in contaminant transport using 2D or 3D model formulations, yet don’t have clear continue to riverine issues. The standard instruments for 2D and 3D contaminant transport in surface water, such as the Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC) and Hamrick, 1992), are not suitable for use in a gamble evaluation structure. Despite being excellent for their intended use, they are data-intensive, complicated, and slow. In addition, they are difficult to implement batch runs, which permit multiple runs of a model with a single model call. Risk assessment, on the other hand, explores a decision space through numerous simulations. For large watersheds, therefore, models that are more nimble and adaptable than EFDC/WASP or models that are similar to them are required. Modelling of contaminant transport must be creative.

1. De Quevedo CMG, da Silva Paganini W (2011) The impact of human activities on the dynamics of phosphorus in the environment and its effect on public health. Cien Saude Colet 16: 3529-3539.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. El-Amier YA, Al-Hadithy ON, Kadhim OG, El-Alfy M (2018) Evaluation of Water and Sediment Quality of the Tigris River, Baghdad City, Iraq. Am J Environ Sci 1: 10-19.

Google Scholar

3. Eppley RW, Renger EH, Venrick EL, Mullin MM (1973) A Study Of Plankton Dynamics And Nutrient Cycling In The Central Gyre Of The North Pacific Ocean. Limnology and oceanography 18: 534-551.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Finch S, Samuel A, Lane GP (2014) Lockhart and Wiseman’s crop husbandry including grassland. Elsevier.
5. Geng Y, Baumann F, Song C, Zhang M, Shi Y, et al. (2017) Increasing temperature reduces the coupling between available nitrogen and phosphorus in soils of Chinese grasslands. Scientific reports 7: 1-10.

Google Scholar

6. GESAMP (2001) Protecting the Oceans from Land-based Activities - Land-based Sources and Activities Affecting the Quality and Uses of the Marine, Coastal and Associated Freshwater Environment.
7. Goldman CR, Horne AJ (1983) Limnology. McGraw-Hill.
8. Hassan FM, AL-Zubaidi N, Al-Dulaimi W (2013) An ecological assessment for Tigris River within Baghdad, Iraq. J of Babylon Univ. Conference of Env. Science Univ. of Babylon/Env. Research Center,
9. Hong SH, Lee JI, Lee CG, Park SJ (2019) Effect of temperature on capping efficiency of zeolite and activated carbon under fabric mats for interrupting nutrient release from sediments. Sci Rep 31: 15754.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Jabar SS, Hassan FM (2022) Monitoring the Water Quality of Tigris River by Applied Overall Index of Pollution. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,