Biochemistry & Physiology: Open Access
Open Access

Biodiesel, derived from renewable sources such as microalgal lipids, stands as a promising alternative to conventional fossil fuels. However, efficient biodiesel production requires robust catalysts to expedite the conversion process. In recent years, advanced nanomaterials and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as catalytic agents, offering enhanced efficiency and selectivity in biodiesel synthesis from microalgal lipids [1]. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the utilization of these innovative materials in biodiesel production processes.

Nanomaterials in biodiesel catalysis

Nanomaterials possess unique properties owing to their high surface area-to-volume ratio and tunable surface chemistry, making them ideal candidates for catalytic applications. Various nanomaterials such as metal nanoparticles (e.g., gold, palladium, and platinum), metal oxides (e.g., titanium dioxide, zinc oxide), and carbon-based materials (e.g., carbon nanotubes, graphene) have shown remarkable catalytic activity in biodiesel production. These materials facilitate the transesterification of microalgal lipids into biodiesel by accelerating the conversion rate and improving the yield [2].

Metal-organic frameworks (mofs) as catalysts

MOFs, characterized by their well-defined porous structures and customizable composition, have gained attention in heterogeneous catalysis. Their high surface area and tunable pore sizes enable the efficient immobilization of active catalytic sites, promoting biodiesel synthesis reactions. Additionally, the modular nature of MOFs allows for the incorporation of various functional groups to enhance catalytic activity and selectivity. Through synergistic interactions between metal nodes and organic linkers, MOFs offer a platform for optimizing biodiesel production processes.

Advantages of nanomaterials and mofs in biodiesel production

The utilization of advanced nanomaterials and MOFs as catalysts in biodiesel production offers several advantages. Firstly, their high catalytic activity accelerates reaction kinetics, leading to shorter reaction times and increased productivity. Moreover, the selective binding of reactant molecules on the catalytic surface minimizes unwanted by-products, enhancing the purity of the biodiesel product [3]. Additionally, the recyclability and stability of nanomaterials and MOFs contribute to the sustainability of biodiesel production processes by reducing catalyst consumption and waste generation.

Microalgae: sources, synthetic organization, and development

Purportedly, 3,000,000 types of microalgae are tracked down in various conditions of nature. Microalgae are photosynthetic microorganisms using daylight, carbon dioxide, and water to combine food. Microalgae have been at the center of scientists for quite a long time because of the presence of a significant number of components in their biomass (Chisti 2007). For the most part, proteins, lipids, and starches are huge synthetic substances present in microalgae; not withstanding this compound.

Bio-diesel from microalgae

Different feedstocks, like corn, soybeans, jatropha, camelina, canola, sunflower, and microalgae, have been utilized for biodiesel creation. Biodiesel delivered from microalgae is beneficial in two ways. In pre-creation, microalgae have high lipid content (70%), high lipid yield (126,900 L/ha. Year), and higher biodiesel (121,104 kg/ha.year) creation with less land use (0.1 m2 year/ kg⋅biodiesel) (Zhang et al., 2022). Pretreatment techniques benefit from the cultivation and growth of microalgae because microalgae cannot be converted directly into biodiesel. In order to become the desired final product, it must undergo pretreatment procedures (Sankaran et al., 2020). Prior to going through pretreatment, the microalgae is isolated from the water [4-7]. This is the most vital move towards the creation of biodiesel from microalgae, and its proficiency and cost influence the item’s general creation cycle and execution (Chen et al., 2015). Different advances are utilized for isolating .

High level materials for biodiesel creation

Expectedly, corrosive and basic impetuses have been utilized for the transesterification of microalgae into bio-diesel; acidic impetuses incorporate hydrochloric corrosive, sulfuric corrosive, and phosphoric corrosive, and basic impetuses incorporate potassium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide. Among these impetuses, soluble impetuses have been utilized all the more generally attributable to their brief time frame and high response rate one more justification for the more uncommon utilization .

Challenges and future perspectives

Despite the promising advancements in utilizing nanomaterials and MOFs for biodiesel production, several challenges persist. The scalability and cost-effectiveness of these materials need to be addressed to facilitate their industrial implementation. Moreover, the long-term stability and durability of catalysts under harsh reaction conditions remain areas of concern [8-11]. Future research efforts should focus on developing novel synthesis strategies and engineering approaches to overcome these challenges and realize the full potential of nanomaterials and MOFs in biodiesel production.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the integration of advanced nanomaterials and metal-organic frameworks represents a significant advancement in catalyzing biodiesel production from microalgal lipids. Their unique physicochemical properties and tailored functionalities offer unprecedented opportunities to enhance the efficiency, selectivity, and sustainability of biodiesel synthesis processes. By addressing current challenges and exploring new avenues for innovation, these materials hold the key to realizing the vision of a renewable and environmentally friendly energy future.

1. Farhan M, Khan M, Oves H (2016)Cancer therapy by catechin involves redox cycling of copper ions and generation of reactive oxygen species. Toxins 8: 37.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Li B, Zhao J, Wang C (2011)Ginsenoside Rh2 induces apoptosis and paraptosis-like cell death in colorectal cancer cells through activation of P53. Cancer Letters 301: 185.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Ahire V, Kumar K, Mishra, Kulkarni P (2017)Ellagic acid enhances apoptotic sensitivity of breast cancer cells toc-radiation. Nutri & Cancer 69: 904-910.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Liang F, Li A, Shi R, Liu J, Tang Y, et al. (2018)Anticancer effects of ginsenoside Rg1, cinnamic acid, and tanshinone IIA in osteosarcoma MG-63 cells: nuclear matrix down regulation and cytoplasmic trafficking of nucleophosmin. Inte J Bioche & Cell 5: 567-574.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Cowling VH, Cole MD (2017)E-cadherin repression contributes to c-Myc-induced epithelial cell transformation.Oncogene 26: 3582-3586.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Clark GM (2015)Prognostic and predictive factors for breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2: 79-89.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Ariazi EA, Ariazi JL, Cordera F, Jordan VC (2016)Estrogen receptors as therapeutic targets in breast cancer. Curr Medicinal Che 6: 181- 202.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

8. Marwa GA, Amal M, Bassem E (2020)Evaluation of cytotoxic and anticancer effect of Orobanche crenata methanolic extract on cancer cell lines. Tumor Biology 5: 67-74.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Tan BL, Norhaizan ME, Huynh K (2015)Brewers‘ rice modulates oxidative stress in azoxymethane-mediated colon carcinogenesis in rats.W J Gastroent 21:8826–8835.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Tan BL, Norhaizan ME, Chan LC (2018)ROS-mediated mitochondrial pathway is required for Manilkara zapota (L.) P. Royen leaf methanol extract inducing apoptosis in the modulation of caspase activation and EGFR/NFkB activities of HeLa human cervical cancer cells. Evid Complem Alternat Med 6: 57-64.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref