ISSN: 2329-8863
Advances in Crop Science and Technology
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
  • Review Article   
  • Adv Crop Sci Tech 2013, Vol 1(4): 113
  • DOI: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000113

Haploid Breeding in Palms-A Brief Review

SunilKumar K* and Sparjanbabu DS
Directorate of Oil Palm Research, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Pedavegi?534 450, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India
*Corresponding Author: SunilKumar K, Directorate of Oil Palm Research, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Pedavegi-534 450, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India, Email: sunilk.icar@gmail.com

Received: 09-Jul-2013 / Accepted Date: 25-Sep-2013 / Published Date: 27-Sep-2013 DOI: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000113

Abstract

Haploids are sporophytic plants with gametophytic chromosome number, and they originate from a single gamete. The chromosome number of haploid could be doubled spontaneously or artificially to obtain doubled haploids carrying two sets of chromosomes from a single parent (homozygous). The important use of haploids is based on the fact that marked improvements in the economics of plant breeding can be achieved through doubled haploid production, since selection and other procedural efficiencies can be markedly improved through the provision of elite true-breeding (homozygous) progenies. Haploids have value in allowing the isolation of mutants, which may be masked in a diploid, particularly where the mutant allele is non-functional. Haploids also have value in transformation programmes. If haploids are transformed directly, then true breeding diploid transgenic plants can be produced in one step, following doubling of chromosomes. Using an integrated approach, including biotechnological tools and conventional methods, it is possible to achieve main goals of crop improvement in short time. Hence, efforts were made to exploit the
potential of haploids in breeding of perennial monocots such as palms. The present paper discusses various developments in haploid breeding with respect to economically important palm species.

Keywords: Haploids, Oil Palm, Date Palm, Coconut, Breeding

402217

Introduction

The life cycle of higher plants proceeds via alternating stages of sporophyte and gametophyte. The free living sporophyte is the most dominant and obvious life form in these plants. The sporophyte is formed by the fertilization of male and female gametes, and contains a set of chromosomes from each parent and the genomic composition is 2n. Sporophytes with n number of chromosomes could be produced in higher plants which are termed as haploids. In other words, haploids are sporophytic plants with gametophytic chromosome number and they originate from a single gamete. The chromosome number of haploid could be doubled spontaneously or artificially to obtain doubled haploids carrying two sets of chromosomes from a single parent (homozygous).

History of haploids

Dorothy Bergner was credited with describing the first natural haploid in Datura stramonium [1]. This was followed by reports of natural haploids in tobacco, as well as wheat, and subsequently, in many other species [1,2]. The breakthrough in haploid research came when Guha and Maheswari [3,4] reported the development of haploid embryos from in vitro culture of immature anthers of Datura anoxia. This was the first report of inducing a change in normal gametophyte development into sporophyte development and embryo with haploid chromosome number can be obtained. Subsequently, a lot of work was carried out for development of haploid and doubled haploids in higher plants [5,6], through artificial methods. Of late, various researchers directed their attention to perennials including palms.

Use of haploids

Classical breeding and cross pollinating procedures are unpredictable with respect to obtaining recombinants of desirable traits, and also time consuming. Against this deficiency of classical methods, production of haploids is considered as the most prolific and desirable approach of new plant varieties. Hence, the important use of haploids is based on the fact that marked improvements in the economics of plant breeding can be achieved via doubled haploid production. This is achieved by markedly improving selection and other procedural efficiencies through the provision of elite truebreeding (homozygous) progenies [7-13]. With doubled haploid production systems, homozygosity is achieved in one generation. Thus, the breeder can eliminate the numerous cycles of inbreeding that is usually necessary to achieve practical levels of homozygosity by conventional methods. Indeed, absolute homozygosity for all traits is not achievable by conventional breeding methods. Consequently, an efficient doubled haploid technology would enable breeders to reduce the time and the cost of cultivar development relative to conventional breeding practices. With respect to merits of haploidy, firstly, such haploids upon chromosome doubling (DHs), are having value in their own right as potential new varieties. Secondly, homozygous plants also have utility for the generation of F1 hybrid plants, where crosses are made between selected homozygous males and females. These F1 plants often exhibit hybrid vigour (heterosis), a characteristic often associated with dramatic increases in yield compared with either of the parents, and was first described by Shull [14]. Furthermore, the production of F1 hybrids allows the breeder to produce large quantities of seed comprising of a single genotype from homozygous parental lines. This property will have many advantages over a genetically heterogeneous mix of genotypes because of the potential to select single elite genotypes that produce high yields, and/or posses other desirable characteristics. There is also potential to achieve higher yields by selecting genotypes for adaptation to specific environments, and to optimize agronomic and management practices. In many crops, the only realistic alternative to producing a single genotype in commercial quantities is by asexual cloning. There are well-developed methods of vegetative propagation, using suckers, cuttings or grafts to produce clones for some crops (for example, rubber, cocoa and coffee), but not all crops (for example, oil palm and coconuts).

As in case of self-pollinators, the application of haploidy in crosspollinated diploid crops is based on the use of DH-lines (Doubled Haploid lines). However, owing to inbreeding depression (note: homozygous individuals of a normally out crossing species typically exhibit reduced vigour, and this is known as inbreeding depression), these lines cannot be used directly, but only as parental inbred lines for the production of hybrid varieties. When inbred lines are being developed via haploids [7], all barriers are repeated selfing, which are characteristics of natural cross-pollinators, are bypassed, e.g. dioecy, self incompatibility and long juvenile periods. The time saving is particularly apparent in biennial crops, and in crops with a long juvenile period. Inbred lines can be developed in these crops only via haploidy [9].

Haploids have value in allowing the isolation of mutants, which may be masked in a diploid, particularly where the mutant allele is nonfunctional. Haploids also have value in transformation programmes. If haploids are transformed directly, then true breeding diploid transgenic plants can be produced in one step, following doubling of chromosomes. As such, haploid plants (and doubled haploids) reveal all their genetic information, or in other words, their genotype is completely displayed by their phenotype. Doubled haploid plants (transgenic plants) produce viable seed and the desired trait is passed on to successive generations. Some of the genetically determined traits can be introduced into plants by a single gene or possible a small cluster of genes, including insecticidal activity, protection against viroid infection, resistance to herbicides, delay of senescence, tolerance to environmental stresses, improved nutritional quality of plant products and self incompatibility. Resistance to pest and diseases or unfavorable external factors (drought, salinity, heavy metal toxicity etc) can thus be directly recognized and selected. Haploid plants allow the detection of mutants that are unable to pass through the embryonic phases. For similar reasons, haploid plant tissue make ideal vehicles for genetic transformation, by whatever gene manipulation techniques are relevant, to give genetically modified material that on doubling give homozygous versions of the introduced gene or genes.

The agricultural applications for haploids centers on their capacity for the rapid generation of homozygous genotypes after chromosome doubling, and are listed below.

• Reduce time for variety development, e.g. in seasonal crops, the duration reduced from 10 to 6 years or even less, and the reduction will be drastic in case of perennial crops

• Homozygous recombinant lines can be developed in one generation, instead of after numerous backcross generations; and

• Selection for recessive traits in recombinant lines is more efficient because recessive alleles are not ‘masked’ by the effects of dominant alleles.

• Introgression of desirable traits/genes speeded by allowing homozygotes to be developed readily.

Using an integrated approach, including biotechnological tools and conventional breeding, it is possible to achieve main goals of crop improvement in short time.

Routes of haploidy

Spontaneous or in vivo haploids and induced or in vitro haploid production are the routes of development of haploid plants.

Spontaneous haploids may occur in many species of plants, albeit at low frequencies. For tropical perennial crop species of commercial importance, the following summary is relevant-coffee (reports of spontaneous haploids) [15], cotton (many examples of spontaneous haploids), cacao (spontaneous haploids reported) [16]. In other words, they are rare in occurrence. For this reason, emphasis has turned to alternative means of generating haploids and doubled haploids.

Besides the two important techniques to obtain haploids (androgenesis and gynogenesis pathway) [17], wide hybridization is one of the technique to achieve them [18]. Haploids also can be obtained naturally or spontaneously, but they exist in low frequency. They were few important haploids in plants like barley, wheat, triticale, maize, and rice and rape seed. Doubled haploids or haploids advantages include usefulness in fixing traits combinations that fulfill industrial needs, facilitate hybrid or wide breeding, applied in molecular marker research, and increase the development of mapping populations and trait load, produced better hybrid and improved parental performance in hybrid combinations [19]. Wide hybridization is crossing or hybridizing a crop cultivar with another plant, that is outside its gene pool, and not sexually compatible [20]. This technology has been applied to several Brassicas, barely, wheat, rice, melon, pepper, and tobacco [21,22]. Wan Ibrahim Wan Hassan et al. [23] reported pollen of Cocos nucifera have been crossed with E. guineensis (Dura) in the efforts to obtain haploids. For screening culled oil palm, germinated seeds were characterized according to their abnormalities, prior to being planted and followed by flow cytometry analysis 12 weeks after planting. Flow cytometry analysis has been used to estimate genome size and ploidy levels, and it is simple, accurate, rapid and convenient method [24,25].

Screening seedlings grown from culled germinated seeds from this study showed 1.36% chances of obtaining potential haploids. However, the seedlings died, which may be due to their own weakness of having half genome size or due to planting conditions. Wide hybridization of E. guineensis (dura) with C. nucifera has resulted in 10 plantlets, which embryos have been rescued from 15 weeks old fruits, and they are currently being sub cultured in rooting media.

There are now four methods [26-30], generally applicable to the production of haploids in plants at frequencies useful for a breeding programme, and a recent monograph detailed the protocols applicable to haploid and doubled haploid production in a number of species. These methods are:

1. Androgenesis, where cultured anthers or isolated microspores undergo embryogenesis/organogenesis, directly or through intermediate callus.

2. Gynogenesis, where cultured unfertilized isolated ovules, ovaries of flower buds, develop embryos from cells of the embryo sac.

3. Wide hybridization crosses, followed by chromosome elimination from one parent of a cross, usually the pollinating parent.

4. Parthenogenesis, where there is development of an embryo by pseudogamy, semigamy or apogamy.

The general lack of progress towards haploid and doubled haploid production in woody species [31-34] is due mainly to the present emphasis on production methods, involving an in vitro phase. There are numerous problems associated with the general intransigence of woody species to growth under such conditions.

Detection of haploids

Haploids of higher plants can be distinguished from their diploid equivalent in many ways. Most obviously from the perspective of phenotype, they are usually smaller in appearance, partly because of their smaller cell size; in general terms, cell volume in plants is positively correlated to ploidy level. Several methods [35] for the provisional assignment of the haploid status to a plant do exploit this relationship. The most widely used of these phenotypic methods is the measurement of stomatal guard cell length and chloroplast content in these cells, although none of the phenotypic predictors of haploidy is absolutely reliable. Methods providing direct measurements of genome size provide a far more reliable diagnosis of haploid status. These include direct measurement of the chromosome number, using conventional chromosome counting techniques and measurement of the DNA content using micro densitometry [36], or more especially, flow cytometry [24,25,37-39]. The latter technique has also been applied to characterize the cell cycle stages in various tissues in case of oil palm material, although not for the detection of haploid plants or tissues [40]. It is also possible to exploit the absolute absence of heterozygosity in haploids and doubled haploids to detect such plants using various co-dominantly inherited molecular marker methods [41].

402218

Achievements In Palms Of Economic Importance

The literature relating to haploid research in palms is limited to date palm, oil palm, and to some extent, coconut and such works are briefly reviewed in this section.

Date palm

Although, studies dedicated to anther and ovule culture recovery are scarce for date palm, attempts under various conditions have led to achieving cell division and to the formation of globular embryos from immature micro spores. Some of the successful attempts with cold treatment, combined with the use of two auxins and one cytokinin, have been proven to be the key elements to generate embryoids [42,43], that unfortunately were unable to develop. Investigations of different treatments and various exogenous factors were successful, when there was a formation of the weak calli surviving only during a short period of time. The main difficulties encountered in such studies were related to the short time flowering period that does not allow, usually having enough fresh anthers with uninucleate microspores. Furthermore, date palm male anthers typically turned brown and died a few weeks after their culture.

Some haploid recovery attempts were made with unfertilized ovules also. Due to the small size of these ovules, browning and necrosis were the main limits encountered by such cultures. Although the carpals enlarged and became quite prominent when cultured, the use of activated charcoal is required to ensure them a much longer survival and roots and callus formation [43]. As on date, the best results ever obtained were from flowers taken from closed spathes, and in which the embryo sacs were formed that contained undifferentiated cells. There is a claim that treatment of unpollinated female date palm inflorescences with gibberellic acid that induced doubled haploid “apomictic” progeny [44].

Oil palm

Oil palm is a perennial monocotyledon, with a long generation period. Hence, breeding of the crop is a very slow process; generally taking approximately 20 years to develop and progeny test a new generation of palms for commercial seed production. There are no reports of breeders producing inbred lines by inbreeding (i.e., eight generations of selfing), because this would take a biological minimum of 40 years to achieve, which is as follows; the time required to make crosses (6 months), process seed (3 months), grow seedlings in nursery (12 months), field plant seedlings (male and female inflorescences will develop after 18-24 months), collect pollen and self pollinate and harvest bunch (24-30 months). Currently, genetic improvement of oil palm is mainly performed by conventional means. Compared to other oil producing crops, which are predominantly annuals, the introduction of novel traits into oil palm is an extremely protracted process; it may require between 12 to 14 years to improve or to introduce a trait into oil palm. In addition to the long generation period, breeding of perennials, such as oil palm, require large areas for breeding trials and an extensive series of time-consuming backcrosses.

Some studies on the development of chromosome doubling techniques in oil palm have already been reported, and whilst these data relate to the doubling of diploid material (to give polyploids), the protocol described will also have utility for haploid doubling [45,46].

The crossing of two homozygous elite lines (like one that can be produced by doubling haploids) can generate genetically uniform, highly heterozygous ‘hybrid’ varieties. However, to date, there has been no corresponding progress with the highest yielding of all oilseed crops, i.e. oil palm, although oil yields of 4.8-7 t/ha is 3-8 times greater than other oil seed crops [47]. Overall, oil palm is the world’s leading source of vegetable oils and fats, on a par with soybean [48], but has nevertheless yet to benefit from the release of hybrid varieties.

The slow or rather lack of progress towards the generation of hybrid varieties for oil palm could be mainly because the breeding system of the crop precludes the simple production of inbred lines. Oil palm is essentially an out breeding species, but unlike corn, in which a male and a female flower are produced on the same plant at the same time, each oil palm plant produces either male or female flowers at any one time, and therefore, a palm can only readily be self-pollinated by methods of controlled pollination using stored pollen. To date, however, there is no published example of any haploid, or homozygous diploid oil palm plant. Nevertheless, there has been extensive breeding [23] cell culture [48-50], and transformation studies (US Application 20030159175) geared towards the genetic improvement of the oil palm crop. Two main species of oil palm plant commercially grown are: Elaeis oleifera Kunth and Elaeis guineensis Jacq. The latter has three sub-types: Dura, Tenera, and Pisifera. Most cultivars or planted stands are Tenera, which produces fruit with higher oil content.

All oil palm seeds currently used for commercial plantings are produced from parents selected from genetically heterogeneous populations of non-homozygous palms. Variation in the level of parental heterozygosity and in the genetic divergence between parental lines means that there is extensive genetic segregation amongst the resulting seed offspring. Thus, the seeds produced from palm crosses are, therefore, not genetically uniform. This genetic variation impedes the oil palm industry from selecting specific genotypes for high yield or other desirable traits.

Mention should be made of the apparent claim by Maluszynski et al. [51] that Texeira et al. [50] have already published a protocol for doubled haploid production in oil palm. This claim is erroneous. In fact, the latter publication describes somatic embryogenesis from diploid floral tissue, and does not describe the culture of anthers or other reproductive tissue, to produce haploid embryos and plants.

Other palms

The only related work on other palm species include, unsuccessful attempts to produce haploids of coconut (Cocos nucifera) via anther culture [52-64] and date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) [42,43]. There is one report of attempt at ovule culture in coconut [38]. However, no haploid plants were produced from any of these in vitro studies. Nevertheless, there is a single example of a haploid coconut plantlet isolated from a twin seedling [65], and cytological evidence of a haploid chromosome number (n=16) observed from a single embryo from the same species.

However, none of these publications describe an effective method to produce and select spontaneous haploids or doubled haploids, or provide teaching relevant to the production of haploid or homozygous material of oil palm.

402219

Conclusion

Haploid research has emerged in the recent as study dealing with fascinating developmental phenomenon in the field of plant breeding. Recent technological innovations, greater understanding of underlying control mechanisms, and an expansion of end user applications has brought about a resurgence of interest in haploids in higher plants. This is evidenced by the publications being brought out recently, whereas in palms, it has met with less success because of its perennial nature. In the future, haploid research will have an enormous impact on traditional plant breeding programmes, including palms, because it can significantly reduce the time taken to develop a new variety against traditional plant breeding techniques. Further, it will also be used to create plants with novel characteristics.

402220

References

  1. Blakeslee AF, Belling J, Farnham ME, Bergner AD (1922) A haploid mutant in the Jimson weed, Datura stramonium. Science 55: 646-647.
  2. Kostoff D (1929) An androgenic Nicotiana haploid. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie 9: 640-642.
  3. Guha S, Maheswari SC (1966) Cell division and differentiation of embryos in the pollen grains of Datura in vitro. Nature 212: 97-98.
  4. Guha S, Maheswari SC (1964) In vitro production of embryos from anthers of datura. Nature 204: 497.
  5. Brian P Forster, Erwin Heberle-Bros, Ken J Kasha, Alisher Touraev (2007) The resurgence of haploids in higher plants. Trend Plant Sci 12: 368-375.
  6. Jim M, Dunwell (2010) Haploids in flowering plants: Origins and exploitation. Plant Biotechnol J 8: 377-424.
  7. Chase SS (1951) The monoploid method of developing inbred lines. 6th annual hybrid corn industry research conference, USA.
  8. Choo TM (1981) Doubled haploids for studying the inheritance of quantitative characters. Genetics 99: 525-540
  9. Hermsen JGT, Ramanna MS, Helsop-Harrison J, Hermsen JGT, den Jijs APM (1981) Haploidy and plant breeding and Discussion. Phil Trans Royal Soc Lond B 292: 499-507.
  10. Melchers G (1972) Haploids in higher plants for plant breeding. Zeit Pflanzenzucht 67: 19-32.
  11. Nei M (1963) The efficiency of haploid methods of plant breeding. Heredity 18: 95-100.
  12. Snape JW (1989) Doubled haploid breeding: theoretical basis and practical applications. In: Second International Symposium on Genetic Manipulation in Crops, EI Batan: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Phillippines, Japan.
  13. Touraev A, Forster BP, Jain SM (2009) Advances in haploid production in higher plants. Ann Bot 104: 348.
  14. Shull GF (1908) The composition of a field of maize. J Hered 4: 296-301.
  15. Lashermes P, Couturon E, Charrier A (1994) Doubled haploids of Coffea canephora: development, fertility and agronomic characteristics. Euphytica 74: 149-157.
  16. Dublin P (1972) Polyembryonie et haploidie chez Theobroma caco. Café Cacao The16: 295-311.
  17. Swapan K Datta (2005) Androgenic haploids: Factors controlling development and its application in crop improvement. Curr Sci 89: 1870-1878
  18. Wedzony M, Forster BP, Zur I, Golemiec E, Szechynska-Hebda M, et al. (2009) Progress in doubled haploid technology in higher plants. Advances in Haploid Technology in Higher Plants 1:1-34
  19. Ceballos M, Perez JC, Iglesias M, Fregene M, Calle F, et al. (2007) The use of double-haploids in cassava breeding. Cassava Breeding Project 150-160.
  20. Murphy D (2007) Plant breeding and biotechnology. Cambridge, United Kingdom
  21. Ahloowalia BS, Maluszynski M, Nichterlein K (2004) Global impact of mutation-derived varieties. Euphytica 135: 187-204.
  22. Zheng MY, Konzak CF (1999) Effect of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on callus induction and plant regeneration in anther culture of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Cell Reports 19: 69-73
  23. Wan Ibrahim Wan Hassan, Zulkifli Yaakub, Norziha Abdullah, Rosimah Nulit, Maria Madon (2011) Obtaining oil palm haploids via screening for naturally occurring haploid (NOH) in oil palm germinated seeds and wide hybridization. Proceedings of the PIPOC International palm Oil Congress.
  24. Dolezel J (1991) Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in higher plants. Phytochem Anal 2: 143-154
  25. Dolezel J, Binavora P, Lucretti S (1989) Analysis of nuclear DNA content in plant cells by flow cytometry. Biologia Plantarum 31:113-120.
  26. Bohanec B (2009) Doubled haploids via gynogenesis: Advances in Haploid Production in Higher Plants (1st edn), Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany.
  27. Feiyu Tang, Yazhong Tao, Tianyong Zhao, Guoying Wang (2006) In vitro production of haploid and doubled haploid plants from pollinated ovaries of maize (Zea mays). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 84: 233-237.
  28. Froelicher Y, Bassene JB, Jedidi-Neji E, Dambier D, Morillon BG (2007) Induced parthenogenesis in mandarin for haploid production: Induction procedures and genetic analysis of plantlets. Plant Cell Rep 26: 937-944.
  29. Guha-Mukherjee S (1999) The discovery of haploid production by anther culture. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 35: 357-227.
  30. Hofer M, Grafe C, Boudichevskaja A, Lopez A, Bueno MA (2008) Characterization of plant material obtained by in vitro androgenesis and in situ parthenogenesis in apple. Scientia Hort 117: 203-211.
  31. Srivastava P, Chaturvedi R (2008) In vitro androgenesis in tree species: An update and prospect for further research. Biotechnol Adv 26: 482-491
  32. Stettler RF, Howe GE (1966) The production of homozygous tree material. Joint Proceedings of the Second Genetics Workshop of the Society of American Foresters and the Seventh Lake States Forest Tree Improvement Conference, USA.
  33. LespinasseY, Bouvier L, Djulbic M, Chevreau E (1999) Haploidy in apple and pear. Acta Hortic 484: 49-54.
  34. Lespinasse Y, Godicheau M, Duron M (1983) Potential value and method of producing haploids in the apple tree Malus pumila(Mill.) Acta Hortic 131: 223-230.
  35. Eder J, Chalyk S (2002) In vivo haploid induction in maize. Theor Appl Genet 104: 703-708.
  36. Bohanec B (2003) Ploidy determination using flow cytometry: Doubled Haploid Production in Crop Plants, A Manual. (1st Edn), Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
  37. Coba de la Pena T, Brown S (2001) Flow cytometry: Plant Cell Biology. (2nd Edn), Oxford University Press, Coconut Research Board of SriLanka, Srilanka.
  38. Eeckhaut T, Leus L,Van Huylenbroeck J (2005) Exploitation of flow cytometry for plant breeding. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 27: 743-750.
  39. Srisawat T, Kanchanapoom K, Pattanapanyasat K, Srikul S, Chuthammathat W (2005) Flow cytometric analysis of oil palm: A preliminary analysis for cultivars and genomic DNA alteration. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 27: 645-652.
  40. Chani E, Veilleux RE, Boluarte-Medina T (2000) Improved androgenesis of interspecific potato and efficiency of SSR markers to identify homozygous regenerants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 60: 101-112.
  41. Bouguedoura N (1991) Connaissance de la morphogenese du palmier dattier (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Etude in situ et in vitro du development morphogenetique des appareils vegetative et Reproducteur, These de Doctorat d’Etat, Universitee d’Alger, Algeria.
  42. Chaibi N, Ben Abdallah A, Harzallah H, Lepoivre P (2002) Potentialities androgenetiques du palmier dattier Phoenix dactylifera L.et culture in vitro d’antheres. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 6: 201-207.
  43. Ben Abdallah A, Leoivre P, du Jardin P (2001) Apomixis induction possibility explored in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera I.). Proceedings of Second International Conference on Date Palms, Tunisia.
  44. Madon M, Clyde MM, Rafdhi MM, Heslop Harrison P, Schwarzacher T (2006) Initial efforts on the production of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) haploids. The International Conference, Haploids in Higher Plants III, Programme, Vienna, Austria.
  45. Madon M, Clyde MM, Hashim H, Yusuf MY, Mat H, et al. (2005) Polyploidy induction of oil palm through colchicines and oryzalin treatments. J Oil Palm Res 17: 110-123.
  46. Wahid MB, Abdullah SNA, Henson IE (2004) Oil palm-achievements and potential. New directions for a diverse planet, Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress Brisbane, Australia.
  47. Abdullah R, Zainal A, Heng WY, Li LC, Beng YC (2005) Immature embryo: A useful tool for oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) genetic transformation studies. Electronic J Biotechnol, Chile.
  48. Rival A, Parveez GKA (2005) Elaeis guineensis oil palm. In: Of Fruit and Nut Crops, Biotechnology in Agriculture, USA 29: 113-143.
  49. Te-chato S, Hilae A, Moosikapala L (2005) Microcolony formation from embryogenic callus-derived protoplasts of oil palm. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 27: 685-691.
  50. Texeira JB, Sondahl MR, Kirby EG (1994) Somatic embryogenesis from immature inflorescences of oil palm. Plant Cell Reports 13: 247-250
  51. Maluszynski M, Kasha KJ, Szarejko I (2003) Published double haploid protocols in plant species: Doubled haploid production in crop plants: A Manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Maluszvanski 309-335.
  52. Buffard-Morel J, Verdeil JL, Pannetier C (1992) Embryogenese somatique du cocoier (Cocos nucifera L.) a partir d’ explants foliaires: Etude histologique. Can J Bot 70: 735-741
  53. Griffis JL, Litz RE (1997) Advances in the in vitro morphogenesis of several coconut; (Cocos nucifera L.) tissues in Florida. International Cashew and Coconut Conference, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
  54. Monfort S (1985) Androgenesis of coconut: Embryos from anther culture. Z Pflanzenzuchtg 94: 251-254.
  55. Pannerier C, Buffard-Morel J (1986) Coconut Palm (Cocos nucifera L.): Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry. Trees Springer-Verlag, Berlin 430-450.
  56. Perera PIP (2003) Cytological examination of pollen development for microspore and anther culture of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) cv Sri Lanka Tall. Cocos 15: 53-59
  57. Perera PIP, Yakandawala DMD, Hocher V, Verdeil JL, Weerakoo LK (2009) Effect of growth regulators on microspore embryogenesis in coconut anthers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 96: 171-180
  58. Perera PIP, Hocher V, Verdeil JL, Weerakoon LK, Yakandawala DMD (2006) Recent advances in anther culture of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.). In: Proceedings of the 11th IAPTC&B Congress, August 31-18, 2006 Beijing, China, Biotechnology and Sustainable Agriculture 2006 and Beyond 451-455.
  59. Perera PI, Perera L, Hocher V, Verdeil JL, Yakandawala DM, et al. (2008) Use of SSR markers to determine the anther-derived homozygous lines in coconut. Plant Cell Rep 27: 1697-1703.
  60. Perera PIP, Hocher V, Verdeil JL, Badupriya HDD, Yakandawala DMD, et al. (2008) Androgenic potential in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 92: 293-302.
  61. Thanh-Tuyen NT, De Guzman E (1983) Pollen development stages for coconut anther culture. Kalikasan Philippine Journal of Biology 12: 135-144.
  62. Thanh-Tuyen NT (1985) Anther culture: Its prospects to coconut improvement. Philipp J Crop Sci 10: 28-35
  63. Thanh-Tuyen NT, De Guzman EV (1983) Formation of pollen embryos in cultured anthers of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) from leaf and inflorescence tissue. Research Findings And Prospects Oleagineux 44: 403-411
  64. Whitehead RA, Chapman GP (1962) Twinning and haploidy in Cocos nucifera. Nature 195: 1228-1229.
  65. Zhang YX, LespinasseY, Chevreau E (1990) Induction of haploidy in fruit trees. Acta Hortic 280: 293-306.

Citation: Kumar SK, Sparjanbabu DS(2013) Haploid Breeding in Palms-A Brief Review. Adv Crop Sci Tech 1:113. DOI: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000113

Copyright: © 2013 Kumar SK, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top