Archives of Science
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Mini Review   
  • Arch Sci 2023, Vol 7(1): 145
  • DOI: 10.4172/science.1000145

Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Co-Benefits across the Global Agricultural Development Programs

Bardot Cassidy*
Department of Agriculture, College of Colchester, United Kingdom
*Corresponding Author: Bardot Cassidy, Department of Agriculture, College of Colchester, United Kingdom, Email: Bardot33@gmail.com

Received: 03-Jan-2023 / Manuscript No. science-23-85443 / Editor assigned: 05-Jan-2023 / PreQC No. science-23-85443 (PQ) / Reviewed: 19-Jan-2023 / QC No. science-23-85443 / Revised: 21-Jan-2023 / Manuscript No. science-23-85443 (R) / Published Date: 30-Jan-2023 DOI: 10.4172/science.1000145

Abstract

The goal of global agricultural development initiatives is to support smallholder farmers and farming communities by building resilient and sustainable food production systems, which can also have the added benefit of promoting the mitigation of climate change (GHG). In this report, the International Fund for Agriculture Development (IFAD), the USAID-Feed the Future (FTF) Initiative, and the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office estimate GHG emissions reductions from almost 100 agricultural development projects across 51 low- and middle-income countries (FCDO, previously DfID). These initiatives supported a net annual reduction in GHG emissions of 6.5 MtCO2e. The project areas’ enhanced agroforestry practises and forest management programmes made the largest contributions to the investment portfolios’ overall mitigation cobenefits (3.9 MtCO2e/y). The reduction in GHG emissions (1.5 MtCO2e/y) was also significantly aided by improved crop management using minimum tillage techniques, residue integration, water management in paddy rice, and the use of organic fertilisers. The chosen projects’ management of grass and grazing lands results in a 0.2 MtCO2e/y net reduction in emissions.

Keywords: Global agricultural development; Greenhouse gas; Grass and pasture

Keywords

Global agricultural development; Greenhouse gas; Grass and pasture

Introduction

In the previous few decades, non-CO2 agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have greatly increased globally, and they are expected to continue to do so in the. This estimate is mostly driven by changes in dietary habits in developing nations and population increase in those economies. To accomplish the world’s climate ambitions, agricultural emissions reduction will be essential as other sectors move toward more rapid decarbonisation. So, in order to prevent global warming from rising 2 °C above pre-industrial levels by 2100, agriculture, like other industries, must slow down its current GHG emission rise. This calls for a quick and significant change in food systems [1, 2].

Materials and Method

Programs for global agricultural development that have been chosen

Enhancing agricultural growth and food security in underdeveloped nations is the goal of the global agricultural development initiatives supported by IFAD, USAID, and FCDO. Through the development of resilient and sustainable food production systems, the programmes aid smallholder farmers and farming communities. 59 agricultural development projects were chosen from the diverse spectrum of IFAD’s investment portfolio to evaluate the potential decrease in emissions from the projects’ implementation. The selection criteria included information about the agricultural methods (single or combined) supported, the number of farmers targeted by the project, and the geographic area. The most prevalent agricultural methods included in the IFAD’s investment portfolio were irrigation and water collection, soil management, enhanced crop diversity, improved agroforestry, and use of organic fertilisers [3].

GHG emissions are projected to be affected

Three techniques were used to conduct an ex-ante analysis of project portfolio activities for IFAD, USAID, and FCDO: I emission coefficients calculated using meta-data of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks extracted from peerreviewed journal publications ii) SOC sequestration rate (World Bank, 2012); and iii) FAO EX-Ante Carbon Balance Tool. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methodology for GHG emissions inventories serves as the foundation for the EX-ACT. The carbon stock changes and GHG emissions per unit of land under various interventions are estimated using this tool, which uses a landbased GHG emission accounting approach. Based on the information in the project documents (such as project design documents, monitoring and evaluation documents.

The total mitigation potential of improved agricultural practises in the IFAD’s investment portfolio was computed using the worldwide mean mitigation potentials derived from the meta-data. Data from 108 studies of SOC stock changes as a result of altered agricultural methods, 51 studies of methane (CH4) emissions from paddy rice, and 38 studies of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from fertiliser application were used to calculate the world mean GHG mitigation potential. Since there were few research on pasture management in the dataset, Conant et al. used their global analysis to estimate the practice’s potential for mitigating climate change (2017). In the chosen studies, the difference between the control treatment and better agricultural practises was used to calculate the impacts of agricultural practises on SOC, N2O, and CH4.

Methods used in a specific agricultural production system. The database also contains information on how individual and combined agricultural techniques may reduce emissions. For example, due to a significantly smaller dataset of N2O measurements, the use of compost, manure, and synthetic nitrogen fertilisers were combined to analyse the impact on N2O emissions [4, 5, and 6].

Transitions in landscape scale

Improved agroforestry systems in poor nations can have significant GHG reduction co-benefits and prevent deforestation and forest degradation. These interventions are crucial for forest dependent populations who rely on revenue production, fuelwood, timber, and non-timber forest products in some way, as well as for improving ecosystem services by minimising soil erosion and nutrient loss (e.g. medicinal plants and fruits). Total interventions with landscape consequences in the IFAD, FTF, and FCDO financed initiatives helped to sequester atmospheric carbon. The landscape transition of around 100,000 ha to afforestation, avoided deforestation and degradation, and better agroforestry systems is expected to reduce emissions by 68 MtCO2e in 20 years. Landscape transition projects are mostly associated with initiatives to conserve natural resources, and benefits related to emission reduction [7, 8].

Conclusion

This assessment of the IFAD, FCDO, and FTF programmes’ support for agricultural development projects has revealed enormous potential for reducing net greenhouse gas emissions or emission intensity in agriculture and related sectors, including improved agricultural growth and food security in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). The global agriculture development programmes must increase support for scaling up/out of agricultural best practises and better integrate agriculture and forestry efforts to prevent land use change in order to advance toward achieving the net-zero emissions and 1.5 °C goals, including food security. To further satisfy national emissions reduction goals, many new and updated NDCs of LMICs additionally focus on agricultural and related sectors (such as crop, livestock, soil, forestry/ agroforestry, etc.). They also mention financial and technological assistance from international communities [9, 10].

Acknowledgement

On request, the authors will provide the data that were used to get the results. We gratefully acknowledge the comments and contributions of Meryl Richards, Aslihan Arslan, Romina Cacatassi, Todd Rosenstock, Uwe Grewer, Julie Nash, Noel Gurwick, Gabriel de Oliveria Quintana, Kyle Dittmer, and Sadie Shelton. The CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), a strategic alliance between CGIAR and Future Earth, funded this work. It cannot be assumed that the views contained in the document represent those of CGIAR, Future Earth, USAID, IFAD, FCDO, or donors.

Potential Conflict of Interest

No conflict or competing interests in the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Butterfield PG, Valanis BG, Spencer PS, Lindeman CA, Nutt JG (1993) Environmental antecedents of young-onset Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 43:1150-1158.
  2. Indexed at

  3. Ward JM, Singh G, Katyal SL, Anderson LM, Kovatch RM (1985) Immunocytochemical localization of the surfactant apoprotein and Clara cell antigen in chemically induced and naturally occurring pulmonary neoplasms of mice. Am J Pathol 118(3): 493-499.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  5. Ward JM, Argilan F, Reynolds CW (1983) Immunoperoxidase localization of large granular lymphocytes in normal tissues and lesions of athymic nude rats. J Immunol 131(1): 132-139.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  7. Homburger F, Russfield AB, Weisburger JH, Lim S, Chak SP, et al.(1975) Aging changes in CD-1 HaM/ICR mice reared under standard laboratory conditions. J Natl Cancer Inst 55(1): 37-45
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  9. Barlow BK, Thiruchelvam MJ, Bennice L, Cory-Slechta DA, Ballatori N, et al.(2003) Increased synaptosomal dopamine content and brain concentration of paraquat produced by selective dithiocarbamates. J Neurochem 85:1075-1086.
  10. Indexed at

  11. Behari M, Srivastava AK, Das RR, Pandey RM (2001) Risk factors of Parkinson’s disease in Indian patients. J Neurol Sci 190:49-55.
  12. Indexed at

  13. Betarbet R, Sherer TB, Di Monte DA, Greenamyre JT (2002) Mechanistic approaches to Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Brain Pathol 12:499-510.
  14. Indexed at

  15. Orentreich N, Matias JR, DeFelice A, Zimmerman JA (1993) Low methionine ingestion by rats extends life span. J Nutr 123(2): 269-274.
  16. Indexed at 

  17. Ooka H, Segall PE, Timiras PS (1988) Histology and survival in age-delayed low-tryptophan-fed rats. Mech Ageing Dev  43(1): 79-98.
  18. Indexed at, Crossref

  19. Segall PE, Timiras PS (1976) Patho-physiologic findings after chronic tryptophan deficiency in rats: a model for delayed growth and aging. Mech Ageing Dev 5(2): 109-124.
  20. Indexed at, Crossref

Citation: Cassidy B (2023) Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Co-Benefits across the Global Agricultural Development Programs. Arch Sci 7: 145. DOI: 10.4172/science.1000145

Copyright:  © 2023 Cassidy B. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top