Journal of Medical Implants & Surgery
Open Access

Cardiovascular surgery; Electroencephalography; Geriatrics; Mobile technology; Non-REM sleep; Perioperative sleep

Introduction

As part of the prospective observational study prognosticating delirium recovery outcomes using wakefulness and Sleep Electroencephalography, we recruited 100 geriatric cardiac surgery patients from Barnes-Jewish Hospital for this pilot study these cardiac surgery patients are at risk for poor clinical outcomes due to perioperative sleep disturbance [1]. The institutional review board approved the human studies. The following criteria were utilised for inclusion English-speaking at least 60 years old and scheduled for elective cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Participants were excluded if they had deep hypothermic circulatory arrest preoperative delirium or were deaf or blind. Patients could be compensated for up to two preoperative and seven postoperative recordings [2].

The population’s average age is rising. The group of people whose numbers are expanding the quickest is those over 80. In the UK 4% of people were 80 years of age or older in 1994; it is predicted that this percentage will reach 6% by 2020. This is about equivalent to 3 600 000 persons. Up to 25 to 50 percent of these persons will have cardiovascular disease that would restrict them [3].

The number of elderly individuals being referred for heart surgery has gradually increased as a result of various promising studies. It should come as no surprise that as experience has grown these patients’ risk profiles have gotten worse. These patients are now mostly confined to hospitals prior to surgery and a small but sizable proportion of them have surgery as real emergencies. Accurate documenting of the results following surgery in these individuals is required since the expectations of both referring doctors and patients have altered [4].

Additionally; there is no clear correlation between the share of the elderly in the population and the share of the gross domestic product spent on health; but as the demand on resources grows; physicians must defend costly operations like senior heart surgery. Therefore; we discuss our experiences with heart surgery in elderly patients [5].

All 242 patients over the age of 80 who underwent heart surgery at the Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre between January 1981 and March 1998 had their data retrospectively examined. The quantity of these sufferers has been gradually rising.

In total 107 men and 135 women were present. The group’s average age ranged from 80 to 95 years old it was 82.8 years. The surgeries comprised AVR (118) AVR+CABG (39) CABG (50) mitral valve replacement (MVR)/MV Repair (15) MVR/MV Repair + CABG (six) and others (14) four involved repeat procedures [6].

With each surgeon’s selected myocardial preservation strategy all patients had surgery utilising cardiopulmonary bypass.

The notes the patients or their general practitioner were used to determine each patient’s fitness and discharge information. General practitioners provided data on survivability (GPs). Additionally to the Office of National Statistics. Early mortality comprised patients who passed away less than 30 days after surgery or who died while still hospitalised beyond that time [7].

Using logistic regression and chi-squared tests the relationship between the factors and surgical mortality was evaluated. There are provided Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Using Cox’s proportional hazards factors that are related to survival were identified.

This series unequivocally shows that for certain patients older than 80 cardiac surgery can have beneficial effects despite the challenges and traps of a retrospective analysis. An elevated risk of operational death was strongly linked to emergency surgery. This has been demonstrated in older people’s research in the past [8]. These individuals a subgroup of patients that do badly in any series include patients with postinfarct VSDs and acute aortic dissection in our experience. Therefore although we do not think that these patients’ emergency situation alone is a surgical contraindication it is better to minimise surgery delays wherever feasible [9]. Comparing these patients to younger individuals with comparable diseases; we think their window of opportunity is reduced. We did not discover a difference in operational mortality between elective and urgent cases like other investigators did. The overall surgical mortality and procedure-specific mortality in this series compare well to previously published series [10].

Conclusion

Considering the acceptable operational mortality we think that older individuals with isolated extremely debilitating heart disease can benefit from cardiac surgery. Following surgery recovery is comparable to that of any older patient. Patients receiving mitral valve surgery must be carefully assessed. This is the first prospective study of inpatient geriatric comanagement for patients undergoing vascular surgery. After applying geriatric comanagement there was a reduction in hospital-acquired geriatric syndromes such as delirium as well as cardiac and infective consequences. These advantages were likewise seen in the fragile category.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

1. Asimakopoulos G, Edwards M, Taylor K (1997) Survival and cause of death after mitral valve replacement in patients aged 80 years and over collective results from the UK heart valve registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Sur11:922-928.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Naunheim K, Dean P, Fiore A, McBride L, Pennington D et al. (1900) Cardiac surgery in the octogenarian. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 4:130-135.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Asimakopoulos G, Dwards EM, Taylor K (1997) Survival and cause of death after mitral valve replacement in patients aged 80 years and over collective results from the UK heart valve registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 11:922-928.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Akins C, Daggett W, Vlahakes G, Hilgenberg A, Torchiana D et al. (1997) Cardiac operations in patients 80 years old and older. Ann Thorac Surg 64:606-615.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Lakatta E (1994) Aging effects on the vasculature in health risk factors for cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 3:11-50.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

6. Mortasawi A, Gehle S, Yaghmaie M (2001) Early and long-term results of aortic valve replacement in patients aged 80 years and older. Herz 26:140-148.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

7. Pilotto A, Cella A, Pilotto A, Daragjati J, Veronese N et al. (2017)Three decades of comprehensive geriatric assessment evidence coming from different healthcare settings and specific clinical conditions. J Am Med Dir Assoc 18:192-196.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

8. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC (1970) Progress in development of the index of ADL. The Gerontologist 10:20-30.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

9. Pernar LI, Peyre SE, Smink DS, (2012) Feasibility and impact of a case based palliative care workshop for general surgery residents. J Am Coll Surg 214:231-236.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

10. Mosavel M, Rafie C, Cadet DL (2012) Opportunities to reduce cancer barriers community town halls and provider focus groups. J Cancer Educ 27:641-648.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at