Oil & Gas Research
Open Access

As global efforts intensify to combat climate change, the reduction of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) has become a critical objective. Geological storage of CO2, often referred to as carbon capture and storage (CCS), represents a pivotal strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from industrial processes and power generation. This technology involves capturing CO2 emissions, transporting them to suitable geological formations, and securely storing them underground for long-term sequestration. Geological storage leverages the natural ability of certain geological formations to contain fluids and gases over geological time scales [1]. The primary techniques for geological storage include the use of depleted oil and gas fields, deep saline aquifers, and unmineable coal seams. Each of these methods offers unique advantages and challenges, depending on the geological characteristics of the storage site, the volume of CO2 to be stored, and the associated environmental and economic considerations.

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the geological storage techniques employed for CO2 sequestration [2]. We begin by discussing the fundamental principles of each storage method, including their geological suitability, capacity, and mechanisms for CO2 containment. The paper then delves into a series of case studies from significant CO2 storage projects around the world, including the Sleipner CO2 Storage Project in Norway, the Gorgon CO2 Injection Project in Australia, and the Weyburn-Midale Project in Canada. These case studies illustrate practical applications of geological storage, highlighting successes, challenges, and key lessons learned [3]. Through an examination of these techniques and case studies, this paper aims to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and viability of geological storage as a means of reducing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. By addressing site selection, risk assessment, monitoring practices, and technological advancements, the paper seeks to enhance understanding of how geological storage can contribute to global climate goals and support the development of robust carbon management strategies [4].

Additionally, the paper addresses key issues related to storage site selection, risk assessment, and monitoring to ensure the long-term stability and safety of stored CO2. By examining these aspects, the paper aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of geological storage technologies, their potential for large-scale CO2 mitigation, and the ongoing advancements needed to enhance their effectiveness. This review underscores the importance of geological storage in achieving climate targets and supports continued research and development in this vital area of carbon management [5].

Discussion

Geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO2) offers a promising solution for mitigating climate change by sequestering CO2 emissions from industrial processes and power generation. The effectiveness and viability of this technology depend on several factors, including the choice of storage technique, site selection, risk management, and monitoring practices. This discussion explores these aspects, drawing insights from various case studies to highlight the potential and challenges of geological CO2 storage. Depleted Oil and Gas Fields: Depleted oil and gas fields are attractive candidates for CO2 storage due to their known geology, existing infrastructure, and proven capacity to trap gases. The use of these fields can also enhance oil recovery (EOR), providing an economic incentive for CO2 injection. Case studies such as the Weyburn-Midale Project in Canada demonstrate the dual benefits of CO2 storage and EOR, showcasing successful long-term containment and economic feasibility [6].

Deep Saline Aquifers: Deep saline aquifers offer vast storage potential due to their widespread availability and large pore volumes. The Sleipner CO2 Storage Project in Norway is a pioneering example of utilizing deep saline aquifers for CO2 sequestration. This project has successfully stored millions of tons of CO2 since 1996, providing valuable data on injection processes, reservoir behavior, and monitoring techniques. However, challenges such as the need for detailed geological characterization and the potential for brine displacement must be carefully managed. Unmineable Coal Seams: Unmineable coal seams provide another option for CO2 storage, with the added benefit of enhancing methane recovery. The injection of CO2 can displace methane adsorbed on the coal surfaces, allowing it to be captured and utilized. While this technique has shown promise in laboratory and pilot-scale studies, large-scale implementation faces challenges related to coal seam permeability, CO2 adsorption capacity, and potential environmental impacts [7].

Selecting suitable storage sites is critical for ensuring the long-term stability and security of stored CO2. Key factors in site selection include geological characteristics, such as porosity, permeability, cap rock integrity, and the presence of natural traps. Detailed geological surveys and modeling are essential to assess the suitability of potential sites and predict their performance over time. Risk management is an integral component of geological CO2 storage. Potential risks include CO2 leakage, induced seismicity, and groundwater contamination. Effective risk management strategies involve comprehensive site characterization, robust monitoring systems, and contingency planning. The Gorgon CO2 Injection Project in Australia exemplifies best practices in risk management, with extensive monitoring and regulatory oversight to ensure safe and effective CO2 storage [8].

Continuous monitoring and verification are crucial for maintaining the integrity and safety of CO2 storage sites. Advanced monitoring techniques, such as seismic surveys, well logging, and pressure monitoring, are employed to track CO2 migration, detect potential leaks, and assess reservoir behavior. The success of the Sleipner Project in Norway is attributed to its rigorous monitoring program, which has provided critical insights into CO2 plume dynamics and storage security. While geological storage of CO2 presents significant opportunities, several challenges must be addressed to achieve widespread implementation [9]. Scaling up from pilot projects to commercial-scale operations requires substantial investment, technological advancements, and supportive policy frameworks. The development of standardized protocols and best practices can facilitate this transition. Regulatory frameworks must evolve to address the specific requirements of CO2 storage, including permitting, liability, and long-term stewardship. Public acceptance is also crucial, as concerns about safety and environmental impacts can influence the deployment of storage projects. Transparent communication and stakeholder engagement are essential for building public trust. Technological Innovation: Continued research and development are needed to improve the efficiency, reliability, and cost-effectiveness of CO2 storage technologies. Innovations in materials science, reservoir engineering, and monitoring techniques can enhance the performance and safety of storage operations [10].

Conclusion

Geological storage of CO2 is a vital component of global efforts to mitigate climate change. The successful implementation of storage projects in depleted oil and gas fields, deep saline aquifers, and unmineable coal seams demonstrates the potential of this technology. However, achieving widespread adoption requires addressing challenges related to site selection, risk management, scalability, and public acceptance. By learning from existing case studies and advancing technological and regulatory frameworks, geological storage can play a critical role in reducing atmospheric CO2 concentrations and supporting a sustainable energy future.

References

1. Lirong D, Wangquan W, Wei X (2020)Progress and suggestions on CNPC’s multinational oil and gas exploration and development. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum 39(2): 21-30.

Google Scholar

2. Anand M, Farooqui SA, Kumar R, Joshi R, Kumar R, et al. (2016)Kinetics, thermodynamics and mechanisms for hydroprocessing of renewable oils. Appl Catal A Gen 516: 144-152.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Chen YK, Hsieh CH, Wang WC (2020)The production of renewable aviation fuel from waste cooking oil. Part II: Catalytic hydro-cracking/isomerization of hydro-processed alkanes into jet fuel range products. Renew Energy 157: 731-740.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Zhaoming W, Zhixin W, Zhengjun H (2022)Characteristics and enlightenment of new progress in global oil and gas exploration in recent ten years. China Petroleum Exploration 27: 27-37

Google Scholar

5. Kalghatgi GT (1983)Lift-off heights and visible lengths of vertical turbulent jet diffusion flames in still air. Combust Sci Technol 41: 17-29.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Ningning Z, Qing W, Jianjun W (2019)Development trends and strategies of global oil majors. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum 8(6): 48-55.

Google Scholar

7. Anand M, Sinha AK (2012)Temperature-dependent reaction pathways for the anomalous hydroconversion of triglycerides in the presence of sulfided Co–Mo-catalyst.Bioresour Technol 126: 148-155.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Chen L, Li H, Fu J, Miao C, Lv P (2016)Catalytic hydroprocessing of fatty acid methyl esters to renewable alkane fuels over Ni/HZSM-5 catalyst. Catal Today 259: 266-276.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Yang Y, Gao Z-yi, Zhao L-hua, Yang X, Xu F, et al. (2022)Sedentary lifestyle and body composition in type 2 diabetes.Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 14(1): 8.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Cheng J, Zhang Z, Zhang X, Liu J, Zhou J, et al. (2019)Hydrodeoxygenation and hydroconversion of microalgae biodiesel to produce jet biofuel over H3PW12O40-Ni/hierarchical mesoporous zeolite Y catalyst. Fuel 245: 384-391.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref