ISSN: 2157-7625

Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Mini Review   
  • J Ecosys Ecograph 2023, Vol 13(12): 467

Genomes and Geochemical Cycling in Molecular Geomicrobiology

Sugandha Panigrahi*
Department of Microbiology, School of life sciences, India
*Corresponding Author: Sugandha Panigrahi, Department of Microbiology, School of life sciences, India, Email: sugandha99@hotmail.com

Received: 03-Nov-2023 / Manuscript No. jee-23-120736 / Editor assigned: 06-Nov-2023 / PreQC No. jee-23-120736 (PQ) / Reviewed: 20-Nov-2023 / QC No. jee-23-120736 / Revised: 22-Nov-2023 / Manuscript No. jee-23-120736 (r) / Published Date: 29-Nov-2023

Abstract

Advances in geomicrobiology are causing a fundamental revision of core concepts in the geosciences. The increased effort put into studying microorganisms in the context of their environments has led to some revolutionary discoveries. Genetic data, especially those that allow the in situ description of microbial populations, have enabled much recent progress.

Keywords

Geomicrobiology; Genomes; Molecular biology

Introduction

The elucidation of previously unexplained or unexpected interactions between microorganisms and Earth materials is being facilitated by new gene and genome sequences. These discoveries have implications for important geological phenomena, including the formation of ore deposits, the regulation of global climate, and surface oxidation state. Additionally, genetic data have caused a significant revision in our understanding of the rate and mechanisms of evolution. Molecular geomicrobiology is still a relatively new field. In the near future, the integration of molecularly resolved ecological studies with contemporary biogeochemistry will stimulate the creation of integrated models for the Earth's formation processes [1-3].

Methodology

We use the term "molecular biology applied to geologic systems" to describe the effort to understand coupled biological and geochemical processes at the molecular level, even though this could also be interpreted that way. In order to determine kinetic parameters with predictive value, geoscientists have shifted from describing complex mineral surface reactions using empirical rate laws to a fundamental analysis of molecular interactions. Similarly, geoscientists need to move beyond treating microorganisms like mysterious black boxes in order to comprehend biogeochemical processes. This is made possible by the availability of whole microbial genome sequences, techniques for tracking gene activity within organisms, and advancements in the analysis of elemental composition, isotopic ratios, and mineral surface chemistry. At the same time, genomes transmit information about metabolic capacities [4,5].

In addition to providing information about gene regulation and metabolic capacities, genomes allow us to investigate the molecular processes that underlie evolution and the origins of life. Simultaneous advances in DNA sequencing capabilities, gene activity monitoring technologies, and statistical and mathematical methods for genetic data analysis have led to rapid advancements in genomics. Approximately 100 organisms' genomes have been sequenced to date. Within the next five years, a project is underway to sequence the genomes of thousands of prokaryotic organisms kept in microbial culture collections.

The new genome sequences are going to be a gold mine for geoscientists. The entire biochemical apparatus responsible for converting significant molecules found in natural settings is represented by the proteins that the genes encode. For the previous 3.4-5 Gyr, these enzymes have mediated global elemental cycles at the molecular level. The evolutionary order of biological processes and the frequency of single or multiple evolutionary events in the history of Earth's proteins with a particular function can both are inferred from gene sequence analysis. The interpretation of lipid biomarkers and isotopic signatures in both contemporary environments and the geologic record is directly impacted by genes that code for proteins involved in lipid biosynthesis and transformations involving elements like C, N, S, Fe, and other metals. Genomic and related technologies will teach us a great deal about biology, geology, and the coupling between these, since microorganisms have dominated most, if not all, of Earth history and are thought to make up the majority of the planet's biomass [6].

Including microbes in the theory of evolution

Biology and geology have been related since the beginning of these two fields of study. The formation of the geologic timescale was largely dependent on the fossil record, and the scope and timing of significant periods of biological innovation and extinction have been determined by stratigraphic correlations based on fossil inventories. Since microorganisms have a limited fossil record, they are significantly underrepresented in this image. This could have significantly influenced our understanding of natural selection and biological.

Important biogeochemical cycles and LGT

Important hints regarding the roles that heredity, gene invention, and LGT played in the evolution of pathways essential to geochemical cycling can be gleaned from the phylogenetic analysis of ancient genes. The geochemical information found in the geologic record can help determine which genes to analyse. Microbial sulphate reduction at 3.47 Ga is supported by isotopic evidence, suggesting that this characteristic evolved early in Earth's history [7,8].

Current surroundings

It's likely that less than 1% of all microorganisms have been grown. The number of organisms recently discovered by ribosomal gene extraction and amplification directly from natural environments has dwarfed previous estimates of biological diversity based on cultivation methods.

Thought-provoking queries to consider

We have discussed in this article how genomic data are changing our knowledge of the roles that microorganisms play in both ancient and modern biogeochemical cycling. We have also covered the way in which lateral gene transfer is implicated by genomic data as the primary mechanism behind microbial evolution. Regarding the relationship between biogeochemical systems and microbial evolution, there are still a lot of unanswered questions [9,10].

Discussion

The new genome sequences are going to be a gold mine for geoscientists. The entire biochemical apparatus responsible for converting significant molecules found in natural settings is represented by the proteins that the genes encode. For the previous 3.4-5 Gyr, these enzymes have mediated global elemental cycles at the molecular level. The evolutionary order of biological processes and the frequency of single or multiple evolutionary events in the history of Earth's proteins with a particular function can both are inferred from gene sequence analysis. The interpretation of lipid biomarkers and isotopic signatures in both contemporary environments and the geologic record is directly impacted by genes that code for proteins involved in lipid biosynthesis and transformations involving elements like C, N, S, Fe, and other metals. Genomic and related technologies will teach us a great deal about biology, geology, and the coupling between these, since microorganisms have dominated most, if not all, of Earth history and are thought to make up the majority of the planet's biomass.

Conclusion

The idea that microbial life has been able to colonize every habitat where biochemical molecules can function and that it has produced energy using almost every thermodynamically favourable energy couple is supported by discoveries made in the last ten years. This achievement has to be ascribed to basic relationships between the geochemical environment and genome evolution. We now have a glimpse of this coupling's molecular foundation, which has significant ramifications for how we comprehend biogeochemical cycling.

References

  1. Laden F, Schwartz J, Speizer F, Dockery D (2006) Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality – extended follow-up of the Harvard six cities study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 173: 667-672.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Kunzli N, Jerrett M, Mack W, Beckerman B, Labree L, et al. (2005) Ambient air pollution and atherosclerosis in Los Angeles. Environ. Health Perspect 113: 201-206.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. He C, Morawska L, Hitchins J, Gilbert D (2004) Contribution from indoor sources to particle number and massconcentrations in residential houses. Atmos Environ 38: 3405-3415.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Dobbin NA, Sun L, Wallace L, Kulka R, You H, et al. (2018) The benefit of kitchen exhaust fan use after cooking - An experimental assessment. Build Environ 135: 286-296.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Kang K, Kim H, Kim DD, Lee YG, Kim T (2019) Characteristics of cooking-generated PM10 and PM2.5 in residential buildings with different cooking and ventilation types. Sci Total Environ 668: 56-66.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Sun L, Wallace LA, Dobbin NA, You H, Kulka R, et al. (2018) Effect of venting range hood flow rate on size-resolved ultrafine particle concentrations from gas stove cooking. Aerosol Sci. Tech. 52: 1370-1381.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Rim D, Wallace LA, Nabinger S, Persily A (2012) Reduction of exposure to ultrafine particles by kitchen exhaust hoods: The effects of exhaust flow rates, particle size, and burner position. Sci Total Environ. 432: 350-56.
  14. Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Singer BC, Pass RZ, Delp WW, Lorenzetti DM, Maddalena RL (2017) Pollutant concentrations and emission rates from natural gas cooking burners without and with range hood exhaust in nine California homes. Build Environ. 43: 3235-3242.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. WHO (2005) Air Quality Guidelines - Global update 2005.
  18. Kim H, Kang K, Kim T (2018) Measurement of particulate matter (PM2.5) and health risk assessment of cooking-generated particles in the kitchen and living rooms of apartment houses. Sustainability 10: 843.
  19. Google Scholar, Crossref

Citation: Panigrahi S (2023) Genomes and Geochemical Cycling in Molecular Geomicrobiology. J Ecosys Ecograph, 13: 467

Copyright: © 2023 Panigrahi S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

http://sacs17.amberton.edu/

Top