ISSN: 2161-069X
Journal of Gastrointestinal & Digestive System

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in Chronic Liver Disease

Dep Huynh1,2, and Nam Q Nguyen1,2,*

1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5000, South Australia, Australia

2Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5000, South Australia, Australia

Corresponding Author:
Nam Q Nguyen
Department of Gastroenterology
Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace
Adelaide, 5000 South Australia, Australia
Tel: 61-88222-5207
Fax: 61-88222-5885
E-mail: quoc.nguyen@health.sa.gov.au

Received Date: May 28, 2014; Accepted Date: February 15, 2015 Published Date: February 25, 2015

Citation: Huynh D, Nguyen NQ (2015) Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in Chronic Liver Disease. J Gastrointest Dig Syst 5:257. doi:10.4172/2161-069X.1000257

Copyright: © 2015 Huynh D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Gastrointestinal & Digestive System

Abstract

Gastrointestinal dysfunction frequently occurs in liver cirrhosis and increases with disease severity. The major abnormalities are altered gastrointestinal motility, disrupted gut barrier function with increased intestinal permeability and malabsorption. Not only does the presence of these gut abnormalities impair oral intake and lead to malnutrition, they can play a central role in the pathogenesis of many of the complications of liver cirrhosis as well as liver disease progression. The aim of this paper is review the details of gastrointestinal dysfunction in chronic liver disease and the associated impact on the clinical outcomes.

Keywords

Liver cirrhosis; Gastrointestinal motility; Intestinal absorption; Intestinal permeability

Introduction

Various abnormalities in gastrointestinal structure and function have been described in patients with liver cirrhosis, including altered gastrointestinal motility, intestinal permeability and absorption. While these changes may not be as clinically overt as other common complications of chronic liver disease, they not only influence nutritional status, but can also contribute to clinical complications such as hepatic encephalopathy and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Disruption of the gut barrier function has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis in alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. This review aims to highlight the abnormalities in gastrointestinal function that are commonly observed in patients with chronic liver disease and their impact on the overall outcomes in these patients (Figure 1).

Digestive-System-Gastrointestinal-dysfunction

Figure 1: Gastrointestinal dysfunction in liver cirrhosis.

Gastric emptying and gastric accommodation in cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis frequently experience gastrointestinal symptoms [1,2]. Abnormal gastric motor function may contribute to symptom generation in these patients. Whilst delayed gastric emptying has been reported in patients with cirrhosis and has been associated with post-prandial fullness and bloating [3-8], this is not a consistent finding and both normal [8-11] and rapid gastric emptying [12,13] have also been observed in these patients. This inconsistency in the rate of gastric emptying in these patients is most likely related to the different methodologies used to determine gastric emptying [14-17], as well as the differences in disease aetiology and severity of the patients at the time of assessment. Overall, the reported prevalence of gastroparesis varies from 24% to 95% [6,18].

The rate of gastric emptying in chronic liver disease appears to be influenced by age and disease severity based on Childs-Pugh Score [3], albumin, bilirubin, prothrombin time and platelet count [19,20]. Aetiology of liver disease may also impact on the rate of gastric emptying, with increased gastrointestinal transit in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension disease and slower transit in alcoholic liver disease [21,22]. The mechanisms underlying the abnormal gastric emptying and intestinal transit in patients with chronic liver disease remain unclear. Autonomic dysfunction is common in liver cirrhosis, irrespective of alcoholic or non-alcoholic aetiology [23-25], and may contribute to the abnormal GI transit. In patients with liver cirrhosis, the presence of autonomic dysfunction is a risk factor for delayed gastric emptying [3,26]. As in healthy and diabetic subjects [9,26], postprandial hyperglycaemia and hyperinsulinaemia have also been found to be associated with reduced gut motility and delayed gastric emptying in cirrhosis [27]. This is particularly relevant as glucose intolerance and diabetes are common in patients with cirrhosis [28-30], characterized by the marked, sustained post-prandial hyperglycaemia following carbohydrate ingestion with increased peripheral plasma insulin levels [31-33]. Although the levels of several gut hormones that are involved in the regulation of gastrointestinal motility are deranged in chronic liver disease, their contribution to gastrointestinal dysmotility remains uncertain. The attenuated rise of post-prandial ghrelin, an orexigenic peptide hormone produced by the stomach and proximal small bowel that also has a gastroprokinetic effect [34,35], appears most relevant as it correlated positively with gastric emptying time and weight loss in patients with liver cirrhosis [36,37]. Both plasma cholecystokinin (CCK) and peptide YY (PYY) are potent satiation peptides that slow gastric emptying [27,38,39]. Whilst they have been shown to be elevated in cirrhosis [40-42], their roles in gastric emptying, energy intake and nutritional status have not been formally evaluated with antagonists. Although elevated serum secretin levels have been correlated with dysrhythmic electrogastrography waveform in liver cirrhosis, it remains unclear how secretin mediates gastric dysmotility in these patients [43]. The presence of ascites is another potential contributor to gastroparesis in these patients [44,45]. While satiety and caloric intake are improved following large volume paracentesis, these symptomatic improvements were not directly related to accelerated gastric emptying [46]. Instead, impaired gastric accommodation appears to be more relevant [43,47], and using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), the presence of ascites in patients with cirrhosis is associated with decreased accommodation, which improves after large volume paracentesis [48].

Intestinal dysmotility in cirrhosis

Data relating to the small intestinal transit in patients with liver disease are conflicting. Using radio-opaque markers to calculate small bowel residence time and lactulose hydrogen breath test to determine oro-caecal transit, small intestinal transit has shown to be prolonged in patients with liver cirrhosis [20,49,50]. In contrast, the transit time of cirrhotic subjects was similar to healthy subjects when magnet based Motility Tracking System [51] and scintigraphic [52] techniques were used. Despite these conflicting findings, manometric studies have consistently demonstrated a number of motor disturbances in the small intestine of these patients, including absence of inter-digestive migratory motor complex (MMC), prolonged duration of MMC cycles and changes in the pattern of contractions with multiple clustered contractions [53-55]. As with gastric emptying, there is a relationship between liver disease severity and small intestinal dysmotility [56], and more importantly, these motor abnormalities normalize after liver transplantation [57].

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is common in patients with cirrhosis and the prevalence appears to vary according to the evaluating techniques. Whilst prevalence of SIBO can be as high as 48-73% based on cultures of jejunal aspirate [5-7,21,58,59], it is much lower (30% to 38%) when glucose hydrogen breath test is used [60-62]. Although glucose hydrogen breath test has been shown to be unreliable in patients with cirrhosis[63], jejunal aspiration requires upper endoscopy, sedation and is invasive [64]. These weaknesses limit the routine clinical application of jejunal aspiration in the investigation of SIBO.

Overall, the risk factors for SIBO in chronic liver disease are advanced disease severity, presence of ascites and hyperbilirubinemia [65-67]. The aetiology of SIBO in these patients remains unclear. As bile acids have a secondary function of inhibiting the growth of bacteria in the small intestine [68,69], the reduced bile acid secretion in cirrhotic patient is thought to contribute to pathogenesis of SIBO [70-72]. Additionally, reduction in the conversion of primary bile acids to secondary bile acids is associated with an increase in the prevalence of more pathogenic bacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae [73] which are also more efficient at bacterial translocation from the gastrointestinal lumen [74]. Gastric acid is also important for decontamination of the stomach and proximal small bowel [38,75]. Acid suppressive therapy and spontaneous fasting hypochlorhydria have both been shown to be strong predictors for SIBO in patients with cirrhosis [76].

Whilst intestinal dysmotility has been associated with SIBO in non-cirrhotic patients and experimental models of cirrhosis [77-79], the data relating the impact of small bowel motor abnormalities on SIBO are more controversial in patients with cirrhosis. Chesta et al. [22] found no difference in the motility pattern in cirrhotic patients with or without SIBO, and treatment of bacterial overgrowth with tetracycline did not significantly alter small intestinal motility apart from reducing the time in phase 2 that was occupied by multiple-clustered contractions. In contrast, a more recent study found that long term treatment with alternating norfloxacin and neomycin was associated with decreased bacterial overgrowth, reduced oro-caecal transit time and improved cyclic activity of MMC on intestinal manometry [80]. This suggests that SIBO itself may contribute to small intestinal dysmotility, therefore creating a vicious cycle that promotes further bacterial overgrowth.

Gastrointestinal permeability in cirrhosis

In the normal gut, the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier prevents diffusion of bacteria and endotoxins across the epithelium. In patients with cirrhosis, there are changes in epithelial barrier function that lead to an increased in intestinal permeability, as assessed by urinary recovery of orally administered test markers [25,81,82]. Available studies suggest that the changes in the structure and function of the enterocyte tight junctions may be responsible for the elevated permeability [83-85]. In vitro studies indicated that alcohol and its metabolite acetaldehyde can inhibit the expression of tight junction protein, resulting in increased permeability [83,86] Additionally, alcohol can impair microtubule cytoskeleton in intestinal epithelial cells by inducing nitric oxide overproduction and oxidation/nitration of cytoskeletal proteins [87]. A recent study has demonstrated that the changes to tight junctions occur in liver cirrhosis of mixed aetiology [88], and are not limited to alcoholic liver disease. More importantly, the reduction in tight junction proteins appears to relate to the disease severity, and is more pronounced in decompensated patients as compared to compensated patients [3].

Consequences of gastrointestinal dysfunction in liver cirrhosis

The combination of gastrointestinal dysmotility, SIBO, and abnormal intestinal epithelial barrier function have been proposed as major risk factors for the development of malnutrition as well as complications and progression of liver cirrhosis.

Malnutrition is common in patients with liver cirrhosis and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Reduced oral intake is thought to be an important contributor of malnutrition and is mediated by a number of factors. It has been proposed that the impaired gastric emptying and intestinal motility are responsible for the adverse gastrointestinal symptoms such as poor appetite, early satiety and bloating [49]. Alterations in appetite regulating gut hormones also may also contribute to the reduced oral intake, including increased fasting leptin [47], attenuated rise in post-prandial ghrelin [47], elevated fasting PYY [89] and CCK [90]. Malabsorption may also contribute to the malnutrition in liver cirrhosis. In experimental models of cirrhosis, intestinal absorption of carbohydrate, fat and protein have been shown to be significantly reduced [16,17,77]. Although fat malabsorption has been reported to occur in up to two-thirds of patients with cirrhosis [59], the absorption of carbohydrate does not appear to be reduced in these patients, using combined sugar probes (D-Xylose/3-O-methyl-D-glucose and rhamnose/3-OMG) [13,91]. The data relating the intestinal absorption of protein in patients with chronic liver disease are lacking. The proposed mechanisms that contribute to fat malabsorption are: decreased bile acid secretion, small bowel bacterial overgrowth, pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in alcoholic liver disease, and use of medications that lead to malabsorption such as neomycin and lactulose [92,93]. While gastric mixing is not essential for carbohydrate digestion as it is with lipid and protein digestion, delayed gastric emptying determines the rate at which nutrient is delivered to the small intestine and has the potential to reduce the rate and extent of carbohydrate absorption [19,31]. The disruption to small intestinal motility after AAA repair has recently been shown to impair fat but not carbohydrate absorption [94]. The contribution of abnormal gastrointestinal motor function to malabsorption has not been evaluated in liver cirrhosis.

The impaired intestinal epithelial barrier function in cirrhotic patients carries a number of important clinical implications that are known to increase both morbidity and mortality. These include ascites [78,87], spontaneous bacterial peritonitis [95], hepatic encephalopathy [78], infections in hospitalized cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal haemorrhage [53], and liver disease progression [15]. Bacterial translocation is a key step in the pathogenesis of many of these complications, and is defined by the migration of viable microorganisms and/or bacterial products (lipopolysaccharides, peptidoglycans, muramyl-dipeptides, bacterial DNA) from the intestinal lumen to mesenteric lymph nodes and/or other extra-intestinal sites [8]. SIBO, increased permeability of the intestinal mucosa and impaired intestinal immunity, including the secretory component (immunoglobulin A, mucin and defensins) contribute to pathological bacterial translocation in liver cirrhosis [96]. Translocation of endotoxins, particularly Lipopolysaccharides (LPS), contribute to the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis through the activation of immune cells, particularly Kupffer cells, leading to an increase in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide. This in turn, results in chronic active inflammation and fibrosis in viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease and non-alcoholic liver disease [15,97,98]. Furthermore, increased plasma endotoxin levels positively correlate with the severity of liver dysfunction [23,33], whereas inactivation of Kupffer cells and deficiency of lipopolysaccharide-binding–protein are associated with less liver injury and fibrosis [1,40]. Nitric oxide overproduction further increases intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation[26], and has also been implicated in exacerbating the hyperdynamic circulatory derangements seen in liver cirrhosis [99,100].

In humans, fasting for 4 days is associated with a decrease in intestinal epithelial proliferation and increases apoptosis [101], leading to mucosal atrophy, reduced villus height and crypt depth, impaired intestinal permeability and reduced absorptive surface area [102]. In addition, luminal nutrient deprivation has also been associated with reduced disaccharidase activity including maltase, sucrase and lactase [103-105], further impairing intestinal absorption. More importantly, refeeding has been shown to associate with repair of mucosal atrophy and reduced permeability [11]. In liver cirrhosis, malnutrition increases intestinal permeability [106-108], and facilitates bacterial translocation [109]. Thus, given that reduced oral intake and “relative starvation” are common in these patients, optimization of oral intake or enteral nutritional support may potentially improve gut barrier function, as well as prevent the related complications.

Conclusion

Gastrointestinal dysfunction frequently occurs in liver cirrhosis and increases with disease severity. It has a central role in the pathogenesis of many of the complications of liver cirrhosis. Abnormal gastrointestinal motility in liver cirrhosis contributes to frequent gastrointestinal symptoms and poor oral intake; it is also associated with quantitative and qualitative changes in the small intestinal microbiota. Loss of mucosal integrity together with SIBO facilitates the translocation of bacteria and endotoxin, which have been linked to the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy and the infectious complications of cirrhosis including spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Bacterial translocation also leads to cascades of event that trigger the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines that can potentially promote the progression of underlying liver disease. Thus, in order to improve oral intake, nutrient absorption and potentially reduce bacterial translocation, it is important to identify and manage the presence of gastrointestinal dysfunction early.

References

--
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 30063
  • [From(publication date):
    February-2015 - Aug 17, 2024]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 25499
  • PDF downloads : 4564
Top