Transplant Reports : Open Access
Open Access

Vascular complications; Arterial bleeding; Transplant recipient; Transplant surgery; Infection; Fungal infection; Vascular injury; Graft dysfunction; Surgical complications; Imaging techniques; Angiography; Vascular intervention; Embolization; Reoperation; Immunosuppression; Follow-up care

Introduction

Since the first order transplant in 1954, there have been major advancements in surgical ways and immunosuppressive curatives, and order transplantation is presently the primary treatment for cases with end- stage renal complaint. Still, 10 of cases who have order transplant may have complications. Medical complications include acute tubular necrosis, acute or habitual allograft rejection, and nephropathy caused by immunosuppressive medicines. Urologic complications include ureteral inhibition, urinoma, abscess, and lymphocele conformation. Vascular complications may beget allograft loss and include patron renal roadway thrombosis or stenosis, renal tone thrombosis, and other lower frequent complications, similar as aneurysm, hematoma, and arteriovenous fistula. Pseudoaneurysms are veritably rare complications after order transplant. Pseudoaneurysms may be anastomotic or intrarenal and generally are caused by infection or specialized error. Mycotic aneurysms do in of cases after order transplantation, but rupture of an anastomotic pseudoaneurysm may beget serious bleeding and death. Exigency treatment of this condition generally includes order allograft nephrectomy. In addition, treatment of mycotic pseudoaneurysm after order transplantation generally causes high morbidity and allograft failure. A literature hunt finds limited studies or only insulated case reports of mycotic pseudoaneurysm after order transplantation. There's contestation about the cause, prevalence, treatment, and prognostic of this condition, but early opinion is important for successfultherapy.We treated 2 cases who had extrarenal mycotic pseudoaneurysm. Early opinion enabled successful remedy and preservation of the order graft, lower branch, and life. The purpose of the present report was to review the successful treatment in these 2 cases [1, 2].

Materials and Method

Case 1

Case 1 was a 54- time-old man with end- stage renal complaint caused by sarcoidosis and scleroderma. Eight times after starting peritoneal dialysis, he passed departed- patron order transplantation of the left order to the right iliac fossa. The reverse table medication of the patron order was uneventful, which included 1 tone and 1 roadway. The philanthropist iliac fossa was exposed extraperitoneal with the use of a Gibson gash. End- to- side anastomoses were performed between the graft vessels and the philanthropist external iliac roadway and tone. Cold ischemia time was16.1 hours, and warm ischemia time was 32 twinkles. The urine affair and postoperative serum creatinine situations indicated immediate graft function. The immunosuppressive authority included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and basiliximab. Antibiotic prophylaxis was given for 48 hours after transplantation (1 g/ d vancomycin, 2 g/ d cefotaxime) [3]. Incontinently after surgery, the case had fever, with blood societies showing Serratia marcescens. He was treated with intravenous meropenem. Eight days after transplantation, the case was in hemorrhagic shock and had rupture of the allograft arterial anastomosis. He passed surgical disquisition through the former gash, and in situ reconstruction of the arterial anastomosis was performed. The case was treated with the use of hemodialysis for 20 days. Diuresis recovery was delayed but effective and serum creatinine position didn't return to the original position incontinently after transplantation (1.2 mg/ dL). Sixty- two days after transplantation, surgical disquisition through a laparotomy showed the pseudoaneurysm at the right external iliac roadway and proximal portion of the patron roadway. The pseudoaneurysm was insulated with scrupulous analysis. Vascular control was attained proximally and distally at the common, internal, and external iliac highways and the scattered renal roadway distal to the pseudoaneurysm. There were no gross signs of infection. The right saphenous tone was gutted and prepared for use as a vascular graft. Intravenous heparin was given (50 IU/ kg), and a bypass was performed from the common iliac roadway to the distal patron renal roadway. The proximal anastomosis was performed with the common iliac roadway incompletely clamped. After creation of the proximal anastomosis, the patron renal roadway was transected. Warm ischemia time was 28 twinkles. Cold in situ perfusion of the graft wasn't performed. The pseudoaneurysms were resected fully, and end- to- end reconstruction of the external iliac roadway was performed [4].

Case 2

Case 2 was a 48- time-old woman who had heritable nephropathy. She entered a departed- patron left order allograft to the right iliac fossa with the use of a Gibson gash and extraperitoneal exposure (cold ischemia time, 22.1 h; warm ischemia time, 44 min). The immunosuppressive authority included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. She entered antithymocyte globulin for postoperative steroid- resistant rejection, and her creatinine position bettered (1.4 mg/ dL). Pathologic examination of the preservation result revealed Citrobacter koseri, and she was treated with systemic meropenem. Five months after transplantation, the case developed non disabling intermittent claudication of the right lower branch and had an acute increase in serum creatinine position (1.8 mg/ dL). She had no signs of systemic infection. Color- enciphered Doppler ultrasonography showed blow up of the allograft arterial anastomosis and an occlusion of the right external iliac roadway. CT angiography showed ischemia of the upper pole of the allograft, thrombus inside the renal roadway, pseudoaneurysm at the arterial anastomosis (30.9 ×18.2 mm), and occlusion of the right external iliac roadway.

Discussion

These 2 cases had mycotic pseudoaneurysms after order transplantation, verified by means of imaging studies and culture of the resected pseudoaneurysm. In case 2, claudication wasn't disabling and branch revascularization wasn't needed. Vascular complications are an important cause of order allograft failure and do after 3- 15 of order transplants, more constantly after departed- patron than after living- patron transplantation and after transplantation with allografts that have multiple vessels [5].. Fungal infection may do after 5- 20 of all solid organ and 5 of order transplantations. These infections may appear from patron towel or, more likely, from exogenous sources during running and transplantation, similar as defiled preservation fluid. Infection with Candida species generally occurs within 2 months after transplantation. Candidiasis transmitted by a order allograft is a major source of morbidity and mortality in transplant donors. Arteritis associated with Candida may beget arterial dislocation, major bleeding, sepsis, and death. There have been 4 preliminarily reported cases of C albicans fungal arteritis from preservation fluid. All 4 cases presented with massive bleeding, and complications included graft loss (2 cases) and death (2 cases). On the base of the inimical results of these 4 cases and others described in the literature early discovery of fungal impurity of the preservation fluid may prompt precautionary nephrectomy [6]. Still, no operative treatment may be a respectable option and may be compatible with patient survival. Among fungal vascular complications of order transplantation, extrarenal mycotic pseudoaneurysms are associated with high morbidity and mortality, but there's contestation about the stylish remedial options. Anyhow of the pathogen, utmost mycotic pseudoaneurysms after order transplantation involve the anastomosis between the patron renal roadway and the philanthropist external iliac roadway. Mycotic pseudoaneurysm may be asymptomatic and discovered apropos on a routine order checkup or may present with fever, anemia, and abdominal pain, a pulsatile and expanding mass or hemorrhagic shock. Hypertension and allograft dysfunction may be caused by foreign contraction of the graft vessels. The morphologic opinion of pseudoaneurysm is generally made by colour- enciphered Doppler ultrasonography. A simple or complex tubercle may be observed in the B mode [7]. Colour- enciphered Doppler analyses may show inflow inside the tubercle, and spectral analyses may show signs of arteriovenous fistula. Fluoroscopic, CT, or glamorous resonance angiography may confirm the ultrasonography findings. Fluoroscopic angiography also may enable remedial intervention at the time of opinion. Treatment guidelines for mycotic pseudoaneurysms after order transplantation aren't available, and treatment options are controversial. Periphery, expansion, wall weakness, presence of inflow, trauma, and radial force of the injury may determine the threat of rupture of an extrarenal pseudoaneurysm. Recent studies have suggested that suggestions for intervention may include the presence of symptoms, periphery>2.5 cm, infection, progressive expansion, and brewing rupture. Small asymptomatic pseudoaneurysms may be treated no operatively with regular imaging surveillance [8]. In our experience, early opinion and treatment may be the determining factors for order allograft preservation and case survival. Literature review showed that utmost cases that have post-transplantation mycotic pseudoaneurysms had allograft nephrectomy because of habitual rejection, graft dysfunction, and infection. Remedial options for extrarenal pseudoaneurysms include surgery, endovascular intervention, and percutaneous ultrasonography- guided thrombin injection. In reports about surgical treatment, allograft preservation was fulfilled in several cases that had tone patch angioplasty and arterial reconstruction (anastomosis modification or bypass from the internal iliac roadway) [9]. In 11 order transplant donors who had mycotic pseudoaneurysms, native roadway reconstruction was important in precluding lower branch ischemia. Prosthetic graft interposition orextra-anatomic reconstruction of the native roadway was generally associated with loss of the allograft. Successful treatment of mycotic pseudoaneurysms after order transplantation includes radical debridement of all infected towel and long- term antifungal remedy. Vascular reconstruction may be delicate. In cases that have infected towel, the use of synthetic grafts may beget continuity of infection, and the use of autologous or allogeneic material may be preferred. In summary, in the 2 cases described then with post-transplantation mycotic pseudoaneurysm, treatment included excision of the infected towel, arterial reconstruction with autologous towel placed in preliminarily unexposed towel, and longternm antifungal remedy, performing in successful preservation of the order allograft. Thus, transplant nephrectomy may not be needed in cases that have post-transplantation mycotic pseudoaneurysm, and treatment should be recommended on an individual base [10].

Acknowledgment

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Siegel M, Barlowe T, Smith KD, Chaidarun SS, LaBarre N, et al. (2020) Islet autotransplantation improves glycemic control in patients undergoing elective distal pancreatectomy for benign inflammatory disease. Clin Transplant 34: 13891.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Tanhehco YC, Weisberg S, Schwartz J (2016) Pancreatic islet autotransplantation for nonmalignant and malignant indications. Transfusion 56: 761-770.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Balzano G, Maffi P, Nano R, Mercalli A, Melzi R, et al. (2016) Autologous Islet Transplantation in Patients Requiring Pancreatectomy: A Broader Spectrum of Indications Beyond Chronic Pancreatitis. Am J Transplant 16:1812-1826.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Chaouch MA, Leon P, Cassese G, Aguilhon C, Khayat S, et al. (2022) Total pancreatectomy with intraportal islet autotransplantation for pancreatic malignancies: a literature overview. Expert Opin Biol Ther 22: 491-497.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Zureikat AH, Nguyen T, Boone BA, Wijkstrom M, Hogg ME, et al. (2015) Robotic total pancreatectomy with or without autologous islet cell transplantation: replication of an open technique through a minimal access approach. Surg Endosc 29: 176-83.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Muratore S, Zeng X, Korc M, McElyea S, Wilhelm J, et al. (2016) Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma After Total Pancreatectomy Islet Autotransplantation for Chronic Pancreatitis. Am J Transplant16: 2747-2752.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Bhayani NH, Enomoto LM, Miller JL, Ortenzi G, Kaifi JT, et al. (2014) Morbidity of total pancreatectomy with islet cell auto-transplantation compared to total pancreatectomy alone. HPB (Oxford) 16: 522-527.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Morgan KA, Nishimura M, Uflacker R, Adams DB (2011) Percutaneous transhepatic islet cell autotransplantation after pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis: a novel approach. HPB (Oxford) 13: 511-516.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Jin SM, Oh SH, Kim SK, Jung HS, Choi SH, et al. (2013) Diabetes-free survival in patients who underwent islet autotransplantation after 50% to 60% distal partial pancreatectomy for benign pancreatic tumors. Transplantation 95: 1396-403.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Bolzano G, Maffi P, Nano R, Zerbi A, Venturini M, et al. (2013) Extending indications for islet autotransplantation in pancreatic surgery. Ann Surg 258: 210-218.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref