Journal of Paediatric Medicine & Surgery
Open Access

Cognitive function; Medicine resistant epilepsy; Intelligence quotient; Command; Medically intractable epilepsy; Neurosurgery; Pediatric; Surgery

Introduction

Medicine- resistant epilepsy (DRE) leads to an enervating life with gross impact on quality of life. Intermittent seizures are known to beget endless and progressive changes in brain structure and function, leading to disabled brain development and a loss in cognitive functioning. Cognitive development may decelerate or cease after the onset of seizures.

DRE is defined by the International League against Epilepsy as ‘failure of acceptable trials of two permitted and meetly chosen and used AED schedules (whether as monotherapies or in combination) to achieve sustained seizure freedom. In similar cases, other forms of timely intervention, which can achieve freedom from seizures and termination of antiepileptic medicines (AED), is pivotal in conserving, stabilizing and potentially perfecting the cognitive function of pediatric cases with epilepsy. Surgical intervention is decreasingly used to treat children with DRE. Pediatric epilepsy surgery aims to remove the epileptogenic area or limit the spread of seizure exertion in the brain, thereby reducing seizure frequence and the need for AED treatment. Junking of the underpinning epileptogenic pathology and reduction of AED treatment may also allow for recovery with advancements in cognitive functioning and neurodevelopment as a whole [2].

Numerous studies have proved a stabilizing effect of epilepsy surgery on seizure control. The general cognitive position frequently remains stable following epilepsy surgery but with longer followup ages, intelligence quotients (Command) have been shown to ameliorate. Still, the study cohorts are small and the maturity include colourful pediatric case groups with different epilepsy runs, colourful age ranges and varying cognitive capacities. Piecemeal from limitations with small sample sizes, there's a general lack of randomized control trials with applicable comparison groups. All these factors make it delicate to assess the goods of surgery on cognitive function.

This is a retrospective follow-up study of a 20- time successive case series of Danish pediatric cases with DRE of different etiologist who passed focal resection. The points of this study were 1) to probe the pre- and postoperative cognitive function in a pediatric epilepsy surgery cohort and 2) to identify prophetic determinants of IQ change postoperatively [3].

Materials and Method

Actors

This study comprised pediatric epilepsy cases from a successive series of 135 Danish, Greenlandic and Faroese children who passed resective epilepsy surgery between January 1996 and December 2016. The cohort included cases with colourful medically intractable epilepsy runs and varying surgical interventions. Cases were considered eligible surgery campaigners if they endured incapacitating epileptic seizures with disabled mindfulness (≥ four seizures/ month) and had been treated with a minimum of three AEDs, where a minimum of two AEDs had been tried contemporaneously. Cases were appertained from all of Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe islets to either Copenhagen University Hospital Rigs Hospitalet or Epilepsy Hospital Filadelfia for preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow- up. Surgery was carried out at one of four locales – Copenhagen (Denmark), Cleveland (USA), Bielefeld (Germany) or Paris (France) [4].

Cases who passed focal resection were either single- ormultioperated and were below 19 times of age at the time of first surgery. All included cases passed both pre- and postoperative cognitive assessment. Cases were barred if cognitive assessment couldn't be carried out satisfactorily, if there was a language hedge, the use of cognitive tests that were inappropriate given the case's internal age or the absence or insufficiency of cognitive data. Cases that passed expansive resection, i.e. colostomy and functional or anatomical hemispherectomy, were barred from this analysis [5].

Pre- and postoperative evaluations

All campaigners for epilepsy surgery were reviewed by amultidisciplinary board including pediatric neurologists, neurophysiologists, neurosurgeons, neuroradiologists and neuropsychologists. Preoperative evaluation included clinical history, physical and neurological examination, nonstop crown videotape electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring, 3 T high- resolution glamorous resonance imaging (MRI) and neuropsychological and cognitive assessments. When necessary, cases passed fresh intracranial EEG, functional imaging with interictal and/ or ictal single photon emigration computer tomography and positron emigration tomography [6].

Following surgery, postoperative evaluations were performed at 6 weeks, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Fresh follow- up consultations was carried out if demanded. All standard postoperative evaluations included physical and neurological examination and enrolment of seizure frequence, postoperative complications and number of AEDs used. At 12 months, a second EEG and an MRI were conducted. During the follow-up period, AED treatment was reduced on an individual base.

Cognitive assessments

All cases passed pre- and at least one postoperative cognitive assessment. Before 2005, postoperative cognitive tests were carried out at the one- time follow- up. Between 2005 and 2013 at both one- and two- time follow- up, and from 2013 at two- time follow- up.

The choice of cognitive test used depended on the case’s internal age and cognitive position. Depending on the preference of the assessing psychologist, either the Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development or the Mullen Scale of Early Learning was used in cases up to age 70 months and in cases with severe internal deceleration. An experimental quotient (DQ) original to full- scale Command was reported for these cases [7]. Aged cases and cases that were mentally able were estimated using the newest available interpretation of the Wechsler Intelligence Tests. These included the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI) for children progressed three to seven times, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) for children progressed six to 18 times and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) for children aged than 16 or 18 depending on the test available at the time of testing. The main Command outgrowth variables examined were preoperative Command and the rearmost enumerated postoperative Command. IQ change was anatomized in three groups, where IQ change( postoperative Command minus preoperative Command) was defined as dropped if there was a decline of = 10 points, stable if the IQ change was-9 to 9 points and increased if the IQ change was = 10 points [8].

Discussion

In this large civil cohort study, we examined the pre- and postoperative cognitive function of 91 of 135 successive cases during a 20- time period. All included cases passed focal surgery, with 79 singleoperated cases and 12multi-operated cases.

IQ remained stable in the maturity of single- andmulti-operated cases. On a group- position, Command in single- operated cases did, still, increase significantly and suggests that surgery allows for postoperative Command earnings. Cases operated effectively with a single operation had the stylish cognitive outgrowth, where 30 showed a = 10- point increase in Command within one to two times after surgery. Cases who demanded further than one operation to achieve a reduction in seizure frequence and/ or AED treatment didn't show any change in IQ one to two times after the last surgery. These cases didn't deteriorate in IQ, as could be anticipated if surgery hadn't been performed and suggests that surgery may have a stabilizing effect on cognitive function one to two times postoperatively, indeed inmulti-operated cases. It's important to note, still, that these conclusions are grounded on findings from a small group of 12 cases. We set up a significant postoperative reduction in AED treatment and seizure frequence in single- operated cases. Multioperated cases didn't witness a reduction in AED treatment. Surgery and continued AED treatment did, still, affect in two- thirds of these cases getting seizure-free [9-10].

Regarding cognitive outgrowth, a review conducted by Van Schooneveld etal. In 2013 pooled data from 16 included studies and set up that postoperative Command/ DQ increased in 19 of the 466 included children, while 11 endured a drop in Command/ DQ and 70 remained unchanged in Command/ DQ. A clear distinction between single- andmulti-operated cases wasn't made and supposedly some of the 16 studies included hemispherectomy cases in their cohorts. Our study made the distinction between number of surgeries and we didn't include hemispherectomy cases. These differences could have contributed to the low number of cases set up with increased Command/ DQ (19) when compared with the overall positive Command increase of our single- operated cases. Conducted a study of IQ change in singleoperated pediatric cases with mild contortion of cortical development and focal cortical dysplasia. The study showed a = 10- point Command increase in 24 of the 36 included cases one- two times after surgery. This study nearly reflects our findings, where 30 showed a = 10- point increase in Command within one to two times after surgery [11-12].

Due to ethical reasons, it has until lately not been possible to carry out a randomized control study with an applicable comparison group. Othernon-randomized studies have examined the effect of surgery in the form of follow- up studies or by using on-surgery campaigners as a comparison group. Lately constructed a case- control study with an applicable control group. Then, cognitive outgrowth two times after surgery was examined in 31 DRE pediatric cases that were compared with 14 else identical surgical campaigners still awaiting surgery two times after addition in the surgical program. An advanced experimental line and bettered Command/ DQ scores were identifiable only in the surgical group. The study reports veritably analogous overall findings to those we report for our single- operated cases and emphasizes that surgery is an essential element for fresh cognitive recovery besides possible Command advancements due to bare aging of cases. [13].

Conclusion

In this civil study, we set up that resective epilepsy surgery was associated with a salutary effect on cognitive functioning in pediatric DRE cases. Command in single- operated cases increased significantly and suggests that surgery allows for postoperative Command earnings. IQ remained stable inmulti-operated cases. Increased preoperative seizure frequence was a significant predictor of negative Command change. Age at surgery wasn't a significant predictor of IQ change in our multivariable analysis but may well be a significant predictor in larger cohorts. The findings from this study advocate for pediatric epilepsy surgery and we recommend that resective epilepsy surgery be prioritized as a possible treatment option for pediatric cases with focal, structural and medicine- resistant epilepsy.

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank the epilepsy surgery group at University Hospital Rigs Hospitalet and at The Danish Epilepsy Center, Filadelfia and all sharing cases and families.

Conflicts of Interest

None

1. Lakhoo K (2012) Fetal counselling for surgical conditions. Early Hum Dev 88: 9-13.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Deeney S, Somme S (2016) Prenatal consultation for foetal anomalies requiring surgery.Women Birth 29: 1-7.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Patel P, Farley J, Impey L, Lakhoo K (2008) Evaluation of a fetomaternal-surgical clinic for prenatal counselling of surgical anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int 24: 391-394.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Aite L, Trucchi A, Nahom A, Zaccara A, La Sala E, et al. (2003) Antenatal diagnosis of surgically correctable anomalies: effects of repeated consultations on parental anxiety. J Perinatol. 23: 652-654.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Raboei EH (2008) The role of the pediatric surgeon in the perinatal multidisciplinary team. Eur J Pediatr Surg 18: 313-317.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Menahem S, Grimwade J (2004) Effective counselling of pre-natal diagnosis of serious heart disease--an aid to maternal bonding? Fetal Diagn Ther 19: 470-474.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Khanna K, Dhua AK, Bhatnagar V (2018) Antenatally Diagnosed Surgical Conditions: Fetus As Our Patient. Indian J Pediatr 85: 1101-1109.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Rabe D, Boos R, Tariverdian S, Schmidt W (1984) [Prenatal diagnosis of a coccygeal teratoma--consequences for continued pregnancy]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 44: 529-532.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Rasiah SV, Ewer AK, Miller P, Wright JG, Barron DJ, et al. (2008) Antenatal perspective of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: 5 years on. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 93: 192-197.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Cass DL (2011) Impact of prenatal diagnosis and therapy on neonatal surgery. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 16:130-138.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

11. Boos R, Rabe D, Schütze U, Schmidt W (1984) [Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of a cystic ovarian tumor].Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 44: 521-524.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

12. Arca MJ, Teich S (2004) Current controversies in perinatal care: fetal versus neonatal surgery. Clin Perinatol 31(3):629-648.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

13. Garabedian C, Vaast P, Bigot J, Sfeir R, Michaud L (2014) [Esophageal atresia: prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and prognosis]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 43: 424-430.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref