International Journal of Inflammation, Cancer and Integrative Therapy
Open Access

Breast cancer; Cancer–testis antigens; MAGE; NY-ESO 1

Introduction

A group of genes that are primarily expressed in human germline cells are responsible for the encoding of cancer–testis (CT) antigens. They are down-controlled in physical grown-up tissues yet may become unusually reexpressed in different malignancies. Until now, very nearly a 100 qualities and quality families encoding CT antigens have been distinguished [1]. The term "CT-X antigens" is used to distinguish CT antigens that map to chromosome X from non-X CT antigens that are found on other chromosomes. The majority of tumors, including melanomas, bladder, lung, ovarian, and hepatocellular carcinomas, express CT-X antigens, while renal, colon, and hematological malignancies express them less frequently [2]. CT-X antigen articulation is related with a less fortunate result and is more pervasive in higher grade and high level stage cancers. Escalated examination into their conceivable use in helpful immunizations is continuous and a few clinical immunization preliminaries utilizing CT-X antigens, specifically antigens of the MAGE-A family and NY-ESO-1, in patients with lung, ovarian tumors and melanoma are progressing or have been finished [3]. However, there are conflicting results because few studies have examined the presence of CT antigens in breast cancer. Interestingly, a recent analysis of a small number of patients showed that triple-negative (TN) primary breast cancer had a higher incidence of CT-X antigen expression [4]. The presence of CT antigens would provide additional immunotherapeutic options considering the worse clinical prognosis associated with TN breast cancer. As a result, we examined a larger number of breast cancers in this study for the presence of CT antigen. We compared a larger collection of hormonereceptor- positive carcinomas to TN breast cancer in order to better understand the possibility of increased expression of CT antigens [5].

Patients and Methods

Study population

The review depends on the bosom data set of the European Foundation of Oncology, Milan, Italy, and contains clinical history, simultaneous sicknesses, kind of medical procedure and obsessive evaluation including morphological and organic elements for all sequential bosom malignant growth patients who went through a medical procedure from January 1997 to December 2001 [6]. A total of 100 invasive breast cancer cases- 50 hormone-receptor-positive and 50 TN cases—were selected from this patient series, and the corresponding paraffin blocks were retrieved from the European Institute of Oncology's Division of Pathology archives. The World Health Organization's Histological Classification of Breast Tumors, which was modified by Rosen and Obermann, was used to classify the tumors. Cancer grade was evaluated by Elston and Ellis [7].

Immunohistochemistry

According to previous reports, the status of the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) as well as the Ki-67-labeling index were evaluated. HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) articulation was assessed utilizing a 1 : 400 weakening of a polyclonal antiserum (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). FISH (Vysis PathVysion;) was used to check for gene amplification in all tumors with equivocal (IHC 2+) HER2 results. Chicago, Illinois: Abbott). Tumors with less than 50% expression in the neoplastic cells were considered to be ER and/ or PgR positive. The immunoreactivity for ER and PgR was absent in TN tumors, as was the negative IHC and FISH results for HER2. HER2 expression was centrally tested in all cases with ER and PgR positivity [8]. HER2 IHC articulation was assessed utilizing a 1 : a 400-fold dilution of a Dako polyclonal antiserum. Two pathologists scored the IHC expression as follows: 0 (no staining or only a faint membrane staining), 1+ (faint membrane staining in more than 10% of tumor cells, incomplete membrane staining), 2+ (weak to moderate membrane staining in more than 10% of tumor cells), and 3+ (intense circumferential membrane staining in more than 10% of tumor cells) are the highest possible scores. HER2 scores of 0 and 1+ were deemed negative for this analysis [9].

Results

The data of 5910 pT1-3 pN0-3 M0 breast cancer patients who were referred to the institute for clinical care and therapy were included in the database between January 1997 and December 2001. 50 consecutive female patients with TN breast cancer and 50 patients with highly ERpositive and HER2-negative breast cancers (ER) were identified from this population. The pattern neurotic attributes of trama center and TN bosom cancers are recorded. Histopathological differences between ER and TN breast cancer patients were to be expected. All trama center positive patients were likewise HER2 negative at a focal modification.

IHC was used to check for MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 expression in all samples. Within specific tumor samples, a variety of staining patterns, ranging from 1+ to 3+, were observed. The visual scale shows power (red for 3+, green for 2+ and blue for 1+) and level of staining for every one of the growth tests. The overexpression of the two antigens in ER and TN tumors at various cut-offs is shown. 13 (26 percent) TN cancers had MAGE-A overexpression (score 2+), but only 5 (ten percent) ER tumors did (P = 0.07). Nine (18%) TN tumors showed NY-ESO-1 overexpression (score 2+), but only two (4%) ER lesions did so (P = 0.05). IHC was used to check for MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 expression in all samples. Within specific tumor samples, a variety of staining patterns, ranging from 1+ to 3+, were observed. For each of the tumor samples, the visual scale depicts the intensity as well as the percentage of staining (red for 3+, green for 2+, and blue for 1+). The overexpression of the two antigens in ER and TN tumors at various cut-offs is shown. 13 (26 percent) TN cancers had MAGE-An overexpression (score 2+), but only 5 (ten percent) ER tumors did (P = 0.07). NY-ESO-1 overexpression (score ≥2+) was recorded in nine (18%) TN cancers however just in two (4%) emergency room sores (P = 0.05).

Discussion

Bosom malignant growth is very much perceived as a heterogeneous sickness from a morphological and underlying point of view as well as in its different practical elements uncovered through examination of its hereditary marks and other lists distinguishable through IHC [10].

TN bosom disease addresses a gathering of cancers, which are hard to treat. Gene array analysis revealed a higher expression of clusters of genes related to proliferation in TN cancers. A higher Ki-67-labeling index expression in TN tumors compared to endocrine-responsive cancers exemplifies this. Our partner of patients showed a comparable raised Ki-67 naming in the TN cases [11]. Vascular-related growth factors and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are two molecules that are frequently expressed in TN tumors and may be the driving force behind these proliferative processes. However, clinical responses to EGFR-targeting agents have been criticized. Alkylating agents, on the other hand, have been shown to be sensitive to BRCA1-deficient cells, such as TN breast cancer cells, in in vitro chemosensitivity studies. Recent research has focused on biological agents like poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARP inhibitors) [12].

The development of the most efficient multimodal strategies and the identification of cohorts of patients most likely to benefit from chemotherapy depend on the prompt identification of characteristics associated with response or resistance to primary therapy. Steroid hormone receptor expression is one of the characteristics that can predict response and outcome. Neurotic complete reduction (pCR) rate are fundamentally higher following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with TN growths contrasted and the chemical receptorpositive companion. No matter what the higher probability of pCR for patients with TN illness, the 5-year sickness free endurance is essentially more regrettable for this accomplice contrasted and the trama center positive associate in a few examinations. Importantly, patients with residual ER-positive tumors fare significantly better than those with residual ER-negative tumors but no pCR [13]. The increased expression of MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 in TN breast cancer may have clinical significance, particularly in the adjuvant treatment setting. It is our ebb and flow imagining that patients with TN bosom malignant growth and insignificant remaining sickness after preoperative chemotherapy are the best setting to test the viability of an inoculation methodology. Until now, breast cancer vaccines have primarily been used to treat end-stage disease [14]. With varying results, vaccines against antigens like MUC1, CEA, HER2, and the carbohydrate antigens have been the subject of several clinical studies. However, after initial treatment, immunotherapy may be most effective in patients with minimal residual disease. CT-X antigens present a novel opportunity to promote vaccine and treatment development [15].

Conclusion

In clinical trials for patients with melanoma and lung cancer, where such antigens are frequently expressed, vaccines that include members of the MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 families are currently being evaluated. MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 antigen expression was found in a patient population with few treatment options, as shown by our research. After surgery, analysis of the expression of the MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 antigens in breast cancer patients may make it possible to identify patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapeutic vaccines.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. SimpsonAJ, Caballero OL, Jungbluth A (2005) Cancer/testis antigens, gametogenesis and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 5: 615-625.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Almeida LG, Sakabe NJ, deOliveira AR (2009) CTdatabase: a knowledge-base of high-throughput and curated data on cancer-testis antigens. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 816-819.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Hofmann O, Caballero OL, Stevenson BJ (2008) Genome-wide analysis of cancer/testis gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 20422-20427.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Gure AO, Chua R, Williamson B (2005) Cancer-testis genes are coordinately expressed and are markers of poor outcome in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11: 8055-8062.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Velazquez EF, Jungbluth AA, Yancovitz M (2007) Expression of the cancer/testis antigen NY-ESO-1 in primary and metastatic malignant melanoma (MM)—correlation with prognostic factors. Cancer Immun 7: 11.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

6. Andrade VC, Vettore AL, Felix RS (2008) Prognostic impact of cancer/testis antigen expression in advanced stage multiple myeloma patients. Cancer Immun 8: 2.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

7. Napoletano C, Bellati F, Tarquini E (2008) MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 expression in cervical cancer: prognostic factors and effects of chemotherapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198: 91-97.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Scanlan MJ, Gure AO, Jungbluth AA (2002) Cancer/testis antigens: an expanding family of targets for cancer immunotherapy. Immunol Rev 188: 22-32.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Bender AA, Karbach J, Neumann A (2007) LUD 00-009: phase 1 study of intensive course immunization with NY-ESO-1 peptides in HLA-A2 positive patients with NY-ESO-1-expressing cancer. Cancer Immun 7: 16.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

10. Atanackovic D, Altorki NK, Cao Y (2008) Booster vaccination of cancer patients with MAGE-A3 protein reveals long-term immunological memory or tolerance depending on priming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 1650-1655.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

11. Jäger E, Karbach J, Gnjatic S (2006) Recombinant vaccinia/fowlpox NY-ESO-1 vaccines induce both humoral and cellular NY-ESO-1-specific immune responses in cancer patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 14453-14458.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

12. van Baren N, Bonnet MC, Dréno B (2005) Tumoral and immunologic response after vaccination of melanoma patients with an ALVAC virus encoding MAGE antigens recognized by T cells. J Clin Oncol 23: 9008-9021.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

13. Valmori D, Souleimanian NE, Tosello V (2007) Vaccination with NY-ESO-1 protein and CpG in Montanide induces integrated antibody/Th1 responses and CD8 T cells through cross-priming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 8947-8952.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

14. Odunsi K, Qian F, Matsuzaki J (2007) Vaccination with an NY-ESO-1 peptide of HLA class I/II specificities induces integrated humoral and T cell responses in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U SA 104: 12837-12842.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

15. Davis ID, Chen W, Jackson H (2004) Recombinant NY-ESO-1 protein with ISCOMATRIX adjuvant induces broad integrated antibody and CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 10697-10702.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref