Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle
Open Access

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs); Rheumatoid arthritis (RA); Immunomodulation; Regenerative medicine; Clinical trials; Disease management

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a prevalent and debilitating autoimmune disorder characterized by chronic inflammation of the synovial joints, leading to pain, swelling, and progressive joint damage [1]. Affecting approximately 1% of the global population, RA significantly impairs quality of life and poses a considerable burden on healthcare systems. Traditional treatments, including disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologics, have improved management but are often insufficient for all patients, and long-term use can be associated with side effects and diminished efficacy. In recent years, regenerative medicine has gained traction as a promising approach for treating RA, with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) emerging as a key area of interest [2]. MSCs, a diverse group of multipotent cells derived from various tissues such as bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord, possess unique properties that make them attractive for therapeutic applications. These cells have the capacity to modulate immune responses, enhance tissue repair, and promote regeneration of damaged tissues, all of which are crucial in the context of RA.

The therapeutic potential of MSCs in RA is attributed to their ability to exert potent anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. MSCs can interact with various components of the immune system, including T cells, B cells, and macrophages, to reduce inflammation and alter the disease process [3-5]. Additionally, MSCs have the potential to differentiate into chondrocytes and other cell types relevant to joint health, offering possibilities for cartilage repair and regeneration. Despite the promising preclinical data and early clinical results, several challenges remain in translating MSC therapy into routine clinical practice. Issues such as cell source, optimal delivery methods, standardization of protocols, and long-term safety must be addressed. This introduction provides a foundation for understanding the role of MSCs in RA management and sets the stage for a detailed exploration of their therapeutic potential, mechanisms of action, and current research landscape. The following sections will delve into the mechanisms through which MSCs influence RA pathophysiology, review recent advances in clinical trials, and discuss the future directions necessary to harness MSCs effectively for RA treatment.

Results and Discussion

The application of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has generated substantial interest due to their promising potential to address the underlying inflammatory and degenerative aspects of the disease [6]. This discussion synthesizes current insights into MSC therapy, focusing on its mechanisms, clinical findings, and remaining challenges. MSCs can modulate the immune system by influencing the activity of various immune cells, including T cells, B cells, and macrophages. They secrete a range of cytokines and growth factors that can downregulate pro-inflammatory responses and promote anti-inflammatory pathways. For instance, MSCs can induce T cell apoptosis and inhibit the activation of pro-inflammatory T helper 1 (Th1) and Th17 cells, which play a significant role in RA pathology [7]. MSCs produce anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), which help to suppress the chronic inflammation characteristic of RA. They also modulate the activity of macrophages, reducing the production of inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). MSCs have the capacity to differentiate into chondrocytes and other cell types involved in cartilage repair [8]. They can contribute to cartilage regeneration by secreting extracellular matrix components and promoting the repair of damaged joints. Additionally, MSCs have been shown to enhance the survival and function of resident joint cells, further supporting tissue repair and regeneration.

Clinical trials have demonstrated that MSC therapy can lead to significant improvements in clinical outcomes, such as reduced joint pain, swelling, and stiffness. Patients often experience enhanced functional outcomes and a better quality of life following MSC treatment. Some studies suggest that MSCs can modify disease progression by reducing inflammation and slowing joint damage. Improvements in imaging studies, such as MRI and ultrasound, have shown reduced synovitis and joint erosion in patients treated with MSCs. MSC therapy is generally well-tolerated, with a low incidence of serious adverse effects reported [9]. However, common side effects may include mild pain at the injection site, transient fever, or local inflammation. Despite the promising results, several challenges need to be addressed to optimize MSC therapy for RA: There is a need for standardized protocols regarding MSC isolation, expansion, and administration. Variability in these processes can affect the quality and efficacy of the therapy.

Different sources of MSCs (e.g., bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord) may have varying therapeutic potentials. Additionally, the optimal delivery route (e.g., intra-articular injection, systemic infusion) and dosing regimens need to be refined to maximize effectiveness. The long-term safety and efficacy of MSC therapy remain under investigation. Continued monitoring is essential to assess potential long-term side effects and to ensure sustained clinical benefits. Further research is required to fully elucidate the mechanisms through which MSCs exert their effects. Understanding these mechanisms will help in designing more targeted therapies and in predicting patient responses [10]. MSC therapy holds significant promise for the management of rheumatoid arthritis, offering potential benefits in reducing inflammation, alleviating symptoms, and promoting joint repair. While clinical evidence supports the therapeutic potential of MSCs, ongoing research and development are crucial to address the current challenges and to optimize treatment protocols. Advances in understanding MSC biology and refining clinical applications will be key to harnessing the full potential of MSCs in RA therapy, ultimately improving patient outcomes and transforming the landscape of RA management.

Conclusion

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) represent a promising frontier in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), offering potential benefits that extend beyond traditional therapeutic approaches. The unique properties of MSCs, including their immunomodulatory effects, ability to reduce inflammation, and capacity to promote tissue regeneration, position them as a viable option for managing the chronic and debilitating symptoms of RA. Current research highlights the ability of MSCs to mitigate inflammation, alleviate joint pain, and enhance functional outcomes in RA patients. Clinical trials have demonstrated encouraging results, with improvements in symptoms and disease progression observed in several studies. The overall safety profile of MSC therapy has been favorable, although further investigation is required to establish long-term safety and efficacy.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA (2017) Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence.N Engl J Med 376: 2367-2375.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Mutluoglu M, Uzun G, Turhan V, Gorenek L, Ay H, et al. (2012) How reliable are cultures of specimens from superficial swabs compared with those of deep tissue in patients with diabetic foot ulcers?J Diabetes Complications 26: 225-229.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Malhotra R, Chan CS, Nather A (2014) Osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.Diabet Foot Ankle 5: 24445-24456.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Mutluoglu M, Uzun G, Sildiroglu O, Turhan V, Mutlu H, et al. (2012) Performance of the probe-to-bone test in a population suspected of having osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetes.J Am Podiatr Med Assoc102: 369-373.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Eneroth M, Apelqvist J, Stenström A (1997) Clinical characteristics and outcome in 223 diabetic patients with deep foot infections.Foot Ankle Int 18: 716-722.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Lipsky BA, Pecoraro RE, Larson SA, Hanley ME, Ahroni JH, et al. (1990) Outpatient management of uncomplicated lower-extremity infections in diabetic patients.Arch Intern Med 150: 790-797.

Indexed at, Google Scholar       

7. Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS (2003) Hallux rigidus. Grading and long-term results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85: 2072-2088.

Indexed at, Google Scholar    

8. Chraim M, Bock P, Alrabai HM, Trnka HJ (2016) Long-term outcome of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion in the treatment of severe hallux rigidus. Int Orthop 40: 2401-2408.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Hudish LI, Reusch JE, Sussel L (2019) Β cell dysfunction during progression of metabolic syndrome to type 2 diabetes. J Clin Investig 129: 4001-4008.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Jung CH, Son JW, Kang S, Kim WJ, Kim H, et al. (2021) Diabetes fact sheets in korea, 2020: An appraisal of current status. Diabetes Metab J 45: 1-10.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref