Insights in Gynecologic Oncology
Open Access

PARP is an enzyme that plays a critical role in the repair of single-strand DNA breaks through the base excision repair pathway. In cancer cells with mutations in genes responsible for homologous recombination repair, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, the inhibition of PARP leads to the accumulation of DNA damage, resulting in cell death. This concept of synthetic lethality is central to the therapeutic efficacy of PARP inhibitors.

Mechanism of Action

When PARP is inhibited in cancer cells already compromised by BRCA mutations or other defects in homologous recombination repair, the cells cannot adequately repair DNA breaks. This leads to:

1. Accumulation of DNA Damage: As DNA damage accumulates, the cancer cells become unable to survive.
2. Cellular Senescence or Apoptosis: The inability to repair DNA triggers cellular senescence (a state of permanent cell cycle arrest) or programmed cell death (apoptosis).

PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer, particularly high-grade serous ovarian cancer, is associated with mutations in the BRCA genes [2-5]. The following PARP inhibitors have been approved for use in ovarian cancer:

Key PARP Inhibitors

Olaparib (Lynparza):

• Indications: Approved for the maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who have received at least two prior lines of chemotherapy and have BRCA mutations. It is also used as a first-line treatment in combination with chemotherapy for BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer.
• Clinical Trials: Studies have shown significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving olaparib compared to placebo.

Niraparib (Zejula):

• Indications: Approved for maintenance treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer, regardless of BRCA status, in patients who are in response to platinum-based chemotherapy.
• Clinical Findings: Niraparib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with HRD-positive tumors, regardless of BRCA mutation status.

Rucaparib (Rubraca):

• Indications: Indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and BRCA mutations who have received at least two prior chemotherapy regimens.
• Outcomes: Rucaparib has shown promising results in patients with BRCA mutations and HRD-positive tumors.

Clinical Implications

• Combination Therapy: Ongoing studies are investigating the combination of PARP inhibitors with chemotherapy or immunotherapy to enhance treatment efficacy. Early results suggest that combining PARP inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors may provide synergistic benefits.
• Biomarker Assessment: Identifying patients with BRCA mutations or HRD is crucial for selecting candidates for PARP inhibitor therapy. Ongoing research aims to develop more reliable biomarkers to expand the use of PARP inhibitors beyond those with known genetic mutations.

PARP Inhibitors in Endometrial Cancer

While the role of PARP inhibitors in endometrial cancer is less established than in ovarian cancer, recent studies indicate potential efficacy, particularly in specific subtypes:

Target Populations

Lynch Syndrome:

• Patients with Lynch syndrome often exhibit mismatch repair deficiency, making them candidates for PARP inhibitor therapy [6,7]. Early studies have suggested that these patients may benefit from PARP inhibition, especially when the tumors also exhibit HRD.

HRD-Positive Endometrial Cancer:

• Emerging evidence indicates that patients with HRD-positive endometrial tumors, regardless of BRCA status, may respond to PARP inhibitors. Clinical trials are underway to assess the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors in these populations.

Ongoing Research

Current clinical trials are exploring the use of PARP inhibitors in combination with other therapies for endometrial cancer. Key areas of investigation include:

• Adjuvant Treatment: The role of PARP inhibitors in the adjuvant setting following surgery and chemotherapy.
• Combination with Immunotherapy: Research is ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of combining PARP inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors for treating endometrial cancer.

Challenges and Future Directions

Resistance Mechanisms

As with many cancer therapies, resistance to PARP inhibitors can develop. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance, such as secondary mutations in BRCA genes or restoration of homologous recombination repair, is crucial for developing strategies to overcome this challenge. Research is ongoing to identify potential combination therapies that can mitigate resistance.

Personalized Medicine

The future of PARP inhibitor therapy in gynecologic cancers lies in personalized medicine. Identifying biomarkers that predict response to PARP inhibitors will enable clinicians to select patients who are most likely to benefit from these therapies. This approach aims to maximize efficacy while minimizing unnecessary exposure to treatment in patients unlikely to respond.

Conclusion

PARP inhibitors represent a significant advancement in the treatment of ovarian and endometrial cancers, particularly for patients with specific genetic profiles. By exploiting the DNA repair vulnerabilities of tumors, these therapies have improved patient outcomes and opened new avenues for research and treatment. As understanding of tumor biology advances, the role of PARP inhibitors in gynecologic cancers will likely expand, offering hope for improved survival and quality of life for women diagnosed with these malignancies. Continued research into combination therapies and resistance mechanisms will be essential in optimizing PARP inhibitor therapy and enhancing personalized treatment strategies.

References

1. Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Fitzgerald D, Guyatt GH, Walker CJ, Sackett DL (1986)How to keep up with the medical literature: V. Access by personal computer to the medical literature. Ann Intern Med 105: 810-816.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Colinet B, Jacot W, Bertrand D, Lacombe S, Bozonnat MC, et al. (2005)A new simplified comorbidity score as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: description and comparison with the Charlson's index. Br J Cancer 93: 1098-1105.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Bernal AL (2001)Overview of current research in parturition. Exp Physiol 86: 213-222

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M (2005)Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 352: 9-19.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Petrou S (2005)The economic consequences of preterm birth during the first 10 years of life. BJOG 112: 10-15.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Lee YH, Hwang MK, Morgan KG, Taggart MJ (2001)Receptor-coupled contractility of uterine smooth muscle: from membrane to myofilaments. Exp Physiol 86: 283-288.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Beedle AS (2007)Non-genomic transgenerational inheritance of disease risk. Bioessays 29: 145-154.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref