Journal of Marine Science: Research & Development
Open Access

Blue carbon; Climate change; Carbon sequestration; Marine ecosystems; Mangroves; Seagrasses; Salt marshes; Oceanic carbon sink; Coastal management; Nature-based solutions

Introduction

As climate change continues to pose an existential threat, the importance of natural climate solutions, including blue carbon sequestration, has gained widespread recognition. Blue carbon ecosystems—mangroves, seagrasses, and salt marshes—are among the most efficient and durable carbon sinks on the planet. They capture carbon dioxide (CO₂) through photosynthesis and store it as biomass in their plant structures and soils over long periods, often spanning centuries. These ecosystems also protect coastlines from erosion, support marine biodiversity, and enhance water quality [1,2].

Despite their immense potential, blue carbon ecosystems are under increasing pressure from deforestation, pollution, and rising sea levels. The degradation of these habitats not only reduces their carbon storage capacity but also releases stored carbon back into the atmosphere, exacerbating climate change. Consequently, understanding the role of blue carbon ecosystems in mitigating climate change is critical for informed policymaking and conservation efforts [3].

Methods

Research on blue carbon sequestration involves a combination of field studies, remote sensing, and computational modeling. These methods are designed to measure carbon fluxes, quantify storage potential, and assess ecosystem health.

Field Measurements Fieldwork is conducted to collect data on biomass and soil carbon stocks within blue carbon ecosystems. Researchers use tools like corers to extract soil samples and assess carbon content at various depths. Aboveground biomass is measured by calculating the weight and volume of vegetation. Standardized protocols, such as those outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), ensure the consistency and comparability of data.

Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Satellite imagery and GIS are employed to map the extent and distribution of blue carbon habitats globally. Remote sensing enables researchers to monitor changes in land cover, assess ecosystem degradation, and identify areas suitable for conservation or restoration.

Carbon Flux Monitoring Eddy covariance towers and aquatic sensors are used to measure carbon exchange between blue carbon ecosystems and the atmosphere or water column. These tools track net ecosystem productivity, providing insights into whether a system is a net sink or source of CO².

Modeling Carbon Dynamics Computational models simulate the long-term dynamics of carbon sequestration within blue carbon habitats. Models incorporate variables such as plant growth rates, soil composition, and environmental conditions to estimate future storage capacity under different climate scenarios.

Community Engagement Indigenous and local communities play a vital role in collecting data, monitoring ecosystems, and implementing conservation projects. Incorporating traditional knowledge enhances the effectiveness and sustainability of blue carbon initiatives [4-6].

By combining these methodologies, researchers gain a comprehensive understanding of blue carbon ecosystems and their contributions to climate mitigation.

Results

Studies on blue carbon sequestration underscore the significant carbon storage potential of mangroves, seagrasses, and salt marshes. These ecosystems can sequester carbon at rates that far exceed terrestrial forests on a per-area basis. For example, mangroves store an estimated 1,000 metric tons of carbon per hectare, with more than 70% of this carbon sequestered in the soil. Similarly, seagrasses account for approximately 10% of the ocean’s total carbon storage despite covering less than 0.2% of the seafloor [7,8].

The preservation and restoration of blue carbon ecosystems have demonstrated measurable benefits for climate mitigation. Restored mangrove forests, for instance, have been shown to rapidly regain their carbon sequestration capacity within a few decades. Furthermore, intact blue carbon habitats contribute to climate resilience by protecting coastlines from storm surges, reducing flood risk, and maintaining fish stocks that support coastal communities [9,10].

However, degradation of blue carbon ecosystems poses a significant challenge. It is estimated that mangroves are being lost at a rate of 0.3% to 0.6% per year, primarily due to aquaculture, agriculture, and urban development. Each hectare of degraded mangrove forest releases up to 1,500 metric tons of CO₂ into the atmosphere, negating the benefits of carbon storage and accelerating global warming.

Economic analyses have demonstrated that investing in the conservation and restoration of blue carbon ecosystems yields high returns. For example, the Blue Carbon Initiative estimates that preserving these habitats provides ecosystem services worth tens of billions of dollars annually, including carbon mitigation, fisheries enhancement, and tourism opportunities.

Discussion

The findings underscore the critical role of blue carbon ecosystems in mitigating climate change and supporting sustainable development. By sequestering significant amounts of carbon, these ecosystems serve as a natural buffer against rising atmospheric CO₂ levels. Moreover, their multifunctional benefits—ranging from biodiversity conservation to disaster risk reduction—enhance their value as nature-based solutions.

The importance of protecting blue carbon ecosystems cannot be overstated. Preventing habitat loss and degradation is essential for maintaining their carbon storage capacity and avoiding emissions. International frameworks such as the Paris Agreement and the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration highlight the need for coordinated action to conserve these habitats.

Despite their potential, several challenges hinder the large-scale implementation of blue carbon initiatives. These include a lack of awareness, insufficient funding, and competing land-use priorities. Additionally, variability in carbon sequestration rates across different ecosystems complicates the development of standardized protocols for measuring and verifying carbon credits.

Emerging technologies and innovative financing mechanisms offer new opportunities for scaling up blue carbon projects. Carbon offset markets, for example, incentivize private sector investment in ecosystem restoration. Advances in satellite-based monitoring provide accurate and cost-effective tools for assessing habitat health and tracking conservation outcomes.

Community involvement is a cornerstone of successful blue carbon initiatives. Indigenous and local communities possess valuable knowledge about ecosystem dynamics and play a key role in stewardship. Inclusive policies that recognize the rights and contributions of these communities enhance the sustainability and equity of conservation efforts.

Looking ahead, integrating blue carbon strategies with broader climate and ocean policies will be critical for maximizing their impact. Cross-sectoral collaboration among governments, NGOs, academia, and the private sector can drive innovation and mobilize resources for blue carbon conservation.

Conclusion

Blue carbon ecosystems offer a vital and underutilized tool for mitigating climate change. Mangroves, seagrasses, and salt marshes not only sequester vast amounts of carbon but also provide a host of ecological, economic, and social benefits. Preserving and restoring these habitats is essential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, enhancing climate resilience, and achieving global sustainability goals.

While challenges remain, advances in research, technology, and community engagement provide a strong foundation for expanding blue carbon initiatives. By prioritizing the protection of marine ecosystems and integrating blue carbon strategies into climate policies, humanity can harness the power of nature to address one of the greatest challenges of our time.

The future of blue carbon lies in collective action and long-term commitment. By valuing and investing in these critical ecosystems, we can pave the way for a more sustainable and resilient planet.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Mariotti A, Pan Y, Zeng N, Alessandri A (2015) Long-Term Climate Change in the Mediterranean Region in the Midst of Decadal Variability. Clim Dyn 44: 1437-1456.

Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Zeroual A, Assani A, Meddi M (2017) Combined Analysis of Temperature and Rainfall Variability as They Relate to Climate Indices in Northern Algeria over the 1972-2013 Period. Hydrol Res 48: 584-595.

Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, et al. (2013) AR5 Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. IPCC Cambridge UK.

Google Scholar

4. Sahnoune F, Belhamel M, Zelmat M, Kerbachi R (2013) Climate Change in Algeria: Vulnerability and Strategy of Mitigation and Adaptation. Energy Procedia 36: 1286-1294.

Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Boudalia S, Gueroui Y, Zebsa R, Arbia T, Chiheb AE, et al. (2023) Camel Livestock in the Algerian Sahara under the Context of Climate Change: Milk Properties and Livestock Production Practices. J Agric Food Res 11: 100528.

Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Pretty J (2020) New Opportunities for the Redesign of Agricultural and Food Systems. Agri Hum Values 37: 629-630.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Boudalia S, Ben Said S, Tsiokos D, Bousbia A, Gueroui Y, et al. (2020) BOVISOL Project: Breeding and Management Practices of Indigenous Bovine Breeds: Solutions towards a Sustainable Future. Sustainability 12: 9891.

Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Santos-Silva J, Alves SP, Francisco A, Portugal AP, Dentinho MT, et al. (2023) Forage Based Diet as an Alternative to a High Concentrate Diet for Finishing Young Bulls-Effects on Growth Performance, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Meat Quality. Meat Sci 198: 109098.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Ariom TO, Dimon E, Nambeye E, Diouf NS, Adelusi OO, et al. (2022) Climate-Smart Agriculture in African Countries: A Review of Strategies and Impacts on Smallholder Farmers. Sustainability 14: 11370.

Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Friess DA, Rogers K, Lovelock CE, Krauss KW, Hamilton SE, et al. (2019) The state of the world’s mangrove forests: Past, present, and future. Ann Rev Environ Res 44: 89-115.

Google Scholar