Advances in Cancer Prevention
Open Access

Surviving cancer is a testament to resilience and strength, marking a significant milestone in one’s life. However, the journey towards recovery extends beyond the triumphant moment of remission. For many cancer survivors, the aftermath of treatment brings forth a range of long-term challenges, with sexual dysfunction and infertility emerging as impactful and often overlooked late effects [1].

The toll of cancer treatment on the body and mind can be profound, and while the focus during treatment is primarily on eradicating the disease, the lasting consequences on sexual health and fertility demand our attention. This article delves into the intricate interplay between cancer treatments and their potential ramifications on sexual wellbeing and reproductive capacity. By understanding the complexities of these late effects, we can pave the way for more comprehensive survivorship care, addressing not only the physical aspects but also the emotional and relational dimensions of life after cancer [2].

Understanding the late effects:

1. Sexual dysfunction: an intimate consequence

Beyond the physical toll exacted by cancer treatments such as chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery lies a realm seldom openly discussed—sexual dysfunction. The aftermath of these treatments can introduce a myriad of changes, from alterations in blood flow and hormonal imbalances to the potential nerve damage incurred during surgical interventions [3]. The intersection of these physical alterations with the psychological toll of a cancer diagnosis creates a complex tapestry where intimacy becomes entwined with issues of desire, arousal, and overall satisfaction.

It is imperative to recognize that the psychological impact of cancer extends beyond the immediate treatment phase. Coping with the existential weight of a cancer diagnosis and navigating the rigors of treatment can give rise to anxiety, depression, and profound shifts in body image [4]. As survivors confront these psychological challenges, they find themselves contending not only with the scars left by the disease but also with the echoes of its impact on their emotional and relational well-being.

2. Infertility: fertility as a fragile frontier

The dream of parenthood can be profoundly affected by certain cancer treatments, notably pelvic radiation and specific chemotherapy regimens. The intricate balance of reproductive organs becomes vulnerable, subjected to structural changes, hormonal imbalances, and potential damage to sperm or eggs. For many individuals, the realization that the journey towards parenthood might be interrupted by the very treatments that saved their lives becomes an additional layer of complexity in the survivorship narrative [5, 6].

As the understanding of the impact on fertility grows, an increasing number of cancer patients are proactively exploring fertility preservation options before embarking on treatment. Sperm or egg freezing, embryo cryopreservation, and the preservation of ovarian and testicular tissues offer a glimmer of hope for those who wish to safeguard their fertility amidst the storm of cancer treatment [7].

The complexity of sexual dysfunction and infertility as late effects of cancer treatment underscores the need for a comprehensive and compassionate approach to survivorship care. Beyond the physical restoration achieved through medical interventions, addressing the intimate and deeply personal aspects of life after cancer becomes an integral part of holistic recovery [8, 9]. This article delves into the intricate interplay between cancer treatments and their potential ramifications on sexual well-being and reproductive capacity. By understanding the complexities of these late effects, we can pave the way for more comprehensive survivorship care, addressing not only the physical aspects but also the emotional and relational dimensions of life after cancer [10].

Conclusion

Surviving cancer is a tremendous achievement, but the journey often involves confronting long-term challenges. Sexual dysfunction and infertility as late effects of cancer treatment underscore the importance of a comprehensive approach to survivorship care. By fostering open communication, providing supportive services, and exploring proactive measures, healthcare professionals can help cancer survivors navigate these challenges and enhance their overall quality of life after treatment.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Walsh JME, Terdiman JP (2003) Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review. JAMA US 289:1288-1296.


Indexed at, Google Scholar

2. Secretan BL, Scoccianti C (2015). Breast-cancer screening—viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med US 372:2353-2358.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

3. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ, Welch HG (2004) Enthusiasm for Cancer Screening in the United States. JAMA US 291:71-78.

Google Scholar

4. McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V, Godwin J (2020). International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature 577:89-94.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

5. Fontana RS, Sanderson DR, Woolner LB, Taylor WF, Miller WE, et al. (1986) Lung cancer screening: the Mayo program. J Occup Med US 28:746-750.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Stroissnigg FH, Ling YY, Zhao J (2017) Identification of HSP90 inhibitors as a novel class of senolytics. Nat Commun EU 8: 1-14.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Fidalgo JAP, Roda D, Roselló S (2009) Aurora kinase inhibitors: a new class of drugs targeting the regulatory mitotic system. Clin Transl Oncol EU 11:787-798.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Folkman J (2003) Angiogenesis inhibitors: a new class of drugs. Cancer Biol Ther US 2:126-132.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Sano M (2018) A new class of drugs for heart failure: SGLT2 inhibitors reduce sympathetic overactivity. J Cardiol EU 71: 471-476.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Sacchi S, Rosini E, Pollegioni L, Gianluca M (2013) D-amino acid oxidase inhibitors as a novel class of drugs for schizophrenia therapy. Curr Pharm Des UAE19:2499-2511.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref