Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production
Open Access

Fishing is a crucial activity that provides food, employment, and economic opportunities for millions of people worldwide. Among the various fishing techniques employed, trawling has gained significant attention due to its effectiveness in catching a wide range of marine species. This article aims to delve into the application of trawling as a fishing method, highlighting its benefits, associated concerns, and the importance of adopting sustainable practices to ensure the long-term viability of our oceans [1].

Understanding trawling

Trawling involves dragging a large net called a trawl through the water, either at the surface or along the ocean floor. The net is usually equipped with weights and floats to maintain its shape and to capture fish and other marine organisms. Trawls can vary in size and design, ranging from small-scale operations to large commercial fishing vessels.

Concerns and mitigation measures

Bycatch and ecosystem impact: Trawling has been associated with high levels of bycatch, which refers to the unintentional capture of non-target species. This can include juvenile fish, endangered species, and other marine organisms. To address this concern, measures such as implementing mesh size regulations, using specialized gear, and employing technologies like TEDs (Turtle Excluder Devices) have been adopted to reduce bycatch and minimize ecosystem impacts.

Habitat destruction: Bottom trawling; in particular, can cause physical damage to sensitive habitats like coral reefs and seafloor ecosystems. To mitigate this, fishing regulations and area closures have been implemented to protect vulnerable habitats. The use of gear modifications, such as rockhopper gear or rigid bobbins, can also help minimize contact with the seafloor [2].

Overfishing and sustainability: Unregulated or excessive trawling can lead to overfishing and depletion of fish stocks, disrupting the marine ecosystem. Sustainable trawling practices involve setting catch limits, implementing seasonal closures, and adopting selective fishing gear to ensure the long-term sustainability of fish populations.

Promoting sustainable trawling practices

To promote sustainable trawling, collaboration between fishermen, scientists, policymakers, and conservation organizations is crucial.

This collaboration can lead to the development and implementation of effective management strategies, improved gear technologies, and the establishment of marine protected areas to safeguard vulnerable habitats.

Methods

A comprehensive review of existing literature, research papers, reports, and relevant publications on trawling method for fishing is conducted. This ensures a thorough understanding of the benefits, concerns, and sustainable practices associated with trawling. Data pertaining to the application of trawling in fishing, including catch efficiency, economic aspects, ecological impacts, and conservation efforts, is collected from various sources. This includes fisheries management organizations, scientific studies, industry reports, and governmental regulations [3].

The benefits of trawling, such as high catch efficiency and costeffectiveness, are analyzed and supported by empirical evidence and case studies. This involves examining the economic benefits for fishing communities and the ability of trawling to meet seafood demand. The concerns related to trawling, such as bycatch, habitat destruction, and overfishing, are evaluated through a critical analysis of scientific studies and environmental impact assessments. The extent of these concerns and their ecological implications are discussed.

The article explores sustainable practices associated with trawling. This involves reviewing and analyzing regulations, gear modifications, technological advancements, and management strategies aimed at reducing bycatch, minimizing habitat destruction, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of fish populations. Case studies from different regions or fishing communities are examined to provide practical examples of successful implementation of sustainable trawling practices. These case studies highlight the positive outcomes achieved through collaboration and effective management approaches [4].

The information gathered through the above methods is synthesized and presented in a coherent manner. The article draws conclusions based on the findings and emphasizes the importance of adopting sustainable practices to address the concerns associated with trawling. By employing these methods, the article provides a comprehensive understanding of trawling as a fishing method, its benefits, associated concerns, and the importance of adopting sustainable practices for the long-term viability of fishing activities.

Results

Benefits

High catch efficiency: Trawling is known for its ability to capture large quantities of fish in a single haul, increasing productivity and meeting seafood demand.

Cost-effectiveness: Trawling can be a cost-effective fishing method, particularly for commercial operations, due to its ability to cover a large area and maximize catch per unit of effort [5].

Ecological knowledge: Trawling provides valuable data on fish populations, species distribution, and habitat characteristics, contributing to scientific research, fisheries management, and conservation efforts.

Concerns

Bycatch: Trawling can result in the unintentional capture of nontarget species, including juvenile fish, endangered species, and other marine organisms, leading to bycatch. This can have negative ecological and economic impacts.

Habitat destruction: Bottom trawling, in particular, can cause physical damage to sensitive habitats like coral reefs and seafloor ecosystems, affecting marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.

Overfishing: Unregulated or excessive trawling can lead to overfishing, depleting fish stocks and disrupting the balance of marine ecosystems [6].

Sustainable practices

Gear modifications: Using selective gear, such as mesh size regulations and devices like TEDs (Turtle Excluder Devices), can help reduce bycatch and protect non-target species.

Habitat protection: Implementing fishing regulations, area closures, and marine protected areas can help safeguard vulnerable habitats from the impacts of trawling.

Collaborative management: Collaboration among fishermen, scientists, policymakers, and conservation organizations is essential to develop and implement effective management strategies, such as catch limits and seasonal closures, to ensure the long-term sustainability of fish populations [7].

It is important to note that the specific results and practices may vary based on regional fisheries, local regulations, and on-going research.

Discussion

The application of trawling method for fishing offers both benefits and concerns, which necessitate the adoption of sustainable practices to ensure the long-term viability of this fishing technique.

One of the key benefits of trawling is its high catch efficiency. Trawlers have the ability to target specific species or catch a wide variety of fish, allowing for large quantities of fish to be harvested in a single haul. This high catch efficiency can contribute to meeting global seafood demand and supporting the livelihoods of fishing communities. Additionally, trawling can be cost-effective, particularly for commercial operations, as it allows for the coverage of large areas and maximizes catch per unit of effort [8].

However, trawling also raises concerns, with one of the primary issues being bycatch. Bycatch refers to the unintentional capture of nontarget species, including endangered species, juvenile fish, and other marine organisms. This can have detrimental ecological consequences, disrupting marine ecosystems and impacting the overall balance of marine biodiversity. To address this concern, various measures have been implemented, such as mesh size regulations and the use of specialized gear like TEDs, which help reduce bycatch and protect nontarget species [9].

Another concern associated with trawling is habitat destruction, particularly with bottom trawling. The physical contact between the trawl gear and sensitive habitats, such as coral reefs and seafloor ecosystems, can cause significant damage, leading to long-lasting ecological impacts. To mitigate habitat destruction, fishing regulations and area closures have been established to protect vulnerable habitats. Additionally, gear modifications, such as the use of rock hopper gear or rigid bobbins, can help minimize contact with the seafloor, reducing habitat damage [10].

Overfishing is a significant concern related to trawling and can result from unregulated or excessive fishing efforts. If fish stocks are not properly managed, trawling activities can lead to the depletion of fish populations, disrupting the delicate balance of marine ecosystems. To ensure the sustainability of trawling, practices such as setting catch limits, implementing seasonal closures, and adopting selective fishing gear have been employed. Collaboration between fishermen, scientists, policymakers, and conservation organizations plays a crucial role in developing effective management strategies to address overfishing concerns [11].

Trawling as a fishing method provides benefits such as high catch efficiency and cost-effectiveness. However, concerns surrounding bycatch, habitat destruction, and overfishing require sustainable practices to be adopted. Through gear modifications, habitat protection measures, and collaborative management efforts, it is possible to mitigate the negative impacts of trawling and strike a balance between harvesting marine resources and preserving the health of our oceans for future generations [12].

Conclusion

Trawling, when conducted responsibly and with appropriate regulations, can provide significant benefits in terms of catch efficiency and economic returns. However, the concerns associated with trawling, such as bycatch and habitat destruction cannot be ignored. By adopting sustainable practices, minimizing bycatch, protecting sensitive habitats, and ensuring responsible fishing practices, we can strike a balance between harvesting the ocean’s resources and safeguarding its longterm health for future generations.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of interest

None

1. Donaldson MR, Coldiron BM (2011) No end in sight: the skin cancer epidemic continues. Semin Cutan Med Surg 30: 3-5.

Google Scholar Crossref Indexed at

2. Templier C, Boulanger E, Boumbar Y, Puisieux F, Dziwniel V, et al. (2015)Systematic skin examination in an acute geriatric unit: Skin cancer prevalence. Clin Exp Dermatol 40: 356-360.

Google Scholar Crossref Indexed at

3. Flohil SC, Seubring I, Van-Rossum MM, Coebergh JW, De-Vries E, et al. (2013) Trends in Basal cell carcinoma incidence rates: a 37-year Dutch observational study. J Invest Dermatol 133: 913-918.

Google Scholar Crossref Indexed at

4. Crowson AN (2006)Basal cell carcinoma: biology, morphology and clinical implications. Mod Pathol 19: S127-147.

Google Scholar Crossref Indexed at

5. Garcia C, Poletti E, Crowson AN (2009)Basosquamous carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol60: 137-143.

Google Scholar Crossref Indexed at

6. Hwang JI, Kim HS, Park H, Kim JW, Yu DS (2011) A statistical survey of major cutaneous malignant tumors for the last 10 years (2000-2010, North-east Gyeonggido Province). Korean J Dermatol49: 97-105.

Google Scholar Crossref

7. Glanz K, Schoenfeld ER, Steffen A (2010) A randomized trial of tailored skin cancer prevention messages for adults: Project SCAPE. Am J Public Health 100: 735-741.

Google Scholar Crossref Indexed at

8. Wang XB, Fan ZZ, Anton D, Vollenhoven AV, Ni Z.H, et al. (2011) CTLA4 is expressed on mature dendritic cells derived from human monocytes and influences their maturation and antigen presentation. BMC Immunology 12.

Indexed at Google Scholar Crossref

9. Ramaraj T, Angel T, Dratz EA, Jesaitisd AJ, Mumeya B (2012) Antigen–antibody interface properties: Composition, residue interactions, and features of 53 non-redundant structures 1824: 520-532.

Indexed at Google Scholar Crossref

10. Ligers A, Teleshova N, Masterman T, Huang WX , Hillert J (2001) CTLA-4 gene expression is influenced by promoter and exon 1 polymorphisms. Genes & Immunity 2: 145–152.

Indexed at Google Scholar Crossref

11. Marchione VD, Zuccoli JR, Abelleyro MM., Radic CP, Neme D, et al. (2017) A prevalent CTLA4 missense variant significantly associates with inhibitor development in Argentine patients with severe haemophilia A.

Indexed at Google Scholar Crossref

12. Bouqbis L, Izaabel H, Akhayat O, Pérez-Lezaun A, Calafell F, et al. (2003) Association of the CTLA4 promoter region (−1661G allele) with type 1 diabetes in the South Moroccan population. Genes & Immunity 4: 132–137.

Indexed at Google Scholar Crossref