Insights in Gynecologic Oncology
Open Access

For young women facing gynecologic cancers, the prospect of losing fertility can add an extra layer of emotional and psychological burden. Treatments for cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers—such as chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery-can significantly impact reproductive function. Fortunately, advancements in oncofertility (the intersection of oncology and fertility preservation) provide options that allow many women to protect their fertility, even during or after cancer treatment. Here, we explore the most commonly used fertility preservation techniques and factors influencing decision-making for young women with gynecologic cancers.

The Impact of Gynecologic Cancers on Fertility

Gynecologic cancers, which include cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers, can severely affect a woman’s reproductive organs. The specific impacts vary depending on the cancer type, stage, and treatment approach:

• Cervical Cancer: Commonly diagnosed in younger women, cervical cancer is often treated with surgery or radiation therapy, both of which can impact fertility. Early-stage disease may be managed with fertility-preserving surgeries, while advanced cases often require more aggressive treatments.
• Ovarian Cancer: Typically more common in older women, ovarian cancer can still affect young women. Treatment frequently involves removing one or both ovaries, which can lead to premature menopause and infertility.
• Endometrial Cancer: Less common in young women, endometrial cancer may still pose fertility risks. Hormonal therapies or conservative surgeries may help preserve fertility in select cases, but traditional treatment usually involves hysterectomy, which eliminates the ability to conceive [1].

Fertility Preservation Options for Gynecologic Cancer Patients

The choice of fertility preservation method depends on the cancer type, stage, and treatment plan, as well as the woman’s age and personal goals. Here are the most common techniques:

1. Fertility-Sparing Surgery

Fertility-sparing surgeries are often viable options for women with early-stage gynecologic cancers. These procedures aim to remove the cancerous tissue while preserving the reproductive organs. Common fertility-sparing surgeries include:

• Trachelectomy: For early-stage cervical cancer, radical trachelectomy involves the removal of the cervix while leaving the uterus intact, allowing for the possibility of future pregnancy.
• Unilateral Oophorectomy: In cases of early-stage ovarian cancer confined to one ovary, the affected ovary may be removed while preserving the other, potentially allowing the patient to retain ovarian function and fertility.
• Hormone-Sparing Options: For early endometrial cancer, hormonal therapy with progestins or levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs may be used as a temporary treatment option for women who wish to delay hysterectomy until after having children.
1. Egg or Embryo Freezing (Cryopreservation)

Egg and embryo cryopreservation are well-established techniques for preserving fertility in women undergoing treatments that may damage the ovaries [2-5]. Both procedures involve ovarian stimulation to retrieve eggs, which are then frozen either as unfertilized eggs or fertilized embryos:

• Egg Freezing: Involves harvesting and freezing mature eggs for future fertilization. This option is ideal for young women who are single or have no partner but wish to preserve their fertility.
• Embryo Freezing: Eggs are fertilized with sperm to create embryos, which are then frozen for future use. This option is common for women who are married or have a partner, as it provides a slightly higher chance of future pregnancy.

These procedures are generally completed in 2-3 weeks, making them accessible for many women even if they have a narrow treatment window.

1. Ovarian Tissue Freezing (Ovarian Cryopreservation)

Ovarian tissue freezing is a promising technique for preserving fertility in women who cannot delay cancer treatment long enough for egg or embryo freezing. It involves surgically removing ovarian tissue, which is then frozen for potential re-implantation after cancer treatment. This approach has several advantages:

• It is not dependent on hormone stimulation, so it can be performed quickly and is suitable for young girls and adolescents.
• After re-implantation, the ovarian tissue can potentially restore natural hormone production and menstruation, allowing for natural conception in some cases.

Although ovarian tissue freezing is still considered experimental, it has shown success in enabling live births and remains a vital option for women undergoing immediate cancer treatment.

1. Ovarian Suppression with GnRH Agonists

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists are medications that temporarily “shut down” the ovaries, placing them in a dormant state to reduce the impact of chemotherapy. By suppressing ovarian function during treatment, GnRH agonists may protect the ovaries from damage and improve the likelihood of retaining fertility.

This method is widely used in breast cancer treatment and has shown promising results in gynecologic cancers, particularly for patients undergoing chemotherapy. However, its efficacy is variable, and it is often used in combination with other fertility preservation techniques for optimal results.

1. Alternative Family-Building Options

When fertility preservation is not feasible or desired, alternative family-building options can provide a path to parenthood. These options include:

• Donor Eggs or Embryos: Using donated eggs or embryos can allow women to carry a pregnancy, even if their own fertility is compromised.
• Gestational Surrogacy: Surrogacy enables women without a functional uterus to have a biological child using their own frozen eggs or embryos with the help of a surrogate.
• Adoption: Adoption is a meaningful way to build a family, offering a permanent home to children in need.

Considerations and Challenges in Fertility Preservation for Gynecologic Cancer Patients

Deciding on fertility preservation is a highly personal and often complex process, influenced by multiple factors:

1. Timing of Cancer Treatment: The urgency of cancer treatment can limit fertility preservation options. For example, ovarian tissue cryopreservation or GnRH agonists may be suitable for patients with tight treatment timelines, while egg or embryo freezing may require a delay of 2-3 weeks.
2. Stage and Type of Cancer: The specific cancer type and stage play a crucial role in determining suitable fertility preservation options. Early-stage cancers may allow for conservative surgeries, while more advanced cancers may limit fertility-sparing approaches.
3. Emotional and Psychological Factors: Coping with a cancer diagnosis and the prospect of infertility can be overwhelming. Support from oncology teams, fertility specialists, and mental health professionals is essential for helping patients make informed and emotionally sound decisions.
4. Financial and Accessibility Challenges: Fertility preservation can be costly, and insurance coverage for these procedures varies widely. Access to fertility preservation options may also be limited for patients in certain geographic regions or healthcare systems, highlighting the need for greater advocacy and support for oncofertility services [6-8].

Future Directions in Oncofertility for Gynecologic Cancers

As research and technology in oncofertility continue to advance, new techniques may expand the options available to women with gynecologic cancers. Ongoing studies are focused on refining ovarian tissue preservation, improving the success rates of egg and embryo freezing, and identifying markers that could predict the likelihood of fertility loss from cancer treatments.

In addition, increased awareness and education among oncologists and gynecologists about fertility preservation will help ensure that more young women receive timely information about their options. Enhanced patient support systems and accessible funding options are equally essential to make oncofertility care available to all patients, regardless of financial or regional barriers.

Conclusion

Fertility preservation in young women with gynecologic cancers is a rapidly growing field that offers hope to patients wishing to have children after treatment. With a variety of techniques available, from fertility-sparing surgeries to cryopreservation, oncofertility care provides a personalized approach to reproductive health for cancer patients. The decision to pursue fertility preservation is complex, but with appropriate support, patients can make choices that align with their long-term family planning goals and overall well-being.

References

1. Chuong EB, Hannibal RL, Green SL, Baker JC (2013)Evolutionary perspectives into placental biology and disease.Appl Transl Genom 2: 64-69.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Silver RM, Barbour KD (2015)Placenta accreta spectrum: accreta, increta, and percreta. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 42: 381-402.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Bailit JL, Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Wapner RJ (2015)Morbidly adherent placenta treatments and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 125: 683-689.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Tantbirojn P, Crum CP, Parast MM (2008)Pathophysiology ofplacentacreta: the role of decidua and extravillous trophoblast.Placenta 639-645.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Mizejewski GJ (2007)Physiology of alpha-fetoprotein as a biomarker for perinatal distress: relevance to adverse pregnancy outcome. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 23: 993-1004.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Mallett S, Royston P, Dutton S, Waters R, Altman DG (2010)Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review. BMC Med 8: 20.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB (2004)Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE: an analytic survey. BMC Med 2:23.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR (1985)Information needs in office practice: are they being met?. Ann Intern Med 103: 596-599.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref