Journal of Analytical & Bioanalytical Techniques
Open Access

Analytical power; Separation mechanisms; Electrophoretic mobility; Electroosmotic flow; Capillary electrophoresis

Introduction

Capillary electrophoresis (CE) stands as a powerful and versatile analytical technique that has revolutionized the field of separation science [1]. Born out of the desire to overcome the limitations of traditional electrophoresis methods, CE has emerged as a sophisticated tool for the separation and analysis of a wide range of compounds with remarkable precision and efficiency [2]. This technique harnesses the principles of electrophoresis within a narrow capillary tube, allowing for the separation of analytes based on their charge-to-size ratio.

The foundation of capillary electrophoresis lies in its ability to exploit the unique properties of capillaries, which offer superior heat dissipation and minimized band broadening compared to conventional electrophoretic systems [3]. This innovation has led to unprecedented advancements in the separation of ions, small molecules, peptides, proteins, and nucleic acids, making CE a versatile analytical method in various scientific disciplines.

The driving force behind the success of capillary electrophoresis is its adaptability to a multitude of detection methods, [4] including ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption, fluorescence, conductivity, and mass spectrometry. Such diverse detection capabilities enhance the sensitivity and selectivity of CE, making it an indispensable tool for researchers and analysts working in fields such as pharmaceuticals, biochemistry, environmental science, and forensic analysis.

Discussion

Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) is a powerful analytical technique that has gained significant attention in the field of separation science [5]. This discussion focuses on the key aspects of CE, its analytical power, and its applications in various scientific domains.

High separation efficiency

One of the primary strengths of capillary electrophoresis is its exceptional separation efficiency [6]. The technique relies on the movement of charged analytes through a narrow capillary under the influence of an electric field. The small diameter of the capillary and the high voltage applied result in efficient separation based on differences in charge-to-size ratios.

Versatility in analyte types: Capillary electrophoresis is versatile and capable of analyzing a wide range of analytes, including ions, small molecules, proteins, peptides, and nucleic acids [7]. This versatility makes it applicable to diverse scientific disciplines, from pharmaceuticals and environmental monitoring to biochemistry and forensics.

Sensitivity and detection limits: The analytical power of CE is further enhanced by its high sensitivity. The small sample volumes required, combined with the ability to focus and separate analytes effectively, contribute to lower detection limits [8]. This sensitivity is crucial in applications where trace analysis is essential, such as in the determination of impurities in pharmaceuticals.

Rapid analysis and throughput: CE is known for its rapid analysis capabilities. The short migration distances within the capillary and the high electric field strength allow for quick separations, making it an attractive option for high-throughput analyses. This is particularly advantageous in situations where a large number of samples need to be processed efficiently.

Chiral separations: Capillary electrophoresis excels in chiral separations, enabling the differentiation of enantiomers [9]. This is of great importance in the pharmaceutical industry, where the stereochemistry of a drug molecule can significantly impact its biological activity. CE’s ability to separate enantiomers contributes to the comprehensive characterization of pharmaceutical compounds.

Miniaturization and portability: The miniaturization of CE systems allows for portability and the potential for in-field analysis. This feature is valuable in applications such as environmental monitoring, food safety, and point-of-care diagnostics. The ability to perform analyses on-site reduces the need for sample transportation and facilitates real-time decision-making.

Challenges and future perspectives: Despite its many advantages, capillary electrophoresis faces challenges, including issues related to detection sensitivity for certain analytes and sample matrix effects [10]. Ongoing research is focused on addressing these challenges and further improving the technique. Future developments may include advancements in detection methods, capillary coatings, and the integration of CE with other analytical techniques for enhanced capabilities.

Conclusion

Capillary electrophoresis offers a remarkable analytical power characterized by high separation efficiency, versatility, sensitivity, rapid analysis, and suitability for chiral separations. As technology continues to evolve, CE is expected to play an increasingly significant role in various scientific and industrial applications, contributing to advancements in analytical chemistry.

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Wei J, Goldberg MB, Burland V, Venkatesan MM, Deng W, et al. (2003) Complete genome sequence and comparative genomics of Shigella flexneri serotype 2a strain 2457T. Infect Immun 71: 2775-2786.
2. Gupta A, Polyak CS, Bishop RD, Sobel J, Mintz ED (2004) Laboratory-confirmed shigellosis in the United States, 1989- 2002: Epidemiologic trends and patterns. Clin Infect Dis 38: 1372-1377.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Torres AG (2004) Current aspects of Shigella pathogenesis. Rev Latinoam Microbiol 46: 89-97.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

4. Bachand N, Ravel A, Onanga R, Arsenault J, Gonzalez JP (2012) Public health significance of zoonotic bacterial pathogens from bushmeat sold in urban markets of Gabon, Central Africa. J Wildl Dis 48: 785-789.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Iwamoto M, Ayers T, Mahon BE, Swerdlow DL (2010) Epidemiology of seafood-associated infections in the United States. Clin Microbiol Rev 23: 399-411.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Germani Y, Sansonetti PJ (2006) The genus Shigella. The prokaryotes In: Proteobacteria: Gamma Subclass Berlin: Springer 6: 99-122.

Google Scholar

7. Taneja N, Mewara A (2016) Shigellosis: epidemiology in India. Indian J Med Res 143: 565-576.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

8. Jomezadeh N, Babamoradi S, Kalantar E, Javaherizadeh H (2014) Isolation and antibiotic susceptibility of Shigella species from stool samplesamong hospitalized children in Abadan, Iran. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 7: 218.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

9. Ranjbar R, Dallal MMS, Talebi M, Pourshafie MR (2008) Increased isolation and characterization of Shigella sonnei obtained from hospitalized children in Tehran, Iran. J Health Popul Nutr 26: 426.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

10. Pourakbari B, Mamishi S, Mashoori N, Mahboobi N, Ashtiani MH, Afsharpaiman S, et al. (2010) Frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of Shigella species isolated in children medical center hospital, Tehran, Iran, 2001–2006. Braz J Infect Dis 14: 153–157.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at