Exploitation of Herbivorous Reef Fish across Micronesia and Ecological Risk
Received: 02-Aug-2022 / Manuscript No. jmsrd-22-71812 / Editor assigned: 04-Aug-2022 / PreQC No. jmsrd-22-71812 / Reviewed: 18-Aug-2022 / QC No. jmsrd-22-71812 / Revised: 23-Aug-2022 / Manuscript No. jmsrd-22-71812 / Published Date: 30-Aug-2022 DOI: 10.4172/2155-9910.1000358
Abstract
Although they are a significant target of spear fisheries in Micronesia, nominally herbivorous reef fish have a number of functional activities that are crucial in preserving the resilience of coral reefs. Although iconic species are given protection in some places, the effects of fishing on the ecology are little known. By combining capture data with species-specific criteria of ecological relevance and sensitivity to fishing, this study aimed to identify the main possible ecological hazards to herbivorous reef fish from the fishery. There were found to be regional and national ecological concerns.
The difficulties managers may encounter locally in turning attention away from intensively fished species were emphasized by an interview-based study of fishers’ preferences for particular species. Opportunities were found to reduce the ecological dangers caused by a sizable portion of the Micronesian fishery. If implemented, changing fishermen’s targeting behavior toward opportunistically caught species may prove practicable in most nations and may ease fishing pressure on functional roles with low redundancy. We have not yet evaluated how well the policy alternatives backed by the current strategy will support reef function and resilience. However, we believe that by educating fishermen about the consequences of their selective behavior, the species’ conservation may actually advance. Therefore, measures to reduce the catch rates of highly sought-after species as well as initiatives to encourage more deliberate targeting practices may supplement the advantages of the current networks of marine protected areas.
Keywords: Fish; Ecology; Micronesia: Herbivorous; Spearfishing
Introduction
On coral reefs, fish that eat plants support a range of essential system processes. From a system perspective, they contribute to the method of “herbivory” (Hoey & Bellwood, Adam et al., Lefevre & Bellwood, Welsh & Bellwood) or “grazing” (van Alystine, Paddack et al., Cheal et al. Ceccarelli et al.) through a spread of feeding modalities. Grazing may be an important considers this setting that shapes benthic communities and reorganizes them into coral-dominated states following physical disruption (Steneck,). (Folke et al.). Undergrazed reefs, on the opposite hand, could begin to be step by step overtaken by algal turfs or macroalgae (Hughes et al., Mumby & Steneck, Diaz-Pulido et al.), which can successively hinder coral enlisting and recovery (Birrell et al., Hughes et al., Mumby et al.) [1]. These families (hereinafter cited as roving herbivores) are capable of getting a major grazing influence through a range of reef habitats as a result of they feed unceasingly throughout the day (Bellwood) and over comparatively massive spatial scales (owing to their roaming behavior) (Fox & Bellwood, Hoey & Bellwood) [2]. Despite being cited as “herbivores” along, these families embrace regarding one hundred species with a range of ingestion ways (Choat et al., Fox et al., Hoey & Bell wood, Marshell & Mumby). Species are classified into four primary useful categories, together with grazers, macro-algal browsers, small excavators, and big excavators that are more and more cited as “nominally herbivorous” Green & Bellwood [3].
Roving herbivores comprise a major portion of the catch in Micronesia, as they’re within the majority of the Pacific Islands and territories (Kitalong & Dalzell; Dalzell et al.; Gillet & Moy; Rhodes et al.). 75% of the reef fish landed in Micronesia is captured by nocturnal spear fishers the remaining 25% are caught by daytime spearfishers, barrier nets, and hook-and-line strategies (Houk et al.). in step with S. Bejarano’s personal observations, roving herbivores conjure over 70% of reef fish captures in Palau and between 52 and 73% in GU, Pohnpei, and therefore the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (Houk et al.) [4]. In addition, it’s probable that augmented fishing pressure is applied to a range of species of wandering grazers in reaction to management ways that defend massive, prone carnivorous reef fishes. such as humphead percoidean and groupers (Serrani dae). Green bumphead percoid and therefore the species Chelinus undulates Muricatum Bolbometopon Since the night spear -Fishing may be a key a part of Micronesia’s economy. Reef fisheries are necessary useful groupings to focus on and need higher fisheries ways (Houk et al.), there’s an opportunity to analysis the fisheries, verify any potential ecological effects, and influence management plans [5].
In this study, we have a tendency to assess the scale of the roaming creature spear workplace in Palau, Pohnpei, and Guam. To see the first ecological threats we have a tendency to determined species-specific parameters of the workplace. Ecological significance (i.e., perform and sensitivity to fishing and probable impact from grazing, then combined these with the catch volumes for the species [6]. fishery’s ecological dangers to extraordinarily fragile species with necessary useful roles were stressed. Lastly, to see potential suggests that of to cut back these risks, we have a tendency to perform intensive as-fishermen ‘assessments on a species’ desirability. Op -Opportunities to counsel different species with comparable social or economic price were sought-after, but either a lot of resilient or less necessary for the system performance [7].
Materials and Method
The industrial sector of the roving-grazer spear workplace was investigated in 3 countries across small - nesia Palau, with a population of 19 907, is found 741 km east of the Philippines and 1300 km southwest of Guam. Palauan fishers are involved over decreasing stocks of herbivores since the middle 1970s (Kitalong & Dalzell) [8]. As a result, a ban on SCUBA-spearfishing, minimum mesh size, and seasonal closures throughout peak procreative periods for a few species are enacted (Johannes) [9]. Though 87% of Palauan households have a minimum of one member fishing for subsistence, for sale, or each (Fitzpatrick & Donaldson), just one fish market operates daily as a provider of reef fish for locals, restaurants and hotels [10].
Guam may be a US territory with a population of 159 358. The island is encircled by offshore banks, and fringing, patch, submerged, and barrier reefs (Gombos et al.). The spearfishery in Guam evolved from a conventional subsistence, preponderantly free-diving follow to an advertisement and principally SCUBA-based follow (Hensley & Robert Emmet Sherwood) [11]. Though the legal use of Aqua-Lung is thought to be one among the most threats to Guam’s reef workplace, a further concern is that the growing range of immigrants from the federate states of Micronesia who wittingly participates in intensive, frequent and indiscriminate free-dive industrial spearfishing. Guam is nearly freed from fishing restrictions, together with for phytophilous fish. Though basket surveys are conducted by the Division of Aquatic and life Resources (DAWR) since the 1960s, information on spearfishing catches has not been monitored systematically or with spare compartmentalization detail to quantify the impacts of workplace on individual species of herbivores [12].
Ecologically vital metrics: For parrotfishes, the measures of a species’ ecological worth enclosed its practical role and potential grazing influence (sensu inexperienced & Bellwood) and (PGI). The daily bite rate (bite rate feeding day length), biting space, and fish abundance were accustomed cypher the species PGI [13]. Bite space was calculable victimization species-specific models that describe its subject relationship with metal (Bejarano). This methodology was used as a cheap various to the standard technique of activity parrot fish bite scars directly on the substrate (Bellwood & Choat, Bellwood, Fox & Bellwood, Bonaldo & Bellwood), that met many limitations during this study. Firstly, spearfishing pressure is probably going to cause fish to be cautious of different, therefore observers were usually unable to approach people closely enough to spot their actual bite location during this study [14].
Because PGI couldn’t be calculated for siganids and acanthurids, the species practical role (sensu inexperienced & Bellwood) was used as their single metric of ecological importance.
Discussion
Managers are increasingly adopting an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management in an effort to maintain ecosystem function and resilience in the face of climate change (Pikitch et al.). Voluntary shifts in fishers’ behavior might alleviate some of these risks, particularly for species that are caught opportunistically (e.g. Naso tonga nus, N. brachycentron and Chloru rus frontalis). Op portunities to recommend alternative targets to re place the most desirable targets (e.g. N. unicornis, C. microrhinos and C. bicolor) were scarce, suggesting that control by regulation rather than voluntary choices might be required [15]. The concerns associated with the exploitation of Naso unicornis support previous studies where fishermen acknowledged significant declines of this species over the last 50 year (Kitalong & Dalzell). From a functional perspective, diminished populations of this vulnerable browser may hinder the capacity of Micronesian reefs to revert from adverse changes generating macroalgal dominance. Given the high value of N. unicornis among fishers, recommending Acanthurus xanthopterus as an alternative species was found to be unfeasible. Such a switch in target may be further complicated by the fact that these species occupy different habitats. However, short-term management of this type will only succeed if densities of N. unicornis are routinely maintained at levels that are demographically relevant and sensitive to a short term change in fishing mortality [16].
The intricate ecological implication of reducing the abundance of certain functional groups on Pacific reefs remains to be empirically tested. Moreover, there is much to be learned about the role of fisheries in decreasing species diversity and disturbing the feeding complementarity within the roving-grazer trophic guild (Burkepile & Hay) and within functional groups (Fox & Bellwood) [17]. Although a relatively high functional redundancy may favors the resilience of Pacific reefs (Bellwood et al., Roff & Mumby), there is low redundancy within functional roles (e.g. Fox & Bellwood). Therefore, risks of phaseshifts are by no means improbable where overfishing contributes to disequilibrium between algal production and consumption [18].
Conclusion
This research merely represents the first step towards creating an actual ecosystem-based fisheries policy for herbivores on coral reefs. A more thorough approach would establish catch limits for specific species or functional groups in accordance with a clear understanding of the species’ role in grazing, the significance of grazing in preventing unfavorable community shifts after disturbance, and a demographic analysis of the response of a given reef fish species to fishing mortality. At this point, we have used the information on herbivore behavior that is currently accessible and taken into account vulnerability based on life history traits. There is still much to learn about the significance of setting key amounts of grazing for system resilience and having a diversified herbivore assemblage (Burkepile & Hay).
Acknowledgement
None
Conflict of Interest
None
References
- Mantyka CS, Bellwood DR (2007) Direct evaluation of macroalgal removal by herbivorous coral reef fishes. Coral Reefs 26: 435-442.
- Kulbicki M, Guillemot N, Amand M (2005) A general approach to length–weight relationships for New Caledonian lagoon fishes. Cybium 29: 235-252.
- Holling CS (1992) Cross-scale morphology, geometry and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62: 447-502.
- Hay ME (1981) Herbivory, algal distribution, and the maintenance of between-habitat diversity on a tropical fringing reef. Am Nat 118: 520-540.
- Fox RJ, Bellwood DR (2008a) Direct versus indirect methods of quantifying herbivore grazing impact on a coral reef. Mar Biol 154: 325-334.
- Depczynski M, Bellwood DR (2003) The role of cryptobenthic reef fishes in coral reef trophodynamics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 256:183-191.
- Choat JH, Clements KD, Robbins WD (2002) The trophic status of herbivorous fishes on coral reefs 1: Dietary analyses. Mar Biol 140: 613-623.
- Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Hoey AS (2006) Sleeping functional group drives coral-reef recovery. Curr Biol 16: 2434-2439.
- Petraitis PS, Latham RE (1999) The importance of scale in testing the origins of alternative community states. Ecology 80: 429-442.
- Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity: ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8: 857-874.
- Wilson SK, Bellwood DR, Choat JH, Furnas MJ (2003) Detritus in the epilithic algal matrix and its use by coral reef fishes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 41: 279-309.
- Wellington GM (1982) Depth zonation of corals in the Gulf of Panama: control and facilitation by resident reef fihes. Ecol Monogr 52: 223-241.
- Porter KG (1977) The plant-animal interface in freshwater ecosystems. Am Sci 65: 159-170.
- Ogden JC, Lobel PS (1978) The role of herbivorous fishes and urchins in coral reef communities. Env Biol Fish 3: 49-63.
- Robertson DR, Sweatman HPA, Fletcher EA, Cleland MG (1976) Schooling as a mechanism for circumventing the territoriality of competitors. Ecology 57: 1208-1220.
- Sterner RW (1986) Herbivores’ direct and indirect effects on algal populations. Science 231:605-607.
- Hall R (1997) Cenozoic plate tectonic reconstructions of SE Asia. Geol Soc London Spec Publ 126: 11-23.
- Gordon AL, Susanto RD, Vranes K (2003) Cool Indonesian throughflow as a consequence of restricted surface layer flow. Nature 425: 824-828.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Citation: Ramirez M (2022) Exploitation of Herbivorous Reef Fish across Micronesia and Ecological Risk. J Marine Sci Res Dev 12: 358. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9910.1000358
Copyright: © 2022 Ramirez M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Share This Article
Recommended Journals
Open Access Journals
Article Tools
Article Usage
- Total views: 1792
- [From(publication date): 0-2022 - Dec 20, 2024]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 1553
- PDF downloads: 239