ISSN: 2155-9910

Journal of Marine Science: Research & Development
Open Access

Like us on:

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Review Article   
  • J Marine Sci Res Dev 2022, Vol 12(7): 350
  • DOI: 10.4172/2155-9910.1000350

Examining Biofouling in Ship Internal Seawater Systems

Chhaya Chaudhary*
Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
*Corresponding Author: Chhaya Chaudhary, Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand, Email: chhayachaudhary@gmail.com

Received: 06-Jul-2022 / Manuscript No. jmsrd-22-70559 / Editor assigned: 08-Jul-2022 / PreQC No. jmsrd-22-70559 / Reviewed: 22-Jul-2022 / QC No. jmsrd-22-70559 / Revised: 27-Jul-2022 / Manuscript No. jmsrd-22-70559 / Published Date: 03-Aug-2022 DOI: 10.4172/2155-9910.1000350

Abstract

 Internal seawater systems (ISS) are essential to a maritime vessel's efficient operation. On board ships, sea water is pumped for a variety of purposes, notably for water provision, cooling capacity, and temperature control (e.g., air conditioners, and electrical systems) (e.g., drinking, firefighting, steam, and ballast). Even while sea water may only briefly enter a ship's internal space system (ISS), it can spread bacteria and macroorganism larvae throughout the system, causing biofouling accumulation that may compromise system integrity or performance. ISS has the ability to support biological invasions by acting as a sub-vector of species translocations. Reports and studies of ISS biofouling are scarce, and much of the specialized literature is decade’s old, due to the difficulty of accessing ISS interior components. The effects of biofouling on ISS and vessel operations are based on increased pipework and equipment surface roughness, constrained water flow, corrosion and component impingement, decreased surface functional efficiency, and potential pathogen contamination that may be harmful to aquatic life and humans. Antifouling coatings and marine growth prevention systems are the key tools used to regulate biofouling, but there are few reliable and easily accessible studies on how effective these systems are in ISS. The level of biofouling in the ISS of the current commercial fleet and the effectiveness of preventative devices need more investigation. Ultimately, decisions based on this information can help ship operators operate more efficiently and guarantee that any potential biosecurity hazards are properly managed

Keywords:  Biofouling; Internal Seawater Systems (ISS); Macroorganism; Fresh water

Keywords

Biofouling; Internal Seawater Systems (ISS); Macroorganism; Fresh water

Introduction

Biofouling may be a present and enduring downside for the maritime shipping business, requiring constant management to optimize operational performance. The hydraulics deficiencies of augmented surface roughness will come on fuel prices to levels that greatly exceed biofouling management prices. As such, the motivation for proactive, or preventive, biofouling management of external submerged surfaces is clear for vessel operators. The same understanding of biofouling incidence and impairment of ships’ internal brine systems (ISS)-drawing from numerous fields of engineering, ship operations, biology, and economics-has not been developed despite long-standing queries on the subject. The present lack of quantitative information on the impacts of biofouling among ISS ends up in associate underappreciation of potential direct and indirect advantages of ISS biofouling management [2]. Direct advantages area unit doubtless to incorporate augmented operational potency and irresponsibleness, whereas indirect advantages embody reducing biosecurity risks related to species translocations. Ships’ ISS deliver close ocean water to a variety of on-board locations via a network of pipes and pumps. This brine delivery system is employed for a range of functions crucial to the correct functioning of ships, as well as engine cooling, ballasting, firefighting, fresh production, aircon, and alternative specialty functions addicted to the ship kind. In extreme things, impairment of those systems will threaten the fitness of vessels, endanger crew and passengers, and injury product [3].

The ISS becomes compromised when one of its components or the entire system is affected by obstructions, malfunctions, or other operational issues. Blockages could be caused by ice, marine organisms (like jellyfish and krill), marine debris (like plastic bags), or the steady buildup of sediments between ISS components. In most cases, breakdown is caused by mechanical or electrical defects, corrosion, or a combination of things (Edyvean, 2010) [4].

The Function, Configuration, and Goal of the ISS

Sea water has been employed in giant quantities on board ships since the first twentieth century once steel ships replaced picket ones,combustion engines became the dominant propulsion for oceangoing vessels, and ocean water became a dominant supply of ballast. additionally to being plentiful, cheap, and simply accessible, ocean water features a vary of useful properties which will be exploited for shipping functions, as well as thermal physical phenomenon, density, fire-quenching, and a supply for fresh generation [5]. A key ISS operate requiring continual waterflow is that the removal of warmth from engine instrumentality or conversion of gases to liquids in condensers. Ocean water absorbs heat from engine systems and its abundance suggests that the warmth is often subtle and discharged instead of recirculated or subjected to treatment [6]. The most firefighting capability and mechanical device systems on board ships also are provided with ocean water, as are general service shops that use ocean water intermittently for improvement and deck wash. Ships extract their fresh provides victimization chemical change plants, and air-con and refrigeration systems need ocean water as an agent in condensers [7]. The configuration, construction, and scale of ships’ ISS vary greatly among vessel sorts, with most ISS being tailored installations that loosely adhere to classification society necessities for material kind, minimum essential dimensions, and labeling [8].

Sea Water Flowing Through the ISS: The ocean chest acts as a reservoir or “halfway house” for sea water, straddling the house between the 12 to 20-knot streamline flow adjacent to a ship’s external hull and therefore the suction facet of intake pipes. The chest prevents countervailing forces that might cause water cavitation that reduces or disrupts pumping potency of incoming water whereas conjointly increasing propulsion drag for the ship chest redundancy is commonplace, with “high” and “low” ocean chests pertaining to their position on the hull: low ocean chests generally draw water at or close to the flat bottom of the hull and international waters chests are sometimes situated on the vertical facet of a ship’s hull. Ship operators switch intake suction between ocean chests supported water depths and out there clearance to the seafloor, which means high sea chests are usually employed in ports to cut back the chance of sediment entrainment whereas low sea chests are used once the ship is current or in deeper anchorage [9, 10].

Sea water cooling systems are designed to be as short and direct as attainable because of acknowledged problems with ISS biofouling and therefore the expense of corrosion-resistant materials. LT fresh water is then pumped up by LT pumps to instrumentality that wants cooling. This decoupling from ocean water makes the temperature management of secondary systems easier because it avoids or reduces issues caused by (1) biofouling of internal surfaces; and (2) the influence of water temperature fluctuations [11].

Overall, ISS are complicated systems whereby ocean water passes grates, chambers, pipes, fittings, valves, strainers, pumps, seals, gaskets, filters, plates, tubes, tanks and membranes. These parts are often made from (or contain) an enormous diversity of fabric sorts, including, however not restricted to steel, stainless-steel, brass, bronze, aluminum, copper-nickel, titanium, rubber, neoprene, epoxy, nylon, polypropene, plastic, silicone, coatings, and anodes [12]. Ocean water will endure a spread of temperature fluctuations, as well as discharges of 60°C and conversion to steam. Up-taken ocean water will traverse ISS areas of variable sizes, starting from millimeters wide (in heat exchangers) to giant tanks many meters high, wide, or long. Water residence times vary from minutes for continuous flow-through cooling systems to days or weeks for ballast systems [13].

Functional ISS Components: Using ocean water in engine cooling systems makes it attainable to possess much sized heat transfer instrumentality on ships at intervals a “single pass” open system that transfers the warmth through brine (typically via a device instead of direct raw water cooling) that’s discharged overboard or redirects this energy to different functions [14]. Economical heat exchange prevents harmful equipment failure and reduces the speed of fuel consumption that helps maintain power. This essential operate explains the necessity for continuous brine flow and also the giant volumes needed to keep up these systems [15]. There are two main forms of heat exchangers to service engine cooling: plate coolers and shell-and-tube (or pipe) coolers. Each sorts work to transfer heat from hot fresh water at intervals a closed-loop engine cooling system to the colder ocean water traversing the cooling chamber at intervals an open brine system. These compartments aren’t accessible from within the ship and whereas they’re generally coated with protective or foul-release coatings to cut back biofouling accumulation, the wind for warmth exchange usually stay uncoated [16].

Floodable loading holds are used as ballast tanks on some industrial ships (e.g., bulk carriers) however dedicated ballast tanks between the hull and internal structure (i.e., double bottoms, wing- and deep tanks) on all ships are often varied, cosmopolitan, and contain complicated internal configurations [17]. Longitudinal and cross structures, baffles, ledges, stairs, struts, and platforms contribute to convoluted flow patterns throughout flooding and emptying, as well as localized lowflow or dead zones. A lot of recently, ballast treatment systems are put in on ships that are meant to regulate the numbers of organisms in ballast tank water. The waste heats from engines are often redirected via ISS to treat ballast water [18].

Firefighting systems on ships are connected to crossover pipes or freelance ISS (usually both) to produce ocean water to main firefighting installations (emergency mains with hose connections), mechanical device systems, and water spray systems [19]. The capability and configuration of the firefighting system is extremely regulated, as well as placement and numbers of pumps, hydrants, and hoses. Once in use, ocean water is employed once the fresh water is discharged and also the sub-system is backfilled with fresh water once use. Ultimately, the firefighting system is dependent on functioning ISS pumps and pipes [20].

Desalination plants on board ships offer on-demand fresh water. There are two main forms of desalinization plant provided with raw ocean water from ISS: distillation generators and reverse diffusion systems. For distillation generators, ocean water passes through an evaporator and also the succeeding steam through a condenser to provide fresh water [21]. Distillation water manufacturers operate in a very vacuum to modify evaporation at 40-45°C and use waste heat from the engine’s cylinder cooling water as a heating supply. Reverse diffusion systems apply pressure to the brine aspect of a membraneseparated chamber to provide fresh water on the opposite aspect. The latter systems will have brine heaters upstream of the unit to boost potency for ships operative in cold waters. Each system is often littered with biofouling and entrained aggregation at filters simply upstream of the systems [22, 23].

The ISS is biofouling

The integrity of the ISS or its element instrumentation, further because the operation of these element systems will all be hampered by biofouling throughout.

The internal surfaces of ISS square measure subjected to biofouling pressure as a result of raw ocean water, especially ocean water related to coastal marine (and port) environments, carries microorganisms and larval stages of a broad vary of marine macroorganisms from the encircling atmosphere [24]. As such, biofouling organisms could expertise quite stable conditions, and there is also eventualities wherever conditions square measure a lot of favorable and stable inside ISS than on external hull surfaces and niche areas (e.g., as a result of it’s a “protected” area with a continuing supply of ocean water for food and respiration, or if heat exchangers yield a lot of appropriate temperatures for given biofouling organisms) [25].

Seas chests are represented as ideal environments for biofouling, biofilms, and mobile marine species as a result of their protected areas with providers of nutrients and clean ocean water, however while not sturdy current flows that might cause dislodgment. Many studies that evaluated diverseness or abundance of marine organisms in ocean chests have found a broad array of taxa that don’t seem to be typically found elsewhere in ship biofouling assemblages. A lot of recently, Lewis (2016) reportable pictures from dry dock surveys of chest grates that were entirely lined with hard-bodied macrofouling, indicating vital occlusion of the grate gaps [26].

Sea strainers square measure one amongst the foremost accessible internal nodes of ISS and square measure set inside meters of the ocean chest. As a result of they’ll be isolated, drained, and opened whereas the vessel is afloat, ocean strainers may be habitually inspected and clean. This follow isn’t essentially mirrored in reports from the literature on biofouling prevalence in ocean strainers and their housings [27].

The impact of biofouling on cooling system potency drives cooling system observance, particularly inside device parts. As these systems don’t seem to be simply accessible, there square measure comparatively few studies with reference to biofouling of ship cooling systems. Whereas the supply and mechanisms of fouling square measure necessary for identification and resolution fouling issues, reports don’t continuously distinguish among them.

Ballast tanks square measure giant compartments in ships providing a whole bunch to thousands of sq. meters for potential biofouling settlement. Ballast tank collection ranges in size from viruses to fish, together with some specimens up to 25 cm long (Davidson pers. obs.) suggesting some uncertainty concerning longevity and growth for a few species in ballast tanks and also the size of organisms which will experience ships’ pumps. Ballast treatment of inflowing water is probably going to more cut back the danger of biofouling in these systems [28].

Biofouling in overboard pipes is essentially unreported, aside from points of discharge at the outer hull, that could be a lot of heterogeneous surface than adjacent vertical hull surfaces. These purpose locations may be colonized by biofouling at the mouth of the pipe. This biofouling is an element of the external biofouling community on a comparatively minor external niche space instead of biofouling derived from water passing through ISS [29].

Discussion and Conclusion

The incidence and impact of biofouling in ships’ ISS may be a curious case whereby the importance of the problem is wide acknowledged however isn’t supported by loosely offered literature or supporting knowledge from acceptable sample sizes of ships. This contradiction is also as a result of knowledge on ISS operations and functioning square measure scattered among personal business and navy accounts, business bulletins and pay walled sources, and standards and code texts. Most of the examples within the literature describe a development of ISS issues coupled to biofouling (without biofouling data) or individual case-study examples to focus on the problem. Limited accessibility to the interior surfaces of most ISS whereas vessels square measure afloat is without doubt an element during a lack of ISS biofouling sampling that contributes to a poor understanding of biofouling impacts on these systems. This poor understanding was noted decades past in relevance transport of non-indigenous species with a presumption that such instances were rare as a result of ISS weren’t allowable to become heavily fouled. Since then, though few studies are conducted, the role of bound elements of ISS has been highlighted as biofouling hotspots and therefore sub-vectors for species translocations, notably ocean chests and simply accessible organ pipe. It is not clear what quantity of a job biofouling plays within the style stage of the many ISS elements, aside from heat exchangers. Notably, hull surfaces and mechanical device systems also are presently designed to think about fluid dynamics and power, however not biofouling, and therefore have confidence post-construction remedies to manage biofouling that reduces potency to below style specifications. in contrast to external biofouling, however, quantitative ship-scale models of the impacts of biofouling on ISS don’t seem to exist. Some activity and modeling have occurred sure as shooting elements (e.g., heat exchangers), providing a potential templet for abundant broader evaluations across fashionable business ships beneath a range of environmental and operational conditions. There also are anecdotal reports of individual problems or incidents, broader understanding of drivers of issues (e.g., MIC), and bigger macro-scale estimates of impact of corrosion and biofouling on alternative water use industries (e.g., energy production industries).

Developing data at the ship scale is important to push understanding of biofouling at intervals ISS, the operational impact of its incidence, and also the advantages of ISS biofouling management. Reductions in biofouling for operational functions would contribute to reductions in international and domestic biofouling transfers with ships and associated biosecurity risks. Incorporating direct and indirect economic elements to ship-scale ISS models is probably going to supply compelling proof to enhance alignment between business and environmental priorities.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

  1. Bailey SA, Duggan IC, Jenkins PT, Mac Isaac HJ (2005) Invertebrate resting stages in residual ballast sediment of transoceanic ships. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62: 1090-1103.
  2. Google Scholar

  3. Paul-Pont I, Dhand NK, Whittington RJ (2013) Spatial distribution of mortality in Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas: reflection on mechanisms of OsHV-1 transmission. Dis Aquat Organ 105: 127-138.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Evans O, Paul-Pont I, Hick P, Whittington RJ (2014) A simple centrifugation method for improving the detection of Ostreid herpesvirus-1 (OsHV-1) in natural seawater samples with an assessment of the potential for particulate attachment. J Virol Methods 210: 59-66.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Peeler EJ, Allan Reese R, Cheslett DL, Geoghegan F, Power A, et al. (2012) Investigation of mortality in Pacific oysters associated with Ostreid herpesvirus-1 μVar in the Republic of Ireland in 2009. Prev Vet Med 105: 136-143.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Jenkins C, Hick P, Gabor M, Spiers Z, Fell SA, et al. (2013) Identification and characterisation of an ostreid herpesvirus-1 microvariant (OsHV-1 micro-var) in Crassostrea gigas (Pacific oysters) in Australia. Dis Aquat Organ 105: 109-126.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Pernet F, Lagarde F, Jeannee N, Daigle G, Barret J, et al. (2014) Spatial and temporal dynamics of mass mortalities in oysters is influenced by energetic reserves and food quality. PLoS One 9: e88469.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Beldomenico PM, Telfer S, Gebert S, Lukomski L, Bennett M, et al. (2009) The vicious circle and infection intensity: The case of Trypanosoma microti in field vole populations. Epidemics 1: 162-167.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Ostfeld RS, Glass GE, Keesing F (2005) Spatial epidemiology: an emerging (or re-emerging) discipline. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 328-336.
  16. Indexed at, Google scholar , Crossref

  17. Thieltges D, Reise K (2007) Spatial heterogeneity in parasite infections at different spatial scales in an intertidal bivalve. Oecologia 150: 569-581.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Esch GW, Curtis LA, Barger MA (2001) A perspective on the ecology of trematode communities in snails. Parasitology 123: S57-S75.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  21. Clegg TA, Morrissey T, Geoghegan F, Martin SW, Lyons K, et al. (2014) Risk factors associated with increased mortality of farmed Pacific oysters in Ireland during 2011. Prev Vet Med 113: 257-267.
  22. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  23. Gray BR, Bushek D, Drane JW, Porter D (2009) Associations between land use and Perkinsus marinus infection of eastern oysters in a high salinity, partially urbanized estuary. Ecotoxicology 18: 259-269.
  24. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  25. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6: 461-464.
  26. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  27. Davison AJ, Trus BL, Cheng N, Steven A, Watson MS, et al. (2005) A novel class of herpesvirus with bivalve hosts. J Gen Virol 86: 41-53.
  28. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  29. Davison A, Eberle R, Ehlers B, Hayward G, McGeoch D, et al. (2009) The order Herpesvirales. Arch Virol 154: 171-177.
  30. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  31. Coberley SS, Condit RC, Herbst LH, Klein PA (2002) Identification and expression of immunogenic proteins of a disease-associated marine turtle herpesvirus. J Virol 76: 10553–10558.
  32. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  33. Pepin JF, Riou A, Renault T (2008) Rapid and sensitive detection of ostreid herpesvirus 1 in oyster samples by real-time PCR. J Virol Methods 149: 269-276.
  34. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  35. Evans AS (1976) Causation and disease: the Henle-Koch postulates revisited. Yale J Biol Med 49: 175-195.
  36. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  37. Burge CA, Griffin FJ, Friedman CS (2006) Mortality and herpesvirus infections of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas in Tomales Bay, California, USA. Dis Aquat Org 72: 31-43.
  38. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  39. Lyman MG, Enquist LW (2009) Herpesvirus interactions with the host cytoskeleton. J Virol 83: 2058-2066.
  40. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  41. Ch'ng TH, Enquist LW (2005) Neuron-to-cell spread of pseudorabies virus in a compartmented neuronal culture system. J Virol 79: 10875-10889.
  42. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  43. Gennerich AA, Carter P, Reck-Peterson SL, Vale RD (2007) Force-induced bidirectional stepping of cytoplasmic dynein. Cell 13: 1952-1965.
  44. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  45. Scott ES, O'Hare P (2001) Fate of the inner nuclear membrane protein lamin B receptor and nuclear lamins in herpes simplex virus type 1 infection. J Virol 75: 8818-8830.
  46. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  47. Ziegler RJ, Herman RE (1980) Peripheral infection in culture of rat sensory neurons by herpes simplex virus. Infect Immun 28: 620-623.
  48. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  49. Schikorski D, Faury N, Pepin JF, Saulnier D, Tourbiez D, et al. (2011) Experimental Ostreid herpesvirus 1 (OsHV-1) infection of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas: Kinetics of virus DNA detection by q-PCR in seawater and in oyster samples. Virus Res 155: 28-34.
  50. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  51. Sharon-Friling R, Goodhouse J, Colberg-Poley AM, Shenk T (2006) Human cytomegalovirus pUL37x1 induces the release of endoplasmic reticulum calcium stores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 19117-19122.
  52. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  53. Salama NKG, Collins CM, Fraser JG, Dunn J, Pert CC, et al. (2013) Development and assessment of a biophysical dispersal model for sea lice. J Fish Dis 36: 323-337.
  54. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  55. Soudant P, Chu F-LE, Volety A (2013) Host-parasite interactions: Marine bivalve molluscs and protozoan parasites, Perkinsus species. J Invertebr Pathol 114: 196-216.
  56. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  57. Normand J, Blin J-L, Jouaux A (2014) Rearing practices identified as risk factors for ostreid herpesvirus 1 (OsHV-1) infection in Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas spat. Dis Aquat Organ 110: 201-211.
  58. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Top