Evaluation of Synergistic Effect Organic and Inorganic Fertilizing System on Grain Yield of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Southern Tigray, Northern Ethiopia

Assefa Workineh Chekolle^*

Tigray Agricultural Research Institute (TARI), Alamata Agricultural Research Center, Alamata, Ethiopia

*Corresponding Author:

Assefa Workineh Chekolle
Tigray Agricultural Research Institute (TARI)
Alamata Agricultural Research Center
PO Box 56, Alamata, Ethiopia
Tel: 251914168651
E-mail: assefaw.02@gmail.com

Received Date: March 21, 2017; Accepted Date: March 25, 2017; Published Date: April 01, 2017

Citation: Chekolle AW (2017) Evaluation of Synergistic Effect Organic and Inorganic Fertilizing System on Grain Yield of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Southern Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Adv Crop Sci Tech 5:269. doi: 10.4172/2329- 8863.1000269

Copyright: © 2017 Chekolle AW. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Advances in Crop Science and Technology

Abstract

Study on the integrated effect of organic and chemical fertilizer levels on bread wheat was conducted in 2013 cropping season at high lands of Adi-golo and Mekan districts of Tigray, Ethiopia with the objective of determining the optimum integration of organic and inorganic fertilization for bread wheat production. The field experiment consists four level of N/P2O5 (0/0, 23/23, 46/46 and 69/69 kg ha-1) and five level of farmyard manure (0, 4, 6, 8 and 10 t ha- 1) arranged in factorial RCBD with three replications. Organic and chemical fertilizer applications had significant (P<0.05) effect on grain yield in the sites. Higher grain yield (5.04 and 2.19 t ha-1) with acceptable marginal of rate return (MRR=1228.9 and 2788.9%) were obtained in the combined application of 46/46 N/P205 kg ha-1+6 t ha-1 farmyard manure and 46/46 N/P2O5 kg ha-1+10 t ha-1 farmyard manure at Adi-golo and Mekan areas respectively. Combined applications of organic and chemical fertilizers are more effective than sole application of organic or chemical fertilizers for sustainable Wheat and soil productivity enhancement.

Keywords

Organic fertilizer; Chemical fertilizer; Wheat; Manure

Introduction

Wheat is one of the most important cereals cultivated in Ethiopia. In area of production, wheat ranks 4^th after Teff, Maize and Sorghum and 3^rd in total grain production after Maize and Teff and 2^nd in yield to Maize. It is cultivated by 4.614 million farmers and accounts for more than 17.9% of the total cereal production [1]. However, the mean national yield is 2.5 t ha^-1, which is 13 and 32% far below Africa and world average productivity respectively [2]. The low yield of wheat in Ethiopia is primarily due to depleted soil fertility [3-6], little or no addition of fertilizers [3,7,8], unavailability of other modern crop management inputs [3], soil degradation [9,10], and poor rainfall distribution and wheat diseases [11]. Ethiopia has one of the highest rates of nutrient depletion in sub Saharan Africa. The estimated annual loss of phosphorus and nitrogen resulting from the use of dung and crop residues for fuel is equivalent to the total amount of commercial fertilizer use [12]. Nitrogen and Phosphorus are among the most productivity limiting nutrients [13-15]. Land degradation and nutrient depletion are exacerbated by overgrazing, deforestation, population pressure and the poor land use planning [12].

Therefore managing soil fertility is crucial for improving agricultural productivity Ethiopia. Nevertheless, many farmers refrain from using fertilizer due to escalating costs [16], uncertainty about the economic returns to fertilizing food crops and, more often, lack of knowledge as to which kinds and rates of fertilizers are suitable [17]. The physical application rates of fertilizer are also well-below those recommended and estimated. Only 30-40% of Ethiopian smallholders use fertilizer [18] and the physical application rates of fertilizer are on average only 37-40 kg ha^-1.

Application of organic materials alone or in combination with inorganic fertilizer helped in maintenance of soil fertility and crop productivity [19- 21]. The positive influence of organic fertilizers on soil fertility, on crop yield and quality has been also indicated in the research finding of [22- 24]. Manures contribute to improve water storage, infiltration capacity and reduce erosion and loss of nutrients [25-27].

Though there are not any concurrent studies conducted to evaluate the combined effects of organic and chemical fertilizers in wheat crop production in the study area, research efforts on how to use of farmyard manure together with chemical fertilizers could be one alternative solution for sustainable fertility management and improving wheat yield. Thus, this study was designed to evaluate the effects of different integrated organic and chemical fertilizers on grain yield of bread wheat.

Materials and Methods

The study area

The study was conducted high land areas of ofla (Adigolo, 39.33°E, 12.31°N and having an elevation 2490 m.a.s.l) and Enda Mehoni (Mekan, 39.32°E and 12.44°N and having an elevation 2430 m.a.s.l) districts of southern Tigray, northern Ethiopia in 2013 main cropping season. Rainfall is bimodal, with a short rainy season from February- March (Belg) and the main rainy season from June-September (Kiremt). The rainfall pattern of the study sites is presented in Figures 1 and 2. The major crops grown in the area are Wheat (Triticum aestivum L), Barley (Hordium vulgare) and Fababean. Mixed crop-livestock farming system is an agricultural production system practiced in the study areas. Both study sites have long cereal based cropping history. The dominant soil type for the study area is vertisols with minimum and maximum air temperature 8 and 22°C respectively.

Figure 1: Monthly Rainfall, Average Maximum (Max. T.) and Minimum (Min. T.) Temperature of the Adi-golo in 2013 [28].

Figure 2: Monthly Rainfall, Average Maximum (Max. T.) and Minimum (Min. T.) Temperature of the Mekan in 2013 [28].

Treatments and experimental design

The Farmyard manure (FYM) used for the experiment was well decomposed and applied all at planting with full dose of Phosphorus fertilizer while, N fertilizer was applied in split form with 1/3^rd of the dose applied at planting and the remaining 2/3^rd after 40 days of sowing. The source of phosphorus and N fertilizer was triple supper phosphate (46% P₂O₅) and Urea (46% N) respectively. Treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The treatments consists four level of N/P₂0₅ combination (0/0, 23/23, 46/46 and 69/69 kg ha^-1) and Five levels of farmyard manure (0, 4, 6, 8 and 10 tone ha^-1) and their interactions. The variety used in the experiment was Mekelle3.

Data collected

Soils data collection: Soil sampling, sample preparation and analysis: Composite surface soil samples were collected using Auger from five to ten spots from each block to form one composite soil sample per block for initial soil fertility evaluation from experimental fields (0-30 cm depth). Similarly, samples were collected after harvest from each plot and then composited by replication to obtain one representative sample per treatment. Particle-size distribution was determined using hydrometer method [28,29]. Soil pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were measured in soil: water extracts (1:2.5) [30]. Organic matter (OM) content was determined by the Walkley and Black method [31]. Total nitrogen (N) was analyzed by Kjeldhal method [32]. Available phosphorus (P) was determined using Olsen method [33]. One molar neutral ammonium acetate (pH=7) was used to extract the exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, K and Na) [34].

Grain yield (kg plot^-1): The grain yield was taken from each plot by excluding the border rows and adjusted to 12.5% moisture content and then converted to hectare basis.

Statistical analysis

The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) on the agronomic traits was computed using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of SAS [35] was following the standard procedures of ANOVA for Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) [36] for the full set of treatments. The differences among farming practices were considered significant if the P-values were ≤ 0.05 and Least Significance Difference (LSD) was used to compare among farming systems. For the on farm trials analysis was done using descriptive analysis.

Partial budget analysis

Grain yield data for the organic and in organic fertilizers effects were subjected to economic analysis, using the CIMMYT [37] partial budget methodology to evaluate the economic profitability of fertilizer and manure options for determination of the economic optimum rate. NP fertilizer rates and manure were analyzed separately by calculating Gross Benefit (GB), Total Costs that Vary (TCV), Net Benefit (NB), and the Marginal Rate of Return (MRR) for each treatment (that is, relative to the next lowest cost or non-dominated treatment for the NP and manure). Dominance analysis was used to screen treatments which have higher variable cost and lower net return and dominated treatment removed from further consideration.

Results and Discussion

Soil physical-chemical properties

According to the soil PH rating established by Tekalign [38] the mean pH values of the composite surface soil samples of the experimental site was categorized under the slightly neutral soil reaction class. The organic matter contents were in the range of 0.68-0.98% on the surface soils (Table 1). These values fall under very low range based on the ratings of soil test values established by Tekalign [38] Total nitrogen levels of the study sites ranges between 0.08 and 0.09% and are taken as very low [39]. It, therefore soils of the study areas are low to very low in their total nitrogen status (Table 1). Moreover, according to Olsen et al. [33] rating, the average available phosphorus contents of the composite surface soil samples of the experimental site fall under the low P status (Table 1). This indicate the low fertility status of the soil aggravated by continuous cereal based cultivation, lack of incorporation of organic materials in to the soils through mulching or crop residues and frequent tillage. Continuous cropping and inadequate replacement of nutrients removed in harvested materials or lose through erosion and leaching has been the major causes of soil fertility decline. The electrical conductivity ranged from 0.01 to 0.21 dSm−1 indicating that these soils have a low content of soluble salts and that there is no danger of salinity in the study areas (Table 1).

Table 1: Soil physico-chemical properties of the study sites.

Grain yield

The statistical analysis revealed significant (p ≤ 0.05) main and interaction effect of farmyard manure and NP fertilizers on grain yield of bread wheat (Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5). Maximum grain yield was obtained in treatment receiving combined application of 46/46 kgha^-1 N/P₂0₅+6 tone ha^-1 of farmyard manure for Adi-golo and 46/46 kgha^-1 N/P₂0₅+10 tone ha^-1 of farmyard manure for Mekan areas respectively; however the lowest grain yield was recorded on plots without any fertilizer application. Hence, this organic and inorganic fertilizing system integration generated 144% and 47% yield increment compared to the control treatment and current NP fertilizer recommendation respectively at Adi-golo. Similarly 162.5% and 12.8% yield increment was obtained from combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizer compared to the control treatment and current NP fertilizer recommendation respectively at Mekan areas. This study strongly confirms the role of manure and chemical fertilizer in increasing grain yield of bread wheat but integration of them has more effect than application of farmyard manure or N/P₂0₅ fertilizer alone. In line to this study integrated use of both organic manure and inorganic fertilizer has been emphasized as a rational strategy in improving crop yields [40].

Table 2: Combined mean square values for grain yield of bread wheat.

Table 3: Effect of main factor treatments on grain yield.

Table 4: Interaction effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer level on grain yield of bread wheat.

Table 5: Interaction effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer level on grain yield of bread wheat.

Table 6: Partial budget analysis for NP and Cattle manure fertilizers on grain yield.

Marginal Rate of Return (MRR) analysis was done for the 20 treatments combinations under varying costs and prices (Tables 6). In economic analysis, it is assumed that farmers require a minimal rate of return of 100%, representing an increase in net return of at least 1 Birr for every 1 Birr invested, to be sufficiently motivated to adopt a new agricultural technology [38]. The results of the partial budget analysis showed maximum net benefit of 24,841 Birr ha^-1 with an acceptable Marginal Rate of Return of 1228.9% was recorded from the integrated application of 46 kg N ha^-1, 46 kg P205 ha^-1 and 6 tone FYM ha^-1 at Adigolo and 60,991 Birr ha^-1 with an acceptable MRR of 2788.9% from the integrated application of 46 kg N ha^-1, 46 kg P205 ha^-1 and 10 tone FYM ha^-1 respectively at Mekan areas. But the profitability and feasibility of an integrated crop nutrient system is not determined by its ultimate economic return per hectare at first season but, manure fertilizer had beneficial residual effects on crop production significantly more grain yield obtained from residual of farmyard manure applied due to the slow release of nutrients from FYM in the former cropping season [21].

Conclusion and Recommendation

From this finding the integrated use of farmyard manure, and N and P fertilizers are efficient than the use of either N/P or FYM alone. It can be concluded that use of farmyard manure and chemical fertilizer considerably improve grain yield of Wheat. The result in this investigation showed that use of 46/46 kg ha^-1 N/P₂0₅ chemical fertilizer integrated with 6 t ha^-1 farmyard manure fertilizer and 46/46 kg ha^-1 N/P₂0₅ chemical fertilizer integrated with 10 t ha^-1 farmyard manure fertilizers could produce satisfactory yield of Wheat in the study areas of Awligra and Mekan respectively.

Acknowledgments

I would like to offer a great thanks to crop directorate research team of Alamata agricultural center for their valuable encouragement and support during the whole period of the study. The author would like to express his gratitude to the Ethiopian meteorological agency for providing rain fall and temperature data. Finally, author extends his thanks to Mekelle soil research center for their collaborative works in soil data analysis and survey.

References

1. Central Statistical Agency (CSA) (2013) Report on Area and Production of Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, MeherSeason). The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Agricultural Sample Survey, Volume I, Statistical Bulletin 532, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
2. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization)(2014) Crop Production Data.FAO, Rome. FAO.
3. Asnakew W, Tekaling M, Mengesha B, Teferra A (1991) Soil fertility management studies on wheat in Ethiopia.In:Hailu GDG, Tanner, Mengistu H (eds.)Wheat Research in Ethiopia. AHistorical Perspective. CIMMYT/IAR, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp: 137-172.
4. Tanner DG, Amanuel G, Asefa T (1993) Fertiliser effects on sustainability in the wheat-based smallholder farming systems of Ethiopia. Field Crops Res33:235-248.
5. Dereje B, Girma A, Abdissa G, De Groote H (2001) Determination of fertilizer and manure requirement in maize production in Western Oromiya, Ethiopia. Integrated Approaches to Higher Maize Productivity in the New Millennium: Proceedings of the Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, 2002, Nairobi, Kenya: CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center) and KARI (Kenya Agricultural Research Institute).
6. Fageria NK, Baligar VC (2005) Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants.Advanced Agronomy 88: 97-185.
7. Amsal T, Hailu G,Francis C (1997) Yield limiting factors to food barley production in Ethiopia. Journal ofSustainable Agriculture10:97-113.
8. Mureithi JG, Mwaura PM, Nekesa CO (2000) Introduction of legume cover crops to smallholder farms in Gatanga, Central Kenya.In: Proceedings of the Second Scientific Conference of the Soil Management and Legume Research Network Projects, pp: 98-102.
9. Campbell J (1991) Land or Peasants? The Dillema Confronting Ethiopian ResourceConservation. Afri Affairs. 90: 5-21.
10. Stahl M (1990) Constraints to Environmental Rehabilitation through People’s Participation in Northern Ethiopian Highland. Discussion Paper No 13. Geneva. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
11. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) (2013) Tackling the threat of stripe rust in Ethiopia.ICARDA, Ethiopia.
12. Ethiopia’s Agriculture Sector Policy and Investment Framework (PIF) 2010-2020 (2010) Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.
13. Kho R (2000) Crop production and the balance of available resources. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment,80: 71- 85.
14. Bereket H, Dawit H, Mehretab H, Gebremedhin G (2014) Effects of Mineral Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers on Yield and Nutrient Utilization of Bread Wheat (Tritcum aestivum) on the Sandy Soils of Hawzen District, Northern Ethiopia.Agric fo Fisheries3: 189-198.
15. Sanchez PA, Shepherd KD, Soule MJ, Place FM, Buresh RJ, et al. (1997) Soil fertility replenishment in Africa:an investment in natural resource capital. In: Buresh B (ed.) Replenishing Soil Fertility in Africa. SSSA Special Publication No 51. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
16. Kefyalew E (2010) Fertilizer Consumption and Agricultural Productivity in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Ethiopian Development Research Institute,Working paper.
17. Hopkins BG, Rosen CJ, Shiffler AK, Taysom TW (2008) Enhanced efficiency fertilizers for improved nutrient management: Potato (Solanum Tuberosum). Crop Management,p: 7.
18. Spielman D, Alemu D, and Kelemwork D (2013) Seeds, Fertilizer, and Agricultural Extension in Ethiopia. In: Dorosh D, Rashid M (eds.) Food and Agricultural Policies in Ethiopia: Progress and Challenges, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia,pp: 84-122.
19. Salim M, Mian SM, Mahmoodul H (1988) Annual technical report of project improvement of soil productivity through biological mean.Pak Agric Res Council, Islamabad.
20. Talashiker SC, Rinal OP (1986) Studies on increasing in combination with city solid waste. J Ind Soc Soil Sci 34:780-784.
21. Assefa WC (2015) Response of Barley (Hordium vulgare L.) to Integrated Cattle Manure and Mineral Fertilizer Application in the Vertisol Areas of South Tigray, Ethiopia. J plant Sci3: 71-76.
22. Stefanescu M (2002) Researches regarding the influence of manure in wheat-maize rotation.In: Biologiesi Biodiversities. Timisoara, p: 243.
23. Hoffman J (2001) Assessment of the long-term effect of organic and mineral fertilization on soil fertility. W FC, Fertilization in the third millennium, Beijing.
24. Sattar MA, Hossain F (2001) Effects of fertilizers and manures on growth on yield of wheat. WFC, Fertilization in the third millennium, Beijing.
25. Rasoulzadeh A, Yaghoubi A (2010) Effect of cattle manure on soil physical properties on a sandy clay loam soil in North-West Iran. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 8: 976 - 979.
26. Liang W, Zhang S, Xing Y, Wang R (2011) Effect of organic amendments on soil water storage in the aeolian sandy land of northeast China. Proceedings of the Electrical and Control E Engineering (ICECE), International Conference, pp: 1538-1540.
27. Salahin N, Islam MS, Begum RA, Alam MK, Hossain KMF (2011) Effect of tillage and integrated nutrient management on soil physical properties and yield under tomato-mungbean-t.aman cropping pattern. International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production 6: 58-62.
28. Ethiopian Meteorological Agency (2013) Meteorological data.
29. Pawluk RR, Sandor JA, Tabor JA(1992) The role of indigenous soil knowledge in agricultural development. Journal of soil and water conservation47:298-302.
30. Rhoades JD(1982) Cation exchange capacity. Methods of soil analysis, Chemical and microbiological properties, pp: 149-157.
31. Walkley A, Black IA(1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science37: 29-38.
32. Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS(1982) Nitrogen-total. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties, pp: 595-624.
33. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3).USDACircular939:1-19.
34. Cottenie A(1980) Soil and plant testing as a basis of fertilizer recommendations (No. 38/2). p: 100.
35. SAS Institute (2002) SAS/STAT guide for personal computers. Version 9.0 ed. SAS Institute INC, Cary, NC, USA.
36. Montgomery DC (1991) Design and analysis of experiment. 3rdedn. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
37. CIMMYT (1998) From Agronomic data to farmersrecommendations: An economic training manual, Mexico, DF.
38. Tekalign T(1991) Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure and compost analysis. Working Document No. 13. International Livestock Research Center for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
39. Beyene D (1982) Diagnosis of phosphorus deficiency in Ethiopian soils. In: Soil Science Bulletin No.3. IAR (Institute of Agriculture), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp: 1-23.
40. Abay A, Tesfaye D (2012) Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers to Increase Yield of Barley and Improve Soil Properties at Fereze, Southern Ethiopia. Innovative Systems Design and Engineering 3: 1-11.