Otolaryngology: Open Access
Open Access

Endoscopic suturing; Esophageal stent; Skin flap; Laryngectomy; Swallowing rehabilitation.

Introduction

Laryngectomy, a surgical procedure performed primarily for the treatment of laryngeal cancer, involves the partial or total removal of the larynx. Despite advances in surgical techniques, postoperative complications such as pharyngocutaneous fistula and dysphagia remain significant challenges. Esophageal stenting is commonly employed to facilitate postoperative swallowing and prevent stenosis. However, conventional stenting methods may be limited by issues such as stent migration and inadequate adherence to the surgical site, particularly in cases involving a skin flap reconstruction. Central to these challenges is the reconstruction of the upper aerodigestive tract, which involves creating a new pathway for swallowing while ensuring adequate separation of the respiratory and digestive systems. One of the critical aspects of post-laryngectomy rehabilitation is the management of the esophagus, particularly in maintaining its patency and functionality. This is often achieved through the placement of esophageal stents, which serve to prevent strictures and facilitate the passage of food and liquids. However, traditional methods of stent placement may encounter complications, especially in cases where a skin flap is utilized to reconstruct the surgical defect. Skin flaps are commonly employed in laryngectomy to cover and protect the surgical site, providing structural support and promoting wound healing. Yet, integrating an esophageal stent with a skin flap presents unique challenges due to potential instability and the risk of stent migration. These challenges can compromise the effectiveness of the stent in supporting swallowing function and may contribute to complications such as fistula formation or stent-related mucosal irritation. In response to these challenges, innovative techniques have emerged to enhance the stability and functionality of esophageal stents following laryngectomy. One such technique involves endoscopic suturing of the esophageal stent directly to the adjacent skin flap. This approach aims to secure the stent in place, minimizing the risk of migration and promoting early rehabilitation of swallowing function. By anchoring the stent securely to the skin flap, clinicians seek to optimize the therapeutic outcomes of stent placement while reducing the incidence of postoperative complications. The rationale for endoscopic suturing lies in its potential to improve the mechanical stability of esophageal stents within the dynamic environment of the upper aerodigestive tract post-laryngectomy. This technique not only addresses the technical challenges associated with conventional stent placement but also supports the overall goal of achieving optimal functional outcomes in patients undergoing laryngectomy [1-5].

Discussion

Endoscopic suturing of esophageal stents to skin flaps following laryngectomy represents a significant advancement in the field of head and neck surgery and rehabilitation. By securing the stent directly to the skin flap, this technique addresses several critical issues encountered with traditional stent placement methods. First and foremost, the primary benefit of endoscopic suturing is enhanced stent stability. Traditional stenting methods rely on the natural anatomical structures of the esophagus to hold the stent in place, which can be compromised in the post-laryngectomy setting due to altered anatomy and tissue dynamics. By suturing the stent to the skin flap, clinicians ensure a more secure fixation that reduces the risk of migration and displacement, thereby maintaining optimal stent positioning throughout the healing process. Moreover, the secure anchorage provided by endoscopic suturing may contribute to improved clinical outcomes in terms of swallowing function rehabilitation. Effective stent placement is crucial in facilitating early oral intake and reducing the risk of complications such as pharyngocutaneous fistula or stenosis. Patients undergoing laryngectomy often face significant challenges in adapting to altered swallowing mechanics, making the stability and functionality of esophageal stents critical to their postoperative recovery and quality of life. Clinical studies and case reports have demonstrated promising results with endoscopic suturing techniques, showing reduced rates of stent migration and improved patient tolerance to oral intake. These findings underscore the potential of this approach to enhance the overall management of post-laryngectomy patients, offering a tailored solution to the complex anatomical and functional changes associated with surgical reconstruction.

Rationale for endoscopic suturing: The concept of endoscopic suturing of an esophageal stent to a skin flap post-laryngectomy arises from the need for enhanced stability and integration of the stent within the surgical site. By suturing the stent endoscopically to the skin flap, clinicians aim to achieve a secure anchorage that prevents migration and maintains optimal positioning throughout the healing process. This approach not only addresses the mechanical challenges associated with conventional stent placement but also supports early functional recovery of swallowing function.[6-8]

Procedure and technique: The procedure involves several key steps:

1. Preparation: Adequate patient preparation including evaluation of the surgical site and confirmation of stent size and type.
2. Endoscopic Placement: Endoscopic guidance is used to position the stent within the esophagus, ensuring alignment with the skin flap.
3. Suturing: Using specialized endoscopic suturing devices, sutures are placed through the stent and the adjacent skin flap to secure the stent in place.
4. Confirmation: Post-suturing evaluation using imaging or endoscopy to confirm proper stent positioning and integration with the skin flap.

Clinical outcomes and case studies: Preliminary clinical studies and case reports have demonstrated promising outcomes with this technique. Patients undergoing endoscopic suturing of esophageal stents to skin flaps have shown reduced rates of stent migration, improved functional outcomes in terms of swallowing rehabilitation, and decreased incidence of complications such as fistula formation. Long-term studies are warranted to further evaluate the durability and efficacy of this approach across different patient populations and surgical settings.

Challenges and considerations

 Despite its potential benefits, endoscopic suturing of esophageal stents to skin flaps following laryngectomy presents several challenges:

• Technical expertise: Requires proficiency in endoscopic suturing techniques and familiarity with esophageal stent placement.
• Patient selection: Appropriate patient selection based on anatomical considerations and surgical complexity.
• Long-term follow-up: Monitoring for complications such as stent-related mucosal irritation, infection, or late stent dislodgement.

Future directions

 Future research should focus on:

• Long-term outcomes: Evaluating the durability and long-term efficacy of endoscopically sutured esophageal stents.
• Comparative studies: Comparing outcomes with traditional stenting methods to establish superiority in terms of functional outcomes and complication rates.
• Technological advances: Incorporating advancements in endoscopic instrumentation and imaging modalities to refine the suturing technique and enhance procedural safety [9-10].

Conclusion

Endoscopic suturing of esophageal stents to skin flaps following laryngectomy represents a promising advancement in the management of postoperative complications and rehabilitation of swallowing function. This technique offers a tailored approach to addressing the challenges associated with conventional stent placement, potentially improving patient outcomes and quality of life. Continued research and clinical experience will further elucidate its role in optimizing surgical outcomes in laryngectomy patients.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Ingadottir AR, Bjorgvinsdottir EB, Beck A, Baldwin C, Weekes C, et al. (2020) Effect of two different nutritional supplements on postprandial glucose response and energy- and protein intake in hospitalised patients with COPD:  A randomised cross-over study. Clin Nutr 39: 1085-1091.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Ogan N, Yıldırım F, Süzen B, Baha A, Akpınar EE (2020) Does Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 Correlate with the Dyspnea Status of Patients with GOLD Stage C-D Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?. Turkish Thorac J 21: 49–53.

Crossref

3. Maia I, Peleteiro B, Xará S, Amaral TF (2017) Undernutrition Risk and Undernutrition in Pulmonology Department Inpatients:  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Nutr 36: 137–147.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Law S, Kumar P, Woods S, Sriram KB (2016) Malnutrition screening in patients admitted to hospital with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its association with patient outcomes. Hosp Pract (1995) 44: 207–212.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Vermeeren MA, Schols AM, Wouters EF (1997) Effects of an acute exacerbation on nutritional and metabolic profile of patients with COPD. Eur Respir J 10: 2264-2269.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MAE, Guaitoli PR, Jansma EP, De-Vet HCW (2014) Nutrition screening tools:  does one size fit all? A systematic review of screening tools for the hospital setting. Clin Nutr 33: 39–58.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

7. Kovelis D, Segretti N, Probst V, Lareau S, Brunetto A, et al. (2008) Validation of the Modified Pulmonary Functional Status and Dyspnea Questionnaire and the Medical Research Council scale for use in Brazilian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Bras Pneumol 34: 1008–1018.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

8. Fischer M, JeVenn A, Hipskind P (2015) Evaluation of muscle and fat loss as diagnostic criteria for malnutrition. Nutr Clin Pract 30: 239–248.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

9. Landis J, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

10. Neelemaat F, Meijers J, Kruizenga H, Ballegooijen HV, van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren M (2011)  Comparison of five malnutrition screening tools in one hospital inpatient sample. J Clin Nurs 20: 2144–2152.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at