+1-947-333-4405
+1-947-333-4405
| Okonkwo Uchenna C1*, Aluka Anthony2and Ezedinachi Emmanuel1 | ||
| 1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria | ||
| 2Department of Family Medicine, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria | ||
| Corresponding Author : | Dr. Okonkwo UC Department of Internal Medicine University of Calabar Teaching Hospital P.M.B. 1278, Calabar, Cross river state, Nigeria Tel: +234 803 3251 240 Email: drucokonkwo@unical.edu.ng |
|
| Received July 07, 2014; Accepted September 23, 2014; Published September 30, 2014 | ||
| Citation: Okonkwo Uchenna C, Aluka Anthony, Ezedinachi Emmanuel (2014) Effects of Silymarin on Treatment Naïve Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Infection-A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Infect Dis Ther 2:168. doi:10.4172/2332-0877.1000168 | ||
| Copyright: © 2014 Uchenna OC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | ||
Related article at Pubmed Scholar Google |
||
Visit for more related articles at Journal of Infectious Diseases & Therapy
Background: Silymarin, an extract of milk thistle (silybum marianum) is widely used in the treatment of patients with chronic liver disease yet its beneficial effects remain controversial.
Aim: To determine the effect of silymarin on liver biochemistry and health related quality of life (HRQOL) in treatment naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B infection.
Methods: This was a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial conducted at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Cross river state. Patients with chronic hepatitis B were randomized to receive silymarin or placebo for 4 weeks. Their liver function tests and HRQOL were assessed at baseline and post-treatment.
Results: Eighty-six persons were enrolled into the study. Seventy-nine completed the study. Silymarin use was associated (p<0.05) with improvement in serum alanine and aspartate aminotransferase and HRQOL from baseline but not with serum bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase.
Conclusion: Silymarin use among patients with chronic hepatitis B is associated with improvement in liver function tests especially markers of liver inflammation and HRQOL.
| Keywords |
| Chronic hepatitis B; Silymarin; Randomized controlled trial |
| Introduction |
| Current treatment of chronic viral hepatitis B with interferon and nucleoside analogues have remained unsatisfactory with sero-conversion of hepatitis B virus from a replicative to a non-replicative state occurring in only 15-32% of patients [1,2]. Along with this high rate of treatment failure, is the prohibitive cost of these medications especially interferon-based medications and associated numerous side-effects. This is especially true in Nigeria where out of pocket payment for healthcare services is still very much the rule. Many patients are therefore too eager to explore the use of complementary and alternative treatment with their optimistic and somewhat sketchy evidence of benefit. |
| Silymarin, an extract of the milk thistle herb (silybum marianum), has been in use for the treatment of liver diseases since ancient times. In the 15th century, Nicholas Culpepper, an English herbalist described the milk thistle as being good against the jaundice [3]. Silymarin is composed of flavonolignans namely silybin, silydianin, silycristin as well as a diastereomer of silybin; isosilybin. Most of its hepato-protective effect is attributed to silybin which constitutes 60-70% of the drug [4]. It is poorly absorbed in the gastro-intestinal tract and primarily excreted in bile. |
| Silymarin is the most commonly consumed complementary and alternative medicine reported in patients with chronic hepatitis [5]. A study in the USA found the prevalence of use of herbal medications for the treatment of allied medical conditions to have increased from 2.5% to 12.1% between 1990 and 1997 [6]. Another study in the same country, reported that as much as 31% of patients attending a hepatology clinic in Oregon, are using alternative remedies such as milk thistle [7]. |
| Silymarin is thought to exert its beneficial effects in chronic liver diseases because of its membrane stabilizing properties. It promotes hepatocyte regeneration by stimulating nucleolar polymerase A and increase ribosomal protein synthesis. Silybin selectively inhibits leukotriene formation by Kupffer cells and also exhibits some anti-oxidant properties by increasing superoxide dismutase activity in the red cells [8,9]. In addition, it has immune-modulatory effects and enhances secretion of interferon gamma, interleukin 4 and 10 [10]. Thus, it has been shown to lead to normalization of serum aminotransferases in patients with chronic liver diseases especially chronic hepatitis C virus infection where it has been documented to prevent graft re-infection after orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis C infection by inhibiting entry of hepatitis C viral particles into transplanted liver [11,12]. |
| Silymarin and its components have shown beneficial effects in reversing liver injury secondary to chronic alcohol abuse and drugs/poisons such as Amanitia phalliodes(deadly mushroom) [13-15]. Few studies have been done to evaluate the effect of this medication in patients with predominantly hepatitis B associated chronic liver disease [14,15] and none has been done in Nigeria. Hence, this study was designed to evaluate the effects of silymarin on liver biochemistry and quality of life in patients with chronic viral hepatitis B infection and compare this to the effect of placebo. |
| General Objective |
| To determine the effect of silymarin on liver biochemistry and quality of life in treatment naïve patients with chronic viral hepatitis B infection after one month of treatment and compare it to placebo. |
| Specific Objectives |
| 1.To evaluate the effect of silymarin on liver function test (bilirubin, aspartate amino transaminase (AST), alanine amino transaminase(ALT) and alkaline phosphatase(ALP). |
| 2.To determine the effect of silymarin on health related quality of life (HRQOL). |
| Subjects, Materials and Methods |
| This was a double- blind randomized, placebo controlled study carried out at the Gastroenterology clinic and the Family Medicine clinic of the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar. It lasted from January-December, 2013. The study was conducted in compliance with the principles of Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital Ethical Board. All participants gave written informed consent. Sample size of 84 was calculated using the formula13 N=f ((α,p)x2xδ2 /d2 . Where δ is the postulated difference observed in the two groups=4, d is the standard error of the sample difference=2, p is the power of the test=90% and α is the level of significance=5% |
| Adult patients who were 18 years and above with a diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B viral infection were randomized to receive silymarin manufactured by Micro Labs Limited, India and marketed as silybon by Micro-Nova Phamaceuticals plc in Nigeria or placebo for a period of four weeks. The active ingredients and placebo were placed in identical tablets as the commercial product and provided in bulk by Micro Nova pharmaceuticals. Inclusion criteria included a positive HBsAg result for 6 months or more and presence of stigmata of chronic liver disease such as leuconychia, jaundice, liver palms. Liver biopsy was not part of the diagnostic criteria for this study. Exclusion criteria were being HBsAg negative, presence of features of liver de-compensation such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding and history of past or current use of anti-viral drugs such as interferon or any of the nucleoside/nucleotide analogues. |
| At first contact, a structured questionnaire was used to document demographic information, symptoms, signs and risk of chronic liver disease including use of herbal remedies. The SF36 questionnaire on health related quality of life (HRQOL) was also administered. Five milliliters of venous blood was collected from the ante-cubital fossa observing the universal precautionary measures for evaluation of liver function tests. The patients were randomized to receive silymarin or placebo using pre-selected random numbers folded in a paper. Both investigators and patients were blinded to which tablet contained the active ingredient or placebo. At the end of four weeks, the HRQOL questionnaire was re-administered and blood was collected to repeat liver function test. Patients who failed to show up after four weeks had a reminder in the form of a phone call or text message. They were considered to have dropped out if they fail to come within two weeks afterwards. |
| Statistical Analysis |
| Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 15. Continuous variables was tested for normal distribution and expressed as mean ± Standard deviation or median as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared by Pearson’s chi-square test. Mean values of bilirubin, AST, ALT and ALP at baseline were compared with post treatment values using the paired sample t-test. Scores for the SF36 questionnaire was calculated online at https://www.amihealthy.com/Surveys/sf36 Pre and post treatment scores were also compared using the paired sample t-test. P value of <0.05 was considered significant. |
| Results |
| Eighty six consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis B infection were randomized to receive 140 mg of silybon three times daily or placebo for 4 weeks. There were 62 males and 24 females. The M: F ratio was 2.6:1. Their ages ranged from 18-54 years with a mean age of 31.15 ± 7 years. In group A (silybon), there were 29 males and 14 females while in group B(placebo), there were 33 males and 10 females The demographic characteristics of group A and B was not statistically significant(p>0.05) (Table 1). |
| Seventy-nine persons completed the study. Seven persons dropped out of the study. Mild adverse event (pruritus, headache, epigastric discomfort and throat irritation) was the reason for dropping out in 5 persons. Three in the treatment group and 2 in the placebo group. While in 2 persons, the reason for dropping out was not documented. In group A, 39 persons completed the study while 40 persons completed in group B. The pre-treatment (baseline) values of the liver enzymes (Bilirubin, AST, ALT, ALP) when compared between the two groups was higher in group A but the difference was not statistically significant. In group A, the mean serum concentration of liver enzymes was reduced from baseline to post-treatment values and this reduction was statistically significant for AST and ALT but not for bilirubin and ALP. The percentages of the subjects whose LFT parameters reduced from baseline values were as follows; bilirubin (24/39=61.5%), AST(28/39=71.8%), ALT(27/39=69.2%) and ALP(22/39=56.4%). In group B, the mean serum concentrations of liver enzymes were also reduced from baseline to post-treatment values except for AST and ALP. However, the differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05) respectively. The percentages of subjects who reduced their LFTs from baseline values were 47.5% for bilirubin, AST and ALT respectively and 45% for ALP. The physical health related score and the mental health related score showed some improvement in both groups. However, only the MHS score in group A showed a statistically significant improvements (p=0.02) (Table 2) The below table compares the baseline and post-treatment value of LFTs for groups A and B. |
| Discussion |
| Seventy-nine patients with chronic hepatitis B were randomized to receive silymarin 140 mg three times a week for 4 weeks or placebo for the same duration. All had their HRQOL assessed using SF-36 questionnaire before and after intervention. Our study showed that silymarin was generally safe and well tolerated as no major adverse event was reported and is in keeping with reports from other studies [14-19]. There are compelling data in literature on the beneficial effects of silymarin on liver injury caused by hepatotoxins such as alcohol and the deadly mushroom, Amanitia phalloides [13-15]. Although some studies have shown that silymarin and its components improve liver function and hepatic fibrosis markers in patients with chronic hepatitis (either B or C) [20,21], others had refuted this claim [22]. This may be because some of these studies focused on end-points such as liver cirrhosis and liver-related complications and mortality that are not affected by silymarin. The beneficial effect of silymarin on the liver is postulated to be due to its anti-oxidant and free radical scavenging properties. In addition, it promotes hepatocyte membrane stabilization, protein synthesis and also modulates immune response. |
| Our study showed that silymarin significantly reduced serum aspartate amino transaminase, and alanine aminotransaminase but not bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase from baseline. This is in keeping with findings by Bruzelli et al. [20] in their study of 20 patients with chronic hepatitis B or C. In a recent meta-analysis of the effects of silymarin or its combination in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, it was shown that silymarin reduced serum transamianases16. Another study amongst patients with chronic hepatitis C, found statistically significant improvements in serum AST, ALT and quality of life scores amongst patients treated with silymarin [23]. The mechanism of liver injury in chronic hepatitis B and C infection is largely immune mediated and related to chronic inflammatory hepatocyte injury. The tendency for patients receiving silymarin to show better improvement in liver function is likely due to its free radical scavenging and membrane stabilizing properties. Thus, it protects neighboring healthy hepatocytes from toxins released by damaged hepatocytes thereby reducing inflammation and systemic inflammatory responses that impact negatively on quality of life. |
| This study demonstrated an improvement in quality of life scores in patients with chronic hepatitis B. The SF-36 questionnaire provides psychometrically based physical and mental component summary. Patients with chronic hepatitis B are mostly asymptomatic or may have symptoms such as mild right hypochondrial pain and fatigue. These do not cause limitations in performing physical activities. However, they are usually anxious about their health situation because of the misconception about the disease. This can impact negatively on their mental health. Studies have shown that silymarin is associated with improved perception of wellbeing and quality of life scores in patient with acute and chronic viral hepatitis [23,24]. It is been shown that quality of life is an important determinant of outcome in any type of chronic illness and many believe it is the single most important factor in the recovery from chronic illnesses [25,26]. |
| Many patients in Nigeria consume silymarin either on prescription or self-medication for a wide variety of liver diseases. Our study showed that a dose of 420 mg daily is safe and well tolerated and associated with some improvement in liver function and quality of life scores. Larger studies are needed to verify these effects. Future studies should incorporate end-points such as viral load and fibrosis markers and also evaluate effects on other aetiologies of liver disease. |
| Summary: |
| Chronic hepatitis B infection is highly prevalent in Nigeria. Standard therapy with interferon or nucleotide/nucleoside analogue is expensive and sometimes disappointing. Patients with chronic hepatitis B resort to the use of silymarin; a complementary and alternative medicine used in the management of liver diseases either on self or prescription medication. Its usefulness in chronic hepatitis B infection is contentious and has not been studied in a Nigerian population. Findings from this study hope to provide evidence based data of its efficacy and possible side effects. |
| Acknowledgement |
| This research was supported by Micronova pharmaceuticals. |
| Manuscript preparation: The funding agency either directly or through a third party, had no role in the study design, gathering, preparation, or analyzing the data, or in the writing of the manuscript. : Okonkwo U.C and Aluka A designed the trial and collected data. Okonkwo U.C contributed data analysis and manuscript writing. Ezedinachi E supervised manuscript writing. All approved final manuscript. |
 |
|
|
| Table 1 | Table 2 |
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
