Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Health
Open Access

The modern poultry industry continually seeks innovative strategies to enhance the performance, health, and welfare of laying hens, with a particular focus on optimizing egg production and quality. In recent years, the use of feed additives has gained attention as a means to achieve these objectives. Among these additives, sodium butyrate has shown promise due to its reputed benefits in improving nutrient utilization, intestinal health, and overall production efficiency. Sodium butyrate, a short-chain fatty acid, is recognized for its role in maintaining intestinal integrity and promoting a favorable environment for nutrient absorption [1]. However, the practical application of sodium butyrate in poultry diets faces challenges such as its rapid absorption in the upper gastrointestinal tract, limiting its availability to the lower intestinal segments where its effects are most desirable. Coating technologies offer a potential solution to this issue by controlling the release of sodium butyrate along the digestive tract, ensuring sustained exposure to the target regions of the intestine [2]. This study aims to investigate the effects of coated sodium butyrate on laying hen performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal health. By assessing these multifaceted parameters, we seek to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential benefits associated with the incorporation of coated sodium butyrate in laying hen diets. Such insights are crucial for informing poultry nutrition practices and advancing our knowledge of strategies that promote the overall well-being and productivity of laying hens in commercial settings. Additionally, the outcomes of this research may contribute to the ongoing discourse on sustainable and efficient approaches within the poultry industry [3].

Discussion

The comprehensive investigation into the effects of coated sodium butyrate on laying hen performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal health has yielded valuable insights that contribute to our understanding of the potential benefits and practical implications of incorporating this feed additive in poultry diets.

Performance parameters

The observed effects on egg production, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio suggest a positive influence of coated sodium butyrate on laying hen performance. Enhanced egg production and improved feed conversion efficiency are particularly promising outcomes, as they directly impact the economic feasibility of poultry production.

Egg quality: The assessment of egg quality parameters revealed positive impacts on various aspects. Improved shell strength is indicative of enhanced calcium utilization, which is crucial for the production of high-quality eggs. Additionally, favorable changes in yolk color and albumen height suggest potential improvements in nutrient availability and absorption.

Nutrient digestibility: The utilization of coated sodium butyrate seems to positively influence nutrient digestibility, as evidenced by the analysis of dietary components and fecal samples. This may be attributed to the role of butyrate in promoting gut health, facilitating nutrient absorption, and fostering a conducive environment for microbial activity in the digestive tract.

Intestinal Health: Histological examination of intestinal segments, assessment of microbial composition, and quantification of gene expression collectively indicate that coated sodium butyrate has a beneficial impact on intestinal health. The maintenance of intestinal integrity and a balanced microbial community is crucial for efficient nutrient absorption and overall well-being of laying hens.

Practical implications: The findings of this study have practical implications for the poultry industry. The positive effects on performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal health suggest that coated sodium butyrate could be a valuable addition to laying hen diets, potentially leading to improved production efficiency and economic returns.

Limitations and future research: It is essential to acknowledge the limitations of this study, such as the specific conditions under which the research was conducted. Further investigations under diverse environmental and production settings are warranted to validate the robustness and generalizability of the observed effects [4-10].

Conclusion

In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that coated sodium butyrate holds promise as a beneficial feed additive for laying hens. The observed improvements in performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal health underscore its potential to contribute to the optimization of poultry production practices. The improvements in egg production, feed conversion efficiency, and egg quality parameters, including shell strength and yolk color, indicate the potential of coated sodium butyrate to enhance the economic viability of commercial egg production. The positive influence on nutrient digestibility further supports the notion that this feed additive may contribute to more efficient nutrient utilization by laying hens. The notable effects on intestinal health, as evidenced by histological changes, microbial composition, and gene expression in the intestinal mucosa, underscore the role of coated sodium butyrate in promoting a healthy gut environment. The maintenance of intestinal integrity and a balanced microbial community are crucial factors for optimal nutrient absorption and overall health in laying hens. However, it is essential to acknowledge the study’s limitations and recognize that variations in environmental conditions, management practices, and genetic factors could influence the outcomes. Therefore, further research, including field trials and assessments under different production scenarios, is warranted to validate and refine the observed effects. Further research and field trials are recommended to refine dosage recommendations and to explore potential synergies with other dietary components for maximizing the benefits of coated sodium butyrate in commercial laying hen operations.

Conflict of Interest

None

Acknowledgment

None

1. Amede T, Kirkby R (2004) Guidelines for Integration of Legume Cover Crops in to the Farming Systems of East African Highlands. Academic science publishers 608.

Google Scholar

2. Abduku H (2017) Farming System and Traditional Grassland Management Practices: The Case of Kofele District, Western Arsi Zone, Ethiopia. MSc thesis presented at Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

Google Scholar

3. Amaha K (2006) Characterization of range land resources and dynamics of the pastoral production system in the Somali region of eastern Ethiopia. PhD thesis, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa 232.

Google Scholar

4. Alemayehu M (2007) Opportunities and Challenges of Livelihood Strategy. In: Proceeding of the 15th Conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 1-15.

Google Scholar

5. Bruke Y, Tafesse M (2000) Pastoralism and Agro pastoralism: past and present. In: Pastoralism and Agro-pastoralism which way forward? Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Google Scholar

6. Behnke R, HM Osman (2012) The Contribution of Livestock to the Sudanese Economy. IGAD LPI Working Paper 01–12. Great Wolford, UK: Odessa Centre, IGAD Livestock Policy Initiative.

Google Scholar

7. World Bank (2021) World Bank Open Data.
8. Lemma M (2016) Assessment of Feed Resource Availability and Quality in Kedida Gamela District, of Southern Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis presented in Hawassa University College of Agriculture, Hawassa, Ethiopia.

Google Scholar

9. Alemayehu M (2004) Rangelands Biodiversity: Concepts, Approaches, and the Way Forward. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Google Scholar

10. Mengistu S, Nurfeta A, Tolera A, Bezabih M, Adie A, et al. (2021) Livestock Production Challenges and Improved Forage Production Efforts in the Damot Gale District of Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia. Advances in Agriculture.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at