Effects of 6-Benzyl aminopurine and Kinetin on In Vitro Shoot Multiplication of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Varieties

Belay Tolera; Mulugeta Diro; Derbew Belew

doi:10.4172/2329-8863.1000129

ISSN: 2329-8863

Advances in Crop Science and Technology

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.

Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Effects of 6-Benzyl aminopurine and Kinetin on In Vitro Shoot Multiplication of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Varieties

*Belay Tolera^1, Mulugeta Diro² and Derbew Belew³**
¹Ethiopian Sugar Corporation, Research and Training Division, Variety Development Directorate, Biotechnology Research Team, Wonji Research Center, Wonji, Ethiopia
²Capacity Building for Scaling up of Evidence-based Best Practices in Agricultural Production in Ethiopia (CASCAPE) Project, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
³Jimma University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma, Ethiopia
Corresponding Author :	Dr. Belay T Ethiopian Sugar Corporation Research and Training Division, Ethiopia Tel: +251-910181644 E-mail: belaytolera@yahoo.com
Received March 03, 2014; Accepted April 18, 2014; Published April 20, 2014
Citation: Tolera B, Diro M, Belew D (2014) Effects of 6-Benzyl aminopurine and Kinetin on In Vitro Shoot Multiplication of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Varieties. Adv Crop Sci Tech 2:129. doi:
Copyright: © 2014 Tolera B, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Related article at Pubmed Scholar Google

Visit for more related articles at Advances in Crop Science and Technology

View PDF Download PDF Tables & Figures

Abstract

In vitro shoot multiplication of two commercial sugarcane varieties grown in Ethiopian sugar estates initiated using shoot tip explants was carried out with the objective to assess the multiplication responses of the sugarcane varieties (B41-227 and N14) under five levels of 6-benzylaminopurine (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 mgL-1) and kinetin (0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mgL-1) in a completely randomized design with 5x5x2 factorial treatment combinations arrangements. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the interaction effects of 6-benzylaminopurine, kinetin and the sugarcane genotypes on number of shoots per explant, average shoot length and number of leaves per shoot was very highly significant (P < 0.0001). Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium fortified with 1 mgL-1 6- benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.5 mgL-1 kinetin for B41-227; and 2 mgL-1 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) without kinetin for N14 were found to give optimum shoot proliferation results. On these medium, B41-227 gave 34 ± 1.54 shoots per explant with 6.95 ± 0.01cm average shoot length and 12 ± 0.17 leaves per shoot while N14 produced 21 ± 0.58 shoots per explant with 5.63 ± 0.01 cm average shoot length and 5.4 ± 00 leaves per shoot after 30 days of culture transfer to multiplication medium. Thus, the optimized protocol is useful for rejuvenation, rapid In vitro propagation and production of large quantity quality sugarcane planting materials and hence help minimizes the major limitations hampering sugarcane production in the Ethiopian sugar Estates.

class="ol">

Abstract

In vitro shoot multiplication of two commercial sugarcane varieties grown in Ethiopian sugar estates initiated using shoot tip explants was carried out with the objective to assess the multiplication responses of the sugarcane varieties (B41-227 and N14) under five levels of 6-benzylaminopurine (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 mgL^-1) and kinetin (0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mgL^-1) in a completely randomized design with 5x5x2 factorial treatment combinations arrangements. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the interaction effects of 6-benzylaminopurine, kinetin and the sugarcane genotypes on number of shoots per explant, average shoot length and number of leaves per shoot was very highly significant (P < 0.0001). Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium fortified with 1 mgL^-1 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.5 mgL^-1 kinetin for B41-227; and 2 mgL^-1 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) without kinetin for N14 were found to give optimum shoot proliferation results. On these medium, B41-227 gave 34 ± 1.54 shoots per explant with 6.95 ± 0.01cm average shoot length and 12 ± 0.17 leaves per shoot while N14 produced 21 ± 0.58 shoots per explant with 5.63 ± 0.01 cm average shoot length and 5.4 ± 00 leaves per shoot after 30 days of culture transfer to multiplication medium. Thus, the optimized protocol is useful for rejuvenation, rapid In vitro propagation and production of large quantity quality sugarcane planting materials and hence help minimizes the major limitations hampering sugarcane production in the Ethiopian sugar Estates.

Keywords

In vitro Shoot multiplication; Sugarcane; 6-benzylamminopurine (BAP); kinetin.

Introduction

Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) is a monocotyledonous crop plant that belongs to the family of grasses, poaceae [1-4]. It is an octaploid crop with chromosome number of 2n = 80 [5-7]. It is a tall perennial tropical grass that tillers at the base, grows 3-4 meters tall and about 5 cm in diameter [8] with strong midrib, white and concave on the upper surface, convex and green below [9]. Sugarcane is one of the most efficient convertors of solar energy into sugar and other renewable forms of energy and hence produced primarily for its ability to store high concentrations of sucrose, or sugar, in the internodes of the stem [10]. Currently, the crop is cultivated in over 120 countries with estimated total annual global sugar production of 1.7 billion tonnes in the year 2011 [11] and the crop accounts for about 70% of the world’s total sugar production [11-14] while the rest is produced from sugar beet. However, in Ethiopia, sugarcane is the sole base material for sugar production and thus the sugar industries in Ethiopia solely depend on the fate of this crop. The sugar industry in Ethiopia has great contributions to the socio-economy of the country, given its agricultural and industrial investments, foreign exchange earnings, its high employment, and its linkages with major suppliers, support industries and customers [15,16].

However, the current sugar production in Ethiopia covers only 60% of the annual demand for domestic consumption while the deficit is imported from abroad. In spite of this fact, the country has huge production potentials and opportunities which include specifically identified irrigable suitable fertile areas of 1,390,000 ha [17], favorable weather conditions, cheap and productive labour force, high demand for sugar and other by-products and huge market outlets to the nearby countries [18]. To utilize these opportunities and reverse current situation: satisfy the local sugar demand and export the surplus; the Ethiopian Sugar Corporation is undertaking large scale expansion and new sugar development projects in different regions of the country. However, availability of adequate amount of quality and disease free planting materials within a short time is the major limiting factor to attain the intended plan using the conventional method of propagation. On the other hand, the yield of the existing few and old commercial cane varieties is declining and some productive sugarcane varieties were also obsolete due to lack of alternative technologies for disease cleansing and rejuvenation. Moreover, commercialization of improved introduced and adapted sugarcane varieties takes more than 10 years using the usual conventional route of propagation.

Varieties of sugarcane are highly heterogeneous and generally multiplied vegetatively by stem cuttings with each cutting or sett having two or three buds and the rate of propagation is very slow, usually 1:10 in a year [19-22]. Lack of rapid multiplication procedures, time spent for multiplication and continuous contamination by systemic disease is the serious economic problem to multiply an elite genotype of sugarcane in the open field [23-26]. In addition, the conventional propagation method requires large quantity of seed and land demanding [27,28] and the cutting implements in seed cane preparation play a significant role in facilitating cross contamination during seedcane preparation [29]. Besides the costly transport of the bulky cane cuttings, harbor many pests and diseases with accumulation of disease over vegetative cycles leading to further yield and quality decline over the years [20,23]. Attacks by pathogens cause 10 -77% yield loss in sugarcane [30-32].

Micropropagation Technology is a technique through which groups of genetically identical plants all derived from a selected individual multiplies vegetativelly and rapidly by aseptic culture of meristematic regions under controlled nutritional and environmental conditions in vitro. Nowadays, unlike the conventional propagation method, it is the only realistic means of achieving rapid and large scale production of disease free quality planting materials in sugarcane [33-35] and an alternative approach for fast multiplication of a variety in its original form [19,36]. It is very effective in entire disease cleansing, rejuvenation and subsequent mass propagation of well adapted and promising varieties facing gradual deterioration in yield, quality and vigor due to accumulation of pathogens during prolonged vegetative cultivation and hence sustains the productive potential of sugarcane crops for a longer period [37,38]. Furthermore, micropropagated sugarcane plants were reported to give superior in cane and sugar yield as compared to their donors under similar agronomic management systems [38-43].

Considering the diverse limitations of conventional method and potential of tissue culture techniques, researchers have developed protocols for sugarcane in vitro propagation using shoot tip explants [28,44-47]. Every new variety or clone needs an efficient protocol to get rapid in vitro propagation [44]. Rapid clonal propagation of sugarcane planting materials depends on the genotype and the plant growth regulators combinations used and needs to develop plant growth regulators combinations for each genotype [28]. The nutritional requirement for in vitro propagation protocol of sugarcane should be according to genotype and explant used [46]. Similarly, plant growth regulators requirements for in vitro propagation responses vary from cultivar to cultivar in sugarcane [47]. The nutritional requirement for every sugarcane variety is specific and exact [48]. In addition, report on tissue culture study of sugarcane varieties grown in Ethiopian Sugar Estates is scarce. Therefore, this study was carried out with the objective to optimize protocol for in vitro shoot multiplication of two commercial sugarcane (B4-227 and N14) varieties widely grown in the Ethiopian Sugar Estates to solve the current challenges of sugarcane production in the country.

S The same batch of micro-shoots initiated from shoot tip explants having similar size were used for the experiment after maintaining the initiated cultures on plant growth regulator free medium to minimize the carry over effect of the initiation medium. Full strength [48], (MS) medium was used with different concentrations and combinations of BAP (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 mgL^-1) and kinetin (0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mgL^-1) in a factorial treatment combinations arrangements along with 30 g/l sucrose as a carbon source. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.8 before gelled with 8 g/l agar and autoclaved at 121°C and 15 psi for 20 minutes. The experiment was carried out at a temperature of 25 ± 2°C less than 16 hours light and eight hours dark photoperiod regimes maintained under fluorescent light having 2500-3000 lux light intensity with 75 to 80% relative humidity of the growth chamber. The experiment was laid out in completely randomized design with three factor factorial treatment combinations arrangements: sugarcane varieties (B41-227 and N14) and two Plant growth regulators (BAP and kinetin). Data on number of shoots per explant, average shoot length (cm) and number of leaves per shoot was collected after 30 days of culture [49].

The collected data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS statistical software (version 9.2) and treatments’ means were separated using the procedure of REGWQ (Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch Multiple Range Test).

Result and Discussion

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the interaction effects of genotype, BAP and kinetin was very highly significant (Genotype ^*BAP^* kinetin = p<0.0001) on the number of shoots per explant, average shoot length (cm) and number of leaves per shoot. Formation of multiple shoots did not occur within 30 days when explants were cultured on MS medium without plant growth regulators (Table 1). Increasing the concentration of kinetin alone from 0 to 0.1 mgL^-1, resulted in 3.5 ± 0.12 and 4.23 ± 0.12 shoots per explant for B41-227 and N14, respectively, while increasing levels of BAP alone from 0 to 0.5 mgL^-1 gave 12.11 ± 0.22 and 4.53 ± 0.00 shoot per explant, respectively. Among the different concentration and combinations of BAP and kinetin used, B41-227 gave the highest average number of 34 ± 1.54 shoots with 6.95 ± 0.01 cm average shoot length and 12 ± 00 leaves per shoot on MS medium fortified with 1 mgL^-1 BAP and 0.5 mgL^-1 kinetin (Table 1 and Figure 1). However, N14 gave maximum of 21 ± 0.58 shoots per explant with 5.63 ± 0.01 cm average shoot length and 5.4 ± 00 leaves per shoot on MS medium supplemented with 2 mgL^-1 BAP (Table 1 and Figure 2). Increase of kinetin from 0.25 to 0.5 mgL^-1at 1 mgL^-1BAP showed a significant increase in the number of shoots per explant (from 21.5 ± 0.27 to 34 ± 1.54), average shoot length (from 4.5 ± 0.00 to 6.95 ± 0.01 cm) and number of leaves per shoot (from 8.3 ± 0.00 to 12 ± 0.17) in B41-227. However, further increase in kinetin to 1 mgL^-1, significantly reduced the number of shoots per explant, average shoot length and number of leaves per shoot to 27.21 ± 0.29, 3.24 ± 0.00 cm and 8.3 ± 0.01, respectively. In the same way, increase in kinetin from 0 to 0.1 mgL^-1 at 2 mgL^-1 BAP, showed a marked reduction in number of shoots per explant (from 21 ± 0.58 to 16.5 ± 0.25), average shoot length (from 5.63 ± 0.01 to 2.51 ± 0.01cm) and number of leaves per shoot (5.4 ± 0.00 to 3.0 ± 0.15) in N14. Similarly, increase in levels of BAP from 1.5 to 2 mgL^-1 at 0 mgL^-1 kinetin showed a significant reduction in number of shoots per explant (from 17 ± 0.58 to 14.07 ± 0.25), average shoot length (from 2.7 ± 0.01 to 1.44 ± 0.28 cm) and number of leaves per shoot (from 7.23 ± 0.11 to 1.73 ± 0.11) in B41-227. This indicates that higher concentrations of cytokinins inhibit cell division and hence multiplication while low concentrations are suitable for cell division and elongation in sugarcane.

However, maintaining the concentration of kinetin at 0 mgL^-1 and increase in BAP from 1.5 to 2 mgL^-1 significantly increased the number of shoots per explant (from 12 ± 0.17 to 21 ± 0.58), average shoot length (from 5.46 ± 0.00 to 5.63 ± 0.01 cm) and number of leaves per shoot (from 3.57 ± 0.00 to 5.4 ± 0.00) in N14. This indicates the need to investigate the shoot multiplication responses in N14 at higher (more than 2 mgL^-1) levels of BAP. The current result in B41-227 is in contrast with the findings of [22] and [50]. On MS medium fortified with 1 mgL^-1 BAP and 0.5 mgL^-1 kinetin, sugarcane varieties CP-77-400 and BL-4 gave 24 ± 1.2490 and 19.6 ± 1.1833 shoots per explant [22]. Similarly, it was reported that 7.0 shoot per explant with 8.5 cm average shoot length and 24 leaves per shoot on the same treatment combination (i.e. MS +1 mgL^-1 BAP +0.5 mgL^-1 kinetin) for sugarcane variety CP-77-400 after 30 days [50]. The result obtained in N14 is in line with the findings of [51].

PGRs= Plant growth regulators. ^*Values for number of shoots per explant, average shoot length and number of leaves per shoot given as mean ± SD. ^*Numbers with in the same column with different letter(s) are significantly different from each other at p ≤ 0.05 according to REGWQ Multiple Range Test.

Conclusion

In vitro shoot multiplication of two commercial sugarcane varieties ‘B41-227’ and ‘N14’ has been developed. The result indicated that in vitro shoot multiplication of sugarcane is highly dependent on the interaction effects of BAP, kinetin and genotype. Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium fortified with 1 mgL^-1 BAP and 0.5 mgL^-1 kinetin for B41-227 and 2 mgL^-1 BAP without kinetin for N14 were found to be optimum. On these medium, B41-227 gave 34 ± 1.54 shoots per explant with 6.95 ± 0.01 cm average shoot length and 12 ± 0.17 leaves per shoot while N14 produced 21 ± 0.58 shoots per explant with 5.63 ± 0.01 cm average shoot length and 5.4 ± 00 leaves per shoot after 30 days of first culture transfer to multiplication medium. Thus, the developed protocol will help minimize the current challenges of sugarcane production by rejuvenating and availing adequate amount of quality disease free planting material of the sugarcane varieties within a short time.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our thanks to Ethiopian Sugar Corporation for financing the research and Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine for provision of Tissue Culture Laboratory and facilities.

References

value="1" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Baksha R, Alam R, Karim MZ, Paul SK, Hossain MA, et al. (2002) In vitro shoot tip culture of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) variety lsd 28. Biotechnology 1: 67-72.

value="2" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Cha-um S, Hien NT, Kirdmanee C(2006) Disease free production of sugarcane varieties (Saccharum officinarum L.) using in vitro meristem culture. Biotechnology 5: 443-448.

value="3" id="Reference_Titile_Link">KarimMz, Alam R, Baksha R, Paul SK, Hossain MA, et al. (2002) Micropropagation of two sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) varieties from callus culture. Journal of biological science 5: 659-661.

value="4" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Sharma M (2005) In vitro regeneration studies of sugarcane. M.Sc. Thesis. Patiala, India. 24-32.

value="5" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Daniels J, Roach BT (1987)Taxonomy and Evolution. Sugarcane improvement through breeding. Amsterdam, Netherland 11:7- 84.

value="6" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Asano T, Takahashi S, Tsudzuki T, Shimada H, Kadowaki K (2004) Complete nucleotide sequence of the sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) chloroplast genome: A comparative analysis of four monocot chloroplast genomes. DNA Research 11:93–99.

value="7" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Anonymous(2011) The biology of Saccharum spp. (sugarcane). Department of health and Aging, office of the gene technology Regulator.

value="8" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Singh R (2003) Tissue culture studies of sugarcane. M.Sc. Thesis submitted to Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

value="9" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Bisht SS, Routray AK, Mishra R (2011) Rapid in vitro propagation technique for sugarcane variety 018. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences: 12:60-65.

value="10" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Naturland EV (2000) Organic farming in the tropics and Sub tropics. First edition. Kleinhaderner, Germany 10-15.

value="11" id="Reference_Titile_Link">FAO (2013) Food and Agriculture Organization of the united States of America. World sugarcane production statistics.

value="12" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Khan MR, Rashid H (2004) Studies on the rapid clonal propagation of Saccharum officinarum. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 6:1876-1879.

value="13" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Ali A, Naz S, and Iqbal J(2007) Effect of different explants and media compositions for efficient somatic embryogenesis in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Pak.J.Bot. 39:1961-1977.

value="14" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Suprasana P (2010) Biotechnological Interventions in sugarcane improvement: Strategies, methods and progress. Nuclear Agriculture and Biotechnology Division, Technology Development Article.

value="15" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Ambachew D, Firehun Y(2010) Cane sugar productivity potential in Ethiopia. Second Biannual Conference.

value="16" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Teklemariam M (1989) Sugar Industry Development in Ethiopia and its economic impact. ISHI acta Horticulture 270. International symposium on horticultural science in developing countries. International society on horticultural science.

value="17" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Rezene F(2009) The status of bio-fuels in Ethiopia. IUCN regional workshop on bio-fuels, Nairobi Kenya. 20-22.

value="18" id="Reference_Titile_Link">ESISC (2008) Investment opportunity profile for sugarcane plantation and processing in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Investment agency, Ethiopia. 18-22.

value="19" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Bahera KK, Sahoo S, (2009) Rapid in vitro micropropagation of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.cv-Nayana) through callus culture. Nature and science 7: 1545-0740.

value="20" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Jalaja NC, Neelamathi D, Sreenivasan TV (2008)Micropropagation for quality seed Production in sugarcane in Asia and the Pacific. Sugarcane pub 13-60.

value="21" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Khan SA, Rashid A, Chaudhary MF, Chaudhary Z, Afroz A (2008) Rapid Micropropagation of three elite Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) varieties by shoot tip culture. African Journal of Biotechnology 7:2174-2180.

value="22" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Khan SA, Rashid H, Chaudry MF,Chaudry Z, Fatima SU, et al.(2009) Effect of cytokinins on shoot multiplication in three elite sugarcane varieties. Pak.J.Bot. 41:1651-1658.

value="23" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Biradar S, Biradar BP, Patil VC, Patil VC, Kambar NS (2009) In vitro plant regeneration using shoot tip culture in commercial cultivars of sugarcane. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 22: 21-24.

value="24" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Lee TSG (1987) Micropropagation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp). Plant cell Tissue org.cult. 10:47-55.

value="25" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Lal M, Singh B, Yadav GC(2001) Efficient protocols for micropropagation of sugarcane using shoot tip explant. Sugar Tech. 3:113-116.

value="26" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Nand L, Singh HN (1994) Rapid clonal multiplication of sugarcane through tissue culture. Plant Tissue Cult. 4: 1-7.

value="27" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Mamun MA, Sikdar MBH, Paul DK, Mizanur M, Rahman MD, et al. (2004) In vitro Micropropagation of Some Important Sugarcane Varieties of Bangladesh. Asian journal of plant sciences 3:666-669.

value="28" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Singh N, Kumar A, Garg GK 2006. Genotype influence of phytohormone combination and sub culturing on Micropropagation of sugarcane varieties. Indian Journal of biotechnology 5: 99-106.

value="29" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Yohannes Z, Firehun Y, Teklu B(2010) Yield loss assessment due to ratoon stunting disease of sugarcane in the Ethiopian sugar estates. ESDA, Research Directorate, Wonji, Ethiopia. 2-3.

value="30" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Bhavan K, Gautam (2002)Micropropagation technology through tissue culture. Indian council for Agric. Res 24-25.

value="31" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Orpez MP, Guevara R, Ramiez JI (1995) Identification of somaclonal variants of sugarcane resistant to sugarcane Mosaic virus via rapid markers. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 13: 182-191.

value="32" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Xue LP, Chen PK (1994) Ellimination of sugarcane Mosaic virus by callus tissue culture and apical culture. J.FujianAgric.Univ. 23:253-256.

value="33" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Feldmann P, Sapotille J, Gredoire P, rott P (1994) Micropropagation of Sugarcane. In vitro culture of tropical plants. France: CIRAD: 15-17.

value="34" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Lal N, Krishna R (1994) Sugarcane and its problems: Tissue culture for pure and disease free seed production in sugarcane. Indian sugar 44:847-848.

value="35" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Lorenzo JC, Ojeda E, Espinosa A,Borroto C (2001) Field performance of temporary immersion bioreactor derived sugarcane plants. In vitro cell Dev. Biol .plant 37:803-806.

value="36" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Lakshmanan (2012) Sugarcane tissue culture. Sugarcane for the future. Information sheet IS13034.

value="37" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Sreenivasan TV, Jalaja NC(1992) Micropropagation of sugarcane varieties for increasing cane yield. SISSTA Jour. 19: 61-64.

value="38" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Krisnamurhi, Tlaskal J(1994)Fiji disease resistant. SaccharumofficinarumL.var. Pindar sub clone from tissue culture. Proc. ISSCT 13:130-137.

value="39" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Anonymous (2002) Micropropagation: Tissue culture techniques in sugarcane. Indian Institute of sugarcane Research, Directorate of sugarcane Development 1-2.

value="40" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Comstock JC, Miller JD (2004) Yield comparison: Disease free tissue cultures versus bud propagated planted sugarcane plants and healthy versus yellow leaf virus infected plants. USDA-ARS, Sugarcane field station, canal point, Florida, USA.

value="41" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Nand L,Ram K (1997) Yield comparison in sugarcane crop raised from conventional and mericlone derived seedcane. Ind. Sugar 47:617-621.

value="42" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Ramanand, Lal M, Singh SB (2005) Comparative performance of micropropagated and conventionally raised crops of sugarcane. Sugar tech 7:93-95.

value="43" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Soodi N, Gupta PK, Srivastava RK,Gosal SS (2006) Comparative studies on field performance of micrpropagated and conventionally propagated sugarcane plants. Plant tissue cult. & Biotech 16:25-29.

value="44" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Geetha S, Padmanabhan D(2001) Effect of hormones on direct somatic embryogenesis in sugarcane. Sugar Tech 3:120-121.

value="45" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Cheema KL, Hussain M (2004) Micropropagation of sugarcane through apical and axillary bud. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 6: 257-259.

value="46" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Roy PK, Kabir MH (2007) In vitro mass propagation of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) var. Isd 32 through shoot tip and folded leaves culture. Biotechnology 6: 588-592.

value="47" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Pathak S, Lal M, Tiwari AK,Sharma ML(2009) Effect of growth regulators on in vitro multiplication and rooting of shoot cultures in sugarcane. Sugar Tech 11:86-88.

value="48" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Tawar PN (2004) Sugarcane Seed multiplication and Economics. National Training course on sugarcane micropropagation. VSI, Pune, India.

value="49" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497.

value="50" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Ali A, Naz S, Siddiqui FA,Iqbal J (2008) An efficient protocol for large-scale production of sugarcane through micropropagation.Pak.J.Bot.Vol40:139-149.

value="51" id="Reference_Titile_Link">Khan IA, Dahot MU, Yasmin S, Kahtri A, Seema N,et al.(2006) Effect of sucrose and growth regulators on the micropropagation of sugarcane clones. Pakistan. Pak.J.Bot. 38:961-967.

Tables and Figures at a glance

Table 1

Figures at a glance


Figure 1		Figure 2

Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Journals

Article Tools

Article Usage

Total views: 14898
[From(publication date):
August-2014 - Nov 21, 2024]
Breakdown by view type
HTML page views : 10333
PDF downloads : 4565

Research Article Open Access

Effects of 6-Benzyl aminopurine and Kinetin on In Vitro Shoot Multiplication of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Varieties

Abstract

References

Tables and Figures at a glance

Figures at a glance

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Journals

Article Tools

Article Usage

Post your comment

Peer Reviewed Journals

Journals by Subject

Clinical & Medical Journals

Conferences by Country

Medical & Clinical Conferences

Conferences By Subject